Question about extended attributes...
my man page says extended xfs attributes can have 256-byte names with up to 64K of data.
Is there a limit on the number of extended attributes max data size or name size?
I.e. could I have 1000 attributes with 64K of data each?
Is there a strong reason why the file and data sizes were limited to 256/64K? Would they be hard to 'generalize' to max-path-segment-len/max-filelen?
Only reason I wonder is wondering what file systems besides apple's "HPFS"(?) and MS's NTFS, that allow alternate data-streams of arbitrary length. I'm not sure about the maximums on HPFS and NTFS, but I haven't _read_ of any notable limits (I'm sure there are some, but it _seems_ you can store alternate file versions in different data-streams on NTFS, for example... I.e. could use it as a revision system, theoretically -- to save older versions of the file with the right software -- but with XFS, it wouldn't be so general case with a 64K data limit -- wouldn't be a show-stopper if one could 'link' multiple data-segments, but am just curious about the limitations (not that I'm planning on implementing a version control system using data-forks...it was just an example! :-)).
linda
Hi Linda,
Quoted 8 lines · Linda A. Walsh
my man page says extended xfs attributes can have 256-byte names with up to 64K of data.
Is there a limit on the number of extended attributes max data size or name size?
I.e. could I have 1000 attributes with 64K of data each?
Yep.
Quoted 2 lines
Is there a strong reason why the file and data sizes were limited to 256/64K?
I presume by file you mean name.
In the various forms of an EA - shortform and leaf form, the namelen is stored as 1 byte and so we can really only store 255 bytes for a name AFAICT.
For the value part, I can see 3 forms in which it is short form or in leaf-form with value local or value remote.
struct xfs_attr_sf_entry {
__uint8_t namelen; /* actual length of name (no NULL) */
__uint8_t valuelen; /* actual length of value (no NULL) */
typedef struct xfs_attr_leaf_name_local {
__be16 valuelen; /* number of bytes in value */
__u8 namelen; /* length of name bytes */typedef struct xfs_attr_leaf_name_remote {
__be32 valueblk; /* block number of value bytes */
__be32 valuelen; /* number of bytes in value */
__u8 namelen; /* length of name bytes */So from a valuelen pt-of-view we have 2^32-1.
Not sure about other limitations there.
I'm not sure why 64K was chosen for a value size limit.
In fact, on a quick look in the xfs code I can't see (other than in dmapi and an assert in list) where we limit this.
We do limit it in the attr(1) userspace cmd by only reading up to ATTR_MAX_VALUELEN.
1 xfs/xfs_attr.h <global> 56 #define ATTR_MAX_VALUELEN (64*1024)
2 dmapi/xfs_dm.c xfs_dm_bulkall_one 685 if (value_len > ATTR_MAX_VALUELEN)
3 dmapi/xfs_dm.c xfs_dm_bulkall_one 686 value_len = ATTR_MAX_VALUELEN;
4 dmapi/xfs_dm.c xfs_dm_get_config 1584 retval = ATTR_MAX_VALUELEN; 5 dmapi/xfs_dm.c xfs_dm_get_dmattr 1957 if (alloc_size > ATTR_MAX_VALUELEN) 6 dmapi/xfs_dm.c xfs_dm_get_dmattr 1958 alloc_size = ATTR_MAX_VALUELEN; 7 dmapi/xfs_dm.c xfs_dm_set_dmattr 2623 if (buflen > ATTR_MAX_VALUELEN)
8 xfs/xfs_attr.c xfs_attr_put_listent 682 ASSERT(context->count < (ATTR_MAX_VALUELEN/8)); And on IRIX we limited the value size in the vfs and not in the xfs code.
I wonder what would happen going straight to the setxattr syscall on an
xfs file.
Okay, we are limited by:
#define XATTR_SIZE_MAX 65536 /* size of an extended attribute value (64k) */
And we have one for the name:
#define XATTR_NAME_MAX 255 /* # chars in an extended attribute name */
static long
setxattr(struct dentry *d, char __user *name, void __user *value,
size_t size, int flags)
{
...
if (size) {
if (size > XATTR_SIZE_MAX)
return -E2BIG;So the Linux interface will limit us here too by the looks of it.
Quoted 21 lines
Would they be hard to 'generalize' to max-path-segment-len/max-filelen?
Only reason I wonder is wondering what file systems besides apple's "HPFS"(?) and
MS's NTFS, that allow alternate data-streams of arbitrary length. I'm not sure about
the maximums on HPFS and NTFS, but I haven't _read_ of any notable limits (I'm sure
there are some, but it _seems_ you can store alternate file versions in different data-streams
on NTFS, for example... I.e. could use it as a revision system, theoretically -- to save
older versions of the file with the right software -- but with XFS, it wouldn't be so
general case with a 64K data limit -- wouldn't be a show-stopper if one could 'link'
multiple data-segments, but am just curious about the limitations (not that I'm planning
on implementing a version control system using data-forks...it was just an example! :-)).
Quoted 2 lines
linda
--Tim
Quoted 15 lines · Timothy Shimmin
Hi Linda,
Quoted 8 lines · Linda A. Walsh
my man page says extended xfs attributes can have 256-byte names with up to 64K of data.
Is there a limit on the number of extended attributes max data size or name size?
I.e. could I have 1000 attributes with 64K of data each?
Yep.
Quoted 2 lines
Is there a strong reason why the file and data sizes were limited to 256/64K?
....
Quoted 1 line
I'm not sure why 64K was chosen for a value size limit.
Because changes to EAs are journalled. Hence there must be a bound size limit because log space is limited.
Cheers,
Dave.
Signature · 2 lines
Dave Chinner [email protected]
Quoted 17 lines · Dave Chinner
Quoted 6 lines · Timothy Shimmin
Hi Linda,
Quoted 3 lines · Linda A. Walsh
my man page says extended xfs attributes can have 256-byte names with up to 64K of data.
Quoted 9 lines
Quoted 5 lines
Is there a limit on the number of extended attributes max data size or name size?
I.e. could I have 1000 attributes with 64K of data each?
Yep.
Quoted 2 lines
Is there a strong reason why the file and data sizes were limited to 256/64K?
Quoted 7 lines
....
Quoted 1 line
I'm not sure why 64K was chosen for a value size limit.
Because changes to EAs are journalled. Hence there must be a bound size limit because log space is limited.
Yeah, good point.
Which I guess also reflects how we consider extended attributes to be more for metadata.
--Tim