RSS container, fix freeing of active pages
PATCH 1/1 RSS container, fix freeing of active pages
Hi, Pavel,
I missed you on the list and the patch did not make it to lkml. I am resending the patch.
Signature · 4 lines
Warm Regards, Balbir Singh Linux Technology Center IBM, ISTL
This patch fixes the bad_page() warning seen while freeing a container page. By default all container pages are added to the active list on the container. This patch lazily moves pages to the right list, so that a page on the active list of the zone LRU and the inactive list of the container does not get freed. If that happens, we see a warning from bad_page().
---
linux/rss_container.h | 0 mm/rss_container.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------- 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
mm/rss_container.c renamed from mm/rss_container.c~rss-fix-free-of-active-pages +22 -8
@@ -119,18 +119,36 @@ void container_rss_move_lists(struct pag }static unsigned long isolate_container_pages (unsigned long nr_to_scan, -struct list_head *src,struct list_head *dst, -unsigned long *scanned,struct zone *zone) +struct rss_container *rss,struct list_head *dst, +unsigned long *scanned,struct zone *zone,bool active) {unsigned long nr_taken =0 ;struct page *page;struct page_container *pc;unsigned long scan; +struct list_head *src;LIST_HEAD (pc_list); + src = active ? &rss->active_list : &rss->inactive_list; +for (scan =0 ; scan < nr_to_scan && !list_empty (src); scan++) { pc = list_entry(src->prev, struct page_container, list); page = pc->page; + +/* +* We might have got our active, inactive lists +* incorrect, fix it here +*/ +if (active && !PageActive (page)) { +list_move (&pc->list, &rss->inactive_list); + scan--; +continue ; + }else if (!active &&PageActive (page)) { +list_move (&pc->list, &rss->active_list); + scan--; +continue ; + } +if (page_zone (page) != zone)continue ;
@@ -158,12 +176,8 @@ unsigned long isolate_pages_in_containerunsigned long ret;spin_lock (&rss->res.lock); -if (active) - ret =isolate_container_pages (nr_to_scan, &rss->active_list, - dst, scanned, zone); -else - ret =isolate_container_pages (nr_to_scan, &rss->inactive_list, - dst, scanned, zone); + ret =isolate_container_pages (nr_to_scan, rss, dst, scanned, zone, + active);spin_unlock (&rss->res.lock);return ret; }
diff -puN include/linux/rss_container.h~rss-fix-free-of-active-pages include/linux/rss_container.h _
Quoted 44 lines · Balbir Singh
Hi, Pavel,
I missed you on the list and the patch did not make it to lkml. I am resending the patch.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
This patch fixes the
bad_page()warning seen while freeing a container page. By default all container pages are added to the active list on the container. This patch lazily moves pages to the right list, so that a page on the active list of the zone LRU and the inactive list of the container does not get freed. If that happens, we see a warning frombad_page().Signed-off-by Balbir Singh <[email protected]>---
linux/rss_container.h | 0 mm/rss_container.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------- 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)diff -puN
mm/rss_container.c~rss-fix-free-of-active-pagesmm/rss_container.cmm/rss_container.c renamed from mm/rss_container.c~rss-fix-free-of-active-pages +3
-2@@ -119,18 +119,36 @@ void container_rss_move_lists(struct pag }static unsigned long isolate_container_pages (unsigned long nr_to_scan, -struct list_head *src,struct list_head *dst, -unsigned long *scanned,struct zone *zone) +struct rss_container *rss,struct list_head *dst, +unsigned long *scanned,struct zone *zone,bool active) {unsigned long nr_taken =0 ;struct page *page;struct page_container *pc;unsigned long scan; +struct list_head *src;LIST_HEAD (pc_list);
mm/rss_container.c void container_rss_move_lists(struct pag · line 141
Quoted 10 lines
mm/rss_container.c renamed from mm/rss_container.c~rss-fix-free-of-active-pages +7
-0+ src = active ? &rss->active_list : &rss->inactive_list; +for (scan =0 ; scan < nr_to_scan && !list_empty (src); scan++) { pc = list_entry(src->prev, struct page_container, list); page = pc->page; + +/* +* We might have got our active, inactive lists +* incorrect, fix it here +*/
Hm... Did you see such a situation in your experiments? If yes, then why not fix it in a normal way by moving the pages from list to list where appropriate?
Quoted 30 lines
mm/rss_container.c renamed from mm/rss_container.c~rss-fix-free-of-active-pages +12
-6+if (active && !PageActive (page)) { +list_move (&pc->list, &rss->inactive_list); + scan--; +continue ; + }else if (!active &&PageActive (page)) { +list_move (&pc->list, &rss->active_list); + scan--; +continue ; + } +if (page_zone (page) != zone)continue ;@@ -158,12 +176,8 @@ unsigned long isolate_pages_in_containerunsigned long ret;spin_lock (&rss->res.lock); -if (active) - ret =isolate_container_pages (nr_to_scan, &rss->active_list, - dst, scanned, zone); -else - ret =isolate_container_pages (nr_to_scan, &rss->inactive_list, - dst, scanned, zone); + ret =isolate_container_pages (nr_to_scan, rss, dst, scanned, zone, + active);spin_unlock (&rss->res.lock);return ret; }diff -puN
include/linux/rss_container.h~rss-fix-free-of-active-pagesinclude/linux/rss_container.h_
Quoted 1 line · Pavel Emelianov
Hm... Did you see such a situation in your experiments?
Yes, we did. We saw a bad_page() error on the console. A page was freed with the active bit set.
Quoted 2 lines
If yes, then why not fix it in a normal way by moving the pages from list to list where appropriate?
If we add the pages to the appropriate list at the time of page_add_*rmap(), we would end up with too many code changes split
all over the place. In many cases when we add a page (install_page() for example), we just release any existing mapping. We would not know where to add the page -- active list or inactive list?
I am not sure if that was your question in the first place :-)
Signature · 4 lines
Warm Regards, Balbir Singh Linux Technology Center IBM, ISTL