Extended return flag
Hi All,
I am thinking that will be good to extend return flag for function not implemented (errno 38) because
some of tests return it when you don't have enable that option is kernel config.
What do you think?
Michal
Signature · 14 lines
Michal Simek, Ing. (M.Eng) PetaLogix - Linux Solutions for a Reconfigurable World w: www.petalogix.com p: +61-7-30090663,+42-0-721842854 f: +61-7-30090663 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july _______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
Quoted 5 lines · On Tuesday 04 August 2009 04:48:25 Michal Simek wrote:
I am thinking that will be good to extend return flag for function not implemented (errno 38) because
some of tests return it when you don't have enable that option is kernel config.
What do you think?
what "return flag" are you talking about ? do you mean test status like TINFO/TBROK/etc... ?
-mike
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
Quoted 9 lines · Mike Frysinger
Quoted 5 lines · On Tuesday 04 August 2009 04:48:25 Michal Simek wrote:
I am thinking that will be good to extend return flag for function not implemented (errno 38) because
some of tests return it when you don't have enable that option is kernel config.
What do you think?what "return flag" are you talking about ? do you mean test status like TINFO/TBROK/etc... ?
I was wondering about this earlier -- why wouldn't TCONF be sufficient? Thanks,
-Garrett
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
Quoted 8 lines · On Thursday 13 August 2009 05:04:13 Garrett Cooper wrote:
Quoted 7 lines · Mike Frysinger
Quoted 5 lines · On Tuesday 04 August 2009 04:48:25 Michal Simek wrote:
I am thinking that will be good to extend return flag for function not implemented (errno 38) because
some of tests return it when you don't have enable that option is kernel config.
What do you think?
Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 2 lines
what "return flag" are you talking about ? do you mean test status like TINFO/TBROK/etc... ?
I was wondering about this earlier -- why wouldn't TCONF be sufficient?
should be fine i think ... we just have to (1) pick a method (2) document it and (3) start using it
-mike
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list