Skip to contentSkip to conversation

LVM2 resync speed problems

linux-lvm Leonard Smith 3 participants 5 messages Jun 13, 2007 – Jul 3, 2007

lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw

I am running CentOS4.4 on two "black" box systems that are identically configured. Both have 500 GB internal drives, ( same type) and were installed using the same kickstart configuration. The drives are being mirrored using LVM.

When I check the first system it is re-syncing and the resync time and speed are

finish=18559.6min speed=355K/sec

On the second system the time and speed are

finish=89.5min speed=68170K/sec

I can't figure out why the speeds are different between the two. I checked /proc/sys/dev/raid/speed_limit_ and they are the same. The priority of the md proceses are they same.

I tweaked the setting of the speel_limit_min and increase the nice priority of the resync process, on the first box, but I could never get it better than

finish=4551.8min speed=1445K/sec

I've googled and I haven't found much more useful information that to adjust those settings. Besides those setting what else dictates the speed used?

Thanks,
Len

#1 lore raw

I am running CentOS4.4 on two "black" box systems that are identically configured. Both have 500 GB internal drives, ( same type) and were installed using the same kickstart configuration. The drives are being mirrored using LVM.

When I check the first system it is re-syncing and the resync time and speed are

finish=18559.6min speed=355K/sec

On the second system the time and speed are

finish=89.5min speed=68170K/sec

I can't figure out why the speeds are different between the two. I checked /proc/sys/dev/raid/speed_limit_ and they are the same. The priority of the md proceses are they same.

I tweaked the setting of the speel_limit_min and increase the nice priority of the resync process, on the first box, but I could never get it better than

finish=4551.8min speed=1445K/sec

I've googled and I haven't found much more useful information that to adjust those settings. Besides those setting what else dictates the speed used?

Thanks,
Len

#2 lore raw
In reply to Leonard Smith
Quoted 22 lines · Leonard Smith

I am running CentOS4.4 on two "black" box systems that are identically configured. Both have 500 GB internal drives, ( same type) and were installed using the same kickstart configuration. The drives are being mirrored using LVM.

When I check the first system it is re-syncing and the resync time and speed are

finish=18559.6min speed=355K/sec

On the second system the time and speed are

finish=89.5min speed=68170K/sec

I can't figure out why the speeds are different between the two. I checked /proc/sys/dev/raid/speed_limit_ and they are the same. The priority of the md proceses are they same.

I tweaked the setting of the speel_limit_min and increase the nice priority of the resync process, on the first box, but I could never get it better than

Quoted 6 lines

finish=4551.8min speed=1445K/sec

I've googled and I haven't found much more useful information that to adjust those settings. Besides those setting what else dictates the speed used?

You might compare the hd settings using 'hdparm'. I'm not sure factor of 100+ can be explained by an incorrect DMA setting or something like that, but it might be a contributor.

Matt

#3 lore raw

Forgot to mention, the drives are WD 500 GB "Raid enabled" SATA drives. They are some of WD newer drives, and I think they are techincally SATA2. The other system also has the same drives.

Quoted 42 lines · Matthew Gillen
Quoted 22 lines · Leonard Smith

I am running CentOS4.4 on two "black" box systems that are identically configured. Both have 500 GB internal drives, ( same type) and were installed using the same kickstart configuration. The drives are being mirrored using LVM.

When I check the first system it is re-syncing and the resync time and speed are

finish=18559.6min speed=355K/sec

On the second system the time and speed are

finish=89.5min speed=68170K/sec

I can't figure out why the speeds are different between the two. I checked /proc/sys/dev/raid/speed_limit_ and they are the same. The priority of the md proceses are they same.

I tweaked the setting of the speel_limit_min and increase the nice priority of the resync process, on the first box, but I could never get it better than

Quoted 6 lines

finish=4551.8min speed=1445K/sec

I've googled and I haven't found much more useful information that to adjust those settings. Besides those setting what else dictates the speed used?

You might compare the hd settings using 'hdparm'. I'm not sure factor of 100+ can be explained by an incorrect DMA setting or something like that, but it might be a contributor.

Matt

_______________________________________________
linux-lvm mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm
read the LVM HOW-TO at http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/

#4 lore raw

Hello

Those WD RE drives are intended for use with TLER aware RAID controllers and should not be directly attached to a server through a regular controller as individual drives.

The reason is that TLER (Time Limited Error Recovery) will occasionally not bother to recover data if it takes longer than a set period of time to do so, this does not bother a TLER aware controller since it would just rebuild the data from parity and would know enough that it's not really a failed
drive unless the issue keeps reoccurring in the same spot. If you use
these drives as regular drives, they could report more errors than a non RE
drive which is probably why you're getting the resyncs. The difference
between the two systems could simply be the number of bordeline flaws on the drive which would normally be recovered by the drive itself but is being passed on up to the OS as the drive assumes the RAID controller could make better decisions as to what to do.

You may want to get yourself a Promise RAID controller as they are considered TLER aware although their approach is quite simple i.e.: retry several times before assuming it's a hard error (might as well not have TLER
with that approach). Better yet, get non-RE drives...

Regards,
John

Quoted 55 lines · Leonard Smith

Forgot to mention, the drives are WD 500 GB "Raid enabled" SATA drives. They are some of WD newer drives, and I think they are techincally SATA2. The other system also has the same drives.

Quoted 35 lines · Matthew Gillen
Quoted 22 lines · Leonard Smith

I am running CentOS4.4 on two "black" box systems that are identically configured. Both have 500 GB internal drives, ( same type) and were installed using the same kickstart configuration. The drives are being mirrored using LVM.

When I check the first system it is re-syncing and the resync time and speed are

finish=18559.6min speed=355K/sec

On the second system the time and speed are

finish=89.5min speed=68170K/sec

I can't figure out why the speeds are different between the two. I checked /proc/sys/dev/raid/speed_limit_ and they are the same. The priority of the md proceses are they same.

I tweaked the setting of the speel_limit_min and increase the nice priority of the resync process, on the first box, but I could never get it better than

Quoted 6 lines

finish=4551.8min speed=1445K/sec

I've googled and I haven't found much more useful information that to adjust those settings. Besides those setting what else dictates the speed used?

You might compare the hd settings using 'hdparm'. I'm not sure factor of 100+
can be explained by an incorrect DMA setting or something like that, but it might be a contributor.

Quoted 8 lines

Matt

_______________________________________________
linux-lvm mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm
read the LVM HOW-TO at http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/

_______________________________________________
linux-lvm mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm
read the LVM HOW-TO at http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/