permisions for Ethetool vs rtnetlink

I've been further enhancing the netperf omni tests to enable reporting stuff like uname for local/remote, the name of the probable egress interface (rtnetlink), and then driver information for that interface. I figure that such information being spat-out by netperf might be useful to have if one were setting-up a database of results and/or making regression checks and the like.

It struck me as a little odd that I can retrieve routing information for a destination as a mere mortal, but to retreive driver information for an interface I have to be priviledged. At first glance I would think the sensitivity of both sets of information would be about the same?

Is the difference simply an artifact of history?

sincerely,

rick jones