Why the alignemt to 4 bytes is necessary in jffs2_commit_write function
Hi All
I'm currently working on JFFS2 improving. I faced some issues with understanding why we need to align start offset to 4 bytes in jffs2_commit_write function? Here is the part of this code:
=========================
unsigned aligned_start = start & ~3;
.........................................
/* Adjust writtenlen for the padding we did, so we don't confuse our
caller */
if (writtenlen < (start&3))
writtenlen = 0;
else
writtenlen -= (start&3);===========================
What does the padding mean here?
If I properly understand the aligned_start is not related to offset of the fragment it is just offset within the file. (Frag offset is aligned) File offset is not necessary to keep aligned - so why not to kick off it. (I tried and didn't find anything wrong in tests).
Thanks,
Alexey
Quoted 4 lines · akorolev
If I properly understand the
aligned_startis not related to offset of the fragment it is just offset within the file. (Frag offset is aligned) File offset is not necessary to keep aligned - so why not to kick off it. (I tried and didn't find anything wrong in tests).
Consider:
while (1) write(fd, "x", 1);
This is fairly much worst-case behaviour for JFFS2, and you end up with a _large_ number of data nodes. One thing we've done to improve behaviour in this situation is rewrite the entire page when we write the last byte in a page -- but that doesn't fix _all_ cases.
Since data nodes _are_ aligned to 4 bytes, it doesn't hurt us at all to write a full 4 bytes instead of only 1 byte. So you'll have a maximum of 1024 data nodes for a given 4KiB page even if you don't manage to trigger the code which rewrites the page.
Signature · 1 line
dwmw2
Aghh I see.
Thank you very much!
Quoted 23 lines · akorolev
Quoted 6 lines
If I properly understand the
aligned_startis not related to offset of the fragment it is just offset within the file. (Frag offset is aligned) File offset is not necessary to keep aligned - so why not to kick off it. (I tried and didn't find anything wrong in tests).Consider:
while (1) write(fd, "x", 1);This is fairly much worst-case behaviour for JFFS2, and you end up with a _large_ number of data nodes. One thing we've done to improve behaviour in this situation is rewrite the entire page when we write the last byte in a page -- but that doesn't fix _all_ cases.
Since data nodes _are_ aligned to 4 bytes, it doesn't hurt us at all to write a full 4 bytes instead of only 1 byte. So you'll have a maximum of 1024 data nodes for a given 4KiB page even if you don't manage to trigger the code which rewrites the page.