Skip to contentSkip to conversation

ath5k suspend

DISCUSSION Daniel J Blueman 3 participants 5 messages Sep 30, 2009 1 message not in the archive

lore
Share & tools
lore

A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): [email protected]

#1 lore raw

Hi Gonsolo,

Quoted 6 lines · Gonsolo

Hi!

Is it possible to add
http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/38550/
to karmic? Otherwise karmic would be broken for me/my notebook/my wireless pccard.

Since Karmic tracks the 2.6.31 -stable kernels, it's worth reporting this upstream (CC'd) instead, particularly if it's a regression from a previous kernel version, using the same ath5k driver...?

Then, it'll be in Karmic in ~ a few weeks.

Daniel

Signature · 1 line
Daniel J Blueman
#2 lore raw
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 4 lines

Is it possible to add
http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/38550/
to karmic? Otherwise karmic would be broken for me/my notebook/my wireless pccard.

Since Karmic tracks the 2.6.31 -stable kernels, it's worth reporting this upstream (CC'd) instead, particularly if it's a regression from a previous kernel version, using the same ath5k driver...?

I did that, too. ;) Hopefully it will be in 2.6.31.2.

g

Tested-by Ben Greear Tested-by Johannes Stezenbach
#3 lore raw
Quoted 10 lines · Gonsolo
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 4 lines

Is it possible to add
http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/38550/
to karmic? Otherwise karmic would be broken for me/my notebook/my wireless pccard.

Since Karmic tracks the 2.6.31 -stable kernels, it's worth reporting this upstream (CC'd) instead, particularly if it's a regression from a previous kernel version, using the same ath5k driver...?

I did that, too. ;) Hopefully it will be in 2.6.31.2.

Maybe I missed it, but did you actually request the -stable team to take the patch? -stable helps more than just Ubuntu... :-)

Greg (or Chris or...), the patch in question is here:

commit edd7fc7003f31da48d06e215a93ea966a22c2a03

Author: Nick Kossifidis <[email protected]>
Date:   Mon Aug 10 03:29:02 2009 +0300

ath5k: Wakeup fixes

* Don't put chip to full sleep because there are problems during wakeup. Instead hold MAC/Baseband on warm reset state via a new function ath5k_hw_on_hold.

* Minor cleanups

Signature · 2 lines
John W. Linville		Someday the world will need a hero, and you
[email protected]			might be all we have.  Be ready.
#4 lore raw

Am 30.09.2009 16:09, schrieb John W. Linville:

Quoted 6 lines · Gonsolo
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 4 lines

Is it possible to add
http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/38550/
to karmic? Otherwise karmic would be broken for me/my notebook/my wireless pccard.

Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 3 lines

Since Karmic tracks the 2.6.31 -stable kernels, it's worth reporting this upstream (CC'd) instead, particularly if it's a regression from a previous kernel version, using the same ath5k driver...?

I did that, too. ;) Hopefully it will be in 2.6.31.2.

Maybe I missed it, but did you actually request the -stable team to take the patch? -stable helps more than just Ubuntu... :-)

I requested it in Ubuntu and stable in two separate emails, just to be sure it will be there when I am going to upgrade. ;) I apologize if I caused confusion or doubled your amount of work.
Maybe I should have done this in one email to both parties.

g

#5 lore raw
Quoted 13 lines · Gonsolo

Am 30.09.2009 16:09, schrieb John W. Linville:

Quoted 12 lines · Gonsolo
Quoted 10 lines
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 4 lines

Is it possible to add
http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/38550/
to karmic? Otherwise karmic would be broken for me/my notebook/my wireless pccard.

Since Karmic tracks the 2.6.31 -stable kernels, it's worth reporting this upstream (CC'd) instead, particularly if it's a regression from a previous kernel version, using the same ath5k driver...?

I did that, too. ;) Hopefully it will be in 2.6.31.2.

Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 2 lines

Maybe I missed it, but did you actually request the -stable team to take the patch? -stable helps more than just Ubuntu... :-)

I requested it in Ubuntu and stable in two separate emails, just to be sure it will be there when I am going to upgrade. ;)
I apologize if I caused confusion or doubled your amount of work. Maybe I should have done this in one email to both parties.

Not really a big deal -- still, one email would tend to reduce confusion. :-)

John

Signature · 2 lines
John W. Linville		Someday the world will need a hero, and you
[email protected]			might be all we have.  Be ready.