Skip to contentSkip to conversation

Where all does preallocated/extra space hide?

DISCUSSION Eric Sandeen 2 participants 6 messages Sep 29, 2009 – Oct 9, 2009

lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw

I was running some of the xfstests enospc tests on ext4, and they were failing; in one case, manymanymany small files are made to fill up a 100M filesystem. ext4 stops quite early with -ENOSPC, but after a bit, (or after a "sync") we get 40MB free again. So 40% of the fs space is hidden somewhere in preallocation...

I tried calling out to discard group prealloc but that's only a few blocks. I'll go trace through the sync paths to see what all gets released, but if anyone knows offhand where the rest of that space is hiding, please give me a shout. :)

Thanks,
-Eric

#1 lore raw
Quoted 6 lines · Eric Sandeen

I was running some of the xfstests enospc tests on ext4, and they were failing; in one case, manymanymany small files are made to fill up a 100M filesystem. ext4 stops quite early with -ENOSPC, but after a bit, (or after a "sync") we get 40MB free again. So 40% of the fs space is hidden somewhere in preallocation...

Quoted 7 lines

I tried calling out to discard group prealloc but that's only a few blocks. I'll go trace through the sync paths to see what all gets released, but if anyone knows offhand where the rest of that space is hiding, please give me a shout. :)

Thanks,
-Eric

Possibly related; on a 1G filesystem, doing this:

#!/bin/bash

xfs_io -F -f -d -c 'pwrite -b 64k 0 512m' /mnt/test/io_test rm /mnt/test/io_test

in a "while true" loop spews ENOSPC. (it's a direct IO 512m write in 64k chunks). Buffered IO seems fine ...

-Eric

#2 lore raw
In reply to Eric Sandeen
Quoted 11 lines · Eric Sandeen

I was running some of the xfstests enospc tests on ext4, and they were failing; in one case, manymanymany small files are made to fill up a 100M filesystem. ext4 stops quite early with -ENOSPC, but after a bit, (or after a "sync") we get 40MB free again. So 40% of the fs space is hidden somewhere in preallocation...

I tried calling out to discard group prealloc but that's only a few blocks. I'll go trace through the sync paths to see what all gets released, but if anyone knows offhand where the rest of that space is hiding, please give me a shout. :)

preallocation space is discarded by default if we fail a block allocation ext4_mb_discard_preallocations does that. What might be happening is the extra meta data blocks that we reserve for making sure we will be able to properly insert the new extent on block allocation. I guess we should force a data allocation when we fail with ENOSPC in ext4_da_writepages We currently force a journal commit so that the we claim back the blocks from deleted files. But we can also force block allocation for delayed allocated inodes so that we free some of the extra meta data we reserved

-aneesh

#3 lore raw
Quoted 23 lines · Aneesh Kumar K.V
Quoted 11 lines · Eric Sandeen

I was running some of the xfstests enospc tests on ext4, and they were failing; in one case, manymanymany small files are made to fill up a 100M filesystem. ext4 stops quite early with -ENOSPC, but after a bit, (or after a "sync") we get 40MB free again. So 40% of the fs space is hidden somewhere in preallocation...

I tried calling out to discard group prealloc but that's only a few blocks. I'll go trace through the sync paths to see what all gets released, but if anyone knows offhand where the rest of that space is hiding, please give me a shout. :)

preallocation space is discarded by default if we fail a block allocation ext4_mb_discard_preallocations does that. What might be happening is the extra meta data blocks that we reserve for making sure we will be able to properly insert the new extent on block allocation. I guess we should force a data allocation when we fail with ENOSPC in ext4_da_writepages We currently force a journal commit so that the we claim back the blocks from deleted files. But we can also force block allocation for delayed allocated inodes so that we free some of the extra meta data we reserved

Quoted 1 line

-aneesh

Yep, I should have followed up, I narrowed it down to just that - the worst-case metadata blocks - 2 metadata blocks for a 20-byte write into an empty file. :)

I'm working on an inode walker to push out delalloc files on enospc.

Thanks,

-Eric

#4 lore raw
Quoted 24 lines · Eric Sandeen
Quoted 23 lines · Aneesh Kumar K.V
Quoted 11 lines · Eric Sandeen

I was running some of the xfstests enospc tests on ext4, and they were failing; in one case, manymanymany small files are made to fill up a 100M filesystem. ext4 stops quite early with -ENOSPC, but after a bit, (or after a "sync") we get 40MB free again. So 40% of the fs space is hidden somewhere in preallocation...

I tried calling out to discard group prealloc but that's only a few blocks. I'll go trace through the sync paths to see what all gets released, but if anyone knows offhand where the rest of that space is hiding, please give me a shout. :)

preallocation space is discarded by default if we fail a block allocation ext4_mb_discard_preallocations does that. What might be happening is the extra meta data blocks that we reserve for making sure we will be able to properly insert the new extent on block allocation. I guess we should force a data allocation when we fail with ENOSPC in ext4_da_writepages We currently force a journal commit so that the we claim back the blocks from deleted files. But we can also force block allocation for delayed allocated inodes so that we free some of the extra meta data we reserved

Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 1 line

-aneesh

Yep, I should have followed up, I narrowed it down to just that - the worst-case metadata blocks - 2 metadata blocks for a 20-byte write into an empty file. :)

I'm working on an inode walker to push out delalloc files on enospc.

Should we do an inode walker ? I guess we should be doing something similar to balance_dirty_pages. That will kick in the flusher threads which inturn will force the block allocation of dirty inodes.

-aneesh

#5 lore raw
Quoted 29 lines · Aneesh Kumar K.V
Quoted 28 lines · Eric Sandeen
Quoted 22 lines · Aneesh Kumar K.V
Quoted 11 lines · Eric Sandeen

I was running some of the xfstests enospc tests on ext4, and they were failing; in one case, manymanymany small files are made to fill up a 100M filesystem. ext4 stops quite early with -ENOSPC, but after a bit, (or after a "sync") we get 40MB free again. So 40% of the fs space is hidden somewhere in preallocation...

I tried calling out to discard group prealloc but that's only a few blocks. I'll go trace through the sync paths to see what all gets released, but if anyone knows offhand where the rest of that space is hiding, please give me a shout. :)

preallocation space is discarded by default if we fail a block allocation ext4_mb_discard_preallocations does that. What might be happening is the extra meta data blocks that we reserve for making sure we will be able to properly insert the new extent on block allocation. I guess we should force a data allocation when we fail with ENOSPC in ext4_da_writepages We currently force a journal commit so that the we claim back the blocks from deleted files. But we can also force block allocation for delayed allocated inodes so that we free some of the extra meta data we reserved

Quoted 1 line

-aneesh

Yep, I should have followed up, I narrowed it down to just that - the worst-case metadata blocks - 2 metadata blocks for a 20-byte write into an empty file. :)

Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 1 line

I'm working on an inode walker to push out delalloc files on enospc.

Should we do an inode walker ? I guess we should be doing something similar to balance_dirty_pages. That will kick in the flusher threads which inturn will force the block allocation of dirty inodes.

-aneesh

it'll need to be synchronous to avoid a spurious enospc I think ... plus, we only want to flush delalloc inodes; flushing everythign would be needlessly expensive I think... need to think about the right way to do this.

-Eric