Skip to contentSkip to conversation

improving AX25 routing frames

PATCH In review Bernard Pidoux 3 participants 3 messages Jul 12, 2008 – Jul 16, 2008 4 messages not in the archive

Subsystems (2)
lore
Share & tools
lore

A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): [email protected]

A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): [email protected]

A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): [email protected]

A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): [email protected]

#4 lore raw

PATCH 1/1 improving AX25 routing frames

Hi David,

You probably did not notice the following patch I re-sent a while ago at your request:

200806071944.07304.bpidoux () free ! fr

Although it is not critical for Linux kernel and for general users, it it of valuable interest for the digital hamradio community as it repairs the rose network routing and gives us the connectivity we are lacking.

I applied this patch to all kernel versions since it was written without any problem.

Could you look at it ?

Best regards,

Bernard Pidoux

Quoted 19 lines · David Miller

From: "bernard.pidoux" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 23 May 2008 17:26:27 +0200

Quoted 4 lines

You may have seen that I actually condensed things by finally having incorporated the search for an already connected node into existing rose_get_neigh() function.
This has the advantage to avoid creating a new function and not to use more spinlocks. Is there any chance that you accept the patch submitted in its resulting form ?

In the time that has passed I am confused as to which of several pending patches I should look at and apply.

Could you simply resubmit (CC:'ing the proper lists, don't take discussions private like this again please) the patches that you think should be looked at seriously right now?

Thanks.

maintainer
#5 lore raw

From: Bernard Pidoux <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2008 11:32:56 +0200

Quoted 8 lines

You probably did not notice the following patch I re-sent a while ago at your request:

200806071944.07304.bpidoux () free ! fr

Although it is not critical for Linux kernel and for general users, it it of valuable interest for the digital hamradio community as it repairs the rose network routing and gives us the connectivity we are lacking.

It's been in my net-next-2.6 GIT tree for weeks, and I will merge it in during the 2.6.27 merge window.

#6 lore raw

David,

This is great news indeed.
I am not pulling net-next-2.6 GIT tree, but only net-2.6.
As I did not received any acknowledgement I thought you did not had time to review my patch. Thanks a lot.

Bernard

Quoted 5 lines · David Miller

From: Bernard Pidoux <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2008 11:32:56 +0200

Quoted 2 lines

You probably did not notice the following patch I re-sent a while ago at your request:

Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 3 lines

200806071944.07304.bpidoux () free ! fr

Although it is not critical for Linux kernel and for general users, it it of valuable interest for the digital hamradio community as it repairs the rose network routing and gives us the connectivity we are lacking.

It's been in my net-next-2.6 GIT tree for weeks, and I will merge it in during the 2.6.27 merge window.
--

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-hams" in the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html