convert exofs to ->evict_inode()
PATCH 47/58 convert exofs to ->evict_inode()
--- fs/exofs/exofs.h | 2 +- fs/exofs/inode.c | 8 ++++---- fs/exofs/super.c | 2 +- 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
fs/exofs/exofs.h +1 -1
@@ -264,7 +264,7 @@ int exofs_write_begin(struct file *file, struct address_space *mapping,extern struct inode *exofs_iget (struct super_block *,unsigned long );struct inode *exofs_new_inode (struct inode *,int );extern int exofs_write_inode (struct inode *,struct writeback_control *wbc); -extern void exofs_delete_inode (struct inode *); +extern void exofs_evict_inode (struct inode *);/* dir.c: */ int exofs_add_link (struct dentry *,struct inode *);
fs/exofs/inode.c +4 -4
@@ -1335,7 +1335,7 @@ static void delete_done(struct exofs_io_state *ios, void *p)* from the OSD here. We make sure the object was created before we try and * delete it. */ -void exofs_delete_inode (struct inode *inode) +void exofs_evict_inode (struct inode *inode) {struct exofs_i_info *oi =exofs_i (inode);struct super_block *sb = inode->i_sb;
@@ -1345,7 +1345,7 @@ void exofs_delete_inode(struct inode *inode)truncate_inode_pages (&inode->i_data,0 ); -if (is_bad_inode (inode)) +if (inode->i_nlink ||is_bad_inode (inode)) goto no_delete;mark_inode_dirty (inode);
@@ -1355,7 +1355,7 @@ void exofs_delete_inode(struct inode *inode)if (inode->i_blocks)exofs_truncate (inode); -clear_inode (inode); +end_writeback (inode); ret =exofs_get_io_state (&sbi->layout, &ios);if (unlikely (ret)) {
@@ -1384,5 +1384,5 @@ void exofs_delete_inode(struct inode *inode)return ; no_delete: -clear_inode (inode); +end_writeback (inode); }
fs/exofs/super.c +1 -1
@@ -743,7 +743,7 @@ static const struct super_operations exofs_sops = { .alloc_inode = exofs_alloc_inode, .destroy_inode = exofs_destroy_inode, .write_inode = exofs_write_inode, - .delete_inode = exofs_delete_inode, + .evict_inode = exofs_evict_inode, .put_super = exofs_put_super, .write_super = exofs_write_super, .sync_fs = exofs_sync_fs,
Signature · 1 line
1.5.6.5
Quoted 2 lines · Al Viro
Signed-off-by Al Viro <[email protected]>
Al hi.
This patch is nice off course, but it clashes with a patch I was intending to push to linux-next today. (For 2.6.36 kernel)
The patch is the one to convert to the new truncate sequence:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-fsdevel&m=127539189718732&w=2
In fact I was meaning to ask you if you could take this patch through your tree, so Christoph could base his cleanup on this as well.
I can re-do below patch on top of mine, or redo the truncate on top of this. Please tell me what you prefer.
Thanks
Boaz
Quoted 70 lines
--- fs/exofs/exofs.h | 2 +- fs/exofs/inode.c | 8 ++++---- fs/exofs/super.c | 2 +- 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)fs/exofs/exofs.h +1
-1@@ -264,7 +264,7 @@ int exofs_write_begin(struct file *file, struct address_space *mapping,extern struct inode *exofs_iget (struct super_block *,unsigned long );struct inode *exofs_new_inode (struct inode *,int );extern int exofs_write_inode (struct inode *,struct writeback_control *wbc); -extern void exofs_delete_inode (struct inode *); +extern void exofs_evict_inode (struct inode *);/* dir.c: */ int exofs_add_link (struct dentry *,struct inode *);fs/exofs/inode.c +4
-4@@ -1335,7 +1335,7 @@ static void delete_done(struct exofs_io_state *ios, void *p)* from the OSD here. We make sure the object was created before we try and * delete it. */ -void exofs_delete_inode (struct inode *inode) +void exofs_evict_inode (struct inode *inode) {struct exofs_i_info *oi =exofs_i (inode);struct super_block *sb = inode->i_sb;@@ -1345,7 +1345,7 @@ void exofs_delete_inode(struct inode *inode)truncate_inode_pages (&inode->i_data,0 ); -if (is_bad_inode (inode)) +if (inode->i_nlink ||is_bad_inode (inode)) goto no_delete;mark_inode_dirty (inode);@@ -1355,7 +1355,7 @@ void exofs_delete_inode(struct inode *inode)if (inode->i_blocks)exofs_truncate (inode); -clear_inode (inode); +end_writeback (inode); ret =exofs_get_io_state (&sbi->layout, &ios);if (unlikely (ret)) {@@ -1384,5 +1384,5 @@ void exofs_delete_inode(struct inode *inode)return ; no_delete: -clear_inode (inode); +end_writeback (inode); }fs/exofs/super.c +1
-1@@ -743,7 +743,7 @@ static const struct super_operations exofs_sops = { .alloc_inode = exofs_alloc_inode, .destroy_inode = exofs_destroy_inode, .write_inode = exofs_write_inode, - .delete_inode = exofs_delete_inode, + .evict_inode = exofs_evict_inode, .put_super = exofs_put_super, .write_super = exofs_write_super, .sync_fs = exofs_sync_fs,
Quoted 9 lines · Boaz Harrosh
Quoted 2 lines · Al Viro
Signed-off-by Al Viro <[email protected]>Al hi.
This patch is nice off course, but it clashes with a patch I was intending to push to linux-next today. (For 2.6.36 kernel)
Quoted 6 lines
The patch is the one to convert to the new truncate sequence:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-fsdevel&m=127539189718732&w=2In fact I was meaning to ask you if you could take this patch through your tree, so Christoph could base his cleanup on this as well.
The new truncate sequence bits already are in Al's tree. And as I said a few times before life would really be a lot simpler if you just base things ontop of that. It makes the API for the file system a lot better.
Quoted 13 lines · Christoph Hellwig
Quoted 12 lines · Boaz Harrosh
Quoted 2 lines · Al Viro
Signed-off-by Al Viro <[email protected]>Al hi.
This patch is nice off course, but it clashes with a patch I was intending to push to linux-next today. (For 2.6.36 kernel)
The patch is the one to convert to the new truncate sequence:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-fsdevel&m=127539189718732&w=2
Quoted 9 lines
Quoted 3 lines
In fact I was meaning to ask you if you could take this patch through your tree, so Christoph could base his cleanup on this as well.
The new truncate sequence bits already are in Al's tree. And as I said a few times before life would really be a lot simpler if you just base things ontop of that. It makes the API for the file system a lot better.
Will do. Patch based on vfs/for-next posted as reply. (Please review?)
Al's patch thing still holds, Al?
Boaz
PATCH 1/1 exofs: New truncate sequence
These changes are crafted based on the similar conversion done to ext2 by Nick Piggin.
* Remove the deprecated ->truncate vector. Let exofs_setattr take care of on-disk size updates.
* Call truncate_pagecache on the unused pages if write_begin/end fails.
* Cleanup exofs_delete_inode that did stupid inode writes and updates on an inode that will be removed.
* And finally get rid of exofs_get_block. We never had any blocks it was all for calling nobh_truncate_page. nobh_truncate_page is not actually needed in exofs since the last page is complete and gone, just like all the other pages. There is no partial blocks in exofs.
I've tested with this patch, and there are no apparent failures, so far.
--- fs/exofs/exofs.h | 1 - fs/exofs/file.c | 1 - fs/exofs/inode.c | 114 ++++++++++++++++++++---------------------------------- 3 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 74 deletions(-)
fs/exofs/exofs.h +0 -1
@@ -256,7 +256,6 @@ static inline int exofs_oi_read(struct exofs_i_info *oi, }/* inode.c */ -void exofs_truncate (struct inode *inode);int exofs_setattr (struct dentry *,struct iattr *); int exofs_write_begin(struct file *file, struct address_space *mapping, loff_t pos, unsigned len, unsigned flags,
fs/exofs/file.c +0 -1
@@ -86,6 +86,5 @@ const struct file_operations exofs_file_operations = { };const struct inode_operations exofs_file_inode_operations = { - .truncate = exofs_truncate, .setattr = exofs_setattr, };
fs/exofs/inode.c +42 -72
181 lines not on this page · raw message
Signature · 1 line
1.6.6.1
Re: [PATCH ver4] exofs: New truncate sequence
Quoted 17 lines · Boaz Harrosh
These changes are crafted based on the similar conversion done to ext2 by Nick Piggin.
* Remove the deprecated ->truncate vector. Let
exofs_setattrtake care of on-disk size updates.
* Calltruncate_pagecacheon the unused pages if write_begin/end fails.
* Cleanupexofs_delete_inodethat did stupid inode writes and updates on an inode that will be removed.
* And finally get rid ofexofs_get_block. We never had any blocks it was all for callingnobh_truncate_page.nobh_truncate_pageis not actually needed in exofs since the last page is complete and gone, just like all the other pages. There is no partial blocks in exofs.
Quoted 6 lines
I've tested with this patch, and there are no apparent failures, so far.
CC Nick Piggin <[email protected]>CC Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Boaz Harrosh <[email protected]>
Al hi.
Please take this through your tree. And/or tell me if you need it reorder with your ->evict patches.
Thanks
Boaz
Quoted 219 lines
--- fs/exofs/exofs.h | 1 - fs/exofs/file.c | 1 - fs/exofs/inode.c | 114 ++++++++++++++++++++---------------------------------- 3 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 74 deletions(-)fs/exofs/exofs.h +0
-1@@ -256,7 +256,6 @@ static inline int exofs_oi_read(struct exofs_i_info *oi, }/* inode.c */ -void exofs_truncate (struct inode *inode);int exofs_setattr (struct dentry *,struct iattr *); int exofs_write_begin(struct file *file, struct address_space *mapping, loff_t pos, unsigned len, unsigned flags,fs/exofs/file.c +0
-1@@ -86,6 +86,5 @@ const struct file_operations exofs_file_operations = { };const struct inode_operations exofs_file_inode_operations = { - .truncate = exofs_truncate, .setattr = exofs_setattr, };fs/exofs/inode.c +42
-72@@ -710,7 +710,7 @@ int exofs_write_begin(struct file *file, struct address_space *mapping, fsdata);if (ret) {EXOFS_DBGMSG ("simple_write_begin faild\n" ); -return ret; + goto out; } page = *pagep;@@ -725,7 +725,14 @@ int exofs_write_begin(struct file *file, struct address_space *mapping,EXOFS_DBGMSG ("__readpage_filler faild\n" ); } } +out: +if (unlikely (ret)) { +struct inode *inode = mapping->host; +loff_t to = pos + len; +if (to > inode->i_size) +truncate_pagecache (inode, to, inode->i_size); + }return ret; }@@ -750,6 +757,10 @@ static int exofs_write_end(struct file *file, struct address_space *mapping,int ret; ret =simple_write_end (file, mapping,pos, len, copied, page, fsdata); +if (unlikely (ret && pos + len > inode->i_size)) +truncate_pagecache (inode, pos + len, inode->i_size); + +/* TODO: once simple_write_end marks inode dirty remove */ if (i_size != inode->i_size)mark_inode_dirty (inode);return ret;@@ -808,91 +819,53 @@ static inline int exofs_inode_is_fast_symlink(struct inode *inode)return S_ISLNK (inode->i_mode) && (oi->i_data[0 ] !=0 ); } -/* -* get_block_t - Fill in a buffer_head -* An OSD takes care of block allocation so we just fake an allocation by -* putting in the inode's sector_t in the buffer_head. -* TODO: What about the case of create==0 and @iblock does not exist in the -* object? -*/ -static int exofs_get_block (struct inode *inode,sector_t iblock, -struct buffer_head *bh_result,int create) -{ -map_bh (bh_result, inode->i_sb, iblock); -return 0 ; -} -const struct osd_attr g_attr_logical_length =ATTR_DEF (OSD_APAGE_OBJECT_INFORMATION ,OSD_ATTR_OI_LOGICAL_LENGTH ,8 ); -static int _do_truncate (struct inode *inode) +static int _do_truncate (struct inode *inode,loff_t newsize) {struct exofs_i_info *oi =exofs_i (inode); -loff_t isize =i_size_read (inode);int ret; inode->i_mtime = inode->i_ctime =CURRENT_TIME ; -nobh_truncate_page (inode->i_mapping, isize, exofs_get_block); + ret =exofs_oi_truncate (oi, (u64 )newsize); +if (likely (!ret)) +truncate_setsize (inode, newsize); - ret =exofs_oi_truncate (oi, (u64 )isize); -EXOFS_DBGMSG ("(0x%lx) size=0x%llx\n" , inode->i_ino, isize); +EXOFS_DBGMSG ("(0x%lx) size=0x%llx ret=>%d\n" , + inode->i_ino, newsize, ret);return ret; }/* -* Truncate a file to the specified size - all we have to do is set the size -* attribute. We make sure the object exists first. -*/ -void exofs_truncate (struct inode *inode) -{ -struct exofs_i_info *oi =exofs_i (inode); -int ret; - -if (!(S_ISREG (inode->i_mode) ||S_ISDIR (inode->i_mode) - ||S_ISLNK (inode->i_mode))) -return ; -if (exofs_inode_is_fast_symlink (inode)) -return ; -if (IS_APPEND (inode) ||IS_IMMUTABLE (inode)) -return ; - -/* if we are about to truncate an object, and it hasn't been -* created yet, wait -*/ -if (unlikely (wait_obj_created (oi))) - goto fail; - - ret =_do_truncate (inode); -if (ret) - goto fail; - -out: -mark_inode_dirty (inode); -return ; -fail: -make_bad_inode (inode); - goto out; -} - -/* -* Set inode attributes - just call generic functions. +* Set inode attributes - update size attribute on OSD if needed, +* otherwise just call generic functions. */ int exofs_setattr (struct dentry *dentry,struct iattr *iattr) {struct inode *inode = dentry->d_inode;int error; +/* if we are about to modify an object, and it hasn't been +* created yet, wait +*/ + error =wait_obj_created (exofs_i (inode)); +if (unlikely (error)) +return error; + error =inode_change_ok (inode, iattr); -if (error) +if (unlikely (error))return error;if ((iattr->ia_valid &ATTR_SIZE ) && iattr->ia_size !=i_size_read (inode)) { -int error; + error =inode_newsize_ok (inode, iattr->ia_size); +if (unlikely (error)) +return error; - error =vmtruncate (inode, iattr->ia_size); -if (error) + error =_do_truncate (inode, iattr->ia_size); +if (unlikely (error))return error; }@@ -1345,28 +1318,25 @@ void exofs_delete_inode(struct inode *inode)truncate_inode_pages (&inode->i_data,0 ); +/* TODO: should do better here */ if (is_bad_inode (inode)) goto no_delete; -mark_inode_dirty (inode); -exofs_update_inode (inode,inode_needs_sync (inode)); - inode->i_size =0 ; -if (inode->i_blocks) -exofs_truncate (inode); -clear_inode (inode); - ret =exofs_get_io_state (&sbi->layout, &ios); -if (unlikely (ret)) { -EXOFS_ERR ("%s: exofs_get_io_state failed\n" , __func__); -return ; - } -/* if we are deleting an obj that hasn't been created yet, wait */ if (!obj_created (oi)) {BUG_ON (!obj_2bcreated (oi));wait_event (oi->i_wq,obj_created (oi)); +/* ignore the error attempt a remove anyway */ + } + +/* Now Remove the OSD objects */ + ret =exofs_get_io_state (&sbi->layout, &ios); +if (unlikely (ret)) { +EXOFS_ERR ("%s: exofs_get_io_state failed\n" , __func__); +return ; } ios->obj.id =exofs_oi_objno (oi);
Al Viro
maintainerRe: [PATCH ver4] exofs: New truncate sequence
Quoted 4 lines · Boaz Harrosh
Al hi.
Please take this through your tree. And/or tell me if you need it reorder with your ->evict patches.
Um... Don't we need to free on-disk data blocks when inode gets deleted?
Re: [PATCH ver4] exofs: New truncate sequence
Quoted 8 lines · Al Viro
Quoted 4 lines · Boaz Harrosh
Al hi.
Please take this through your tree. And/or tell me if you need it reorder with your ->evict patches.
Um... Don't we need to free on-disk data blocks when inode gets deleted?
No, the OSD device takes care of that when you send it an OSD_REMOVE command.
Thanks
Boaz
Al Viro
maintainerRe: [PATCH ver4] exofs: New truncate sequence
Quoted 5 lines · Boaz Harrosh
Quoted 4 lines · Al Viro
Quoted 2 lines · Boaz Harrosh
Al hi.
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 2 lines
Please take this through your tree. And/or tell me if you need it reorder with your ->evict patches.
Um... Don't we need to free on-disk data blocks when inode gets deleted?
No, the OSD device takes care of that when you send it an
OSD_REMOVEcommand.
OK, ver5 applied to for-next, evict_inode rediffed. Should show up on git.kernel.org shortly.
Re: [PATCH ver4] exofs: New truncate sequence
Quoted 9 lines · Al Viro
Quoted 8 lines · Boaz Harrosh
Quoted 7 lines · Al Viro
Quoted 4 lines · Boaz Harrosh
Al hi.
Please take this through your tree. And/or tell me if you need it reorder with your ->evict patches.
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 1 line
Um... Don't we need to free on-disk data blocks when inode gets deleted?
No, the OSD device takes care of that when you send it an
OSD_REMOVEcommand.OK, ver5 applied to for-next,
evict_inoderediffed. Should show up on git.kernel.org shortly.
Thank you Al.
I'm also publishing a few exofs patches on -next through the osd tree.
I have test merges of:
- Base Linus tree - as of today
+ merge vfs/for-next
+ merge vfs/evict_inode
+ merge osd/linux-next - based on Linus
By visual inspection of vfs/evict_inode and vfs/for-next they should not conflict I will monitor linux-next carefully to make sure we are clean. If there are problems I'll base my tree on vfs/for-next, which should be good as long as you don't rebase.
Thanks again
Boaz
Re: [PATCH ver4] exofs: New truncate sequence
In reply to Boaz Harroshfs/exofs/inode.c int exofs_write_begin(struct file *file, struct address_space *mapping, · line 735
Quoted 7 lines
fs/exofs/inode.c +6
-0+if (unlikely (ret)) { +struct inode *inode = mapping->host; +loff_t to = pos + len; +if (to > inode->i_size) +truncate_pagecache (inode, to, inode->i_size); + }
Might be worth to add a exofs_write_failed helper similar to ext2 that can be shared with write_end, and once added ->direct_IO?
fs/exofs/inode.c static inline int exofs_inode_is_fast_symlink(struct inode *inode) · line 865
Quoted 3 lines
fs/exofs/inode.c +3
-0+ error =inode_newsize_ok (inode, iattr->ia_size); +if (unlikely (error)) +return error;
This has been folded into inode_change_ok in vfs.git #for_next, you can drop it.
Re: [PATCH ver4] exofs: New truncate sequence
Quoted 11 lines · Christoph Hellwig
fs/exofs/inode.c int exofs_write_begin(struct file *file, struct address_space *mapping, · line 735
Quoted 7 lines
fs/exofs/inode.c +6
-0+if (unlikely (ret)) { +struct inode *inode = mapping->host; +loff_t to = pos + len; +if (to > inode->i_size) +truncate_pagecache (inode, to, inode->i_size); + }Might be worth to add a
exofs_write_failedhelper similar to ext2 that can be shared withwrite_end, and once added ->direct_IO?
Quoted 7 lines
fs/exofs/inode.c static inline int exofs_inode_is_fast_symlink(struct inode *inode) · line 865
Quoted 3 lines
fs/exofs/inode.c +3
-0+ error =inode_newsize_ok (inode, iattr->ia_size); +if (unlikely (error)) +return error;This has been folded into
inode_change_okin vfs.git #for_next, you can drop it.
Christoph didn't you have a patch to simple_write_end, is it in vfs/for-next This patch adds this comment:
+ /* TODO: once simple_write_end marks inode dirty remove */
if (i_size != inode->i_size)
mark_inode_dirty(inode);
Please CC me on that patch
Thanks for the review
Boaz
PATCH 1/1 exofs: New truncate sequence
In reply to Boaz HarroshThese changes are crafted based on the similar conversion done to ext2 by Nick Piggin.
* Remove the deprecated ->truncate vector. Let exofs_setattr take care of on-disk size updates.
* Call truncate_pagecache on the unused pages if write_begin/end fails.
* Cleanup exofs_delete_inode that did stupid inode writes and updates on an inode that will be removed.
* And finally get rid of exofs_get_block. We never had any blocks it was all for calling nobh_truncate_page. nobh_truncate_page is not actually needed in exofs since the last page is complete and gone, just like all the other pages. There is no partial blocks in exofs.
I've tested with this patch, and there are no apparent failures, so far.
--- fs/exofs/exofs.h | 1 - fs/exofs/file.c | 1 - fs/exofs/inode.c | 115 ++++++++++++++++++++---------------------------------- 3 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 75 deletions(-)
fs/exofs/exofs.h +0 -1
@@ -256,7 +256,6 @@ static inline int exofs_oi_read(struct exofs_i_info *oi, }/* inode.c */ -void exofs_truncate (struct inode *inode);int exofs_setattr (struct dentry *,struct iattr *); int exofs_write_begin(struct file *file, struct address_space *mapping, loff_t pos, unsigned len, unsigned flags,
fs/exofs/file.c +0 -1
@@ -86,6 +86,5 @@ const struct file_operations exofs_file_operations = { };const struct inode_operations exofs_file_inode_operations = { - .truncate = exofs_truncate, .setattr = exofs_setattr, };
fs/exofs/inode.c +42 -73
186 lines not on this page · raw message
Signature · 1 line
1.6.6.1