Skip to contentSkip to conversation

statistic module

DISCUSSION John Lister 1 participant 2 messages Feb 26, 2009

lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw

with the old nth module you could specify a counter to use allowing you to have multiple overlapping counts.

Is this possible with the new statistic module? If not is there a way round it?

Thanks

Signature · 1 line
Got needs? Get Goblin'! - http://www.pricegoblin.co.uk/
#1 lore raw

Statistic module nth problem

I've played with the nth function of the statistic module and i can't seem to get it to work, This mirrors a previous post where it matches each entry once and then doesn't match any more...

looking at the source code makes me surprised it does this unless i've misunderstood completely...

from /net/netfilter/xt_statistic.c

static bool
statistic_mt(const struct sk_buff *skb, const struct net_device *in,
const struct net_device *out, const struct xt_match *match, const void *matchinfo, int offset, unsigned int protoff, bool *hotdrop)
{
struct xt_statistic_info *info = (struct xt_statistic_info *)matchinfo; bool ret = info->flags & XT_STATISTIC_INVERT;

switch (info->mode) {
case XT_STATISTIC_MODE_RANDOM:
if ((net_random() & 0x7FFFFFFF) < info->u.random.probability)

     ret = !ret;
     break;
   case XT_STATISTIC_MODE_NTH:
     info = info->master;
     spin_lock_bh(&nth_lock);
     if (info->u.nth.count++ == info->u.nth.every) {
       info->u.nth.count = 0;
       ret = !ret;
     }
     spin_unlock_bh(&nth_lock);
     break;

}

return ret;
}

The second case should look like this - or have i missed something?
case XT_STATISTIC_MODE_NTH:

     info = info->master;
     spin_lock_bh(&nth_lock);
     if (info->u.nth.count == info->u.nth.packet) {
       ret=!ret;
     }
     if (info->u.nth.count++ == info->u.nth.every) {
       info->u.nth.count = 0;
     }
     spin_unlock_bh(&nth_lock);
     break;

I'll submit a patch if anyone agrees and i'll also add stuff to handle multiple counts - why was this removed????

Thanks