Question about phonebook_add_contact
Hi!
I've got question about this part of code from beginning phonebook_add_contact func:
if ((contact->numbers == NULL && (contact->fullname == NULL ||
contact->fullname[0] == '\0')))
return;Is this checking really needed in that place? It is possible to have contacts data in phonebook that have all data except phone set (by example: email addresses, main address etc). In that condition when we want to pull target vcard entry, then empty string will be returned even if user send ATTRIBUTE_MASK to include all fields in the result.
I'm asking because I have problem with "0.vcf" vcard (this is responsible for personal information of device owner). This entry by default does not have any phone's data filled in address book but it is mandatory to put this in vcard-listing. Actually, I am forced to initialize contact->numbers list with empty number even if none of number is available to return correct result for "0.vcf."(in phonebook-tracker)...
Can this 'contact->numbers' checking be removed from there or maybe other phonebooks rely on this behaviour?
BR,
Radek
Hi Radek,
Quoted 9 lines · Radoslaw Jablonski
Hi!
I've got question about this part of code from beginningphonebook_add_contactfunc:if ((
contact->numbers== NULL && (contact->fullname== NULL || contact->fullname[0] == '\0'))) return;
Quoted 10 lines
Is this checking really needed in that place? It is possible to have contacts data
in phonebook that have all data except phone set (by example: email addresses,
main address etc). In that condition when we want to pull target vcard entry, then
empty string will be returned even if user sendATTRIBUTE_MASKto include all fields
in the result.
That piece of code is a legacy from simpler times, when we supported less types of contact information.
Quoted 10 lines
I'm asking because I have problem with "0.vcf" vcard (this is responsible for personal
information of device owner). This entry by default does not have any phone's data
filled in address book but it is mandatory to put this in vcard-listing. Actually, I am forced to initializecontact->numberslist with empty number even if
none of number is available to return correct result for "0.vcf."(in phonebook-tracker)...
Quoted 5 lines
Can this '
contact->numbers' checking be removed from there or maybe other phonebooks
rely on this behaviour?From what I know, the Tracker backend is the only thing that relies on
that, so I think that check could be removed with little to no problem. In fact, as you are already dealing with the empty numbers list case, the problem is already solved.
Quoted 11 lines
BR,
Radek--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bluetooth" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Cheers,
Signature · 1 line
Vinicius