Skip to contentSkip to conversation

multi-machine simultaneous kernel panic in tcp_transmit_kcb

DISCUSSION Doug Hughes 2 participants 2 messages Oct 28, 2010

Subsystems (2)
lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw

3 machines within 1 minute of each other (odd, by itself, but not the root of the question).

2 of this:
2.6.18-164.15.1.el5 #1 SMP Wed Mar 17 11:30:06 EDT 2010 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux (I have a screen shot on the kvm)
all Cent 5.4

1 Xen instances with 2.6.18-128.1.14.el5xen #1 SMP Wed Jun 17 07:10:16 EDT 2009 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux

a slightly older kernel but crashed within one minute of the other two. Since it's a xen, I have a text traceback:

Pid: 0, comm: swapper Not tainted 2.6.18-128.1.14.el5xen #1

RIP: e030:[<ffffffff8040e077>]  [<ffffffff8040e077>] pskb_copy+0x133/0x1b1
RSP: e02b:ffffffff8066ade0  EFLAGS: 00010282
RAX: ffff8800325fa120 RBX: ffff8800434f5780 RCX: ffff88006d311930
RDX: 656363612f647074 RSI: ffff8800325fa130 RDI: 0000000000000002
RBP: ffff8800549aa680 R08: 7ffffffffffffffe R09: 0000000000000000
R10: ffff8800434f5780 R11: 00000000000000c8 R12: 0000000000000220
R13: ffff8800549aa680 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: ffffffffff578000
FS:  00002b84514af260(0000) GS:ffffffff805ba000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS:  e033 DS: 0000 ES: 0000
Process swapper (pid: 0, threadinfo ffffffff8062a000, task ffffffff804e0a80)
Stack:  ffffffff802886d9  ffff88006ad3d280  0000000000000001  ffffffff80222485
 ffff880025665380  000000017d0f80ab  0000000000000001  ffff88006ad3d280
 ffff8800549aa680  00000000ffffff8f
Call Trace:
<IRQ>  [<ffffffff802886d9>] rebalance_tick+0x18b/0x3d4
 [<ffffffff80222485>] tcp_transmit_skb+0x73/0x667
 [<ffffffff8043903a>] tcp_retransmit_skb+0x53d/0x638
 [<ffffffff8043a569>] tcp_write_timer+0x0/0x68e
 [<ffffffff8043a9d6>] tcp_write_timer+0x46d/0x68e
 [<ffffffff80291f8b>] run_timer_softirq+0x13f/0x1c6
 [<ffffffff802130d6>] __do_softirq+0x8d/0x13b
 [<ffffffff80260da4>] call_softirq+0x1c/0x278
 [<ffffffff8026e0be>] do_softirq+0x31/0x98
 [<ffffffff8026df39>] do_IRQ+0xec/0xf5
 [<ffffffff803a7b94>] evtchn_do_upcall+0x13b/0x1fb
 [<ffffffff802608d6>] do_hypervisor_callback+0x1e/0x2c
<EOI>  [<ffffffff802063aa>] hypercall_page+0x3aa/0x1000
 [<ffffffff802063aa>] hypercall_page+0x3aa/0x1000
 [<ffffffff8026f511>] raw_safe_halt+0x84/0xa8
 [<ffffffff8026ca52>] xen_idle+0x38/0x4a
 [<ffffffff8024b0d8>] cpu_idle+0x97/0xba
 [<ffffffff80634b09>] start_kernel+0x21f/0x224
 [<ffffffff806341e5>] _sinittext+0x1e5/0x1eb


Code: 48 8b 02 25 00 40 02 00 48 3d 00 40 02 00 75 04 48 8b 52 10
RIP  [<ffffffff8040e077>] pskb_copy+0x133/0x1b1
 RSP <ffffffff8066ade0>

<0>Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception

---

The first 4 lines of the trace on the xen and the non-xen are the same except for the addresses.

In fact, they are the same up until the 9th line where they start to diverge a little bit.

The last thing in the kern log before the crash on one was an nfs server not responding, but those happen sporadically and often enough that I don't suspect it's related.

Given that its looks, seemed like an appropriate question for netdev (following a failed google search)

#1 lore raw
Quoted 8 lines · Doug Hughes

3 machines within 1 minute of each other (odd, by itself, but not the root of the question).

2 of this:
2.6.18-164.15.1.el5 #1 SMP Wed Mar 17 11:30:06 EDT 2010 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
(I have a screen shot on the kvm)
all Cent 5.4

[...]

Please don't ask netdev to support an old distribution kernel. Try asking on CentOS support forums or buy support from Red Hat.

Ben.

Signature · 3 lines
Ben Hutchings, Senior Software Engineer, Solarflare Communications
Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job.
They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.