: Consolidate hash kfree-ing in mesh.c.
Subsystems (3)
PATCH 7/7 : Consolidate hash kfree-ing in mesh.c.
There are already two places, that kfree the mesh_table and its buckets.
Signed-off-by Pavel Emelyanov <[email protected]>
--- net/mac80211/mesh.c | 15 +++++++++------ 1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
net/mac80211/mesh.c +9 -6
@@ -315,6 +315,13 @@ struct mesh_table *mesh_table_alloc(int size_order)return newtbl; } +static void __mesh_table_free (struct mesh_table *tbl) +{ +kfree (tbl->hash_buckets); +kfree (tbl->hashwlock); +kfree (tbl); +} +void mesh_table_free (struct mesh_table *tbl,bool free_leafs) {struct hlist_head *mesh_hash;
@@ -330,9 +337,7 @@ void mesh_table_free(struct mesh_table *tbl, bool free_leafs) }spin_unlock (&tbl->hashwlock[i]); } -kfree (tbl->hash_buckets); -kfree (tbl->hashwlock); -kfree (tbl); +__mesh_table_free (tbl); }static void ieee80211_mesh_path_timer (unsigned long data)
@@ -378,9 +383,7 @@ errcopy:hlist_for_each_safe (p, q, &newtbl->hash_buckets[i]) tbl->free_node (p,0 ); } -kfree (newtbl->hash_buckets); -kfree (newtbl->hashwlock); -kfree (newtbl); +__mesh_table_free (tbl); endgrow:return NULL ; }
Signature · 1 line
1.5.3.4
A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): [email protected]
Quoted 14 lines · On Wednesday 07 May 2008 17:57:11 Pavel Emelyanov wrote:
There are already two places, that kfree the
mesh_tableand its buckets.Signed-off-by Pavel Emelyanov <[email protected]>--- net/mac80211/mesh.c | 15 +++++++++------ 1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)net/mac80211/mesh.c +0
-0
net/mac80211/mesh.c struct mesh_table *mesh_table_alloc(int size_order) · line 318
Quoted 4 lines
net/mac80211/mesh.c +1
-0@@ -315,6 +315,13 @@ struct mesh_table *mesh_table_alloc(int size_order)return newtbl; } +static void __mesh_table_free (struct mesh_table *tbl)
Why is this __double_underscored?
Quoted 31 lines
net/mac80211/mesh.c +8
-6+{ +kfree (tbl->hash_buckets); +kfree (tbl->hashwlock); +kfree (tbl); +} +void mesh_table_free (struct mesh_table *tbl,bool free_leafs) {struct hlist_head *mesh_hash;@@ -330,9 +337,7 @@ void mesh_table_free(struct mesh_table *tbl, bool free_leafs) }spin_unlock (&tbl->hashwlock[i]); } -kfree (tbl->hash_buckets); -kfree (tbl->hashwlock); -kfree (tbl); +__mesh_table_free (tbl); }static void ieee80211_mesh_path_timer (unsigned long data)@@ -378,9 +383,7 @@ errcopy:hlist_for_each_safe (p, q, &newtbl->hash_buckets[i]) tbl->free_node (p,0 ); } -kfree (newtbl->hash_buckets); -kfree (newtbl->hashwlock); -kfree (newtbl); +__mesh_table_free (tbl); endgrow:return NULL ; }
Signature · 5 lines
Greetings Michael. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Quoted 18 lines · Michael Buesch
Quoted 17 lines · On Wednesday 07 May 2008 17:57:11 Pavel Emelyanov wrote:
There are already two places, that kfree the
mesh_tableand its buckets.Signed-off-by Pavel Emelyanov <[email protected]>--- net/mac80211/mesh.c | 15 +++++++++------ 1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)net/mac80211/mesh.c +0
-0@@ -315,6 +315,13 @@ struct mesh_table *mesh_table_alloc(int size_order)return newtbl; }
Quoted 3 lines
net/mac80211/mesh.c struct mesh_table *mesh_table_alloc(int size_order) · line 318
Quoted 1 line
net/mac80211/mesh.c +1
-0+static void __mesh_table_free (struct mesh_table *tbl)Why is this
__double_underscored?
To show, that this one is to be used "with care", i.e. - with all entries previously flushed.
Quoted 34 lines
Quoted 31 lines
net/mac80211/mesh.c +8
-6+{ +kfree (tbl->hash_buckets); +kfree (tbl->hashwlock); +kfree (tbl); +} +void mesh_table_free (struct mesh_table *tbl,bool free_leafs) {struct hlist_head *mesh_hash;@@ -330,9 +337,7 @@ void mesh_table_free(struct mesh_table *tbl, bool free_leafs) }spin_unlock (&tbl->hashwlock[i]); } -kfree (tbl->hash_buckets); -kfree (tbl->hashwlock); -kfree (tbl); +__mesh_table_free (tbl); }static void ieee80211_mesh_path_timer (unsigned long data)@@ -378,9 +383,7 @@ errcopy:hlist_for_each_safe (p, q, &newtbl->hash_buckets[i]) tbl->free_node (p,0 ); } -kfree (newtbl->hash_buckets); -kfree (newtbl->hashwlock); -kfree (newtbl); +__mesh_table_free (tbl); endgrow:return NULL ; }