MPC8641D PCI-Express error
Quoted 11 lines · Kumar Gala
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 4 lines · Marco Stornelli
No, but I can try to backport the PCI-E code from 2.6.24 to 2.6.18 if it could help. What do you think about it? Do you think this problem could be not present in 2.6.24?
I have no idea there, honestly. Sorry.As Jon said, try 2.6.24 and see if it has an issue, if so we can look at helping. if not, you know you need to back port the fixes.
- k
I've "backported" the PCI-Express code from 2.6.24 to 2.6.18, but it still doesn't work, I have the same problem (sigh), could you give me any suggestions?
Thanks.
Marco
Quoted 8 lines · Marco Stornelli
Quoted 6 lines · Kumar Gala
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 4 lines · Marco Stornelli
No, but I can try to backport the PCI-E code from 2.6.24 to 2.6.18 if it could help. What do you think about it? Do you think this problem could be not present in 2.6.24?
I have no idea there, honestly. Sorry.
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 4 lines
As Jon said, try 2.6.24 and see if it has an issue, if so we can look at helping. if not, you know you need to back port the fixes.
- k
I've "backported" the PCI-Express code from 2.6.24 to 2.6.18, but it still doesn't work, I have the same problem (sigh), could you give me any suggestions?
did 2.6.24 work for you or not?
- k
Kumar Gala ha scritto:
Quoted 16 lines · Marco Stornelli
Quoted 14 lines
Quoted 11 lines · Kumar Gala
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 4 lines · Marco Stornelli
No, but I can try to backport the PCI-E code from 2.6.24 to 2.6.18 if it could help. What do you think about it? Do you think this problem could be not present in 2.6.24?
I have no idea there, honestly. Sorry.As Jon said, try 2.6.24 and see if it has an issue, if so we can look at helping. if not, you know you need to back port the fixes.
- k
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 3 lines
I've "backported" the PCI-Express code from 2.6.24 to 2.6.18, but it still doesn't work, I have the same problem (sigh), could you give me any suggestions?
did 2.6.24 work for you or not?
- k
No, it didn't. I have the same problem even with the 2.6.18 plus the 2.6.24 PCI-Express code. I performed this action because I can't change kernel version but I can modify it.
Marco
Quoted 3 lines · Marco Stornelli
No, it didn't. I have the same problem even with the 2.6.18 plus the 2.6.24 PCI-Express code. I performed this action because I can't change kernel version but I can modify it.
Please try 2.6.24 (or even better, 2.6.25-rc2). You may have done something wrong in back-porting the code to 2.6.18. There's no reason why you can't at least try the latest version of the code for testing purposes, even if you can't use it in production.
Signature · 2 lines
Timur Tabi Linux kernel developer at Freescale
Quoted 8 lines · Timur Tabi
Quoted 3 lines · Marco Stornelli
No, it didn't. I have the same problem even with the 2.6.18 plus the 2.6.24 PCI-Express code. I performed this action because I can't change kernel version but I can modify it.
Please try 2.6.24 (or even better, 2.6.25-rc2). You may have done something wrong in back-porting the code to 2.6.18. There's no reason why you can't at least try the latest version of the code for testing purposes, even if you can't use it in production.
Also, once you back-ported it and all the DTS changes, and all the fsl_soc.c changes needed and , and, and otherwise made it look _like_, 2.6.24 but still called it 2.6.18, after all that, can you remind us what was the error or failure mode that you saw?
jdl
Jon Loeliger ha scritto:
Quoted 13 lines
Quoted 11 lines · Timur Tabi
Quoted 3 lines · Marco Stornelli
No, it didn't. I have the same problem even with the 2.6.18 plus the 2.6.24 PCI-Express code. I performed this action because I can't change kernel version but I can modify it.
Please try 2.6.24 (or even better, 2.6.25-rc2). You may have done something wrong in back-porting the code to 2.6.18. There's no reason why you can't at least try the latest version of the code for testing purposes, even if you can't use it in production.
Quoted 8 lines
Also, once you back-ported it and all the DTS changes, and all the
fsl_soc.cchanges needed and , and, and otherwise made it look _like_, 2.6.24 but still called it 2.6.18, after all that, can you remind us what was the error or failure mode that you saw?jdl
When I try to read some register from my FPGA (virtex5) I have this bus error:
Machine check in kernel mode.
Caused by (from SRR1=149030): Transfer error ack signal
Oops: Machine check, sig: 7 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NR_CPUS=2 Modules linked in: virtex5
LTT NESTING LEVEL : 0
NIP: F108019C LR: F1080198 CTR: 00000001
REGS: c044dd60 TRAP: 0200 Not tainted (2.6.18-mpc8641d_hpcn)
MSR: 00149030 <EE,ME,IR,DR> CR: 22000222 XER: 00000000 TASK = c20e9990[568] 'insmod' THREAD: c044c000 CPU: 0
GPR00: F1080198 C044DE10 C20E9990 0000002E 80000000 FFFFFFFF 00008000 00002EA3
GPR08: C20E9990 00000000 C04C0220 C044C000 22000222 1001956C 00000000 00000000
GPR16: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000
GPR24: 3000EAA0 7FD6FDC0 00000000 C045FCC0 F107E594 F10A0000 00000000 C2036000
NIP [F108019C] virtex5_probe+0x130/0x1c4 [virtex5]
LR [F1080198] virtex5_probe+0x12c/0x1c4 [virtex5]
Call Trace:
[C044DE10] [F1080198] virtex5_probe+0x12c/0x1c4 [virtex5] (unreliable)
[C044DE30] [C01D2A58] pci_device_probe+0x84/0xbc
[C044DE50] [C0213754] driver_probe_device+0x60/0x118
[C044DE70] [C0213890] __driver_attach+0x84/0x88
[C044DE90] [C02130F4] bus_for_each_dev+0x58/0x94
[C044DEC0] [C02135D4] driver_attach+0x24/0x34
[C044DED0] [C0212AC8] bus_add_driver+0x88/0x164
[C044DEF0] [C021397C] driver_register+0x70/0xb8
[C044DF00] [C01D284C] __pci_register_driver+0x64/0x98
[C044DF10] [F1080030] init_module+0x30/0x6c [virtex5]
[C044DF20] [C004CBFC] sys_init_module+0xc8/0x25c
[C044DF40] [C0011358] ret_from_syscall+0x0/0x38
--- Exception: c00 at 0xff6de0c
LR = 0x10000de4Instruction dump:
40820060 3c60f108 3863cea0 48000311 807f0238 3c800001 48000395 7c7d1b78 3c60f108 3863ced4 480002f5 809d0000 <3c60f108> 3863cf04 480002e5 3c60f108
Quoted 3 lines · Marco Stornelli
When I try to read some register from my FPGA (virtex5) I have this bus error:
Hmmm.... OK, so if we've eliminated PCI-E as a source for this issue, it really must be in the Virtex support somewhere then. Unfortunately, I know nothing about those, and am not going to be much direct help there.
Sorry.
jdl
Quoted 38 lines
Machine check in kernel mode.
Caused by (from SRR1=149030): Transfer error ack signalOops: Machine check, sig: 7 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NR_CPUS=2 Modules linked in: virtex5LTT NESTING LEVEL : 0
NIP: F108019C LR: F1080198 CTR: 00000001
REGS:c044dd60TRAP: 0200 Not tainted (2.6.18-mpc8641d_hpcn)
MSR: 00149030 <EE,ME,IR,DR> CR: 22000222 XER: 00000000 TASK = c20e9990[568] 'insmod' THREAD:c044c000CPU: 0
GPR00: F1080198 C044DE10 C20E9990 0000002E 80000000 FFFFFFFF 00008000 00002EA3
GPR08: C20E9990 00000000 C04C0220 C044C000 22000222 1001956C 00000000 00000000
GPR16: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000
GPR24: 3000EAA0 7FD6FDC0 00000000 C045FCC0 F107E594 F10A0000 00000000 C2036000
NIP [F108019C]virtex5_probe+0x130/0x1c4[virtex5]
LR [F1080198]virtex5_probe+0x12c/0x1c4[virtex5]Call Trace: [C044DE10] [F1080198] virtex5_probe+0x12c/0x1c4 [virtex5] (unreliable) [C044DE30] [C01D2A58] pci_device_probe+0x84/0xbc [C044DE50] [C0213754] driver_probe_device+0x60/0x118 [C044DE70] [C0213890] __driver_attach+0x84/0x88 [C044DE90] [C02130F4] bus_for_each_dev+0x58/0x94 [C044DEC0] [C02135D4] driver_attach+0x24/0x34 [C044DED0] [C0212AC8] bus_add_driver+0x88/0x164 [C044DEF0] [C021397C] driver_register+0x70/0xb8 [C044DF00] [C01D284C] __pci_register_driver+0x64/0x98 [C044DF10] [F1080030] init_module+0x30/0x6c [virtex5] [C044DF20] [C004CBFC] sys_init_module+0xc8/0x25c [C044DF40] [C0011358] ret_from_syscall+0x0/0x38 --- Exception: c00 at 0xff6de0c LR = 0x10000de4Instruction dump:
408200603c60f1083863cea048000311807f02383c800001480003957c7d1b783c60f1083863ced4480002f5809d0000<3c60f108>3863cf04480002e53c60f108
Jon Loeliger ha scritto:
Quoted 54 lines
Quoted 2 lines · Marco Stornelli
When I try to read some register from my FPGA (virtex5) I have this bus error:
Hmmm.... OK, so if we've eliminated PCI-E as a source for this issue, it really must be in the Virtex support somewhere then. Unfortunately, I know nothing about those, and am not going to be much direct help there.
Sorry.
jdl
Quoted 35 lines
Machine check in kernel mode.
Caused by (from SRR1=149030): Transfer error ack signalOops: Machine check, sig: 7 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NR_CPUS=2 Modules linked in: virtex5LTT NESTING LEVEL : 0
NIP: F108019C LR: F1080198 CTR: 00000001
REGS:c044dd60TRAP: 0200 Not tainted (2.6.18-mpc8641d_hpcn)
MSR: 00149030 <EE,ME,IR,DR> CR: 22000222 XER: 00000000 TASK = c20e9990[568] 'insmod' THREAD:c044c000CPU: 0
GPR00: F1080198 C044DE10 C20E9990 0000002E 80000000 FFFFFFFF 00008000 00002EA3
GPR08: C20E9990 00000000 C04C0220 C044C000 22000222 1001956C 00000000 00000000
GPR16: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000
GPR24: 3000EAA0 7FD6FDC0 00000000 C045FCC0 F107E594 F10A0000 00000000 C2036000
NIP [F108019C]virtex5_probe+0x130/0x1c4[virtex5]
LR [F1080198]virtex5_probe+0x12c/0x1c4[virtex5]Call Trace: [C044DE10] [F1080198] virtex5_probe+0x12c/0x1c4 [virtex5] (unreliable) [C044DE30] [C01D2A58] pci_device_probe+0x84/0xbc [C044DE50] [C0213754] driver_probe_device+0x60/0x118 [C044DE70] [C0213890] __driver_attach+0x84/0x88 [C044DE90] [C02130F4] bus_for_each_dev+0x58/0x94 [C044DEC0] [C02135D4] driver_attach+0x24/0x34 [C044DED0] [C0212AC8] bus_add_driver+0x88/0x164 [C044DEF0] [C021397C] driver_register+0x70/0xb8 [C044DF00] [C01D284C] __pci_register_driver+0x64/0x98 [C044DF10] [F1080030] init_module+0x30/0x6c [virtex5] [C044DF20] [C004CBFC] sys_init_module+0xc8/0x25c [C044DF40] [C0011358] ret_from_syscall+0x0/0x38 --- Exception: c00 at 0xff6de0c LR = 0x10000de4Quoted 3 lines
Instruction dump:
408200603c60f1083863cea048000311807f02383c800001480003957c7d1b783c60f1083863ced4480002f5809d0000<3c60f108>3863cf04480002e53c60f108
Quoted 5 lines
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-embedded mailing list
[email protected]
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-embedded
I tried to use 2.6.24 but I have the same error. It looks like this problem happens when I try to read something in my ML555 board (Virtex5 evaluation board), but if try to write everything works fine. I tried to change the settings about inbound/outbound PCI-E windows but I have the same problem. Have you got any suggestions?
Thanks.
Marco