BUG Fixes for OSD in mainline (2.6.30)
cover BUG Fixes for OSD in mainline (2.6.30)
A very serious and stupid bug was found by users in current osd code, which caused it not to be usable in it's current form.
It would hard-lock immediately on any asynchronous execution call on an SMP Kernel. Just to show that it was only run on uni-machines until today.
Since found I've setup a test rig with SMP machines banging on each other with multi threaded/devices/mounts and they are still up. (Same setup I used to run with UMLs before)
Thanks to Xu Yang <[email protected]> for reporting this and his devotion to finding a fix.
These are the patches
[PATCH 1/2] libosd: BUGFIX: blk_put_request can't be called from within request_end_io
A fix for a very serious and stupid bug in osd_initiator. It used to call blk_put_request() regardless of if it was from the end_io callback or if called after a sync execution. It should call the unlocked version __blk_put_request() instead.
Also fixed is the remove of _abort_unexecuted_bios hack, and use of blk_end_request(,-ERROR,) to deallocate half baked requests. I've audited the code and it should be safe.
Reported and
[PATCH 2/2] osd_uld: Remove creation of osd_scsi class symlink
Remove the creation of the symlink from the device to it's class. On modern systems this is already created by a udev rule and would WARN on load. On old systems it is not needed, none of the current osd user-mode tools use this link.
Please apply for inclusion in the next round of scsi fixes for 2.6.30
Thank you
Boaz
PATCH 1/2 libosd: BUG: blk_put_request called from within request_end_io
A fix for a very serious and stupid bug in osd_initiator. It used to call blk_put_request() regardless of if it was from the end_io callback or if called after a sync execution. It should call the unlocked version __blk_put_request() instead.
Also fixed is the remove of _abort_unexecuted_bios hack, and use of blk_end_request(,-ERROR,) to deallocate half baked requests. I've audited the code and it should be safe.
Reported and
--- drivers/scsi/osd/osd_initiator.c | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++---------------- 1 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
drivers/scsi/osd/osd_initiator.c +24 -18
@@ -338,20 +338,6 @@ struct osd_request *osd_start_request(struct osd_dev *dev, gfp_t gfp) }EXPORT_SYMBOL (osd_start_request); -/* -* If osd_finalize_request() was called but the request was not executed through -* the block layer, then we must release BIOs. -*/ -static void _abort_unexecuted_bios (struct request *rq) -{ -struct bio *bio; - -while ((bio = rq->bio) !=NULL ) { - rq->bio = bio->bi_next; -bio_endio (bio,0 ); - } -} - static void _osd_free_seg(struct osd_request *or __unused,struct _osd_req_data_segment *seg) {
@@ -363,9 +349,30 @@ static void _osd_free_seg(struct osd_request *or __unused, seg->alloc_size =0 ; } +static void _put_request (struct request *rq ,bool is_async) +{ +if (is_async) { +WARN_ON (rq->bio); +__blk_put_request (rq->q, rq); + }else { +/* +* If osd_finalize_request() was called but the request was not +* executed through the block layer, then we must release BIOs. +* TODO: Keep error code in or->async_error. Need to audit all +* code paths. +*/ +if (unlikely (rq->bio)) +blk_end_request (rq, -ENOMEM ,blk_rq_bytes (rq)); +else +blk_put_request (rq); + } +} +void osd_end_request (struct osd_request *or) {struct request *rq = or->request; +/* IMPORTANT: make sure this agrees with osd_execute_request_async */ +bool is_async = (or->request->end_io_data == or);_osd_free_seg (or, &or->set_attr);_osd_free_seg (or, &or->enc_get_attr);
@@ -373,12 +380,11 @@ void osd_end_request(struct osd_request *or)if (rq) {if (rq->next_rq) { -_abort_unexecuted_bios (rq->next_rq); -blk_put_request (rq->next_rq); +_put_request (rq->next_rq, is_async); + rq->next_rq =NULL ; } -_abort_unexecuted_bios (rq); -blk_put_request (rq); +_put_request (rq, is_async); }_osd_request_free (or); }
Signature · 1 line
1.6.2.1
PATCH 2/2 osd_uld: Remove creation of osd_scsi class symlink
In reply to Boaz HarroshRemove the creation of the symlink from the device to it's class. On modern systems this is already created by a udev rule and would WARN on load. On old systems it is not needed, none of the current osd user-mode tools use this link.
--- drivers/scsi/osd/osd_uld.c | 6 ------ 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
drivers/scsi/osd/osd_uld.c +0 -6
@@ -345,10 +345,6 @@ static int osd_probe(struct device *dev) }dev_set_drvdata (oud->class_member, oud); - error =sysfs_create_link (&scsi_device->sdev_gendev.kobj, - &oud->class_member->kobj, osd_symlink); -if (error) -OSD_ERR ("warning: unable to make symlink\n" );OSD_INFO ("osd_probe %s\n" , disk->disk_name);return 0 ;
@@ -377,8 +373,6 @@ static int osd_remove(struct device *dev) scsi_device); } -sysfs_remove_link (&oud->od.scsi_device->sdev_gendev.kobj, osd_symlink); -if (oud->class_member)device_destroy (osd_sysfs_class,MKDEV (SCSI_OSD_MAJOR , oud->minor));
Signature · 1 line
1.6.2.1