trivial: s/i_sem /i_mutex/
PATCH 1/1 trivial: s/i_sem /i_mutex/
Hello Adrian,
please, include this patch to your tree.
Quoted 1 line
From
6f20d2abd85874658ef424ac46b79c43244d2274Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Artem Bityutskiy <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2007 14:23:48 +0300
Subject: [PATCH] trivial: s/i_sem /i_mutex/
This patch substitutes i_sem by i_mutex in Documentation/filesystems/Locking. The patch also removes a couple of trailing white-spaces.
---Documentation/filesystems/Locking | 10 +++++-----
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
Documentation/filesystems/Locking +0 -0
@@ -21,12 +21,12 @@ locking rules:
dcache_lock rename_lock ->d_lock may block
d_revalidate: no no no yesd_hash no no no yes
-d_compare: no yes no no +d_compare: no yes no nod_delete: yes no yes nod_release: no no no yesd_iput: no no no yes
---------------------------- inode_operations --------------------------- +--------------------------- inode_operations --------------------------- prototypes:
int (*create) (struct inode *,struct dentry *,int, struct nameidata *); struct dentry * (*lookup) (struct inode *,struct dentry *, struct nameid
@@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ ata *);
locking rules:
all may block, none have BKL
- i_sem(inode)
+ i_mutex(inode)
lookup: yes
create: yes
link: yes (both)
@@ -72,7 +72,7 @@ setxattr: yes
getxattr: no
listxattr: no
removexattr: yes
- Additionally, ->rmdir(), ->unlink() and ->rename() have ->i_sem on
+ Additionally, ->rmdir(), ->unlink() and ->rename() have ->i_mutex on
victim.
cross-directory ->rename() has (per-superblock) ->s_vfs_rename_sem. ->truncate() is never called directly - it's a callback, not a
@@ -459,7 +459,7 @@ doesn't take the BKL.
->read on directories probably must go away - we should just enforce -EISDIR in sys_read() and friends.
-->fsync() has i_sem on inode.
+->fsync() has i_mutex on inode.
--------------------------- dquot_operations ------------------------------- prototypes:
Signature · 6 lines
1.5.0.6 -- Best Regards, Artem Bityutskiy (Артём Битюцкий)