Skip to contentSkip to conversation

potential null dereference

DISCUSSION Jiri Slaby 2 participants 2 messages Jun 15, 2016

lore
Share & tools
lore

Jiri Slaby

author
#0 lore raw

Hi,

Stanse found the following error in unpack-trees.c:
dereferencing NULL pointer here.[. * o src_index]

int unpack_trees(unsigned len, struct tree_desc *t, struct unpack_trees_options *o)
{
int ret;
static struct cache_entry *dfc;
...
if (o->src_index) { <-- loc0
o->result.timestamp.sec = o->src_index->timestamp.sec; o->result.timestamp.nsec = o->src_index->timestamp.nsec;
}
o->merge_size = len;

if (!dfc)
dfc = xcalloc(1, ((1 + (0) + 8) & ~7));
o->df_conflict_entry = dfc;

if (len) {
...
}

if (o->merge) {
while (o->pos < o->src_index->cache_nr) { <-- here

It triggers, because there is a test for o->src_index being NULL at loc0, but here, it is dereferenced without a check. Can this happen (e.g. does o->merge != NULL imply o->src_index != NULL)?

Further, there is a warning in log-tree.c:
pointer always points to valid memory here, but checking for not NULL.[parents]

static int log_tree_diff(struct rev_info *opt, struct commit *commit, struct log_info *log)
{
int showed_log;
struct commit_list *parents;
unsigned const char *sha1 = commit->object.sha1;

if (!opt->diff && !((&opt->diffopt)->flags & (1 << 14)))
return 0;

parents = commit->parents;
if (!parents) { <-- loc0
if (opt->show_root_diff) {
diff_root_tree_sha1(sha1, "", &opt->diffopt);
log_tree_diff_flush(opt);
}
return !opt->loginfo; <-- loc1
}

if (parents && parents->next) { <-- here

I.e. if parents was NULL at loc0, we escaped at loc1. But we check parents against NULL here again.

thanks,

Signature · 1 line
js
#1 lore raw

Am 15.12.2009 13:41, schrieb Jiri Slaby:

Quoted 25 lines

Hi,

Stanse found the following error in unpack-trees.c:
dereferencing NULL pointer here.[. * o src_index]

int unpack_trees(unsigned len, struct tree_desc *t, struct unpack_trees_options *o)
{
int ret;
static struct cache_entry *dfc;
...
if (o->src_index) { <-- loc0
o->result.timestamp.sec = o->src_index->timestamp.sec; o->result.timestamp.nsec = o->src_index->timestamp.nsec;
}
o->merge_size = len;

if (!dfc)
dfc = xcalloc(1, ((1 + (0) + 8) & ~7));
o->df_conflict_entry = dfc;

if (len) {
...
}

Quoted 6 lines

if (o->merge) {
while (o->pos < o->src_index->cache_nr) { <-- here

It triggers, because there is a test for o->src_index being NULL at loc0, but here, it is dereferenced without a check. Can this happen (e.g. does o->merge != NULL imply o->src_index != NULL)?

Running "git grep -w -B70 unpack_trees" and looking for "src_index" using less' search command showed me that src_index is never NULL when unpack_trees() is called.

Quoted 20 lines

Further, there is a warning in log-tree.c:
pointer always points to valid memory here, but checking for not NULL.[parents]

static int log_tree_diff(struct rev_info *opt, struct commit *commit, struct log_info *log)
{
int showed_log;
struct commit_list *parents;
unsigned const char *sha1 = commit->object.sha1;

if (!opt->diff && !((&opt->diffopt)->flags & (1 << 14)))
return 0;

parents = commit->parents;
if (!parents) { <-- loc0

  if (opt->show_root_diff) {
   diff_root_tree_sha1(sha1, "", &opt->diffopt);
   log_tree_diff_flush(opt);
Quoted 8 lines

}
return !opt->loginfo; <-- loc1
}

if (parents && parents->next) { <-- here

I.e. if parents was NULL at loc0, we escaped at loc1. But we check parents against NULL here again.

The check may be duplicate, but I suspect removing it won't change the resulting object code -- the compiler should be smart enough to come to the same conclusion.

Thanks,
René