external gpl kernel module build problem on 2.6.26.8-rt16
I get the following while trying to build this driver. What does it mean.
Building modules, stage 2.
MODPOST 1 modules
WARNING: "__bad_func_type" [/local/work/markh/pci5565-linux/driver/rfm2g.ko] undefined!
Then obviously the module doesn't load for the same reason.
When I grep the kernel for bad_func_type all I see is
include/linux/rt_lock.h:192:extern int __bad_func_type(void); include/linux/pickop.h:8:extern int __bad_func_type(void);
include/linux/pickop.h:16: else __bad_func_type();
\include/linux/pickop.h:27: else __ret = __bad_func_type();
Any help or hints would be appreciated
Thanks in advance
Mark
Quoted 13 lines · Mark Hounschell
I get the following while trying to build this driver. What does it mean.
Building modules, stage 2.
MODPOST 1 modules
WARNING: "__bad_func_type" [/local/work/markh/pci5565-linux/driver/rfm2g.ko] undefined!Then obviously the module doesn't load for the same reason.
When I grep the kernel for
bad_func_typeall I see isinclude/linux/rt_lock.h:192:extern int
__bad_func_type(void); include/linux/pickop.h:8:extern int__bad_func_type(void);
Quoted 8 lines
include/linux/pickop.h:16: else __bad_func_type(); \
include/linux/pickop.h:27: else__ret=__bad_func_type();Any help or hints would be appreciated
Thanks in advance
Mark
#define PICK_FUNCTION(type1, type2, func1, func2, arg0, ...) \
do { \
if (PICK_TYPE_EQUAL((arg0), type1)) \
func1((type1)(arg0), ##__VA_ARGS__); \
else if (PICK_TYPE_EQUAL((arg0), type2)) \
func2((type2)(arg0), ##__VA_ARGS__); \
else __bad_func_type(); \} while (0)
And PICK_FUNCTION_RET() uses the same technique.
Something that invokes PICK_FUNCTION() or PICK_FUNCTION_RET() is passing in an arg0 that is not type1 and is not type2.
One easy way to figure out what is invoking PICK_FUNCTION()/PICK_FUNCTION_RET() is to look at the output from the cpp of your driver. The method I usually use is to add the flags "-C -E" to my compile command (and remove "-c"). Then search the cpp output for __bad_func_type.
-Frank Rowand
Sony Corporation of America
Quoted 34 lines · Frank Rowand
Quoted 13 lines · Mark Hounschell
I get the following while trying to build this driver. What does it mean.
Building modules, stage 2.
MODPOST 1 modules
WARNING: "__bad_func_type" [/local/work/markh/pci5565-linux/driver/rfm2g.ko] undefined!Then obviously the module doesn't load for the same reason.
When I grep the kernel for
bad_func_typeall I see isinclude/linux/rt_lock.h:192:extern int
__bad_func_type(void); include/linux/pickop.h:8:extern int__bad_func_type(void);Quoted 8 lines
include/linux/pickop.h:16: else __bad_func_type(); \
include/linux/pickop.h:27: else__ret=__bad_func_type();Any help or hints would be appreciated
Thanks in advance
Mark#define PICK_FUNCTION(type1, type2, func1, func2, arg0, ...) \ do { \ if (PICK_TYPE_EQUAL((arg0), type1)) \ func1((type1)(arg0), ##__VA_ARGS__); \ else if (PICK_TYPE_EQUAL((arg0), type2)) \ func2((type2)(arg0), ##__VA_ARGS__); \ else __bad_func_type(); \} while (0)
And
PICK_FUNCTION_RET()uses the same technique.
Quoted 8 lines
Something that invokes
PICK_FUNCTION()orPICK_FUNCTION_RET()is passing in an arg0 that is not type1 and is not type2.One easy way to figure out what is invoking PICK_FUNCTION()/PICK_FUNCTION_RET() is to look at the output from the cpp of your driver. The method I usually use is to add the flags "-C -E" to my compile command (and remove "-c"). Then search the cpp output for
__bad_func_type.
Thanks for the pointer. How might one do this using the kernel build system though? Isn't the compile command used actually the kernels compile command? Can I assume this would entail modifying the kernels top Makefile in some way?
Thanks again
Mark
Hello,
Quoted 44 lines · Mark Hounschell
Quoted 34 lines · Frank Rowand
Quoted 13 lines · Mark Hounschell
I get the following while trying to build this driver. What does it mean.
Building modules, stage 2.
MODPOST 1 modules
WARNING: "__bad_func_type" [/local/work/markh/pci5565-linux/driver/rfm2g.ko] undefined!Then obviously the module doesn't load for the same reason.
When I grep the kernel for
bad_func_typeall I see isinclude/linux/rt_lock.h:192:extern int
__bad_func_type(void); include/linux/pickop.h:8:extern int__bad_func_type(void);Quoted 8 lines
include/linux/pickop.h:16: else __bad_func_type(); \
include/linux/pickop.h:27: else__ret=__bad_func_type();Any help or hints would be appreciated
Thanks in advance
Mark#define PICK_FUNCTION(type1, type2, func1, func2, arg0, ...) \ do { \ if (PICK_TYPE_EQUAL((arg0), type1)) \ func1((type1)(arg0), ##__VA_ARGS__); \ else if (PICK_TYPE_EQUAL((arg0), type2)) \ func2((type2)(arg0), ##__VA_ARGS__); \ else __bad_func_type(); \} while (0)
And
PICK_FUNCTION_RET()uses the same technique.Quoted 8 lines
Something that invokes
PICK_FUNCTION()orPICK_FUNCTION_RET()is passing in an arg0 that is not type1 and is not type2.One easy way to figure out what is invoking PICK_FUNCTION()/PICK_FUNCTION_RET() is to look at the output from the cpp of your driver. The method I usually use is to add the flags "-C -E" to my compile command (and remove "-c"). Then search the cpp output for
__bad_func_type.
Quoted 3 lines
Thanks for the pointer. How might one do this using the kernel build system though? Isn't the compile command used actually the kernels compile command? Can I assume this would entail modifying the kernels top
Makefilein some way?
You can compile using
make V=1
With that you can see the complete commands. Then just take the last command (i.e. the failing one) and do s/-c/-C -E/.
BTW, my guess is that it has to do with spinlocks and you do something like:
spinlock_t lock; .... spin_lock_irqsave(lock, flags);
instead of
spin_lock_irqsave(&lock, flags);
Best regards
Uwe
Signature · 6 lines
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Quoted 64 lines · Uwe Kleine-König
Hello,
Quoted 37 lines · Mark Hounschell
Quoted 36 lines · Frank Rowand
Quoted 13 lines · Mark Hounschell
I get the following while trying to build this driver. What does it mean.
Building modules, stage 2.
MODPOST 1 modules
WARNING: "__bad_func_type" [/local/work/markh/pci5565-linux/driver/rfm2g.ko] undefined!Then obviously the module doesn't load for the same reason.
When I grep the kernel for
bad_func_typeall I see isinclude/linux/rt_lock.h:192:extern int
__bad_func_type(void); include/linux/pickop.h:8:extern int__bad_func_type(void);Quoted 8 lines
include/linux/pickop.h:16: else __bad_func_type(); \
include/linux/pickop.h:27: else__ret=__bad_func_type();Any help or hints would be appreciated
Thanks in advance
Mark#define PICK_FUNCTION(type1, type2, func1, func2, arg0, ...) \ do { \ if (PICK_TYPE_EQUAL((arg0), type1)) \ func1((type1)(arg0), ##__VA_ARGS__); \ else if (PICK_TYPE_EQUAL((arg0), type2)) \ func2((type2)(arg0), ##__VA_ARGS__); \ else __bad_func_type(); \} while (0)
And
PICK_FUNCTION_RET()uses the same technique.Something that invokes
PICK_FUNCTION()orPICK_FUNCTION_RET()is passing in an arg0 that is not type1 and is not type2.Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 5 lines
One easy way to figure out what is invoking PICK_FUNCTION()/PICK_FUNCTION_RET() is to look at the output from the cpp of your driver. The method I usually use is to add the flags "-C -E" to my compile command (and remove "-c"). Then search the cpp output for
__bad_func_type.Thanks for the pointer. How might one do this using the kernel build system though? Isn't the compile command used actually the kernels compile command? Can I assume this would entail modifying the kernels top
Makefilein some way?You can compile using
make V=1
With that you can see the complete commands. Then just take the last command (i.e. the failing one) and do s/-c/-C -E/.
BTW, my guess is that it has to do with spinlocks and you do something like:
spinlock_t lock; .... spin_lock_irqsave(lock, flags);
Quoted 7 lines
instead of
spin_lock_irqsave(&lock, flags);Best regards
Uwe
Thanks, it turns out, to get the cpp output I had to modified the kernels "scripts/Makefile.build" as described above. That got me something to look at. Not really understanding all I was seeing I found is wasn't the spin_lock stuff causing it but semaphore related stuff such as init_MUTEX/up/down etc. I think I've got it worked out. Thanks for the help
Regards
Mark
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html