Skip to contentSkip to conversation

use the same btree_cur union member for alloc and inobt trees

PATCH In review Christoph Hellwig 2 participants 4 messages Jul 23, 2008 – Jul 29, 2008 XFS filesystem

lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw

PATCH 2/15 use the same btree_cur union member for alloc and inobt trees

The alloc and inobt btree use the same agbp/agno pair in the btree_cur union. Make them use the same bc_private.a union member so that code for these two short form btree implementations can be shared.

fs/xfs/xfs_btree.h +2 -6
Index: linux-2.6-xfs/fs/xfs/xfs_btree.h
===================================================================
@@ -158,8 +158,8 @@ typedef struct xfs_btree_cur
 	__uint8_t	bc_blocklog;	/* log2(blocksize) of btree blocks */
 	xfs_btnum_t	bc_btnum;	/* identifies which btree type */
 	union {
-		struct {			/* needed for BNO, CNT */
-			struct xfs_buf	*agbp;	/* agf buffer pointer */
+		struct {			/* needed for BNO, CNT, INO */
+			struct xfs_buf	*agbp;	/* agf/agi buffer pointer */
 			xfs_agnumber_t	agno;	/* ag number */
 		} a;
 		struct {			/* needed for BMAP */
@@ -172,10 +172,6 @@ typedef struct xfs_btree_cur
 			char		flags;		/* flags */
 #define	XFS_BTCUR_BPRV_WASDEL	1			/* was delayed */
 		} b;
-		struct {			/* needed for INO */
-			struct xfs_buf	*agbp;	/* agi buffer pointer */
-			xfs_agnumber_t	agno;	/* ag number */
-		} i;
 	}		bc_private;	/* per-btree type data */
 } xfs_btree_cur_t;
 
fs/xfs/xfs_btree.c +9 -9
Index: linux-2.6-xfs/fs/xfs/xfs_btree.c
===================================================================
@@ -570,6 +570,13 @@ xfs_btree_init_cursor(
 		cur->bc_private.a.agbp = agbp;
 		cur->bc_private.a.agno = agno;
 		break;
+	case XFS_BTNUM_INO:
+		/*
+		 * Inode allocation btree fields.
+		 */
+		cur->bc_private.a.agbp = agbp;
+		cur->bc_private.a.agno = agno;
+		break;
 	case XFS_BTNUM_BMAP:
 		/*
 		 * Bmap btree fields.
@@ -582,13 +589,6 @@ xfs_btree_init_cursor(
 		cur->bc_private.b.flags = 0;
 		cur->bc_private.b.whichfork = whichfork;
 		break;
-	case XFS_BTNUM_INO:
-		/*
-		 * Inode allocation btree fields.
-		 */
-		cur->bc_private.i.agbp = agbp;
-		cur->bc_private.i.agno = agno;
-		break;
 	default:
 		ASSERT(0);
 	}
@@ -863,12 +863,12 @@ xfs_btree_readahead_core(
 	case XFS_BTNUM_INO:
 		i = XFS_BUF_TO_INOBT_BLOCK(cur->bc_bufs[lev]);
 		if ((lr & XFS_BTCUR_LEFTRA) && be32_to_cpu(i->bb_leftsib) != NULLAGBLOCK) {
-			xfs_btree_reada_bufs(cur->bc_mp, cur->bc_private.i.agno,
+			xfs_btree_reada_bufs(cur->bc_mp, cur->bc_private.a.agno,
 				be32_to_cpu(i->bb_leftsib), 1);
 			rval++;
 		}
 		if ((lr & XFS_BTCUR_RIGHTRA) && be32_to_cpu(i->bb_rightsib) != NULLAGBLOCK) {
-			xfs_btree_reada_bufs(cur->bc_mp, cur->bc_private.i.agno,
+			xfs_btree_reada_bufs(cur->bc_mp, cur->bc_private.a.agno,
 				be32_to_cpu(i->bb_rightsib), 1);
 			rval++;
 		}
fs/xfs/xfs_ialloc_btree.c +15 -15
Index: linux-2.6-xfs/fs/xfs/xfs_ialloc_btree.c
===================================================================
@@ -181,7 +181,7 @@ xfs_inobt_delrec(
 		 * then we can get rid of this level.
 		 */
 		if (numrecs == 1 && level > 0) {
-			agbp = cur->bc_private.i.agbp;
+			agbp = cur->bc_private.a.agbp;
 			agi = XFS_BUF_TO_AGI(agbp);
 			/*
 			 * pp is still set to the first pointer in the block.
@@ -194,7 +194,7 @@ xfs_inobt_delrec(
 			 * Free the block.
 			 */
 			if ((error = xfs_free_extent(cur->bc_tp,
-				XFS_AGB_TO_FSB(mp, cur->bc_private.i.agno, bno), 1)))
+				XFS_AGB_TO_FSB(mp, cur->bc_private.a.agno, bno), 1)))
 				return error;
 			xfs_trans_binval(cur->bc_tp, bp);
 			xfs_ialloc_log_agi(cur->bc_tp, agbp,
@@ -379,7 +379,7 @@ xfs_inobt_delrec(
 		rrecs = be16_to_cpu(right->bb_numrecs);
 		rbp = bp;
 		if ((error = xfs_btree_read_bufs(mp, cur->bc_tp,
-				cur->bc_private.i.agno, lbno, 0, &lbp,
+				cur->bc_private.a.agno, lbno, 0, &lbp,
 				XFS_INO_BTREE_REF)))
 			return error;
 		left = XFS_BUF_TO_INOBT_BLOCK(lbp);
@@ -401,7 +401,7 @@ xfs_inobt_delrec(
 		lrecs = be16_to_cpu(left->bb_numrecs);
 		lbp = bp;
 		if ((error = xfs_btree_read_bufs(mp, cur->bc_tp,
-				cur->bc_private.i.agno, rbno, 0, &rbp,
+				cur->bc_private.a.agno, rbno, 0, &rbp,
 				XFS_INO_BTREE_REF)))
 			return error;
 		right = XFS_BUF_TO_INOBT_BLOCK(rbp);
@@ -484,7 +484,7 @@ xfs_inobt_delrec(
 		xfs_buf_t		*rrbp;
 
 		if ((error = xfs_btree_read_bufs(mp, cur->bc_tp,
-				cur->bc_private.i.agno, be32_to_cpu(left->bb_rightsib), 0,
+				cur->bc_private.a.agno, be32_to_cpu(left->bb_rightsib), 0,
 				&rrbp, XFS_INO_BTREE_REF)))
 			return error;
 		rrblock = XFS_BUF_TO_INOBT_BLOCK(rrbp);
@@ -497,7 +497,7 @@ xfs_inobt_delrec(
 	 * Free the deleting block.
 	 */
 	if ((error = xfs_free_extent(cur->bc_tp, XFS_AGB_TO_FSB(mp,
-				     cur->bc_private.i.agno, rbno), 1)))
+				     cur->bc_private.a.agno, rbno), 1)))
 		return error;
 	xfs_trans_binval(cur->bc_tp, rbp);
 	/*
@@ -854,7 +854,7 @@ xfs_inobt_lookup(
 	{
 		xfs_agi_t	*agi;	/* a.g. inode header */
 
-		agi = XFS_BUF_TO_AGI(cur->bc_private.i.agbp);
+		agi = XFS_BUF_TO_AGI(cur->bc_private.a.agbp);
 		agno = be32_to_cpu(agi->agi_seqno);
 		agbno = be32_to_cpu(agi->agi_root);
 	}
@@ -1089,7 +1089,7 @@ xfs_inobt_lshift(
 	 * Set up the left neighbor as "left".
 	 */
 	if ((error = xfs_btree_read_bufs(cur->bc_mp, cur->bc_tp,
-			cur->bc_private.i.agno, be32_to_cpu(right->bb_leftsib),
+			cur->bc_private.a.agno, be32_to_cpu(right->bb_leftsib),
 			0, &lbp, XFS_INO_BTREE_REF)))
 		return error;
 	left = XFS_BUF_TO_INOBT_BLOCK(lbp);
@@ -1207,10 +1207,10 @@ xfs_inobt_newroot(
 	/*
 	 * Get a block & a buffer.
 	 */
-	agi = XFS_BUF_TO_AGI(cur->bc_private.i.agbp);
+	agi = XFS_BUF_TO_AGI(cur->bc_private.a.agbp);
 	args.tp = cur->bc_tp;
 	args.mp = cur->bc_mp;
-	args.fsbno = XFS_AGB_TO_FSB(args.mp, cur->bc_private.i.agno,
+	args.fsbno = XFS_AGB_TO_FSB(args.mp, cur->bc_private.a.agno,
 		be32_to_cpu(agi->agi_root));
 	args.mod = args.minleft = args.alignment = args.total = args.wasdel =
 		args.isfl = args.userdata = args.minalignslop = 0;
@@ -1233,7 +1233,7 @@ xfs_inobt_newroot(
 	 */
 	agi->agi_root = cpu_to_be32(args.agbno);
 	be32_add(&agi->agi_level, 1);
-	xfs_ialloc_log_agi(args.tp, cur->bc_private.i.agbp,
+	xfs_ialloc_log_agi(args.tp, cur->bc_private.a.agbp,
 		XFS_AGI_ROOT | XFS_AGI_LEVEL);
 	/*
 	 * At the previous root level there are now two blocks: the old
@@ -1376,7 +1376,7 @@ xfs_inobt_rshift(
 	 * Set up the right neighbor as "right".
 	 */
 	if ((error = xfs_btree_read_bufs(cur->bc_mp, cur->bc_tp,
-			cur->bc_private.i.agno, be32_to_cpu(left->bb_rightsib),
+			cur->bc_private.a.agno, be32_to_cpu(left->bb_rightsib),
 			0, &rbp, XFS_INO_BTREE_REF)))
 		return error;
 	right = XFS_BUF_TO_INOBT_BLOCK(rbp);
@@ -1492,7 +1492,7 @@ xfs_inobt_split(
 	 * Allocate the new block.
 	 * If we can't do it, we're toast.  Give up.
 	 */
-	args.fsbno = XFS_AGB_TO_FSB(args.mp, cur->bc_private.i.agno, lbno);
+	args.fsbno = XFS_AGB_TO_FSB(args.mp, cur->bc_private.a.agno, lbno);
 	args.mod = args.minleft = args.alignment = args.total = args.wasdel =
 		args.isfl = args.userdata = args.minalignslop = 0;
 	args.minlen = args.maxlen = args.prod = 1;
@@ -1725,7 +1725,7 @@ xfs_inobt_decrement(
 
 		agbno = be32_to_cpu(*XFS_INOBT_PTR_ADDR(block, cur->bc_ptrs[lev], cur));
 		if ((error = xfs_btree_read_bufs(cur->bc_mp, cur->bc_tp,
-				cur->bc_private.i.agno, agbno, 0, &bp,
+				cur->bc_private.a.agno, agbno, 0, &bp,
 				XFS_INO_BTREE_REF)))
 			return error;
 		lev--;
@@ -1897,7 +1897,7 @@ xfs_inobt_increment(
 
 		agbno = be32_to_cpu(*XFS_INOBT_PTR_ADDR(block, cur->bc_ptrs[lev], cur));
 		if ((error = xfs_btree_read_bufs(cur->bc_mp, cur->bc_tp,
-				cur->bc_private.i.agno, agbno, 0, &bp,
+				cur->bc_private.a.agno, agbno, 0, &bp,
 				XFS_INO_BTREE_REF)))
 			return error;
 		lev--;
fs/xfs/xfsidbg.c +0 -4
Index: linux-2.6-xfs/fs/xfs/xfsidbg.c
===================================================================
@@ -4579,10 +4579,6 @@ xfsidbg_xbtcur(xfs_btree_cur_t *c)
 			xfs_fmtfsblock(c->bc_private.b.firstblock, c->bc_mp),
 			c->bc_private.b.flist,
 			c->bc_private.b.allocated);
-	} else if (c->bc_btnum == XFS_BTNUM_INO) {
-		kdb_printf("private agbp 0x%p agno 0x%x\n",
-			c->bc_private.i.agbp,
-			c->bc_private.i.agno);
 	} else {
 		kdb_printf("private agbp 0x%p agno 0x%x\n",
 			c->bc_private.a.agbp,
#1 lore raw

Hi there,

This was fine but just one thing which looked odd:

Quoted 21 lines · Christoph Hellwig

Index: linux-2.6-xfs/fs/xfs/xfs_btree.c
===================================================================

fs/xfs/xfs_btree.c +7 -0
@@ -570,6 +570,13 @@ xfs_btree_init_cursor(
 		cur->bc_private.a.agbp = agbp;
 		cur->bc_private.a.agno = agno;
 		break;
+	case XFS_BTNUM_INO:
+		/*
+		 * Inode allocation btree fields.
+		 */
+		cur->bc_private.a.agbp = agbp;
+		cur->bc_private.a.agno = agno;
+		break;
 	case XFS_BTNUM_BMAP:
 		/*
 		 * Bmap btree fields.
@@ -582,13 +589,6 @@ xfs_btree_init_cursor(
 		cur->bc_private.b.flags = 0;

fs/xfs/xfs_btree.c xfs_btree_init_cursor( · line 592

Quoted 10 lines
fs/xfs/xfs_btree.c +0 -7
 		cur->bc_private.b.whichfork = whichfork;
 		break;
-	case XFS_BTNUM_INO:
-		/*
-		 * Inode allocation btree fields.
-		 */
-		cur->bc_private.i.agbp = agbp;
-		cur->bc_private.i.agno = agno;
-		break;
 	default:

Could probably just add XFS_BNUM_INO to the case below (and modify the comment):

Quoted 8 lines
fs/xfs/xfs_btree.c +0 -0
 	case XFS_BTNUM_BNO:
 	case XFS_BTNUM_CNT:
		/*
		 * Allocation btree fields.
		 */
		cur->bc_private.a.agbp = agbp;
		cur->bc_private.a.agno = agno;
		break;

--Tim

#2 lore raw
Quoted 31 lines · Timothy Shimmin

Hi there,

This was fine but just one thing which looked odd:

Quoted 26 lines · Christoph Hellwig

Index: linux-2.6-xfs/fs/xfs/xfs_btree.c
===================================================================

fs/xfs/xfs_btree.c +7 -3
@@ -570,6 +570,13 @@ xfs_btree_init_cursor(
 		cur->bc_private.a.agbp = agbp;
 		cur->bc_private.a.agno = agno;
 		break;
+	case XFS_BTNUM_INO:
+		/*
+		 * Inode allocation btree fields.
+		 */
+		cur->bc_private.a.agbp = agbp;
+		cur->bc_private.a.agno = agno;
+		break;
 	case XFS_BTNUM_BMAP:
 		/*
 		 * Bmap btree fields.
@@ -582,13 +589,6 @@ xfs_btree_init_cursor(
 		cur->bc_private.b.flags = 0;
 		cur->bc_private.b.whichfork = whichfork;
 		break;
-	case XFS_BTNUM_INO:
-		/*
-		 * Inode allocation btree fields.
Quoted 8 lines

fs/xfs/xfs_btree.c xfs_btree_init_cursor( · line 592

Quoted 5 lines
fs/xfs/xfs_btree.c +0 -4
-		 */
-		cur->bc_private.i.agbp = agbp;
-		cur->bc_private.i.agno = agno;
-		break;
 	default:

Could probably just add XFS_BNUM_INO to the case below (and modify the comment):

We could, and in fact that was my plan initially but I gave it up because later we'd add the method table initialization which would be different for the alloc vs inobt trees. I then later factored these out into separate functions, so this whole switch goes away a few patches later in the series.

Given that it would only cause churn in the series I'd prefer to leave the patch as-is.

#3 lore raw
Quoted 40 lines · Christoph Hellwig
Quoted 30 lines · Timothy Shimmin

Hi there,

This was fine but just one thing which looked odd:

Quoted 25 lines · Christoph Hellwig

Index: linux-2.6-xfs/fs/xfs/xfs_btree.c
===================================================================

fs/xfs/xfs_btree.c +7 -2
@@ -570,6 +570,13 @@ xfs_btree_init_cursor(
 		cur->bc_private.a.agbp = agbp;
 		cur->bc_private.a.agno = agno;
 		break;
+	case XFS_BTNUM_INO:
+		/*
+		 * Inode allocation btree fields.
+		 */
+		cur->bc_private.a.agbp = agbp;
+		cur->bc_private.a.agno = agno;
+		break;
 	case XFS_BTNUM_BMAP:
 		/*
 		 * Bmap btree fields.
@@ -582,13 +589,6 @@ xfs_btree_init_cursor(
 		cur->bc_private.b.flags = 0;
 		cur->bc_private.b.whichfork = whichfork;
 		break;
-	case XFS_BTNUM_INO:
-		/*
Quoted 8 lines

fs/xfs/xfs_btree.c xfs_btree_init_cursor( · line 592

Quoted 6 lines
fs/xfs/xfs_btree.c +0 -5
-		 * Inode allocation btree fields.
-		 */
-		cur->bc_private.i.agbp = agbp;
-		cur->bc_private.i.agno = agno;
-		break;
 	default:

Could probably just add XFS_BNUM_INO to the case below (and modify the comment):

Quoted 1 line

We could, and in fact that was my plan initially

I'm not surprised :-)

Quoted 6 lines

but I gave it up
because later we'd add the method table initialization which would be different for the alloc vs inobt trees. I then later factored these out into separate functions, so this whole switch goes away a few patches later in the series.

Oh okay, method in the madness ;-)

Quoted 2 lines

Given that it would only cause churn in the series I'd prefer to leave the patch as-is.

Yep, fine.

--Tim