Skip to contentSkip to conversation

net/eth.c: Fix env_enetaddr signed overflow

PATCH New Shinya Kuribayashi 3 participants 3 messages Nov 19, 2007 Networking

lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw

PATCH 1/1 net/eth.c: Fix env_enetaddr signed overflow

My colleague founded this problem months ago. I'd like to see this bug fixed in 1.3.0. Please apply.

---
net/eth.c: Fix env_enetaddr signed overflow

Assigning the output of simple_strtoul(CB:A9:87:65:43:21) to `char', we are warned as below:

U-Boot 1.2.0 (Aug 30 2007 - 08:27:37)

DRAM: 256 MB
Flash: 32 MB

  In:    serial
  Out:   serial
  Err:   serial
  Net:   NEC-Candy

Warning: NEC-Candy MAC addresses don't match:
Address in SROM is 00:00:4C:80:92:A2
Address in environment is FFFFFFCB:FFFFFFA9:FFFFFF87:65:43:21

This patch changes env_enetaddr type from char' to unsigned char'.

---

 net/eth.c |    3 ++-
 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
net/eth.c +2 -1
index 1b56a35..64ef312 100644
@@ -138,7 +138,8 @@ int eth_register(struct eth_device* dev)
 
 int eth_initialize(bd_t *bis)
 {
-	char enetvar[32], env_enetaddr[6];
+	char enetvar[32];
+	unsigned char env_enetaddr[6];
 	int i, eth_number = 0;
 	char *tmp, *end;
 
Signature · 2 lines
Shinya Kuribayashi
NEC Electronics
#1 lore raw

PATCH 1/1 net/eth.c: Fix env_enetaddr signed overflow

Quoted 37 lines · Shinya Kuribayashi

My colleague founded this problem months ago. I'd like to see this bug fixed in 1.3.0. Please apply.

---
net/eth.c: Fix env_enetaddr signed overflow

Assigning the output of simple_strtoul(CB:A9:87:65:43:21) to `char', we are warned as below:

U-Boot 1.2.0 (Aug 30 2007 - 08:27:37)

DRAM: 256 MB
Flash: 32 MB

  In:    serial
  Out:   serial
  Err:   serial
  Net:   NEC-Candy

Warning: NEC-Candy MAC addresses don't match:
Address in SROM is 00:00:4C:80:92:A2
Address in environment is FFFFFFCB:FFFFFFA9:FFFFFF87:65:43:21

This patch changes env_enetaddr type from char' to unsigned char'.

---

 net/eth.c |    3 ++-
 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
net/eth.c +0 -0
index 1b56a35..64ef312 100644

net/eth.c int eth_register(struct eth_device* dev) · line 145

Quoted 9 lines
net/eth.c +2 -1
@@ -138,7 +138,8 @@ int eth_register(struct eth_device* dev)
 
 int eth_initialize(bd_t *bis)
 {
-	char enetvar[32], env_enetaddr[6];
+	char enetvar[32];
+	unsigned char env_enetaddr[6];
 	int i, eth_number = 0;
 	char *tmp, *end;
 

This looks harmless enough, but is in a place that is touched by every board on every architecture, and the bug doesn't really seem to hurt anything other than printing garbage. IMHO it should wait until the next release. I will apply it to a 'for_1.3.1' branch of the net tree.

regards,
Ben

#2 lore raw

PATCH 1/1 net/eth.c: Fix env_enetaddr signed overflow

Quoted 37 lines · Ben Warren
Quoted 36 lines · Shinya Kuribayashi

My colleague founded this problem months ago. I'd like to see this bug fixed in 1.3.0. Please apply.

---
net/eth.c: Fix env_enetaddr signed overflow

Assigning the output of simple_strtoul(CB:A9:87:65:43:21) to `char', we are warned as below:

U-Boot 1.2.0 (Aug 30 2007 - 08:27:37)

DRAM: 256 MB
Flash: 32 MB

  In:    serial
  Out:   serial
  Err:   serial
  Net:   NEC-Candy

Warning: NEC-Candy MAC addresses don't match:
Address in SROM is 00:00:4C:80:92:A2
Address in environment is FFFFFFCB:FFFFFFA9:FFFFFF87:65:43:21

This patch changes env_enetaddr type from char' to unsigned char'.

---

 net/eth.c |    3 ++-
 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
net/eth.c +0 -0
index 1b56a35..64ef312 100644
@@ -138,7 +138,8 @@ int eth_register(struct eth_device* dev)
 
Quoted 14 lines

net/eth.c int eth_register(struct eth_device* dev) · line 145

Quoted 10 lines
net/eth.c +2 -1
 int eth_initialize(bd_t *bis)
 {
-	char enetvar[32], env_enetaddr[6];
+	char enetvar[32];
+	unsigned char env_enetaddr[6];
 	int i, eth_number = 0;
 	char *tmp, *end;
 

This looks harmless enough, but is in a place that is touched by every board on every architecture, and the bug doesn't really seem to hurt anything other than printing garbage. IMHO it should wait until the next release. I will apply it to a 'for_1.3.1' branch of the net tree.

Ok, I'm afraid I have to wait. Thanks for your comment,

Shinya