Skip to contentSkip to conversation

ALSA: HDSP: check for io box before uploading firmware

PATCH In review Tim Blechmann 3 participants 3 messages Nov 8, 2008 – Nov 10, 2008 Sound

lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw

PATCH 1/1 ALSA: HDSP: check for io box before uploading firmware

currently the hdsp driver tries to upload the firmware, even if the io box is not connected. this patch adds a check for the io box before trying to upload the firmware.
thus instead of messages complaining about the fifo status and firmware loading failure, the driver gives a message that no multiface or digiface is connected.

---
 sound/pci/rme9652/hdsp.c |    5 ++++-
 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
sound/pci/rme9652/hdsp.c +4 -1
index d723543..cf9eb41 100644
@@ -5045,6 +5045,9 @@ static int __devinit snd_hdsp_create(struct snd_card *card,
 		/* we wait 2 seconds to let freshly inserted cardbus cards do their hardware init */
 		ssleep(2);
 
+		if ((err = hdsp_check_for_iobox(hdsp)) < 0)
+			return err;
+
 		if ((hdsp_read (hdsp, HDSP_statusRegister) & HDSP_DllError) != 0) {
 #ifdef HDSP_FW_LOADER
 			if ((err = hdsp_request_fw_loader(hdsp)) < 0)
@@ -5057,7 +5060,7 @@ static int __devinit snd_hdsp_create(struct snd_card *card,
 				/* init is complete, we return */
 				return 0;
 #endif
-			/* no iobox connected, we defer initialization */
+			/* we defer initialization */
 			snd_printk(KERN_INFO "Hammerfall-DSP: card initialization pending : waiting for firmware\n");
 			if ((err = snd_hdsp_create_hwdep(card, hdsp)) < 0)
 				return err;
Signature · 1 line
1.5.6.3

_______________________________________________
Alsa-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel

#1 lore raw

Some questions on snd_kontrol_new

Could someone get me some insight into the snd_kontrol_new? I'm especially interested in the "private_value" and "index" field. At least in usb_mixer.c it seems to me like private_value is used as the index!? If that's the case, when should index be used and when private_value?
Is there any special convention for the string of "name" field?

#2 lore raw

Re: Some questions on snd_kontrol_new

Quoted 5 lines · LCID Fire

Could someone get me some insight into the snd_kontrol_new? I'm especially interested in the "private_value" and "index" field. At least in usb_mixer.c it seems to me like private_value is used as the index!? If that's the case, when should index be used and when private_value?

The index field is used when several controls have the same name.

The private_value field can be used by drivers for any purpose.

The functions for the Audigy 2 NX's LEDs store the LED number in the private_value field so that the same function can be used for all three LEDs without having to look at the control name.

Quoted 1 line

Is there any special convention for the string of "name" field?

linux/Documentation/sound/alsa/ControlNames.txt

HTH
Clemens