Skip to contentSkip to conversation

Getting DSS2 to mainline

DISCUSSION Tomi Valkeinen 4 participants 4 messages Aug 17, 2009 Framebuffer layer

lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw

Hi,

As I'm new to sending patches upstream, I'm not sure how to go forward with DSS2 now. Should I send it to linux-arm-kernel mailing list, or directly to main linux kernel mailing list? Or is there a route through fbdev-devel list for DSS2 to go forward?

Tomi

#1 lore raw

Hi,

Quoted 3 lines · Tomi Valkeinen

Hi,

As I'm new to sending patches upstream, I'm not sure how to go forward with DSS2 now. Should I send it to linux-arm-kernel mailing list, or directly to main linux kernel mailing list? Or is there a route through fbdev-devel list for DSS2 to go forward?

I am also new to this process but from what I've heard I decided to always cc Andrew Morton <[email protected]> when I think that something is mature enough for inclusion. That works very well, thanks Andrew. Sending them only to linux-fbdev-devel looks rather like a dead end at least if I look on the fate of some patches in the archive.
I always cc the LKML but until now I didn't hear anything from there either so I doubt that would be the right way.

I'm sorry if anything of the above is incorrect, it's just my experience.

Regards,

Florian Tobias Schandinat

#2 lore raw
Quoted 15 lines · Florian Tobias Schandinat
Quoted 4 lines · Tomi Valkeinen

As I'm new to sending patches upstream, I'm not sure how to go forward with DSS2 now. Should I send it to linux-arm-kernel mailing list, or directly to main linux kernel mailing list? Or is there a route through fbdev-devel list for DSS2 to go forward?

I am also new to this process but from what I've heard I decided to always cc Andrew Morton <[email protected]> when I think that something is mature enough for inclusion. That works very well, thanks Andrew.
Sending them only to linux-fbdev-devel looks rather like a dead end at least if I look on the fate of some patches in the archive. I always cc the LKML but until now I didn't hear anything from there either so I doubt that would be the right way.

Quoted 1 line

I'm sorry if anything of the above is incorrect, it's just my experience.

Yes, CCing Andrew Morton is The Right Thing To Do.

Thanks!

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- [email protected]

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds

#3 lore raw
In reply to Tomi Valkeinen
Quoted 6 lines · Tomi Valkeinen

Hi,

As I'm new to sending patches upstream, I'm not sure how to go forward with DSS2 now. Should I send it to linux-arm-kernel mailing list, or directly to main linux kernel mailing list? Or is there a route through fbdev-devel list for DSS2 to go forward?

I suggest send them to fbdev-devel list and cc linux-omap. For the clock alias patches you might want to also cc linux-arm-kernel.

Regards,

Tony