MTD: OneNAND: Synchronize block locking operations
PATCH 1/1 MTD: OneNAND: Synchronize block locking operations
Ensure OneNAND's block locking operations are synchronized like all other operations.
---drivers/mtd/onenand/onenand_base.c | 18 ++++++++++++++----
1 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
drivers/mtd/onenand/onenand_base.c +0 -0
@@ -1904,7 +1904,12 @@ static int onenand_do_lock_cmd(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t ofs, size_t len, int*/
static int onenand_lock(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t ofs, size_t len) {
- return onenand_do_lock_cmd(mtd, ofs, len, ONENAND_CMD_LOCK);
+ int ret;
+
+ onenand_get_device(mtd, FL_LOCKING);
+ ret = onenand_do_lock_cmd(mtd, ofs, len, ONENAND_CMD_LOCK);
+ onenand_release_device(mtd);
+ return ret;
}
/**
@@ -1917,7 +1922,12 @@ static int onenand_lock(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t ofs, size_t len)
*/
static int onenand_unlock(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t ofs, size_t len)
{
- return onenand_do_lock_cmd(mtd, ofs, len, ONENAND_CMD_UNLOCK);
+ int ret;
+
+ onenand_get_device(mtd, FL_LOCKING);
+ ret = onenand_do_lock_cmd(mtd, ofs, len, ONENAND_CMD_UNLOCK);
+ onenand_release_device(mtd);
+ return ret;
}
/**
@@ -1979,7 +1989,7 @@ static int onenand_unlock_all(struct mtd_info *mtd)
loff_t ofs = this->chipsize >> 1; size_t len = mtd->erasesize;
- onenand_unlock(mtd, ofs, len);
+ onenand_do_lock_cmd(mtd, ofs, len, ONENAND_CMD_UNLOCK); } onenand_check_lock_status(this); @@ -1987,7 +1997,7 @@ static int onenand_unlock_all(struct mtd_info *mtd) return 0; }
- onenand_unlock(mtd, 0x0, this->chipsize);
+ onenand_do_lock_cmd(mtd, 0x0, this->chipsize, ONENAND_CMD_UNLOCK);
return 0; }
Signature · 1 line
1.4.4.2
Quoted 4 lines
Ensure OneNAND's block locking operations are synchronized like all other operations.
Signed-off-by Adrian Hunter <[email protected]>
Yes, it's reasonable.
While the read/write operation we can do lock/unlock request from userspace.