um: Kill directly reference of netdev->priv
Subsystems (3)
PATCH 1/1 um: Kill directly reference of netdev->priv
Simply replace netdev->priv with netdev_priv().
Not do compile test, because no such arch.
Signed-off-by Wang Chen <[email protected]>
--- arch/um/drivers/daemon_kern.c | 2 +- arch/um/drivers/mcast_kern.c | 2 +- arch/um/drivers/net_kern.c | 22 +++++++++++----------- arch/um/drivers/pcap_kern.c | 2 +- arch/um/drivers/slip_kern.c | 2 +- arch/um/drivers/slirp_kern.c | 2 +- arch/um/drivers/vde_kern.c | 2 +- arch/um/os-Linux/drivers/ethertap_kern.c | 2 +- arch/um/os-Linux/drivers/tuntap_kern.c | 2 +- 9 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
arch/um/drivers/daemon_kern.c +1 -1
@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ static void daemon_init(struct net_device *dev, void *data)struct daemon_data *dpri;struct daemon_init *init = data; - pri = dev->priv; + pri =netdev_priv (dev); dpri = (struct daemon_data *) pri->user; dpri->sock_type = init->sock_type; dpri->ctl_sock = init->ctl_sock;
arch/um/drivers/mcast_kern.c +1 -1
@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ static void mcast_init(struct net_device *dev, void *data)struct mcast_data *dpri;struct mcast_init *init = data; - pri = dev->priv; + pri =netdev_priv (dev); dpri = (struct mcast_data *) pri->user; dpri->addr = init->addr; dpri->port = init->port;
arch/um/drivers/net_kern.c +11 -11
@@ -76,7 +76,7 @@ out:static int uml_net_rx (struct net_device *dev) { -struct uml_net_private *lp = dev->priv; +struct uml_net_private *lp =netdev_priv (dev);int pkt_len;struct sk_buff *skb;
@@ -119,7 +119,7 @@ static void uml_dev_close(struct work_struct *work)static irqreturn_t uml_net_interrupt (int irq,void *dev_id) {struct net_device *dev = dev_id; -struct uml_net_private *lp = dev->priv; +struct uml_net_private *lp =netdev_priv (dev);int err;if (!netif_running (dev))
@@ -150,7 +150,7 @@ out:static int uml_net_open (struct net_device *dev) { -struct uml_net_private *lp = dev->priv; +struct uml_net_private *lp =netdev_priv (dev);int err;if (lp->fd >=0 ) {
@@ -195,7 +195,7 @@ out:static int uml_net_close (struct net_device *dev) { -struct uml_net_private *lp = dev->priv; +struct uml_net_private *lp =netdev_priv (dev);netif_stop_queue (dev);
@@ -213,7 +213,7 @@ static int uml_net_close(struct net_device *dev)static int uml_net_start_xmit (struct sk_buff *skb,struct net_device *dev) { -struct uml_net_private *lp = dev->priv; +struct uml_net_private *lp =netdev_priv (dev);unsigned long flags;int len;
@@ -250,7 +250,7 @@ static int uml_net_start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev)static struct net_device_stats *uml_net_get_stats (struct net_device *dev) { -struct uml_net_private *lp = dev->priv; +struct uml_net_private *lp =netdev_priv (dev);return &lp->stats; }
@@ -267,7 +267,7 @@ static void uml_net_tx_timeout(struct net_device *dev)static int uml_net_set_mac (struct net_device *dev,void *addr) { -struct uml_net_private *lp = dev->priv; +struct uml_net_private *lp =netdev_priv (dev);struct sockaddr *hwaddr = addr;spin_lock_irq (&lp->lock);
@@ -368,7 +368,7 @@ static void net_device_release(struct device *dev) {struct uml_net *device = dev->driver_data;struct net_device *netdev = device->dev; -struct uml_net_private *lp = netdev->priv; +struct uml_net_private *lp =netdev_priv (netdev);if (lp->remove !=NULL ) (*lp->remove)(&lp->user);
@@ -420,7 +420,7 @@ static void eth_configure(int n, void *init, char *mac,printk (KERN_INFO "Netdevice %d (%pM) : " , n, device->mac); - lp = dev->priv; + lp =netdev_priv (dev);/* This points to the transport private data. It's still clear, but we * must memset it to 0 *now*. Let's help the drivers. */ memset (lp,0 , size);
@@ -730,7 +730,7 @@ static int net_remove(int n, char **error_out)return -ENODEV ; dev = device->dev; - lp = dev->priv; + lp =netdev_priv (dev);if (lp->fd >0 )return -EBUSY ;unregister_netdev (dev);
@@ -761,7 +761,7 @@ static int uml_inetaddr_event(struct notifier_block *this, unsigned long event,if (dev->open != uml_net_open)return NOTIFY_DONE ; - lp = dev->priv; + lp =netdev_priv (dev); proc =NULL ;switch (event) {
arch/um/drivers/pcap_kern.c +1 -1
@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ void pcap_init(struct net_device *dev, void *data)struct pcap_data *ppri;struct pcap_init *init = data; - pri = dev->priv; + pri =netdev_priv (dev); ppri = (struct pcap_data *) pri->user; ppri->host_if = init->host_if; ppri->promisc = init->promisc;
arch/um/drivers/slip_kern.c +1 -1
@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ static void slip_init(struct net_device *dev, void *data)struct slip_data *spri;struct slip_init *init = data; - private = dev->priv; + private =netdev_priv (dev); spri = (struct slip_data *) private->user;memset (spri->name,0 ,sizeof (spri->name));
arch/um/drivers/slirp_kern.c +1 -1
@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ void slirp_init(struct net_device *dev, void *data)struct slirp_init *init = data;int i; - private = dev->priv; + private =netdev_priv (dev); spri = (struct slirp_data *) private->user; spri->argw = init->argw;
arch/um/drivers/vde_kern.c +1 -1
@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ static void vde_init(struct net_device *dev, void *data)struct uml_net_private *pri;struct vde_data *vpri; - pri = dev->priv; + pri =netdev_priv (dev); vpri = (struct vde_data *) pri->user; vpri->vde_switch = init->vde_switch;
arch/um/os-Linux/drivers/ethertap_kern.c +1 -1
@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ static void etap_init(struct net_device *dev, void *data)struct ethertap_data *epri;struct ethertap_init *init = data; - pri = dev->priv; + pri =netdev_priv (dev); epri = (struct ethertap_data *) pri->user; epri->dev_name = init->dev_name; epri->gate_addr = init->gate_addr;
arch/um/os-Linux/drivers/tuntap_kern.c +1 -1
@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ static void tuntap_init(struct net_device *dev, void *data)struct tuntap_data *tpri;struct tuntap_init *init = data; - pri = dev->priv; + pri =netdev_priv (dev); tpri = (struct tuntap_data *) pri->user; tpri->dev_name = init->dev_name; tpri->fixed_config = (init->dev_name !=NULL );
Signature · 1 line
1.5.3.4
From: Wang Chen <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2008 20:56:32 +0800
Quoted 5 lines
Simply replace
netdev->privwithnetdev_priv().Not do compile test, because no such arch.
Signed-off-by Wang Chen <[email protected]>
Applied.
But, you don't need a special cpu or machine type to compile these, "um" is "user-mode" Linux. You should be able to build that on plain x86 just fine.