kvm mmu: don't check PT_WRITABLE_MASK directly
PATCH 1/1 kvm mmu: don't check PT_WRITABLE_MASK directly
Since we have is_writable_pte(), make use of it.
Signed-off-by Gui Jianfeng <[email protected]>
--- arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c | 8 ++++---- 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c +4 -4
@@ -2923,7 +2923,7 @@ void kvm_mmu_slot_remove_write_access(struct kvm *kvm, int slot) pt = sp->spt;for (i =0 ; i <PT64_ENT_PER_PAGE ; ++i)/* avoid RMW */ -if (pt[i] &PT_WRITABLE_MASK ) +if (is_writable_pte (pt[i])) pt[i] &= ~PT_WRITABLE_MASK ; }kvm_flush_remote_tlbs (kvm);
@@ -3358,7 +3358,7 @@ void inspect_spte_has_rmap(struct kvm *kvm, u64 *sptep)struct kvm_mmu_page *rev_sp;gfn_t gfn; -if (*sptep &PT_WRITABLE_MASK ) { +if (is_writable_pte (*sptep)) { rev_sp =page_header (__pa (sptep)); gfn = rev_sp->gfns[sptep - rev_sp->spt];
@@ -3408,7 +3408,7 @@ static void check_writable_mappings_rmap(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)if (!(ent &PT_PRESENT_MASK ))continue ; -if (!(ent &PT_WRITABLE_MASK )) +if (!is_writable_pte (ent))continue ;inspect_spte_has_rmap (vcpu->kvm, &pt[i]); }
@@ -3442,7 +3442,7 @@ static void audit_write_protection(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) spte =rmap_next (vcpu->kvm, rmapp,NULL );while (spte) { -if (*spte &PT_WRITABLE_MASK ) +if (is_writable_pte (*spte)) printk(KERN_ERR "%s: (%s) shadow page has " "writable mappings: gfn %lx role %x\n", __func__, audit_msg, sp->gfn,
Signature · 1 line
1.6.5.2
Avi Kivity
AppliedQuoted 2 lines · Gui Jianfeng
Since we have
is_writable_pte(), make use of it.
Applied, thanks.
Signature · 1 line
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function