kernel SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED changed to __SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED()
Subsystems (3)
PATCH RESEND 1/1 kernel SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED changed to __SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED()
There are still some files containing .lock = SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED type assignments which should be converted to __SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED(). Corrected spacing between __SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED and ( for ARM.
---
arch/arm/kernel/smp.c +1 -1
@@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ struct ipi_data { }; static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct ipi_data, ipi_data) = { - .lock =SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED , + .lock =__SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED (ipi_data.lock), };enum ipi_msg_type {
arch/mips/kernel/vpe.c +2 -2
@@ -148,9 +148,9 @@ struct {spinlock_t tc_list_lock;struct list_head tc_list;/* Thread contexts */ } vpecontrol = { - .vpe_list_lock = SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED, + .vpe_list_lock = __SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED(vpecontrol.vpe_list_lock), .vpe_list = LIST_HEAD_INIT(vpecontrol.vpe_list), - .tc_list_lock = SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED, + .tc_list_lock = __SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED(vpecontrol.tc_list_lock), .tc_list =LIST_HEAD_INIT (vpecontrol.tc_list) };
kernel/cred.c +1 -1
@@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ static struct kmem_cache *cred_jar;static struct thread_group_cred init_tgcred = { .usage =ATOMIC_INIT (2 ), .tgid =0 , - .lock =SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED , + .lock =__SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED (init_tgcred.lock), };#endif
Signature · 3 lines
Atul Sowani (sowani at gmail.com) http://savannah.gnu.org/users/atul ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hi Atul,
Quoted 3 lines · Atul Sowani
There are still some files containing .lock =
SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKEDtype assignments which should be converted to__SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED(). Corrected spacing between__SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKEDand ( for ARM.
IMHO the last sentence shouldn't appear in the commit log. (If you still want to let your readers know what you changed---generally a good idea---you can do so after the triple-dash below.)
I don't know you patch series, but I'd expect that all archs don't want the space between __SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED and (.
Other than that
Best regards
Uwe
Quoted 52 lines
Signed-off-by Atul Sowani <[email protected]>---
diff -uprN
a/arch/arm/kernel/smp.cb/arch/arm/kernel/smp.carch/arm/kernel/smp.c +1
-1@@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ struct ipi_data { }; static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct ipi_data, ipi_data) = { - .lock =SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED , + .lock =__SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED (ipi_data.lock), };enum ipi_msg_type {diff -uprN
a/arch/mips/kernel/vpe.cb/arch/mips/kernel/vpe.carch/mips/kernel/vpe.c +2
-2@@ -148,9 +148,9 @@ struct {spinlock_t tc_list_lock;struct list_head tc_list;/* Thread contexts */ } vpecontrol = { - .vpe_list_lock = SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED, + .vpe_list_lock = __SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED(vpecontrol.vpe_list_lock), .vpe_list = LIST_HEAD_INIT(vpecontrol.vpe_list), - .tc_list_lock = SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED, + .tc_list_lock = __SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED(vpecontrol.tc_list_lock), .tc_list =LIST_HEAD_INIT (vpecontrol.tc_list) };diff -uprN
a/kernel/cred.cb/kernel/cred.ckernel/cred.c +1
-1@@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ static struct kmem_cache *cred_jar;static struct thread_group_cred init_tgcred = { .usage =ATOMIC_INIT (2 ), .tgid =0 , - .lock =SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED , + .lock =__SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED (init_tgcred.lock), };#endif Signature · 8 lines
Atul Sowani (sowani at gmail.com) http://savannah.gnu.org/users/atul ------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
Signature · 2 lines
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-K?nig | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Quoted 3 lines · Atul Sowani
There are still some files containing .lock =
SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKEDtype assignments which should be converted to__SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED(). Corrected spacing between__SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKEDand ( for ARM.
Thinking about the ARM bit, I'll have to NAK this patch.
arch/arm/kernel/smp.c struct ipi_data { · line 60
Quoted 10 lines
diff -uprN
a/arch/arm/kernel/smp.cb/arch/arm/kernel/smp.carch/arm/kernel/smp.c +1
-1@@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ struct ipi_data { }; static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct ipi_data, ipi_data) = { - .lock =SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED , + .lock =__SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED (ipi_data.lock), };
This lock is in the percpu data area. This means that when other CPUs are brought online, and therefore other percpu areas are instantiated, this lock will be mis-initialized (the pointers et.al. will be pointing at the original percpu instance.)
So NAK, this will break.
We can either go back to a static array for this, initialize the lock manually (though this could be problematical), or we require to go to per-ipi type interrupts for all SMP architectures.
Quoted 16 lines · On Monday 15 November 2010 10:24:04 Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
arch/arm/kernel/smp.c 2010-11-07 00:47:32.000000000 +0530 struct ipi_data { · line 60
Quoted 10 lines
diff -uprN
a/arch/arm/kernel/smp.cb/arch/arm/kernel/smp.carch/arm/kernel/smp.c 2010-11-07 00:47:32.000000000 +0530 renamed from arch/arm/kernel/smp.c 2010-10-21 02:00:22.000000000 +0530 +1
-1@@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ struct ipi_data { }; static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct ipi_data, ipi_data) = { - .lock = SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED, + .lock = __SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED(ipi_data.lock), };This lock is in the percpu data area. This means that when other CPUs are brought online, and therefore other percpu areas are instantiated, this lock will be mis-initialized (the pointers et.al. will be pointing at the original percpu instance.)
Quoted 1 line
So NAK, this will break.
I believe right now we only use the argument of __SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED as an identifier string for lockdep, but not for any pointers, so the patch would actually do what was intended, but break if we ever start relying on the pointer.
Maybe we can mangle the argument in some way to make sure it will break at build time when that happens, e.g.
.lock = __SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED(ipi_data.__lock)
This would at least let us remove SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED.
Arnd
Quoted 13 lines · Arnd Bergmann
Quoted 6 lines · On Monday 15 November 2010 10:24:04 Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
This lock is in the percpu data area. This means that when other CPUs are brought online, and therefore other percpu areas are instantiated, this lock will be mis-initialized (the pointers et.al. will be pointing at the original percpu instance.)
So NAK, this will break.
I believe right now we only use the argument of
__SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKEDas an identifier string for lockdep, but not for any pointers, so the patch would actually do what was intended, but break if we ever start relying on the pointer.
Quoted 6 lines
Maybe we can mangle the argument in some way to make sure it will break at build time when that happens, e.g.
.lock = __SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED(ipi_data.__lock)This would at least let us remove
SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED.
Or do one of the things I've suggested - one of which I've just completed the code changes for, and results in this lock going away completely. It's not a nice idea to have percpu data written to by 'foreign' CPUs.