Zero-copy Block IO with XFS
Hi all,
I'm experimenting with using XFS with a network block device (DST), and have come up against the problem that when writing data to the network, it uses kernel_sendpage to hand the page presented at the BIO layer to the network stack. It then completes the block IO request.
The problem arises when XFS proceeds to then reuse that page before the NIC actually sends it. Particularly if TX checksumming or TCP segmentation is being offloaded to the NIC, it seems that the NIC will try to access to page after the BIO request has returned, and so operate on stale data. I assume the same problem might happen in the case of TCP retransmits or similar. The motivation for using sendpage rather than sendmsg (or using sendpage on a copy of the original page) is to try to ensure speed by a zero-copy path through the subsystem.
Is there any way at all in which XFS would be able to (theoretically) expose an API to allow an underlying block device to retain ownership of pages until it's done with them, so as to avoid a potentially needless copy? Or is there another way of achieving this?
thanks in advance,
Matthew.
Signature · 4 lines
Matthew Hodgson <[email protected]> Media & Systems Project Manager Tel: +44 (0) 845 666 7778 http://www.mxtelecom.com
Quoted 6 lines · Matthew Hodgson
Hi all,
I'm experimenting with using XFS with a network block device (DST), and have come up against the problem that when writing data to the network, it uses
kernel_sendpageto hand the page presented at the BIO layer to the network stack. It then completes the block IO request.
Actually, you can pass a sendpage read actor which takes a reference on
the page
which ensures valid page exists with you. As long as you have ref on the
page and
no truncate to the same file, you can safely access the file. Once NIC
sends the
data over wire, you can do put_page. This should work. By the way, linux
sendfile
does something similar to the above. Look into read actor of nfs server
sendfile
usage.
-Cheers,
Bhagi.
Quoted 18 lines
The problem arises when XFS proceeds to then reuse that page before the NIC actually sends it. Particularly if TX checksumming or TCP segmentation is being offloaded to the NIC, it seems that the NIC will try to access to page after the BIO request has returned, and so operate on stale data. I assume the same problem might happen in the case of TCP retransmits or similar. The motivation for using sendpage rather than sendmsg (or using sendpage on a copy of the original page) is to try to ensure speed by a zero-copy path through the subsystem.
Is there any way at all in which XFS would be able to (theoretically) expose an API to allow an underlying block device to retain ownership of pages until it's done with them, so as to avoid a potentially needless copy? Or is there another way of achieving this?
thanks in advance,
Quoted 11 lines
Matthew.
--
Matthew Hodgson <[email protected]>
Media & Systems Project Manager
Tel: +44 (0) 845 666 7778
http://www.mxtelecom.com
[[HTML alternate version deleted]]
Quoted 10 lines · Bhagi rathi
Quoted 6 lines · Matthew Hodgson
Hi all,
I'm experimenting with using XFS with a network block device (DST), and have come up against the problem that when writing data to the network, it uses
kernel_sendpageto hand the page presented at the BIO layer to the network stack. It then completes the block IO request.Actually, you can pass a sendpage read actor which takes a reference on the page which ensures valid page exists with you.
Hmm, i'm a little confused as to how one would do that - I can see that sendfile can be passed a read actor for use in the underlying read, but I can't see anywhere where sendpage can be used with a read actor. I see that nfsd/vfs.c:nfsd_read_actor() adjusts the page refcounting to stop them being freed before they are sent - but that only seems to be usable when sending with sendfile.
Quoted 1 line
As long as you have ref on the page and no truncate to the same file, you can safely access the file. Once NIC sends the data over wire, you can do
put_page. This should work.
I'm not sure that it will help, though. The problem seems to be that XFS itself overwrites the page with new data (rather than the page being freed and reused) whilst the page is waiting to be sent in the TCP stack. Is there any way to prevent XFS from doing this - or have I misunderstood the problem?
Along similar lines, is there any way to stop XFS from passing slab pages to the block IO layer? Attempts to pass slab pages over to the TCP stack fail too.
thanks,
Matthew.
Quoted 9 lines · Matthew Hodgson
Hi all,
I'm experimenting with using XFS with a network block device (DST), and have come up against the problem that when writing data to the network, it uses
kernel_sendpageto hand the page presented at the BIO layer to the network stack. It then completes the block IO request.The problem arises when XFS proceeds to then reuse that page before the NIC actually sends it.
Where does XFS overwrite a page while I/O is still in progress? Stack trace please.
Quoted 4 lines
Particularly if TX checksumming or TCP
segmentation is being offloaded to the NIC, it seems that the NIC will try to access to page after the BIO request has returned, and so operate on stale data.
That sounds like you are completing the bio before the I/O has really been completed. Basically, the bio can't be completed until the data has been sent and that will prevent any use after free or overwrite of the data while it is being sent...
Cheers,
Dave.
Signature · 3 lines
Dave Chinner Principal Engineer SGI Australian Software Group
Hi Dave,
Thanks for the response :)
Quoted 7 lines · David Chinner
Quoted 3 lines · Matthew Hodgson
I'm experimenting with using XFS with a network block device (DST), and have come up against the problem that when writing data to the network, it uses
kernel_sendpageto hand the page presented at the BIO layer to the network stack. It then completes the block IO request.The problem arises when XFS proceeds to then reuse that page before the NIC actually sends it.
Where does XFS overwrite a page while I/O is still in progress? Stack trace please.
It doesn't. The problem is that after the block device has completed the IO request with bio_endio(), there's a risk that it may still need access to the page in order to retransmit it, perform offloaded checksumming, etc.
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 1 line
Particularly if TX checksumming or TCP segmentation is being offloaded to the NIC, it seems that the NIC will try to access to page after the BIO request has returned, and so operate on stale data.
That sounds like you are completing the bio before the I/O has really been completed. Basically, the bio can't be completed until the data has been sent and that will prevent any use after free or overwrite of the data while it is being sent...
Agreed. In general that will cause a fairly major performance hit, however (you'd have to at least wait for the ACK from the TCP peer before completing the BIO). Or make a copy of the page. Is there no scope (however theoretical - I guess this is starting to become an academic question) for providing XFS with hints that particular pages are in use elsewhere and should not be overwritten? Could XFS mandate only overwriting pages in its cache with a ->count of 1?
In other news, does XFS still provide the block layer with slab-allocated pages for metadata operations?
thanks,
Matthew.
Signature · 4 lines
Matthew Hodgson <[email protected]> Media & Systems Project Manager Tel: +44 (0) 845 666 7778 http://www.mxtelecom.com