Future Linux filesystems
Quoted 2 lines
I also would like to comment that btrfs is ready for the future storage
- the solid state drive. Btrfs performs well on both HDD and SSD.
SSD is still very expensive when compared to traditional hard disks.
*If* btrfs supported compression, I would second your opinion that btrfs is (will be, when it's stable) ready for the future storage.
Signature · 2 lines
Tomasz Chmielewski http://wpkg.org
Quoted 2 lines
SSD is still very expensive when compared to traditional hard disks.
When measured by GB/$, sure.
Many data centers, though, care more about (ops/sec) / ($ * power * heat). SSDs look much more compelling by that metric.
- z