conditionalize PCI reassign code
Subsystems (2)
PATCH 1/1 conditionalize PCI reassign code
... by a config option, selected only from privileged Xen configurations.
Also eliminate the pointless new macro ROUND_UP_TO_PAGESIZE().
Finally, I'm not really understanding the need for two command line options (reassigndev= and reassign_resources) here - wouldn't the former suffice? Specifying one without the other doesn't seem to make much sense...
As usual, written and tested on 2.6.27 and made apply to the 2.6.18 tree without further testing.
drivers/pci/Kconfig +3 -0
@@ -21,6 +21,9 @@ config PCI_MSI If you don't know what to do here, say N. +config PCI_REASSIGN + bool + config PCI_DEBUG bool "PCI Debugging" depends on PCI && DEBUG_KERNEL
drivers/pci/Makefile +2 -2
@@ -3,8 +3,8 @@ # obj-y += access.o bus.o probe.o remove.o pci.o quirks.o \ - pci-driver.o search.o pci-sysfs.o rom.o setup-res.o \ - reassigndev.o + pci-driver.o search.o pci-sysfs.o rom.o setup-res.o +obj-$(CONFIG_PCI_REASSIGN) += reassigndev.o obj-$(CONFIG_PROC_FS) += proc.o # Build PCI Express stuff if needed
drivers/pci/pci.h +5 -2
@@ -144,8 +144,11 @@ struct pci_slot_attribute {return NULL ; } -#define ROUND_UP_TO_PAGESIZE (size) ((size + PAGE_SIZE - 1) & ~(PAGE_SIZE - 1)) - +#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_REASSIGN extern int reassign_resources;extern int is_reassigndev (struct pci_dev *dev);extern void pci_update_bridge (struct pci_dev *dev,int resno); +#else +#define reassign_resources 0 +#define is_reassigndev (dev) 0 +#endif
drivers/pci/setup-bus.c +2 -3
@@ -354,9 +354,8 @@ static int pbus_size_mem(struct pci_buscontinue ; r_size = r->end - r->start +1 ; -if (reassign) { - r_size =ROUND_UP_TO_PAGESIZE (r_size); - } +if (reassign) + r_size =ALIGN (r_size,PAGE_SIZE );/* For bridges size != alignment */ align = (i <PCI_BRIDGE_RESOURCES ) ? r_size : r->start;
drivers/pci/setup-res.c +9 -5
@@ -126,7 +126,8 @@ pci_claim_resource(struct pci_dev *dev, }EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL (pci_claim_resource); -void +#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_REASSIGN +void pci_update_bridge (struct pci_dev *dev,int resno) {struct resource *res = &dev->resource[resno];
@@ -193,6 +194,7 @@ pci_update_bridge(struct pci_dev *dev, i break; } } +#endif int pci_assign_resource (struct pci_dev *dev,int resno) {
@@ -215,7 +217,7 @@ int pci_assign_resource(struct pci_dev * align = size;if ((reassigndev) && (res->flags &IORESOURCE_MEM )) { - align =ROUND_UP_TO_PAGESIZE (align); + align =ALIGN (align,PAGE_SIZE ); } }else { align = res->start;
@@ -242,9 +244,11 @@ int pci_assign_resource(struct pci_dev * resno, (unsigned long long )size, (unsigned long long)res->start, pci_name(dev)); }else if (resno <PCI_BRIDGE_RESOURCES ) { -printk (KERN_DEBUG "PCI: Assign resource(%d) on %s " -"%016llx - %016llx\n" , resno,pci_name (dev), - (u64 )res->start, (u64 )res->end); +if (reassign_resources &&is_reassigndev (dev)) +printk (KERN_DEBUG "PCI: Assign resource(%d) on %s " +"%016llx - %016llx\n" , resno,pci_name (dev), + (unsigned long long )res->start, + (unsigned long long )res->end);pci_update_resource (dev, res, resno); }
drivers/xen/Kconfig +1 -0
@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ menu "XEN" config XEN_PRIVILEGED_GUEST bool "Privileged Guest (domain 0)" + select PCI_REASSIGN if PCI help Support for privileged operation (domain 0)
Quoted 4 lines · On Tue, 14 Oct 2008 14:39:50 +0100 "Jan Beulich" <[email protected]> wrote:
Finally, I'm not really understanding the need for two command line options (reassigndev= and
reassign_resources) here - wouldn't the former suffice? Specifying one without the other doesn't seem to make much sense...
I agree with you that reassign_resources option is not needed.
I will submit the patch to remove it, after submitting the patch to fix the issue which was found by Zhao, Yu.
Thanks,
--
Yuji Shimada
Hello Yuji,
It would be great if you could submit your patch to the linux-pci. Since the native kernel (KVM) may also interested in this feature.
Thanks,
Yu
Quoted 22 lines · Yuji Shimada
Quoted 4 lines · On Tue, 14 Oct 2008 14:39:50 +0100 "Jan Beulich" <[email protected]> wrote:
Finally, I'm not really understanding the need for two command line options (reassigndev= and
reassign_resources) here - wouldn't the former suffice? Specifying one without the other doesn't seem to make much sense...I agree with you that
reassign_resourcesoption is not needed.I will submit the patch to remove it, after submitting the patch to fix the issue which was found by Zhao, Yu.
Thanks,
--
Yuji Shimada_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
There is build error (c/s 701) with this patch, please take a look.
Thanks.
Quoted 142 lines · Jan Beulich
... by a config option, selected only from privileged Xen configurations.
Also eliminate the pointless new macro
ROUND_UP_TO_PAGESIZE().Finally, I'm not really understanding the need for two command line options (reassigndev= and
reassign_resources) here - wouldn't the former suffice? Specifying one without the other doesn't seem to make much sense...As usual, written and tested on 2.6.27 and made apply to the 2.6.18 tree without further testing.
Signed-off-by Jan Beulich <[email protected]>Index: head-2008-10-13/drivers/pci/Kconfig
===================================================================drivers/pci/Kconfig 2008-10-13 15:14:53.000000000 +0200 renamed from drivers/pci/Kconfig 2008-10-13 15:11:33.000000000 +0200 +3
-0@@ -21,6 +21,9 @@ config PCI_MSI If you don't know what to do here, say N. +config PCI_REASSIGN + bool + config PCI_DEBUG bool "PCI Debugging" depends on PCI && DEBUG_KERNELIndex: head-2008-10-13/drivers/pci/Makefile
===================================================================drivers/pci/Makefile 2008-10-13 15:14:53.000000000 +0200 renamed from drivers/pci/Makefile 2008-10-13 15:11:33.000000000 +0200 +2
-2@@ -3,8 +3,8 @@ # obj-y += access.o bus.o probe.o remove.o pci.o quirks.o \ - pci-driver.o search.o pci-sysfs.o rom.o setup-res.o \ - reassigndev.o + pci-driver.o search.o pci-sysfs.o rom.o setup-res.o +obj-$(CONFIG_PCI_REASSIGN) += reassigndev.o obj-$(CONFIG_PROC_FS) += proc.o # Build PCI Express stuff if neededIndex:
head-2008-10-13/drivers/pci/pci.h
===================================================================drivers/pci/pci.h 2008-10-13 15:14:53.000000000 +0200 renamed from drivers/pci/pci.h 2008-10-13 15:11:33.000000000 +0200 +5
-2@@ -144,8 +144,11 @@ struct pci_slot_attribute { return NULL; } -#define ROUND_UP_TO_PAGESIZE(size) ((size + PAGE_SIZE - 1) & ~(PAGE_SIZE - 1)) - +#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_REASSIGN extern int reassign_resources; extern int is_reassigndev(struct pci_dev *dev); extern void pci_update_bridge(struct pci_dev *dev, int resno); +#else +#define reassign_resources 0 +#define is_reassigndev(dev) 0 +#endifIndex:
head-2008-10-13/drivers/pci/setup-bus.c
===================================================================drivers/pci/setup-bus.c 2008-10-13 15:14:53.000000000 +0200 renamed from drivers/pci/setup-bus.c 2008-10-13 15:11:33.000000000 +0200 +2
-3@@ -354,9 +354,8 @@ static int pbus_size_mem(struct pci_bus continue; r_size = r->end - r->start + 1; - if (reassign) { - r_size = ROUND_UP_TO_PAGESIZE(r_size); - } + if (reassign) + r_size = ALIGN(r_size, PAGE_SIZE); /* For bridges size != alignment */ align = (i < PCI_BRIDGE_RESOURCES) ? r_size : r->start;Index:
head-2008-10-13/drivers/pci/setup-res.c
===================================================================drivers/pci/setup-res.c 2008-10-13 15:14:53.000000000 +0200 renamed from drivers/pci/setup-res.c 2008-10-13 15:11:33.000000000 +0200 +9
-5@@ -126,7 +126,8 @@ pci_claim_resource(struct pci_dev *dev, } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pci_claim_resource); -void +#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_REASSIGN +void pci_update_bridge(struct pci_dev *dev, int resno) { struct resource *res = &dev->resource[resno];@@ -193,6 +194,7 @@ pci_update_bridge(struct pci_dev *dev, i break; } } +#endif int pci_assign_resource(struct pci_dev *dev, int resno) {@@ -215,7 +217,7 @@ int pci_assign_resource(struct pci_dev * align = size; if ((reassigndev) && (res->flags & IORESOURCE_MEM)) { - align = ROUND_UP_TO_PAGESIZE(align); + align = ALIGN(align, PAGE_SIZE); } } else { align = res->start;@@ -242,9 +244,11 @@ int pci_assign_resource(struct pci_dev * resno, (unsigned long long)size, (unsigned long long)res->start, pci_name(dev)); } else if (resno < PCI_BRIDGE_RESOURCES) { - printk(KERN_DEBUG "PCI: Assign resource(%d) on %s " - "%016llx - %016llx\n", resno, pci_name(dev), - (u64)res->start, (u64)res->end); + if (reassign_resources && is_reassigndev(dev)) + printk(KERN_DEBUG "PCI: Assign resource(%d) on %s " + "%016llx - %016llx\n", resno, pci_name(dev), + (unsigned long long)res->start, + (unsigned long long)res->end); pci_update_resource(dev, res, resno); }Index: head-2008-10-13/drivers/xen/Kconfig
===================================================================drivers/xen/Kconfig 2008-10-13 15:16:22.000000000 +0200 renamed from drivers/xen/Kconfig 2008-10-13 15:14:34.000000000 +0200 +1
-0@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ menu "XEN" config XEN_PRIVILEGED_GUEST bool "Privileged Guest (domain 0)" + select PCI_REASSIGN if PCI help Support for privileged operation (domain 0)_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
Quoted 2 lines
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
"Zhao, Yu" <[email protected]> 17.10.08 04:43 >>>
There is build error (c/s 701) with this patch, please take a look.
This is why I always include
Quoted 2 lines
Quoted 2 lines
As usual, written and tested on 2.6.27 and made apply to the 2.6.18 tree without further testing.
I'm making a best effort attempt at getting things in proper state for that tree, but time-wise can't afford full validation. But I always assumed that if this appears in the real (not the staging) tree, it at least survived building in Citrix' trees - is that not correct, Keir?
As you observed the build error - why don't you provide at least the error the compiler generated? That might make it possible to provide a fix quickly.
Jan
Quoted 7 lines · Jan Beulich
Quoted 2 lines
Quoted 2 lines
As usual, written and tested on 2.6.27 and made apply to the 2.6.18 tree without further testing.
I'm making a best effort attempt at getting things in proper state for that tree, but time-wise can't afford full validation. But I always assumed that if this appears in the real (not the staging) tree, it at least survived building in Citrix' trees - is that not correct, Keir?
Yes, but obviously only one configuration is tested. If this build failure is with CONFIG_PCI_REASSIGN we would not pick that up unless it's in the default buildconfig.
-- Keir
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
Keir Fraser <[email protected]> 17.10.08 09:22 >>>
Quoted 3 lines · Jan Beulich
Quoted 2 lines
Quoted 2 lines
As usual, written and tested on 2.6.27 and made apply to the 2.6.18 tree without further testing.
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 4 lines
I'm making a best effort attempt at getting things in proper state for that tree, but time-wise can't afford full validation. But I always assumed that if this appears in the real (not the staging) tree, it at least survived building in Citrix' trees - is that not correct, Keir?
Yes, but obviously only one configuration is tested. If this build failure is with
CONFIG_PCI_REASSIGNwe would not pick that up unless it's in the default buildconfig.
CONFIG_PCI_REASSIGN is not a user-visible option, it gets selected from XEN_PRIVILEGED_GUEST. So as long as your builds include a Dom0 kernel build, they'd cover this case.
Jan
Quoted 8 lines · Jan Beulich
Quoted 2 lines
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
"Zhao, Yu" <[email protected]> 17.10.08 04:43 >>>
There is build error (c/s 701) with this patch, please take a look.
This is why I always include
Quoted 2 lines
Quoted 2 lines
As usual, written and tested on 2.6.27 and made apply to the 2.6.18 tree without further testing.
Quoted 8 lines
I'm making a best effort attempt at getting things in proper state for that tree, but time-wise can't afford full validation. But I always assumed that if this appears in the real (not the staging) tree, it at least survived building in Citrix' trees - is that not correct, Keir?
As you observed the build error - why don't you provide at least the error the compiler generated? That might make it possible to provide a fix quickly.
+#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_REASSIGN
extern int reassign_resources;
extern int is_reassigndev(struct pci_dev *dev); extern void pci_update_bridge(struct pci_dev *dev, int resno);
+#else
+#define reassign_resources 0
+#define is_reassigndev(dev) 0
+#endif
When the CONFIG_PCI_REASSIGN is not set, e.g., a domU kernel, the following line fails to be compiled (drivers/pci/quirks.c):
int reassign_resources = 0;
Quoted 3 lines
Jan
Quoted 13 lines · Yu
Quoted 3 lines
As you observed the build error - why don't you provide at least the error the compiler generated? That might make it possible to provide a fix quickly.
drivers/pci/pci.h +5
-0+#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_REASSIGN extern int reassign_resources;extern int is_reassigndev (struct pci_dev *dev);extern void pci_update_bridge (struct pci_dev *dev,int resno); +#else +#define reassign_resources 0 +#define is_reassigndev (dev) 0 +#endif
Quoted 4 lines
When the
CONFIG_PCI_REASSIGNis not set, e.g., a domU kernel, the following line fails to be compiled (drivers/pci/quirks.c):int
reassign_resources= 0;
Ah, the automated tests only build the -xen config.
-- Keir
Quoted 16 lines · Keir Fraser
Quoted 12 lines · Yu
Quoted 3 lines
As you observed the build error - why don't you provide at least the error the compiler generated? That might make it possible to provide a fix quickly.
drivers/pci/pci.h +5
-0+#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_REASSIGN extern int reassign_resources;extern int is_reassigndev (struct pci_dev *dev);extern void pci_update_bridge (struct pci_dev *dev,int resno); +#else +#define reassign_resources 0 +#define is_reassigndev (dev) 0 +#endif
Quoted 10 lines
Quoted 4 lines
When the
CONFIG_PCI_REASSIGNis not set, e.g., a domU kernel, the following line fails to be compiled (drivers/pci/quirks.c):int
reassign_resources= 0;Ah, the automated tests only build the -xen config.
-- Keir
Actually I happened to get it by misusing a native kernel config ...
Quoted 10 lines
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
"Zhao, Yu" <[email protected]> 17.10.08 09:27 >>>
(quoted diff) +5
-0+#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_REASSIGN extern int reassign_resources; extern int is_reassigndev(struct pci_dev *dev); extern void pci_update_bridge(struct pci_dev *dev, int resno); +#else +#define reassign_resources 0 +#define is_reassigndev(dev) 0 +#endif
Quoted 4 lines
When the
CONFIG_PCI_REASSIGNis not set, e.g., a domU kernel, the following line fails to be compiled (drivers/pci/quirks.c):int
reassign_resources= 0;
Ah, yes, I overlooked that, because when I merged these changes into our kernel the main change to quirks.c needed to be done differently (and then properly in reassigndev.c) anyway, and hence I at once moved the misplaced (and as we agreed elsewhere unnecessary) option into reassigndev.c. So the (untested) patch below should fix it until the patch to eliminate the option will arrive from the original submitter.
drivers/pci/quirks.c +0 -13
@@ -33,19 +33,6 @@ }__setup ("pci-mem-align" , set_pci_mem_align); - -int reassign_resources =0 ; - -static int __init set_reassign_resources (char *str) -{ -/* resources reassign on */ - reassign_resources =1 ; -printk (KERN_DEBUG "PCI: resource reassign ON.\n" ); - -return 1 ; -} -__setup ("reassign_resources" , set_reassign_resources); -/* This quirk function enables us to force all memory resources which are * assigned to PCI devices, to be page-aligned. */
drivers/pci/reassigndev.c +12 -0
@@ -34,6 +34,18 @@ static int pbus_size_mem(struct pci_bus }__setup ("reassigndev=" , reassigndev_setup); +int reassign_resources =0 ; + +static int __init set_reassign_resources (char *str) +{ +/* resources reassign on */ + reassign_resources =1 ; +printk (KERN_DEBUG "PCI: resource reassign ON.\n" ); + +return 1 ; +} +__setup ("reassign_resources" , set_reassign_resources); +int is_reassigndev (struct pci_dev *dev) {char dev_str[TOKEN_MAX +1 ];