suspend warning with 3c59x
Subsystems (2)
I have got a warning with the 3c59.
(reproduced with pm-suspend)
[ 254.214993] 3c59x 0000:00:0d.0: PME# enabled [ 254.215021] BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/mutex.c:94 [ 254.215030] in_atomic(): 0, irqs_disabled(): 1, pid: 4875, name: ethtool [ 254.215042] Pid: 4875, comm: ethtool Tainted: G W 2.6.36-rc3+ #7 [ 254.215049] Call Trace: [ 254.215050] [] __might_sleep+0xb1/0xb6 [ 254.215050] [] mutex_lock+0x17/0x30 [ 254.215050] [] acpi_enable_wakeup_device_power+0x2b/0xb1 [ 254.215050] [] acpi_pm_device_sleep_wake+0x42/0x7f [ 254.215050] [] acpi_pci_sleep_wake+0x5d/0x63 [ 254.215050] [] platform_pci_sleep_wake+0x1d/0x20 [ 254.215050] [] __pci_enable_wake+0x90/0xd0 [ 254.215050] [] acpi_set_WOL+0x8e/0xf5 [3c59x] [ 254.215050] [] vortex_set_wol+0x4e/0x5e [3c59x] [ 254.215050] [] dev_ethtool+0x1cf/0xb61 [ 254.215050] [] ? debug_mutex_free_waiter+0x45/0x4a [ 254.215050] [] ? __mutex_lock_common+0x204/0x20e [ 254.215050] [] ? __mutex_lock_slowpath+0x12/0x15 [ 254.215050] [] ? mutex_lock+0x23/0x30 [ 254.215050] [] dev_ioctl+0x42c/0x533 [ 254.215050] [] ? _cond_resched+0x8/0x1c [ 254.215050] [] ? lock_page+0x1c/0x30 [ 254.215050] [] ? page_address+0x15/0x7c [ 254.215050] [] ? filemap_fault+0x187/0x2c4 [ 254.215050] [] sock_ioctl+0x1d4/0x1e0 [ 254.215050] [] ? sock_ioctl+0x0/0x1e0 [ 254.215050] [] vfs_ioctl+0x19/0x33 [ 254.215050] [] do_vfs_ioctl+0x424/0x46f [ 254.215050] [] ? selinux_file_ioctl+0x3c/0x40 [ 254.215050] [] sys_ioctl+0x40/0x5a [ 254.215050] [] sysenter_do_call+0x12/0x22
Warning introduced with commit 690a1f2002a3091bd18a501f46c9530f10481463:
3c59x: Add ethtool WOL support
vortex_set_wol protected with a spinlock, but nested acpi_set_WOL acquires a mutex inside atomic context. Do we really need to protect .set_wol with a vp->lock at all?
Hello.
Quoted 10 lines · On Tuesday 14 September 2010 18:32:40 you wrote:
I have got a warning with the 3c59.
(reproduced with pm-suspend)[ 254.214993] 3c59x 0000:00:0d.0: PME# enabled [ 254.215021] BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/mutex.c:94 [ 254.215030] in_atomic(): 0, irqs_disabled(): 1, pid: 4875, name: ethtool [ 254.215042] Pid: 4875, comm: ethtool Tainted: G W 2.6.36-rc3+ #7 [ 254.215049] Call Trace:
Quoted 6 lines
Warning introduced with commit
690a1f2002a3091bd18a501f46c9530f10481463:
3c59x: Add ethtool WOL support
vortex_set_wolprotected with a spinlock, but nestedacpi_set_WOLacquires a mutex inside atomic context. Do we really need to protect .set_wol with avp->lockat all?
Yes, that was my mistake, we do not actually need it.
Signature · 1 line
WBR, Andrew