proc01: read /proc/acpi/event failed if acpi daemon stopped
An error message occured when i tested proc01.
---------
proc01 1 TFAIL : read failed: /proc/acpi/event: errno=EAGAIN(11): Resource temporarily unavailable
---------
If "service acpid start", this message will be turned to:
---------
proc01 0 TINFO : /proc/acpi/event: known issue: errno=EBUSY(16): Device or resource busy
---------
I think we should to add a check of acpi daemon's status in testcases/kernel/fs/proc/proc01.c.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
Quoted 11 lines · Shi Weihua
An error message occured when i tested proc01.
---------
proc01 1 TFAIL : read failed:/proc/acpi/event: errno=EAGAIN(11): Resource temporarily unavailable
---------If "service acpid start", this message will be turned to:
---------
proc01 0 TINFO : /proc/acpi/event: known issue: errno=EBUSY(16): Device or resource busy
---------I think we should to add a check of acpi daemon's status in
testcases/kernel/fs/proc/proc01.c.
No, that's making things too complicated and won't scale as every
distro has developed a different means for specifying the status for a service. Why not just add EAGAIN for that /proc node? Thanks,
-Garrett
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
Quoted 11 lines · Garrett Cooper
Quoted 10 lines · Shi Weihua
An error message occured when i tested proc01.
---------
proc01 1 TFAIL : read failed:/proc/acpi/event: errno=EAGAIN(11): Resource temporarily unavailable
---------If "service acpid start", this message will be turned to:
---------
proc01 0 TINFO : /proc/acpi/event: known issue: errno=EBUSY(16): Device or resource busy
---------
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 1 line
I think we should to add a check of acpi daemon's status in
testcases/kernel/fs/proc/proc01.c.No, that's making things too complicated and won't scale as every distro has developed a different means for specifying the status for a service. Why not just add EAGAIN for that /proc node?
And FWIW the error condition is correct in my opinion if kernel
acpi hasn't been enabled, which was the case here. Thanks,
-Garrett
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
Hi Garrett
Quoted 12 lines · Garrett Cooper
Quoted 11 lines · Garrett Cooper
Quoted 10 lines · Shi Weihua
An error message occured when i tested proc01.
---------
proc01 1 TFAIL : read failed:/proc/acpi/event: errno=EAGAIN(11): Resource temporarily unavailable
---------If "service acpid start", this message will be turned to:
---------
proc01 0 TINFO :/proc/acpi/event: known issue: errno=EBUSY(16): Device or resource busy
---------
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 1 line
I think we should to add a check of acpi daemon's status in
testcases/kernel/fs/proc/proc01.c.No, that's making things too complicated and won't scale as every
distro has developed a different means for specifying the status for a service. Why not just add EAGAIN for that /proc node?And FWIW the error condition is correct in my opinion if kernel
acpi hasn't been enabled, which was the case here.
I think we should to give a warning message to LTP users. How do you think the following patch?
testcases/kernel/fs/proc/proc01.c +1 -0
@@ -101,6 +101,7 @@ const Mapping known_issues[] = { {"read", "/proc/fs/nfsd/filehandle", EINVAL}, {"read", "/proc/fs/nfsd/.getfs", EINVAL}, {"read", "/proc/fs/nfsd/.getfd", EINVAL}, + {"read", "/proc/acpi/event", EAGAIN}, //EAGAIN will be returned if acpi daemon disabled {"", "", 0} };
Quoted 4 lines
Thanks,
-Garrett
Signature · 12 lines
Shi Weihua ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev _______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
Quoted 32 lines · Shi Weihua
Hi Garrett
Quoted 12 lines · Garrett Cooper
Quoted 11 lines · Garrett Cooper
Quoted 10 lines · Shi Weihua
An error message occured when i tested proc01.
---------
proc01 1 TFAIL : read failed:/proc/acpi/event: errno=EAGAIN(11): Resource temporarily unavailable
---------If "service acpid start", this message will be turned to:
---------
proc01 0 TINFO : /proc/acpi/event: known issue: errno=EBUSY(16): Device or resource busy
---------Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 1 line
I think we should to add a check of acpi daemon's status in
testcases/kernel/fs/proc/proc01.c.No, that's making things too complicated and won't scale as every distro has developed a different means for specifying the status for a service. Why not just add EAGAIN for that /proc node?
And FWIW the error condition is correct in my opinion if kernel acpi hasn't been enabled, which was the case here.
I think we should to give a warning message to LTP users. How do you think the following patch?
testcases/kernel/fs/proc/proc01.c +0
-0
testcases/kernel/fs/proc/proc01.c const Mapping known_issues[] = { · line 106
Quoted 6 lines
testcases/kernel/fs/proc/proc01.c +1
-0@@ -101,6 +101,7 @@ const Mapping known_issues[] = { {"read", "/proc/fs/nfsd/filehandle", EINVAL}, {"read", "/proc/fs/nfsd/.getfs", EINVAL}, {"read", "/proc/fs/nfsd/.getfd", EINVAL}, + {"read", "/proc/acpi/event", EAGAIN}, //EAGAIN will be returned if acpi daemon disabled {"", "", 0} };
Looks good minus the C++ style comment ;).
Thanks again!
-Garrett
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
Quoted 28 lines · Garrett Cooper
Quoted 27 lines · Shi Weihua
Hi Garrett
Quoted 12 lines · Garrett Cooper
Quoted 11 lines · Garrett Cooper
Quoted 10 lines · Shi Weihua
An error message occured when i tested proc01.
---------
proc01 1 TFAIL : read failed:/proc/acpi/event: errno=EAGAIN(11): Resource temporarily unavailable
---------If "service acpid start", this message will be turned to:
---------
proc01 0 TINFO :/proc/acpi/event: known issue: errno=EBUSY(16): Device or resource busy
---------Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 1 line
I think we should to add a check of acpi daemon's status in
testcases/kernel/fs/proc/proc01.c.No, that's making things too complicated and won't scale as every
distro has developed a different means for specifying the status for a service. Why not just add EAGAIN for that /proc node?And FWIW the error condition is correct in my opinion if kernel
acpi hasn't been enabled, which was the case here.I think we should to give a warning message to LTP users. How do you think the following patch?
Quoted 13 lines
testcases/kernel/fs/proc/proc01.c const Mapping known_issues[] = { · line 106
Quoted 11 lines
testcases/kernel/fs/proc/proc01.c +1
-0@@ -101,6 +101,7 @@ const Mapping known_issues[] = { {"read", "/proc/fs/nfsd/filehandle", EINVAL}, {"read", "/proc/fs/nfsd/.getfs", EINVAL}, {"read", "/proc/fs/nfsd/.getfd", EINVAL}, + {"read", "/proc/acpi/event", EAGAIN}, //EAGAIN will be returned if acpi daemon disabled {"", "", 0} };Looks good minus the C++ style comment ;).
ok, let's use C style comment.
testcases/kernel/fs/proc/proc01.c +1 -0
@@ -101,6 +101,7 @@ const Mapping known_issues[] = { {"read", "/proc/fs/nfsd/filehandle", EINVAL}, {"read", "/proc/fs/nfsd/.getfs", EINVAL}, {"read", "/proc/fs/nfsd/.getfd", EINVAL}, + {"read", "/proc/acpi/event", EAGAIN}, /* EAGAIN will be returned if acpi daemon disabled */ {"", "", 0} };
Quoted 4 lines
Thanks again!
-Garrett
Signature · 12 lines
Shi Weihua ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev _______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
Garrett Cooper
Acked-byQuoted 50 lines · Shi Weihua
Quoted 28 lines · Garrett Cooper
Quoted 27 lines · Shi Weihua
Hi Garrett
Quoted 12 lines · Garrett Cooper
Quoted 11 lines · Garrett Cooper
Quoted 10 lines · Shi Weihua
An error message occured when i tested proc01.
---------
proc01 1 TFAIL : read failed:/proc/acpi/event: errno=EAGAIN(11): Resource temporarily unavailable
---------If "service acpid start", this message will be turned to:
---------
proc01 0 TINFO : /proc/acpi/event: known issue: errno=EBUSY(16): Device or resource busy
---------Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 1 line
I think we should to add a check of acpi daemon's status in
testcases/kernel/fs/proc/proc01.c.No, that's making things too complicated and won't scale as every distro has developed a different means for specifying the status for a service. Why not just add EAGAIN for that /proc node?
And FWIW the error condition is correct in my opinion if kernel acpi hasn't been enabled, which was the case here.
I think we should to give a warning message to LTP users. How do you think the following patch?
Quoted 13 lines
testcases/kernel/fs/proc/proc01.c const Mapping known_issues[] = { · line 106
Quoted 11 lines
testcases/kernel/fs/proc/proc01.c +1
-0@@ -101,6 +101,7 @@ const Mapping known_issues[] = { {"read", "/proc/fs/nfsd/filehandle", EINVAL}, {"read", "/proc/fs/nfsd/.getfs", EINVAL}, {"read", "/proc/fs/nfsd/.getfd", EINVAL}, + {"read", "/proc/acpi/event", EAGAIN}, //EAGAIN will be returned if acpi daemon disabled {"", "", 0} };Looks good minus the C++ style comment ;).
ok, let's use C style comment.
testcases/kernel/fs/proc/proc01.c +0
-0
testcases/kernel/fs/proc/proc01.c const Mapping known_issues[] = { · line 106
Quoted 6 lines
testcases/kernel/fs/proc/proc01.c +1
-0@@ -101,6 +101,7 @@ const Mapping known_issues[] = { {"read", "/proc/fs/nfsd/filehandle", EINVAL}, {"read", "/proc/fs/nfsd/.getfs", EINVAL}, {"read", "/proc/fs/nfsd/.getfd", EINVAL}, + {"read", "/proc/acpi/event", EAGAIN}, /* EAGAIN will be returned if acpi daemon disabled */ {"", "", 0} };
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list