JFFS2: min/max confusion?
PATCH 1/1 JFFS2: min/max confusion?
MAX_SUMMARY_SIZE was meant as a limit, not as a minimum
Signed-off-by Roel Kluin <[email protected]>
--- fs/jffs2/summary.c | 2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
unless I am mistaken?
fs/jffs2/summary.c +1 -1
@@ -23,7 +23,7 @@int jffs2_sum_init (struct jffs2_sb_info *c) { -uint32_t sum_size =max_t (uint32_t, c->sector_size,MAX_SUMMARY_SIZE ); +uint32_t sum_size =min_t (uint32_t, c->sector_size,MAX_SUMMARY_SIZE ); c->summary =kzalloc (sizeof (struct jffs2_summary ),GFP_KERNEL );
Quoted 14 lines · Roel Kluin
MAX_SUMMARY_SIZEwas meant as a limit, not as a minimumSigned-off-by Roel Kluin <[email protected]>--- fs/jffs2/summary.c | 2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)unless I am mistaken?
fs/jffs2/summary.c +0
-0
fs/jffs2/summary.c line 28
Quoted 7 lines
fs/jffs2/summary.c +1
-1@@ -23,7 +23,7 @@int jffs2_sum_init (struct jffs2_sb_info *c) { -uint32_t sum_size =max_t (uint32_t, c->sector_size,MAX_SUMMARY_SIZE ); +uint32_t sum_size =min_t (uint32_t, c->sector_size,MAX_SUMMARY_SIZE ); c->summary =kzalloc (sizeof (struct jffs2_summary ),GFP_KERNEL );
This looks right, I've pushed your patch to my l2-mtd tree, thanks.
Signature · 2 lines
Best Regards, Artem Bityutskiy (Артём Битюцкий)