Add -Werror to libkvm compile
PATCH 1/1 Add -Werror to libkvm compile
# HG changeset patch
# User Jerone Young <[email protected]>
# Date 1206384205 18000
# Branch merge
# Node ID e23a26d1da04a6dbb831da7d03922abf95de7b30 # Parent 972f62b6acae693c388d7b05d3a9ba7ef26ab4a0 Add -Werror to libkvm compile
This patch adds -Werror to CFLAGS for compilation of libkvm. This should stop complaints about Warnings.
Often I miss these warnings as they scroll right by with everything else during a big compile. This will help catch them.
For qemu this using -Werror is not possible as a lot of qemu throw a gcc warning of some sort.
libkvm/Makefile +1 -0
@@ -11,6 +11,7 @@ CFLAGS += $(call cc-option, -fno-stack-p CFLAGS += $(call cc-option, -fno-stack-protector, "") CFLAGS += $(call cc-option, -fno-stack-protector-all, "") CFLAGS += -I $(KERNELDIR)/include +CFLAGS += -Werror LDFLAGS += $(CFLAGS)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
Quoted 2 lines
This patch adds -Werror to CFLAGS for compilation of libkvm. This should stop complaints about Warnings.
Does libkvm build without warnings using GCC-4.3 (or even GCC-4.4) on all supported platforms? If not, please fix that first :-)
Segher
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
It does work with gcc 4.2.3 . Though no idea if gcc-4.3 & 4.4 would workout. Though they should. I'll need to to compile them and give them a try.
Quoted 10 lines · Segher Boessenkool
Quoted 2 lines
This patch adds -Werror to CFLAGS for compilation of libkvm. This should stop complaints about Warnings.
Does libkvm build without warnings using GCC-4.3 (or even GCC-4.4) on all supported platforms? If not, please fix that first :-)
Segher
Quoted 8 lines
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
kvm-devel mailing list [email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
Quoted 4 lines · Jerone Young
It does work with gcc 4.2.3 . Though no idea if gcc-4.3 & 4.4 would workout. Though they should. I'll need to to compile them and give them a try.
While I'm a fan of -Werror, I have to agree with Anthony it can cause no end of pain to users if they have a slightly different configuration.
Maybe enable it conditionally based on ./configure --developer as Anthony suggests (but I'll forget to use it myself, I'm sure).
Signature · 7 lines
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
Yeah. This could "potentially" cause hell for users (non developers) down the road. I'm just going to keep this patch in my queue for myself, so no one will complain about warnings from my patches anymore.
I think having a --developer flag to configure could work, but we would then need separate file for including the CFLAG, this would just clutter things more.
Quoted 6 lines · Avi Kivity
Quoted 4 lines · Jerone Young
It does work with gcc 4.2.3 . Though no idea if gcc-4.3 & 4.4 would workout. Though they should. I'll need to to compile them and give them a try.
Quoted 6 lines
While I'm a fan of -Werror, I have to agree with Anthony it can cause no end of pain to users if they have a slightly different configuration.
Maybe enable it conditionally based on ./configure --developer as Anthony suggests (but I'll forget to use it myself, I'm sure).
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
Quoted 8 lines · Jerone Young
Yeah. This could "potentially" cause hell for users (non developers) down the road. I'm just going to keep this patch in my queue for myself, so no one will complain about warnings from my patches anymore.
I think having a --developer flag to configure could work, but we would then need separate file for including the CFLAG, this would just clutter things more.
One other option is to enable -Werror by default, and have a --disable-werror configure flag. It means we'll get better coverage, but the user experience when it breaks will be worse.
Signature · 8 lines
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace
Quoted 10 lines · Jerone Young
# HG changeset patch
# User Jerone Young <[email protected]>
# Date 1206384205 18000
# Branch merge
# Node IDe23a26d1da04a6dbb831da7d03922abf95de7b30# Parent972f62b6acae693c388d7b05d3a9ba7ef26ab4a0Add -Werror to libkvm compileThis patch adds -Werror to CFLAGS for compilation of libkvm. This should stop complaints about Warnings.
What's unfortunate about -Werror is that GCC is notorious about introducing warnings that aren't valid for particular versions of GCC. While libkvm may compile with -Werror for you and may, there may be existing (or future) versions of GCC that it won't build with whereas the error being reported is not valid.
This is okay for developers, but not for users. In general, most projects reserve -Werror for a developer or maintainer mode.
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
Quoted 19 lines
Often I miss these warnings as they scroll right by with everything else during a big compile. This will help catch them.
For qemu this using -Werror is not possible as a lot of qemu throw a gcc warning of some sort.
Signed-off-by Jerone Young <[email protected]>libkvm/Makefile +1
-1@@ -11,6 +11,7 @@ CFLAGS += $(call cc-option, -fno-stack-p CFLAGS += $(call cc-option, -fno-stack-protector, "") CFLAGS += $(call cc-option, -fno-stack-protector-all, "") CFLAGS += -I $(KERNELDIR)/include +CFLAGS += -Werror LDFLAGS += $(CFLAGS) -------------------------------------------------------------------------
Quoted 8 lines
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
kvm-devel mailing list [email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/