Skip to contentSkip to conversation

smc911x: test after postfix decrement fails in smc911x_{reset,drop_pkt}

PATCH In review Roel Kluin 2 participants 2 messages Apr 9, 2008 – Apr 10, 2008

Subsystems (2)
lore
Share & tools
lore

Roel Kluin

author
#0 lore raw

PATCH 1/1 smc911x: test after postfix decrement fails in smc911x_{reset,drop_pkt}

When timeout reaches 0 the postfix decrement still subtracts, so the test fails

---

drivers/net/smc911x.c +3 -3
index 76cc1d3..2126d24 100644
@@ -243,7 +243,7 @@ static void smc911x_reset(struct net_device *dev)
 		do {
 			udelay(10);
 			reg = SMC_GET_PMT_CTRL() & PMT_CTRL_READY_;
-		} while ( timeout-- && !reg);
+		} while ( --timeout && !reg);
 		if (timeout == 0) {
 			PRINTK("%s: smc911x_reset timeout waiting for PM restore\n", dev->name);
 			return;
@@ -267,7 +267,7 @@ static void smc911x_reset(struct net_device *dev)
 				resets++;
 				break;
 			}
-		} while ( timeout-- && (reg & HW_CFG_SRST_));
+		} while ( --timeout && (reg & HW_CFG_SRST_));
 	}
 	if (timeout == 0) {
 		PRINTK("%s: smc911x_reset timeout waiting for reset\n", dev->name);
@@ -413,7 +413,7 @@ static inline void smc911x_drop_pkt(struct net_device *dev)
 		do {
 			udelay(10);
 			reg = SMC_GET_RX_DP_CTRL() & RX_DP_CTRL_FFWD_BUSY_;
-		} while ( timeout-- && reg);
+		} while ( --timeout && reg);
 		if (timeout == 0) {
 			PRINTK("%s: timeout waiting for RX fast forward\n", dev->name);
 		}
Acked-by on v1 1/1
#1 lore raw
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line

"Roel" == Roel Kluin <[email protected]> writes:

Roel> When timeout reaches 0 the postfix decrement still subtracts, Roel> so the test fails

Ahh, good catch. Notice that Nicolas isn't the author of smc911x, Dustin McIntire is.

Roel> Signed-off-by: Roel Kluin <[email protected]>
Roel> ---
Roel> diff --git a/drivers/net/smc911x.c b/drivers/net/smc911x.c Roel> index 76cc1d3..2126d24 100644
Roel> --- a/drivers/net/smc911x.c
Roel> +++ b/drivers/net/smc911x.c
Roel> @@ -243,7 +243,7 @@ static void smc911x_reset(struct net_device *dev)

 Roel>  		do {
 Roel>  			udelay(10);
 Roel>  			reg = SMC_GET_PMT_CTRL() & PMT_CTRL_READY_;
 Roel> -		} while ( timeout-- && !reg);
 Roel> +		} while ( --timeout && !reg);
 Roel>  		if (timeout == 0) {
 Roel>  			PRINTK("%s: smc911x_reset timeout waiting for PM restore\n", dev->name);
 Roel>  			return;
 Roel> @@ -267,7 +267,7 @@ static void smc911x_reset(struct net_device *dev)
 Roel>  				resets++;
 Roel>  				break;
 Roel>  			}
 Roel> -		} while ( timeout-- && (reg & HW_CFG_SRST_));
 Roel> +		} while ( --timeout && (reg & HW_CFG_SRST_));
 Roel>  	}
 Roel>  	if (timeout == 0) {
 Roel>  		PRINTK("%s: smc911x_reset timeout waiting for reset\n", dev->name);
 Roel> @@ -413,7 +413,7 @@ static inline void smc911x_drop_pkt(struct net_device *dev)
 Roel>  		do {
 Roel>  			udelay(10);
 Roel>  			reg = SMC_GET_RX_DP_CTRL() & RX_DP_CTRL_FFWD_BUSY_;
 Roel> -		} while ( timeout-- && reg);
 Roel> +		} while ( --timeout && reg);
 Roel>  		if (timeout == 0) {
 Roel>  			PRINTK("%s: timeout waiting for RX fast forward\n", dev->name);
 Roel>  		}

Roel> --

Signature · 1 line
Bye, Peter Korsgaard