cgroups: show correct file mode
Subsystems (2)
cover cgroups: show correct file mode
Now a cgroup subsystem can set default file mode of its control files, so here is a patchset to correct file mode of each subsystem's files.
Should be applied after:
cgroup-allow-subsys-to-set-default-mode-of-its-own-file.patch
[PATCH 1/4] cgroup debug: show correct file mode
[PATCH 2/4] cpuacct: show correct file mode
[PATCH 3/4] devcgroup: show correct file mode
[PATCH 4/4] cpuset: show correct file mode
PATCH 1/4 cgroup debug: show correct file mode
All control files in debug subsystem are read-only.
--- kernel/cgroup_debug.c | 5 +++++ 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
kernel/cgroup_debug.c +5 -0
@@ -71,25 +71,30 @@ static struct cftype files[] = { { .name = "cgroup_refcount", .read_u64 = cgroup_refcount_read, + .mode = 0444, }, { .name = "taskcount", .read_u64 = taskcount_read, + .mode = 0444, }, { .name = "current_css_set", .read_u64 = current_css_set_read, + .mode = 0444, }, { .name = "current_css_set_refcount", .read_u64 = current_css_set_refcount_read, + .mode = 0444, }, { .name = "releasable", .read_u64 = releasable_read, + .mode = 0444, }, };
-- 1.5.4.rc3
PATCH 2/4 cpuacct: show correct file mode
In reply to Li Zefancpuacct.usage_percpu is read-only.
--- kernel/sched.c | 1 + 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
kernel/sched.c +1 -0
@@ -9734,6 +9734,7 @@ static struct cftype files[] = { { .name = "usage_percpu", .read_seq_string = cpuacct_percpu_seq_read, + .mode = 0444, }, };
-- 1.5.4.rc3
PATCH 3/4 devcgroup: show correct file mode
In reply to Li Zefandevices.allow and devices.deny are write-only, and devices.list is read-only.
--- security/device_cgroup.c | 3 +++ 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
security/device_cgroup.c +3 -0
@@ -439,16 +439,19 @@ static struct cftype dev_cgroup_files[] = { .name = "allow", .write_string = devcgroup_access_write, .private = DEVCG_ALLOW, + .mode = 0200, }, { .name = "deny", .write_string = devcgroup_access_write, .private = DEVCG_DENY, + .mode = 0200, }, { .name = "list", .read_seq_string = devcgroup_seq_read, .private = DEVCG_LIST, + .mode = 0444, }, };
-- 1.5.4.rc3
A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): [email protected]
Serge E. Hallyn
Acked-byRe: [PATCH 3/4] devcgroup: show correct file mode
Quoted 3 lines · Li Zefan
devices.allow and devices.deny are write-only, and devices.list is read-only.
Signed-off-by Li Zefan <[email protected]>
Yup that should be intuitive for people.
thanks,
-serge
Quoted 29 lines
--- security/device_cgroup.c | 3 +++ 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)security/device_cgroup.c +3
-1@@ -439,16 +439,19 @@ static struct cftype dev_cgroup_files[] = { .name = "allow", .write_string = devcgroup_access_write, .private = DEVCG_ALLOW, + .mode = 0200, }, { .name = "deny", .write_string = devcgroup_access_write, .private = DEVCG_DENY, + .mode = 0200, }, { .name = "list", .read_seq_string = devcgroup_seq_read, .private = DEVCG_LIST, + .mode = 0444, }, }; -- 1.5.4.rc3
Re: [PATCH 3/4] devcgroup: show correct file mode
In reply to Li ZefanQuoted 3 lines · Li Zefan
devices.allow and devices.deny are write-only, and devices.list is read-only.
Signed-off-by Li Zefan <[email protected]>
Yup that should be intuitive for people.
thanks,
-serge
Quoted 29 lines
--- security/device_cgroup.c | 3 +++ 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)security/device_cgroup.c +3
-1@@ -439,16 +439,19 @@ static struct cftype dev_cgroup_files[] = { .name = "allow", .write_string = devcgroup_access_write, .private = DEVCG_ALLOW, + .mode = 0200, }, { .name = "deny", .write_string = devcgroup_access_write, .private = DEVCG_DENY, + .mode = 0200, }, { .name = "list", .read_seq_string = devcgroup_seq_read, .private = DEVCG_LIST, + .mode = 0444, }, }; -- 1.5.4.rc3
PATCH 4/4 cpuset: show correct file mode
In reply to Li Zefancpuset.memory_pressure is read-only.
--- kernel/cpuset.c | 1 + 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
kernel/cpuset.c +1 -0
@@ -1671,6 +1671,7 @@ static struct cftype files[] = { .read_u64 = cpuset_read_u64, .write_u64 = cpuset_write_u64, .private = FILE_MEMORY_MIGRATE, + .mode = 0444, }, {
-- 1.5.4.rc3
A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): [email protected]
PATCH 3/4 devcgroup: show correct file mode
devices.allow and devices.deny are write-only, and devices.list is read-only.
--- security/device_cgroup.c | 3 +++ 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
security/device_cgroup.c +3 -0
@@ -439,16 +439,19 @@ static struct cftype dev_cgroup_files[] = { .name = "allow", .write_string = devcgroup_access_write, .private = DEVCG_ALLOW, + .mode = 0200, }, { .name = "deny", .write_string = devcgroup_access_write, .private = DEVCG_DENY, + .mode = 0200, }, { .name = "list", .read_seq_string = devcgroup_seq_read, .private = DEVCG_LIST, + .mode = 0444, }, };
-- 1.5.4.rc3
PATCH 4/4 cpuset: show correct file mode
In reply to a message not in the archivecpuset.memory_pressure is read-only.
--- kernel/cpuset.c | 1 + 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
kernel/cpuset.c +1 -0
@@ -1671,6 +1671,7 @@ static struct cftype files[] = { .read_u64 = cpuset_read_u64, .write_u64 = cpuset_write_u64, .private = FILE_MEMORY_MIGRATE, + .mode = 0444, }, {
-- 1.5.4.rc3
Quoted 2 lines · Li Zefan
Now a cgroup subsystem can set default file mode of its control files, so here is a patchset to correct file mode of each subsystem's files.
I really think that we should be defaulting this based on whether the control file has read or write handlers.
Sure, there are special cases like "tasks" that we'd need to set a manual value for, but most of these patches would be unnecessary.
Paul
Quoted 10 lines
Should be applied after:
cgroup-allow-subsys-to-set-default-mode-of-its-own-file.patch[PATCH 1/4] cgroup debug: show correct file mode
[PATCH 2/4] cpuacct: show correct file mode
[PATCH 3/4] devcgroup: show correct file mode
[PATCH 4/4] cpuset: show correct file mode
Quoted 2 lines · Li Zefan
Now a cgroup subsystem can set default file mode of its control files, so here is a patchset to correct file mode of each subsystem's files.
I really think that we should be defaulting this based on whether the control file has read or write handlers.
Sure, there are special cases like "tasks" that we'd need to set a manual value for, but most of these patches would be unnecessary.
Paul
Quoted 10 lines
Should be applied after:
cgroup-allow-subsys-to-set-default-mode-of-its-own-file.patch[PATCH 1/4] cgroup debug: show correct file mode
[PATCH 2/4] cpuacct: show correct file mode
[PATCH 3/4] devcgroup: show correct file mode
[PATCH 4/4] cpuset: show correct file mode
A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): 6599ad830903021019p3b29c173oc7772af6679d90e0-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org
Quoted 10 lines · On Mon, 2 Mar 2009 10:19:15 -0800 Paul Menage…
Quoted 2 lines · Li Zefan
Now a cgroup subsystem can set default file mode of its control files, so here is a patchset to correct file mode of each subsystem's files.
I really think that we should be defaulting this based on whether the control file has read or write handlers.
Sure, there are special cases like "tasks" that we'd need to set a manual value for, but most of these patches would be unnecessary.
like this ?
int mode; if (cft->mode) mode = cft->mode; else if (cft->write_xxx || .....) mode = 0644; else mode = 0444;
Thanks,
-Kame
Quoted 10 lines · On Mon, 2 Mar 2009 10:19:15 -0800 Paul Menage <[email protected]> wrote:
Quoted 2 lines · Li Zefan
Now a cgroup subsystem can set default file mode of its control files, so here is a patchset to correct file mode of each subsystem's files.
I really think that we should be defaulting this based on whether the control file has read or write handlers.
Sure, there are special cases like "tasks" that we'd need to set a manual value for, but most of these patches would be unnecessary.
like this ?
int mode; if (cft->mode) mode = cft->mode; else if (cft->write_xxx || .....) mode = 0644; else mode = 0444;
Thanks,
-Kame
A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): 20090303090950.60cea53a.kamezawa.hiroyu-+CUm20s59erQFUHtdCDX3A@public.gmane.org
Quoted 8 lines · KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
int mode;
if (cft->mode)
mode = cft->mode;
else if (cft->write_xxx || .....)
mode = 0644;
else
mode = 0444;Almost:
int mode;
if (cft->mode) {
mode = cft->mode;
} else {
if (cft->write_xxx || ....)
mode |= 0600;
if (cft->read_xxx || ...)
mode |= 0444;
}Paul
Quoted 8 lines · KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
int mode;
if (cft->mode)
mode = cft->mode;
else if (cft->write_xxx || .....)
mode = 0644;
else
mode = 0444;Almost:
int mode;
if (cft->mode) {
mode = cft->mode;
} else {
if (cft->write_xxx || ....)
mode |= 0600;
if (cft->read_xxx || ...)
mode |= 0444;
}Paul
Quoted 18 lines · On Mon, 2 Mar 2009 16:15:51 -0800 Paul Menage…
Quoted 8 lines · KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
int mode; if (cft->mode) mode = cft->mode; else if (cft->write_xxx || .....) mode = 0644; else mode = 0444;Almost:
int mode;
if (cft->mode) {
mode =cft->mode;
} else {
if (cft->write_xxx|| ....)
Quoted 5 lines
mode |= 0600;
if (cft->read_xxx || ...)
mode |= 0444;
}Oh, I see. But int mode=0, at first ;)
I have no objections but please forgive subsys to set mode=0644 explicitly.
Thanks,
-Kame
A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): 20090303092021.93e69b96.kamezawa.hiroyu-+CUm20s59erQFUHtdCDX3A@public.gmane.org
Quoted 11 lines · KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
Quoted 11 lines
int mode;
if (cft->mode) {
mode =cft->mode;
} else {
if (cft->write_xxx|| ....)mode |= 0600; if (cft->read_xxx || ...) mode |= 0444; }
Quoted 1 line
Oh, I see. But int mode=0, at first ;)
Oops, yes.
Quoted 1 line
I have no objections but please forgive subsys to set mode=0644 explicitly.
Do you mean "allow" rather than "forgive"? if so, then yes, a subsystem should be able to override this to whatever it wants.
Paul
Quoted 12 lines · KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
Quoted 9 lines · On Mon, 2 Mar 2009 16:15:51 -0800 Paul Menage…
Quoted 7 lines · KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
int mode; if (cft->mode) mode = cft->mode; else if (cft->write_xxx || .....) mode = 0644; else mode = 0444;
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 8 lines
Almost:
int mode;
if (cft->mode) {
mode =cft->mode;
} else {
if (cft->write_xxx|| ....)mode |= 0600;
0200 ?
Quoted 14 lines
Quoted 4 lines
if (
cft->read_xxx|| ...)mode |= 0444; }Oh, I see. But int mode=0, at first ;)
I have no objections but please forgive subsys to set mode=0644 explicitly.Thanks,
-Kame_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list Containers-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
Quoted 11 lines · KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
Quoted 11 lines
int mode;
if (cft->mode) {
mode =cft->mode;
} else {
if (cft->write_xxx|| ....)mode |= 0600; if (cft->read_xxx || ...) mode |= 0444; }
Quoted 1 line
Oh, I see. But int mode=0, at first ;)
Oops, yes.
Quoted 1 line
I have no objections but please forgive subsys to set mode=0644 explicitly.
Do you mean "allow" rather than "forgive"? if so, then yes, a subsystem should be able to override this to whatever it wants.
Paul
Quoted 12 lines · KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
Quoted 9 lines · On Mon, 2 Mar 2009 16:15:51 -0800 Paul Menage <[email protected]> wrote:
Quoted 7 lines · KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
int mode; if (cft->mode) mode = cft->mode; else if (cft->write_xxx || .....) mode = 0644; else mode = 0444;
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 8 lines
Almost:
int mode;
if (cft->mode) {
mode =cft->mode;
} else {
if (cft->write_xxx|| ....)mode |= 0600;
0200 ?
Quoted 14 lines
Quoted 4 lines
if (
cft->read_xxx|| ...)mode |= 0444; }Oh, I see. But int mode=0, at first ;)
I have no objections but please forgive subsys to set mode=0644 explicitly.Thanks,
-Kame_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): [email protected]
Quoted 4 lines · Mike Waychison
Quoted 2 lines
Quoted 2 lines
if (
cft->write_xxx|| ....)
mode |= 0600;0200 ?
Oops (again). Yes, that's what I meant. Coding in email considered harmful :-)
Paul
Quoted 4 lines · Mike Waychison
Quoted 2 lines
Quoted 2 lines
if (
cft->write_xxx|| ....)
mode |= 0600;0200 ?
Oops (again). Yes, that's what I meant. Coding in email considered harmful :-)
Paul
Quoted 10 lines · Paul Menage
Quoted 2 lines · Li Zefan
Now a cgroup subsystem can set default file mode of its control files, so here is a patchset to correct file mode of each subsystem's files.
I really think that we should be defaulting this based on whether the control file has read or write handlers.
Sure, there are special cases like "tasks" that we'd need to set a manual value for, but most of these patches would be unnecessary.
Those patches are small and trivial, but it's ok for me to do this automatically. How about below patch.
Note cpuset.memory_pressure is read-only though it has read handler. Since if the read handler is removed, it'll return EINVAL instead of the current EACCESS, I think it's better to leave as it is.
=====================
cgroups: show correct file mode
--- include/linux/cgroup.h | 5 +++++ kernel/cgroup.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ kernel/cpuset.c | 1 + 3 files changed, 36 insertions(+)
include/linux/cgroup.h +5 -0
@@ -258,6 +258,11 @@ struct cftype {*/ char name[MAX_CFTYPE_NAME ];int private; +/* +* If not 0, file mode is set to this value, otherwise it will +* be figured out automatically +*/ +int mode;/* * If non-zero, defines the maximum length of string that can
kernel/cgroup.c +30 -0
@@ -1750,6 +1750,33 @@ static int cgroup_create_dir(struct cgroup *cgrp, struct dentry *dentry,return error; } +/** +* cgroup_file_mode - deduce file mode of a control file +* @cft: the control file in question +* +* returns cftype->mode if ->mode is not 0 +* returns 0644 if it has both a read and a write handler +* returns 0444 if it has only a read handler +* returns 0200 if it has only a write hander +*/ +static int cgroup_file_mode (const struct cftype *cft) +{ +int mode =0 ; + +if (cft->mode) +return cft->mode; + +if (cft->read || cft->read_u64 || cft->read_s64 || + cft->read_map || cft->read_seq_string) + mode +=0444 ; + +if (cft->write || cft->write_u64 || cft->write_s64 || + cft->write_string || cft->trigger) + mode +=0200 ; + +return mode; +} +int cgroup_add_file (struct cgroup *cgrp,struct cgroup_subsys *subsys,const struct cftype *cft)
@@ -1757,6 +1784,7 @@ int cgroup_add_file(struct cgroup *cgrp,struct dentry *dir = cgrp->dentry;struct dentry *dentry;int error; +int mode;char name[MAX_CGROUP_TYPE_NAMELEN +MAX_CFTYPE_NAME +2 ] = {0 };if (subsys && !test_bit (ROOT_NOPREFIX , &cgrp->root->flags)) {
@@ -1767,6 +1795,7 @@ int cgroup_add_file(struct cgroup *cgrp,BUG_ON (!mutex_is_locked (&dir->d_inode->i_mutex)); dentry =lookup_one_len (name, dir,strlen (name));if (!IS_ERR (dentry)) { + mode =cgroup_file_mode (cft); error =cgroup_create_file (dentry,0644 |S_IFREG , cgrp->root->sb);if (!error)
@@ -2349,6 +2378,7 @@ static struct cftype files[] = { .write_u64 = cgroup_tasks_write, .release = cgroup_tasks_release, .private = FILE_TASKLIST, + .mode = 0644, }, {
kernel/cpuset.c +1 -0
@@ -1678,6 +1678,7 @@ static struct cftype files[] = { .read_u64 = cpuset_read_u64, .write_u64 = cpuset_write_u64, .private = FILE_MEMORY_PRESSURE, + .mode = 0444, }, {
A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): [email protected]
Quoted 68 lines · On Tue, 03 Mar 2009 09:08:23 +0800 Li Zefan…
Quoted 10 lines · Paul Menage
Quoted 2 lines · Li Zefan
Now a cgroup subsystem can set default file mode of its control files, so here is a patchset to correct file mode of each subsystem's files.
I really think that we should be defaulting this based on whether the control file has read or write handlers.
Sure, there are special cases like "tasks" that we'd need to set a manual value for, but most of these patches would be unnecessary.
Those patches are small and trivial, but it's ok for me to do this automatically. How about below patch.
Note cpuset.memory_pressure is read-only though it has read handler. Since if the read handler is removed, it'll return EINVAL instead of the current EACCESS, I think it's better to leave as it is.
=====================
cgroups: show correct file mode
Signed-off-by Li Zefan <[email protected]>--- include/linux/cgroup.h | 5 +++++ kernel/cgroup.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ kernel/cpuset.c | 1 + 3 files changed, 36 insertions(+)include/linux/cgroup.h +5
-0@@ -258,6 +258,11 @@ struct cftype {*/ char name[MAX_CFTYPE_NAME ];int private; +/* +* If not 0, file mode is set to this value, otherwise it will +* be figured out automatically +*/ +int mode;/* * If non-zero, defines the maximum length of string that can kernel/cgroup.c +14
-0@@ -1750,6 +1750,33 @@ static int cgroup_create_dir(struct cgroup *cgrp, struct dentry *dentry,return error; } +/** +* cgroup_file_mode - deduce file mode of a control file +* @cft: the control file in question +* +* returns cftype->mode if ->mode is not 0 +* returns 0644 if it has both a read and a write handler +* returns 0444 if it has only a read handler +* returns 0200 if it has only a write hander +*/ +static int cgroup_file_mode (const struct cftype *cft) +{ +int mode =0 ; + +if (cft->mode)
kernel/cgroup.c static int cgroup_create_dir(struct cgroup *cgrp, struct dentry *dentry, · line 1776
Quoted 10 lines
kernel/cgroup.c +10
-0+return cft->mode; + +if (cft->read || cft->read_u64 || cft->read_s64 || + cft->read_map || cft->read_seq_string) + mode +=0444 ; + +if (cft->write || cft->write_u64 || cft->write_s64 || + cft->write_string || cft->trigger) + mode +=0200 ; +
+= is not |=...
Thanks,
-Kame
Quoted 68 lines · On Tue, 03 Mar 2009 09:08:23 +0800 Li Zefan <[email protected]> wrote:
Quoted 10 lines · Paul Menage
Quoted 2 lines · Li Zefan
Now a cgroup subsystem can set default file mode of its control files, so here is a patchset to correct file mode of each subsystem's files.
I really think that we should be defaulting this based on whether the control file has read or write handlers.
Sure, there are special cases like "tasks" that we'd need to set a manual value for, but most of these patches would be unnecessary.
Those patches are small and trivial, but it's ok for me to do this automatically. How about below patch.
Note cpuset.memory_pressure is read-only though it has read handler. Since if the read handler is removed, it'll return EINVAL instead of the current EACCESS, I think it's better to leave as it is.
=====================
cgroups: show correct file mode
Signed-off-by Li Zefan <[email protected]>--- include/linux/cgroup.h | 5 +++++ kernel/cgroup.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ kernel/cpuset.c | 1 + 3 files changed, 36 insertions(+)include/linux/cgroup.h +5
-0@@ -258,6 +258,11 @@ struct cftype {*/ char name[MAX_CFTYPE_NAME ];int private; +/* +* If not 0, file mode is set to this value, otherwise it will +* be figured out automatically +*/ +int mode;/* * If non-zero, defines the maximum length of string that can kernel/cgroup.c +14
-0@@ -1750,6 +1750,33 @@ static int cgroup_create_dir(struct cgroup *cgrp, struct dentry *dentry,return error; } +/** +* cgroup_file_mode - deduce file mode of a control file +* @cft: the control file in question +* +* returns cftype->mode if ->mode is not 0 +* returns 0644 if it has both a read and a write handler +* returns 0444 if it has only a read handler +* returns 0200 if it has only a write hander +*/ +static int cgroup_file_mode (const struct cftype *cft) +{ +int mode =0 ; + +if (cft->mode)
kernel/cgroup.c static int cgroup_create_dir(struct cgroup *cgrp, struct dentry *dentry, · line 1776
Quoted 10 lines
kernel/cgroup.c +10
-0+return cft->mode; + +if (cft->read || cft->read_u64 || cft->read_s64 || + cft->read_map || cft->read_seq_string) + mode +=0444 ; + +if (cft->write || cft->write_u64 || cft->write_s64 || + cft->write_string || cft->trigger) + mode +=0200 ; +
+= is not |=...
Thanks,
-Kame
Quoted 18 lines
Quoted 18 lines
kernel/cgroup.c +18
-0+/** +* cgroup_file_mode - deduce file mode of a control file +* @cft: the control file in question +* +* returns cftype->mode if ->mode is not 0 +* returns 0644 if it has both a read and a write handler +* returns 0444 if it has only a read handler +* returns 0200 if it has only a write hander +*/ +static int cgroup_file_mode (const struct cftype *cft) +{ +int mode =0 ; + +if (cft->mode) +return cft->mode; + +if (cft->read || cft->read_u64 || cft->read_s64 || + cft->read_map || cft->read_seq_string)
Quoted 9 lines
kernel/cgroup.c static int cgroup_create_dir(struct cgroup *cgrp, struct dentry *dentry, · line 1776
Quoted 6 lines
kernel/cgroup.c +6
-0+ mode +=0444 ; + +if (cft->write || cft->write_u64 || cft->write_s64 || + cft->write_string || cft->trigger) + mode +=0200 ; ++= is not |=...
Ah, yes, though both happen to result in 0644.
A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): [email protected]
Quoted 28 lines · On Tue, 03 Mar 2009 09:15:42 +0800 Li Zefan…
Quoted 18 lines
Quoted 18 lines
kernel/cgroup.c +18
-0+/** +* cgroup_file_mode - deduce file mode of a control file +* @cft: the control file in question +* +* returns cftype->mode if ->mode is not 0 +* returns 0644 if it has both a read and a write handler +* returns 0444 if it has only a read handler +* returns 0200 if it has only a write hander +*/ +static int cgroup_file_mode (const struct cftype *cft) +{ +int mode =0 ; + +if (cft->mode) +return cft->mode; + +if (cft->read || cft->read_u64 || cft->read_s64 || + cft->read_map || cft->read_seq_string)Quoted 9 lines
kernel/cgroup.c static int cgroup_create_dir(struct cgroup *cgrp, struct dentry *dentry, · line 1776
Quoted 6 lines
kernel/cgroup.c +6
-0+ mode +=0444 ; + +if (cft->write || cft->write_u64 || cft->write_s64 || + cft->write_string || cft->trigger) + mode +=0200 ; ++= is not |=...
Quoted 2 lines
Ah, yes, though both happen to result in 0644.
yes but I like |= rather than += in bit ops.
Reviewed-by; KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <[email protected]>
Quoted 28 lines · On Tue, 03 Mar 2009 09:15:42 +0800 Li Zefan <[email protected]> wrote:
Quoted 18 lines
Quoted 18 lines
kernel/cgroup.c +18
-0+/** +* cgroup_file_mode - deduce file mode of a control file +* @cft: the control file in question +* +* returns cftype->mode if ->mode is not 0 +* returns 0644 if it has both a read and a write handler +* returns 0444 if it has only a read handler +* returns 0200 if it has only a write hander +*/ +static int cgroup_file_mode (const struct cftype *cft) +{ +int mode =0 ; + +if (cft->mode) +return cft->mode; + +if (cft->read || cft->read_u64 || cft->read_s64 || + cft->read_map || cft->read_seq_string)Quoted 9 lines
kernel/cgroup.c static int cgroup_create_dir(struct cgroup *cgrp, struct dentry *dentry, · line 1776
Quoted 6 lines
kernel/cgroup.c +6
-0+ mode +=0444 ; + +if (cft->write || cft->write_u64 || cft->write_s64 || + cft->write_string || cft->trigger) + mode +=0200 ; ++= is not |=...
Quoted 2 lines
Ah, yes, though both happen to result in 0644.
yes but I like |= rather than += in bit ops.
Reviewed-by; KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <[email protected]>
A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): 20090303100827.43d82c3a.kamezawa.hiroyu-+CUm20s59erQFUHtdCDX3A@public.gmane.org
Quoted 18 lines
Quoted 18 lines
kernel/cgroup.c +18
-0+/** +* cgroup_file_mode - deduce file mode of a control file +* @cft: the control file in question +* +* returns cftype->mode if ->mode is not 0 +* returns 0644 if it has both a read and a write handler +* returns 0444 if it has only a read handler +* returns 0200 if it has only a write hander +*/ +static int cgroup_file_mode (const struct cftype *cft) +{ +int mode =0 ; + +if (cft->mode) +return cft->mode; + +if (cft->read || cft->read_u64 || cft->read_s64 || + cft->read_map || cft->read_seq_string)
Quoted 9 lines
kernel/cgroup.c static int cgroup_create_dir(struct cgroup *cgrp, struct dentry *dentry, · line 1776
Quoted 6 lines
kernel/cgroup.c +6
-0+ mode +=0444 ; + +if (cft->write || cft->write_u64 || cft->write_s64 || + cft->write_string || cft->trigger) + mode +=0200 ; ++= is not |=...
Ah, yes, though both happen to result in 0644.
Paul Menage
Acked-byQuoted 7 lines · Li Zefan
Those patches are small and trivial, but it's ok for me to do this automatically. How about below patch.
Note cpuset.memory_pressure is read-only though it has read handler. Since if the read handler is removed, it'll return EINVAL instead of the current EACCESS, I think it's better to leave as it is.
Hmm. I find it hard to believe that anyone would have behaviour that depends on cpuset.memory_pressure returning EACCES rather than EINVAL, but I guess it's not a big deal.
On the += or |= issue, I think |= is slightly more familiar to most readers given that you're doing bit options, although the end result is the same in this case.
Quoted 104 lines
=====================
cgroups: show correct file mode
Signed-off-by Li Zefan <[email protected]>--- include/linux/cgroup.h | 5 +++++ kernel/cgroup.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ kernel/cpuset.c | 1 + 3 files changed, 36 insertions(+)include/linux/cgroup.h +5
-0@@ -258,6 +258,11 @@ struct cftype {*/ char name[MAX_CFTYPE_NAME ];int private; +/* +* If not 0, file mode is set to this value, otherwise it will +* be figured out automatically +*/ +int mode;/* * If non-zero, defines the maximum length of string that can kernel/cgroup.c +30
-0@@ -1750,6 +1750,33 @@ static int cgroup_create_dir(struct cgroup *cgrp, struct dentry *dentry,return error; } +/** +* cgroup_file_mode - deduce file mode of a control file +* @cft: the control file in question +* +* returns cftype->mode if ->mode is not 0 +* returns 0644 if it has both a read and a write handler +* returns 0444 if it has only a read handler +* returns 0200 if it has only a write hander +*/ +static int cgroup_file_mode (const struct cftype *cft) +{ +int mode =0 ; + +if (cft->mode) +return cft->mode; + +if (cft->read || cft->read_u64 || cft->read_s64 || + cft->read_map || cft->read_seq_string) + mode +=0444 ; + +if (cft->write || cft->write_u64 || cft->write_s64 || + cft->write_string || cft->trigger) + mode +=0200 ; + +return mode; +} +int cgroup_add_file (struct cgroup *cgrp,struct cgroup_subsys *subsys,const struct cftype *cft)@@ -1757,6 +1784,7 @@ int cgroup_add_file(struct cgroup *cgrp,struct dentry *dir = cgrp->dentry;struct dentry *dentry;int error; +int mode;char name[MAX_CGROUP_TYPE_NAMELEN +MAX_CFTYPE_NAME +2 ] = {0 };if (subsys && !test_bit (ROOT_NOPREFIX , &cgrp->root->flags)) {@@ -1767,6 +1795,7 @@ int cgroup_add_file(struct cgroup *cgrp,BUG_ON (!mutex_is_locked (&dir->d_inode->i_mutex)); dentry =lookup_one_len (name, dir,strlen (name));if (!IS_ERR (dentry)) { + mode =cgroup_file_mode (cft); error =cgroup_create_file (dentry,0644 |S_IFREG , cgrp->root->sb);if (!error)@@ -2349,6 +2378,7 @@ static struct cftype files[] = { .write_u64 = cgroup_tasks_write, .release = cgroup_tasks_release, .private = FILE_TASKLIST, + .mode = 0644, }, {kernel/cpuset.c +1
-0@@ -1678,6 +1678,7 @@ static struct cftype files[] = { .read_u64 = cpuset_read_u64, .write_u64 = cpuset_write_u64, .private = FILE_MEMORY_PRESSURE, + .mode = 0444, }, {