Fix lazy mode vmalloc synchronization for paravirt
PATCH 1/1 Fix lazy mode vmalloc synchronization for paravirt
Found this looping Ubuntu installs with VMI.
If unlucky enough to hit a vmalloc sync fault during a lazy mode operation (from an IRQ handler for a module which was not yet populated in current page directory, or from inside copy_one_pte, which touches swap_map, and hit in an unused 4M region), the required PDE update would never get flushed, causing an infinite page fault loop.
This bug affects any paravirt-ops backend which uses lazy updates, I believe that makes it a bug in Xen, VMI and lguest. It only happens on LOWMEM kernels.
Currently for 2.6.23, but we'll want to backport to -stable as well.
Zach
Touching vmalloc memory in the middle of a lazy mode update can generate a kernel PDE update, which must be flushed immediately. The fix is to leave lazy mode when doing a vmalloc sync.
arch/i386/mm/fault.c +0 -0
arch/i386/mm/fault.c +3 -2
@@ -249,9 +249,10 @@ static inline pmd_t *vmalloc_sync_one(pgd_t *pgd, unsigned long address) pmd_k =pmd_offset (pud_k, address);if (!pmd_present (*pmd_k))return NULL ; -if (!pmd_present (*pmd)) +if (!pmd_present (*pmd)) {set_pmd (pmd, *pmd_k); -else +arch_flush_lazy_mmu_mode (); + }else BUG_ON (pmd_page (*pmd) !=pmd_page (*pmd_k));return pmd_k; }
Quoted 7 lines · Zachary Amsden
Found this looping Ubuntu installs with VMI.
If unlucky enough to hit a vmalloc sync fault during a lazy mode operation (from an IRQ handler for a module which was not yet populated in current page directory, or from inside
copy_one_pte, which touchesswap_map, and hit in an unused 4M region), the required PDE update would never get flushed, causing an infinite page fault loop.
Ah, good catch.
Quoted 3 lines
This bug affects any paravirt-ops backend which uses lazy updates, I believe that makes it a bug in Xen, VMI and lguest. It only happens on LOWMEM kernels.
No, under Xen the kernel/hypervisor PMD is not shared between processes, so this is still used when PAE is enabled.
J
Quoted 3 lines · Jeremy Fitzhardinge
No, under Xen the kernel/hypervisor PMD is not shared between processes, so this is still used when PAE is enabled.
Ahh, yes. So this was a lucky catch for us. Non-PAE kernels seem to be increasing in value at antique sales.
Zach