Guest Support Status wiki page
Hi all,
here is a list of Supported Guests:
http://kvm.qumranet.com/kvmwiki/Guest_Support_Status
The tables are a bit unclear to me, I will explain using the 'Debian Etch' example.
The top line of the table states:
Guest: Debian Etch
Guest bitness: 32/64
Host version: kvm-29
Host cpu: Intel
Host bitness: 64
Status: Works
Comments:
Now I have just verified that there is a way to get kvm-35 running on a Debian Etch amd64 (quite easily I must say).
And I have also verified that Debian Etch i386 as a Guest runs perfectly on that host (installing with debian-40r0-i386-netinst.iso).
Should I now add a line to that table that states:
Guest: Debian Etch
Guest bitness: 32
Host version: kvm-35
Host cpu: AMD
Host bitness: 64
Status: Works
Should I leave the lines that are allready there about the same Guest untouched?
Should I test the same OS again when kvm-36 is released?
Koen
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): 46C60F58.9010407-OoqVcbiag8BWk0Htik3J/[email protected]
Quoted 7 lines · On Saturday 18 August 2007 02:42:56 Koen de Jonge wrote:
Hi all,
here is a list of Supported Guests:
http://kvm.qumranet.com/kvmwiki/Guest_Support_StatusThe tables are a bit unclear to me, I will explain using the 'Debian Etch' example.
There's no guideline on what the table should look like. It should just be easy for new and returning users to find the information they're looking for, easily at one place. If you think there's a better way in which the table can be laid out, a trial version can be placed on a temporary wiki page for others to comment.
Quoted 23 lines
The top line of the table states:
Guest: Debian Etch
Guest bitness: 32/64
Host version: kvm-29
Host cpu: Intel
Host bitness: 64
Status: Works
Comments:Now I have just verified that there is a way to get kvm-35 running on a Debian Etch amd64 (quite easily I must say).
And I have also verified that Debian Etch i386 as a Guest runs perfectly on that host (installing with debian-40r0-i386-netinst.iso).
Should I now add a line to that table that states:
Guest: Debian Etch
Guest bitness: 32
Host version: kvm-35
Host cpu: AMD
Host bitness: 64
Status: Works
Quoted 2 lines
Should I leave the lines that are allready there about the same Guest untouched?
If you have also tried a 64-bit guest, you can just update the Host Version field. Otherwise, a new line would be ok.
Quoted 1 line
Should I test the same OS again when kvm-36 is released?
If you regularly use kvm, it will definitely be beneficial to add the most recent information to the wiki as well. But simply putting a '+' after the release should do; like 'Host version: kvm-35+'. That avoids us mentioning all the releases. When things break, they can be marked as such.
Quoted 2 lines
Koen
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): 200708181437.05539.amit.shah-atKUWr5tajBWk0Htik3J/[email protected]
Quoted 11 lines · Amit Shah
Quoted 8 lines · On Saturday 18 August 2007 02:42:56 Koen de Jonge wrote:
Hi all,
here is a list of Supported Guests:
http://kvm.qumranet.com/kvmwiki/Guest_Support_StatusThe tables are a bit unclear to me, I will explain using the 'Debian Etch' example.
Quoted 6 lines
There's no guideline on what the table should look like. It should just be easy for new and returning users to find the information they're looking for, easily at one place. If you think there's a better way in which the table can be laid out, a trial version can be placed on a temporary wiki page for others to comment.
OK, that is a clear answer. I will create a temporary page then. I think we (I would, but only for the free ones out there) test a few of the most frequently used OSes after each release.
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 3 lines
Should I leave the lines that are allready there about the same Guest untouched?
If you have also tried a 64-bit guest, you can just update the Host Version field. Otherwise, a new line would be ok.
Hmm ok. I will test a 64-bit guest in a few hours then, so I can update that line.
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 2 lines
Should I test the same OS again when kvm-36 is released?
If you regularly use kvm, it will definitely be beneficial to add the most recent information to the wiki as well. But simply putting a '+' after the release should do; like 'Host version: kvm-35+'. That avoids us mentioning all the releases. When things break, they can be marked as such.
I'm planning to use it each day every day, so that is ok.
Can I add this Q and A to the FAQ page below 'General info - What kernel version does it work with? (http://kvm.qumranet.com/kvmwiki/FAQ):
Q: What version of KVM should I use?
A: With all the rapid development these days you should always use the latest version of KVM, with any kernel.
Greetz,
Koen
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
Quoted 7 lines · Amit Shah
Quoted 5 lines · On Saturday 18 August 2007 02:42:56 Koen de Jonge wrote:
Hi all,
here is a list of Supported Guests:
http://kvm.qumranet.com/kvmwiki/Guest_Support_Status
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 3 lines
The tables are a bit unclear to me, I will explain using the 'Debian Etch' example.
There's no guideline on what the table should look like. It should just be easy for new and returning users to find the information they're looking for, easily at one place.
Yes, that is the most important guideline. I think that in order to be clear, each guest should appear exactly once (unless it works on one vendor and not on the other).
Also, if the comment is long, it should be turned into a link into a dedicated page in the wiki.
Signature · 8 lines
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/