block/blk-merge.c: inverted likeliness in ll_back_merge_fn()
PATCH 1/1 block/blk-merge.c: inverted likeliness in ll_back_merge_fn()
In my likely profile it appears this one is inverted.
---
Invert likeliness
Signed-off-by Roel Kluin <[email protected]>
---
block/blk-merge.c +1 -1
@@ -305,7 +305,7 @@ int ll_back_merge_fn(struct request_queue *q, struct request *req, }if (unlikely (!bio_flagged (req->biotail,BIO_SEG_VALID )))blk_recount_segments (q, req->biotail); -if (unlikely (!bio_flagged (bio,BIO_SEG_VALID ))) +if (likely (!bio_flagged (bio,BIO_SEG_VALID )))blk_recount_segments (q, bio); len = req->biotail->bi_hw_back_size + bio->bi_hw_front_size; if (BIOVEC_VIRT_MERGEABLE(__BVEC_END(req->biotail), __BVEC_START(bio))
Quoted 1 line · Roel Kluin
In my likely profile it appears this one is inverted.
Depends entirely on the workload, it should be removed rather than inverted.
Signature · 1 line
Jens Axboe
Quoted 6 lines · Jens Axboe
Quoted 1 line · Roel Kluin
In my likely profile it appears this one is inverted.
Depends entirely on the workload, it should be removed rather than inverted.
---
Signed-off-by Roel Kluin <[email protected]>
---
block/blk-merge.c +1 -1
@@ -305,7 +305,7 @@ int ll_back_merge_fn(struct request_queue *q, struct request *req, }if (unlikely (!bio_flagged (req->biotail,BIO_SEG_VALID )))blk_recount_segments (q, req->biotail); -if (unlikely (!bio_flagged (bio,BIO_SEG_VALID ))) +if (!bio_flagged (bio,BIO_SEG_VALID ))blk_recount_segments (q, bio); len = req->biotail->bi_hw_back_size + bio->bi_hw_front_size; if (BIOVEC_VIRT_MERGEABLE(__BVEC_END(req->biotail), __BVEC_START(bio))