Skip to contentSkip to conversation

pppoe: RCU locking in get_item_by_addr()

PATCH In review Eric Dumazet 2 participants 2 messages Nov 2, 2009

Subsystems (2)
lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw

PATCH 1/1 pppoe: RCU locking in get_item_by_addr()

Note : this patch depends on dev_get_by_name_rcu(), not yet comitted.

Thanks

[PATCH net-next-2.6] pppoe: RCU locking in get_item_by_addr()

Use dev_get_by_name_rcu() instead of dev_get_by_name(), to avoid touching device refcount in hotpath.

---
 drivers/net/pppoe.c |   19 +++++++++----------
 1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
drivers/net/pppoe.c +9 -10
index 2559991..60c8d23 100644
@@ -250,20 +250,19 @@ static inline struct pppox_sock *get_item_by_addr(struct net *net,
 {
 	struct net_device *dev;
 	struct pppoe_net *pn;
-	struct pppox_sock *pppox_sock;
+	struct pppox_sock *pppox_sock = NULL;
 
 	int ifindex;
 
-	dev = dev_get_by_name(net, sp->sa_addr.pppoe.dev);
-	if (!dev)
-		return NULL;
-
-	ifindex = dev->ifindex;
-	pn = net_generic(net, pppoe_net_id);
-	pppox_sock = get_item(pn, sp->sa_addr.pppoe.sid,
+	rcu_read_lock();
+	dev = dev_get_by_name_rcu(net, sp->sa_addr.pppoe.dev);
+	if (dev) {
+		ifindex = dev->ifindex;
+		pn = net_generic(net, pppoe_net_id);
+		pppox_sock = get_item(pn, sp->sa_addr.pppoe.sid,
 				sp->sa_addr.pppoe.remote, ifindex);
-	dev_put(dev);
-
+	}
+	rcu_read_unlock();
 	return pppox_sock;
 }
 
maintainer
#1 lore raw

From: Eric Dumazet <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 02 Nov 2009 06:51:22 +0100

Quoted 2 lines

Note : this patch depends on dev_get_by_name_rcu(), not yet comitted.

Yep, I just tossed that one ine.

Quoted 6 lines

[PATCH net-next-2.6] pppoe: RCU locking in get_item_by_addr()

Use dev_get_by_name_rcu() instead of dev_get_by_name(), to avoid touching device refcount in hotpath.

And now this one too, applied, thanks!