Auto-response for your message to the "linux-dvb" mailing list
A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): [email protected]
Quoted 4 lines · [email protected] wrote:
This ML is deprecated. Please use [email protected] instead. For more info about [email protected], please read:
http://vger.kernel.org/vger-lists.html#linux-media
Since when???
I thought we were going to have separate -user and -devel mailing lists? Now three separate mailing lists are being folded into one?!?!?
Quoted 6 lines · On Sun, 18 Jan 2009 13:10:02 -0500 Michael Krufky <[email protected]> wrote:
Quoted 4 lines · [email protected] wrote:
This ML is deprecated. Please use [email protected] instead. For more info about [email protected], please read:
http://vger.kernel.org/vger-lists.html#linux-mediaSince when???
Please see the discussions about that at:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.drivers.video-input-infrastructure/420
Quoted 2 lines
I thought we were going to have separate -user and -devel mailing lists? Now three separate mailing lists are being folded into one?!?!?
If there are enough user-only threads and enough users intended to have discussions that aren't interesting for developers, nor needs developers answers, then, we can create later a v4l-dvb-users ML.
However, what I've seen since the creation of linux-media is that the discussions on linux-dvb are interesting also for developers, and are posted there, instead of linux-media, just because people were still thinking that such discussions should be handled there.
For now, it seems better to focus everything into one ML.
Someone proposed to send a daily email asking for people at linux-dvb to use linux-media instead, but this is a sort of unsolicited bulk email (aka: SPAM). It is better to warn just the ones that are still posting at linux-dvb about the changes.
Signature · 2 lines
Cheers, Mauro