cfq-iosched: Introduce cfq_entity for CFQ queue
Subsystems (3)
A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): [email protected]
PATCH v3 1/6 cfq-iosched: Introduce cfq_entity for CFQ queue
Introduce cfq_entity for CFQ queue.
--- block/cfq-iosched.c | 119 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------ 1 files changed, 76 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)
block/cfq-iosched.c +76 -43
@@ -91,20 +91,31 @@ struct cfq_rb_root {#define CFQ_RB_ROOT (struct cfq_rb_root) { .rb = RB_ROOT, .left = NULL, \ .count = 0, .min_vdisktime = 0, } + +/* +* This's the CFQ queue schedule entity which is scheduled on service tree. +*/ +struct cfq_entity { +/* service tree */ +struct cfq_rb_root *service_tree; +/* service_tree member */ +struct rb_node rb_node; +/* service_tree key, represent the position on the tree */ +unsigned long rb_key; +}; +/* * Per process-grouping structure */ struct cfq_queue { +/* The schedule entity */ +struct cfq_entity cfqe;/* reference count */ atomic_t ref;/* various state flags, see below */ unsigned int flags;/* parent cfq_data */ struct cfq_data *cfqd; -/* service_tree member */ -struct rb_node rb_node; -/* service_tree key */ -unsigned long rb_key;/* prio tree member */ struct rb_node p_node;/* prio tree root we belong to, if any */
@@ -143,7 +154,6 @@ struct cfq_queue {u32 seek_history;sector_t last_request_pos; -struct cfq_rb_root *service_tree;struct cfq_queue *new_cfqq;struct cfq_group *cfqg;struct cfq_group *orig_cfqg;
@@ -302,6 +312,15 @@ struct cfq_data {struct rcu_head rcu; }; +static inline struct cfq_queue * +cfqq_of_entity (struct cfq_entity *cfqe) +{ +if (cfqe) + return container_of(cfqe, struct cfq_queue, cfqe); + +return NULL ; +} +static struct cfq_group *cfq_get_next_cfqg (struct cfq_data *cfqd); static struct cfq_rb_root *service_tree_for(struct cfq_group *cfqg,
@@ -743,7 +762,7 @@ cfq_choose_req(struct cfq_data *cfqd, struct request *rq1, struct request *rq2,/* * The below is leftmost cache rbtree addon */ -static struct cfq_queue *cfq_rb_first (struct cfq_rb_root *root) +static struct cfq_entity *cfq_rb_first (struct cfq_rb_root *root) {/* Service tree is empty */ if (!root->count)
@@ -753,7 +772,7 @@ static struct cfq_queue *cfq_rb_first(struct cfq_rb_root *root) root->left =rb_first (&root->rb);if (root->left) - return rb_entry(root->left, struct cfq_queue, rb_node); + return rb_entry(root->left, struct cfq_entity, rb_node);return NULL ; }
@@ -1170,21 +1189,24 @@ static inline void cfq_put_cfqg(struct cfq_group *cfqg) {}static void cfq_service_tree_add (struct cfq_data *cfqd,struct cfq_queue *cfqq,bool add_front) { +struct cfq_entity *cfqe;struct rb_node **p, *parent; -struct cfq_queue *__cfqq; +struct cfq_entity *__cfqe;unsigned long rb_key;struct cfq_rb_root *service_tree;int left;int new_cfqq =1 ;int group_changed =0 ; + cfqe = &cfqq->cfqe; +#ifdef CONFIG_CFQ_GROUP_IOSCHED if (!cfqd->cfq_group_isolation &&cfqq_type (cfqq) ==SYNC_NOIDLE_WORKLOAD && cfqq->cfqg && cfqq->cfqg != &cfqd->root_group) {/* Move this cfq to root group */ cfq_log_cfqq (cfqd, cfqq,"moving to root group" ); -if (!RB_EMPTY_NODE (&cfqq->rb_node)) +if (!RB_EMPTY_NODE (&cfqe->rb_node))cfq_group_service_tree_del (cfqd, cfqq->cfqg); cfqq->orig_cfqg = cfqq->cfqg; cfqq->cfqg = &cfqd->root_group;
@@ -1194,7 +1216,7 @@ static void cfq_service_tree_add(struct cfq_data *cfqd, struct cfq_queue *cfqq, && cfqq_type(cfqq) == SYNC_WORKLOAD && cfqq->orig_cfqg) {/* cfqq is sequential now needs to go to its original group */ BUG_ON (cfqq->cfqg != &cfqd->root_group); -if (!RB_EMPTY_NODE (&cfqq->rb_node)) +if (!RB_EMPTY_NODE (&cfqe->rb_node))cfq_group_service_tree_del (cfqd, cfqq->cfqg);cfq_put_cfqg (cfqq->cfqg); cfqq->cfqg = cfqq->orig_cfqg;
@@ -1209,9 +1231,9 @@ static void cfq_service_tree_add(struct cfq_data *cfqd, struct cfq_queue *cfqq,if (cfq_class_idle (cfqq)) { rb_key =CFQ_IDLE_DELAY ; parent =rb_last (&service_tree->rb); -if (parent && parent != &cfqq->rb_node) { - __cfqq = rb_entry(parent, struct cfq_queue, rb_node); - rb_key += __cfqq->rb_key; +if (parent && parent != &cfqe->rb_node) { + __cfqe = rb_entry(parent, struct cfq_entity, rb_node); + rb_key += __cfqe->rb_key; }else rb_key += jiffies; }else if (!add_front) {
@@ -1226,37 +1248,37 @@ static void cfq_service_tree_add(struct cfq_data *cfqd, struct cfq_queue *cfqq, cfqq->slice_resid =0 ; }else { rb_key = -HZ ; - __cfqq =cfq_rb_first (service_tree); - rb_key += __cfqq ? __cfqq->rb_key : jiffies; + __cfqe =cfq_rb_first (service_tree); + rb_key += __cfqe ? __cfqe->rb_key : jiffies; } -if (!RB_EMPTY_NODE (&cfqq->rb_node)) { +if (!RB_EMPTY_NODE (&cfqe->rb_node)) { new_cfqq =0 ;/* * same position, nothing more to do */ -if (rb_key == cfqq->rb_key && - cfqq->service_tree == service_tree) +if (rb_key == cfqe->rb_key && + cfqe->service_tree == service_tree)return ; -cfq_rb_erase (&cfqq->rb_node, cfqq->service_tree); - cfqq->service_tree =NULL ; +cfq_rb_erase (&cfqe->rb_node, cfqe->service_tree); + cfqe->service_tree =NULL ; } left =1 ; parent =NULL ; - cfqq->service_tree = service_tree; + cfqe->service_tree = service_tree; p = &service_tree->rb.rb_node;while (*p) {struct rb_node **n; parent = *p; - __cfqq = rb_entry(parent, struct cfq_queue, rb_node); + __cfqe = rb_entry(parent, struct cfq_entity, rb_node);/* * sort by key, that represents service time. */ -if (time_before (rb_key, __cfqq->rb_key)) +if (time_before (rb_key, __cfqe->rb_key)) n = &(*p)->rb_left;else { n = &(*p)->rb_right;
@@ -1267,11 +1289,11 @@ static void cfq_service_tree_add(struct cfq_data *cfqd, struct cfq_queue *cfqq, }if (left) - service_tree->left = &cfqq->rb_node; + service_tree->left = &cfqe->rb_node; - cfqq->rb_key = rb_key; -rb_link_node (&cfqq->rb_node, parent, p); -rb_insert_color (&cfqq->rb_node, &service_tree->rb); + cfqe->rb_key = rb_key; +rb_link_node (&cfqe->rb_node, parent, p); +rb_insert_color (&cfqe->rb_node, &service_tree->rb); service_tree->count++;if ((add_front || !new_cfqq) && !group_changed)return ;
@@ -1373,13 +1395,16 @@ static void cfq_add_cfqq_rr(struct cfq_data *cfqd, struct cfq_queue *cfqq)*/ static void cfq_del_cfqq_rr (struct cfq_data *cfqd,struct cfq_queue *cfqq) { +struct cfq_entity *cfqe;cfq_log_cfqq (cfqd, cfqq,"del_from_rr" );BUG_ON (!cfq_cfqq_on_rr (cfqq));cfq_clear_cfqq_on_rr (cfqq); -if (!RB_EMPTY_NODE (&cfqq->rb_node)) { -cfq_rb_erase (&cfqq->rb_node, cfqq->service_tree); - cfqq->service_tree =NULL ; + cfqe = &cfqq->cfqe; + +if (!RB_EMPTY_NODE (&cfqe->rb_node)) { +cfq_rb_erase (&cfqe->rb_node, cfqe->service_tree); + cfqe->service_tree =NULL ; }if (cfqq->p_root) {rb_erase (&cfqq->p_node, cfqq->p_root);
@@ -1707,13 +1732,13 @@ static struct cfq_queue *cfq_get_next_queue(struct cfq_data *cfqd)return NULL ;if (RB_EMPTY_ROOT (&service_tree->rb))return NULL ; -return cfq_rb_first (service_tree); +return cfqq_of_entity (cfq_rb_first (service_tree)); }static struct cfq_queue *cfq_get_next_queue_forced (struct cfq_data *cfqd) {struct cfq_group *cfqg; -struct cfq_queue *cfqq; +struct cfq_entity *cfqe;int i, j;struct cfq_rb_root *st;
@@ -1724,9 +1749,11 @@ static struct cfq_queue *cfq_get_next_queue_forced(struct cfq_data *cfqd)if (!cfqg)return NULL ; -for_each_cfqg_st (cfqg, i, j, st) -if ((cfqq =cfq_rb_first (st)) !=NULL ) -return cfqq; +for_each_cfqg_st (cfqg, i, j, st) { + cfqe =cfq_rb_first (st); +if (cfqe !=NULL ) +return cfqq_of_entity (cfqe); + }return NULL ; }
@@ -1863,9 +1890,12 @@ static struct cfq_queue *cfq_close_cooperator(struct cfq_data *cfqd,static bool cfq_should_idle (struct cfq_data *cfqd,struct cfq_queue *cfqq) { +struct cfq_entity *cfqe;enum wl_prio_t prio =cfqq_prio (cfqq); -struct cfq_rb_root *service_tree = cfqq->service_tree; +struct cfq_rb_root *service_tree; + cfqe = &cfqq->cfqe; + service_tree = cfqe->service_tree;BUG_ON (!service_tree);BUG_ON (!service_tree->count);
@@ -2075,7 +2105,7 @@ static void cfq_setup_merge(struct cfq_queue *cfqq, struct cfq_queue *new_cfqq)static enum wl_type_t cfq_choose_wl (struct cfq_data *cfqd,struct cfq_group *cfqg,enum wl_prio_t prio) { -struct cfq_queue *queue; +struct cfq_entity *cfqe;int i;bool key_valid = false;unsigned long lowest_key =0 ;
@@ -2083,10 +2113,10 @@ static enum wl_type_t cfq_choose_wl(struct cfq_data *cfqd,for (i =0 ; i <=SYNC_WORKLOAD ; ++i) {/* select the one with lowest rb_key */ - queue =cfq_rb_first (service_tree_for (cfqg, prio, i)); -if (queue && - (!key_valid ||time_before (queue->rb_key, lowest_key))) { - lowest_key = queue->rb_key; + cfqe =cfq_rb_first (service_tree_for (cfqg, prio, i)); +if (cfqe && + (!key_valid ||time_before (cfqe->rb_key, lowest_key))) { + lowest_key = cfqe->rb_key; cur_best = i; key_valid = true; }
@@ -2833,7 +2863,10 @@ static void cfq_ioc_set_ioprio(struct io_context *ioc)static void cfq_init_cfqq (struct cfq_data *cfqd,struct cfq_queue *cfqq,pid_t pid,bool is_sync) { -RB_CLEAR_NODE (&cfqq->rb_node); +struct cfq_entity *cfqe; + + cfqe = &cfqq->cfqe; +RB_CLEAR_NODE (&cfqe->rb_node);RB_CLEAR_NODE (&cfqq->p_node);INIT_LIST_HEAD (&cfqq->fifo);
@@ -3242,7 +3275,7 @@ cfq_should_preempt(struct cfq_data *cfqd, struct cfq_queue *new_cfqq,/* Allow preemption only if we are idling on sync-noidle tree */ if (cfqd->serving_type ==SYNC_NOIDLE_WORKLOAD &&cfqq_type (new_cfqq) ==SYNC_NOIDLE_WORKLOAD && - new_cfqq->service_tree->count ==2 && + new_cfqq->cfqe.service_tree->count ==2 &&RB_EMPTY_ROOT (&cfqq->sort_list))return true;
Signature · 1 line
1.6.5.2
PATCH v3 2/6 cfq-iosched: Introduce cfq_entity for CFQ group
In reply to a message not in the archiveIntroduce cfq_entity for CFQ group.
--- block/cfq-iosched.c | 111 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------- 1 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-)
block/cfq-iosched.c +67 -44
@@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ static DEFINE_IDA(cic_index_ida);#define cfq_class_rt (cfqq) ((cfqq)->ioprio_class == IOPRIO_CLASS_RT)#define sample_valid (samples) ((samples) > 80) -#define rb_entry_cfqg (node) rb_entry((node), struct cfq_group, rb_node) +#define rb_entry_entity (node) rb_entry((node), struct cfq_entity, rb_node)/* * Most of our rbtree usage is for sorting with min extraction, so
@@ -102,6 +102,11 @@ struct cfq_entity {struct rb_node rb_node;/* service_tree key, represent the position on the tree */ unsigned long rb_key; + +/* group service_tree key */ +u64 vdisktime; +bool is_group_entity; +unsigned int weight; };/*
@@ -183,12 +188,8 @@ enum wl_type_t {/* This is per cgroup per device grouping structure */ struct cfq_group { -/* group service_tree member */ -struct rb_node rb_node; - -/* group service_tree key */ -u64 vdisktime; -unsigned int weight; +/* cfq group sched entity */ +struct cfq_entity cfqe;/* number of cfqq currently on this group */ int nr_cfqq;
@@ -315,12 +316,22 @@ struct cfq_data {static inline struct cfq_queue *cfqq_of_entity (struct cfq_entity *cfqe) { -if (cfqe) +if (cfqe && !cfqe->is_group_entity) return container_of(cfqe, struct cfq_queue, cfqe);return NULL ; } +static inline struct cfq_group * +cfqg_of_entity (struct cfq_entity *cfqe) +{ +if (cfqe && cfqe->is_group_entity) + return container_of(cfqe, struct cfq_group, cfqe); + +return NULL ; +} + +static struct cfq_group *cfq_get_next_cfqg (struct cfq_data *cfqd); static struct cfq_rb_root *service_tree_for(struct cfq_group *cfqg,
@@ -548,12 +559,12 @@ cfq_prio_to_slice(struct cfq_data *cfqd, struct cfq_queue *cfqq)return cfq_prio_slice (cfqd,cfq_cfqq_sync (cfqq), cfqq->ioprio); } -static inline u64 cfq_scale_slice (unsigned long delta,struct cfq_group *cfqg) +static inline u64 cfq_scale_slice (unsigned long delta,struct cfq_entity *cfqe) {u64 d = delta <<CFQ_SERVICE_SHIFT ; d = d *BLKIO_WEIGHT_DEFAULT ; -do_div (d, cfqg->weight); +do_div (d, cfqe->weight);return d; }
@@ -578,11 +589,11 @@ static inline u64 min_vdisktime(u64 min_vdisktime, u64 vdisktime)static void update_min_vdisktime (struct cfq_rb_root *st) {u64 vdisktime = st->min_vdisktime; -struct cfq_group *cfqg; +struct cfq_entity *cfqe;if (st->left) { - cfqg =rb_entry_cfqg (st->left); - vdisktime =min_vdisktime (vdisktime, cfqg->vdisktime); + cfqe =rb_entry_entity (st->left); + vdisktime =min_vdisktime (vdisktime, cfqe->vdisktime); } st->min_vdisktime =max_vdisktime (st->min_vdisktime, vdisktime);
@@ -613,8 +624,9 @@ static inline unsigned cfq_group_slice(struct cfq_data *cfqd, struct cfq_group *cfqg) { struct cfq_rb_root *st = &cfqd->grp_service_tree; +struct cfq_entity *cfqe = &cfqg->cfqe; -return cfq_target_latency * cfqg->weight / st->total_weight; +return cfq_target_latency * cfqe->weight / st->total_weight; } static inline void
@@ -777,13 +789,13 @@ static struct cfq_entity *cfq_rb_first(struct cfq_rb_root *root)return NULL ; } -static struct cfq_group *cfq_rb_first_group (struct cfq_rb_root *root) +static struct cfq_entity *cfq_rb_first_entity (struct cfq_rb_root *root) {if (!root->left) root->left =rb_first (&root->rb);if (root->left) -return rb_entry_cfqg (root->left); +return rb_entry_entity (root->left);return NULL ; }
@@ -840,9 +852,9 @@ static unsigned long cfq_slice_offset(struct cfq_data *cfqd, }static inline s64 -cfqg_key (struct cfq_rb_root *st,struct cfq_group *cfqg) +entity_key (struct cfq_rb_root *st,struct cfq_entity *entity) { -return cfqg->vdisktime - st->min_vdisktime; +return entity->vdisktime - st->min_vdisktime; } static void
@@ -850,15 +862,16 @@ __cfq_group_service_tree_add(struct cfq_rb_root *st, struct cfq_group *cfqg) {struct rb_node **node = &st->rb.rb_node;struct rb_node *parent =NULL ; -struct cfq_group *__cfqg; -s64 key =cfqg_key (st, cfqg); +struct cfq_entity *__cfqe; +struct cfq_entity *cfqe = &cfqg->cfqe; +s64 key =entity_key (st, cfqe);int left =1 ;while (*node !=NULL ) { parent = *node; - __cfqg =rb_entry_cfqg (parent); + __cfqe =rb_entry_entity (parent); -if (key <cfqg_key (st, __cfqg)) +if (key <entity_key (st, __cfqe)) node = &parent->rb_left;else { node = &parent->rb_right;
@@ -867,21 +880,22 @@ __cfq_group_service_tree_add(struct cfq_rb_root *st, struct cfq_group *cfqg) }if (left) - st->left = &cfqg->rb_node; + st->left = &cfqe->rb_node; -rb_link_node (&cfqg->rb_node, parent, node); -rb_insert_color (&cfqg->rb_node, &st->rb); +rb_link_node (&cfqe->rb_node, parent, node); +rb_insert_color (&cfqe->rb_node, &st->rb); }static void cfq_group_service_tree_add (struct cfq_data *cfqd,struct cfq_group *cfqg) {struct cfq_rb_root *st = &cfqd->grp_service_tree; -struct cfq_group *__cfqg; +struct cfq_entity *cfqe = &cfqg->cfqe; +struct cfq_entity *__cfqe;struct rb_node *n; cfqg->nr_cfqq++; -if (!RB_EMPTY_NODE (&cfqg->rb_node)) +if (!RB_EMPTY_NODE (&cfqe->rb_node))return ;/*
@@ -891,19 +905,20 @@ cfq_group_service_tree_add(struct cfq_data *cfqd, struct cfq_group *cfqg)*/ n =rb_last (&st->rb);if (n) { - __cfqg =rb_entry_cfqg (n); - cfqg->vdisktime = __cfqg->vdisktime +CFQ_IDLE_DELAY ; + __cfqe =rb_entry_entity (n); + cfqe->vdisktime = __cfqe->vdisktime +CFQ_IDLE_DELAY ; }else - cfqg->vdisktime = st->min_vdisktime; + cfqe->vdisktime = st->min_vdisktime;__cfq_group_service_tree_add (st, cfqg); - st->total_weight += cfqg->weight; + st->total_weight += cfqe->weight; }static void cfq_group_service_tree_del (struct cfq_data *cfqd,struct cfq_group *cfqg) {struct cfq_rb_root *st = &cfqd->grp_service_tree; +struct cfq_entity *cfqe = &cfqg->cfqe;BUG_ON (cfqg->nr_cfqq <1 ); cfqg->nr_cfqq--;
@@ -913,9 +928,9 @@ cfq_group_service_tree_del(struct cfq_data *cfqd, struct cfq_group *cfqg)return ;cfq_log_cfqg (cfqd, cfqg,"del_from_rr group" ); - st->total_weight -= cfqg->weight; -if (!RB_EMPTY_NODE (&cfqg->rb_node)) -cfq_rb_erase (&cfqg->rb_node, st); + st->total_weight -= cfqe->weight; +if (!RB_EMPTY_NODE (&cfqe->rb_node)) +cfq_rb_erase (&cfqe->rb_node, st); cfqg->saved_workload_slice =0 ;cfq_blkiocg_update_dequeue_stats (&cfqg->blkg,1 ); }
@@ -953,6 +968,7 @@ static void cfq_group_served(struct cfq_data *cfqd, struct cfq_group *cfqg,unsigned int used_sl, charge;int nr_sync = cfqg->nr_cfqq -cfqg_busy_async_queues (cfqd, cfqg) - cfqg->service_tree_idle.count; +struct cfq_entity *cfqe = &cfqg->cfqe;BUG_ON (nr_sync <0 ); used_sl = charge =cfq_cfqq_slice_usage (cfqq);
@@ -963,8 +979,8 @@ static void cfq_group_served(struct cfq_data *cfqd, struct cfq_group *cfqg, charge = cfqq->allocated_slice;/* Can't update vdisktime while group is on service tree */ -cfq_rb_erase (&cfqg->rb_node, st); - cfqg->vdisktime +=cfq_scale_slice (charge, cfqg); +cfq_rb_erase (&cfqe->rb_node, st); + cfqe->vdisktime +=cfq_scale_slice (charge, cfqe);__cfq_group_service_tree_add (st, cfqg);/* This group is being expired. Save the context */
@@ -976,8 +992,8 @@ static void cfq_group_served(struct cfq_data *cfqd, struct cfq_group *cfqg, }else cfqg->saved_workload_slice =0 ; -cfq_log_cfqg (cfqd, cfqg,"served: vt=%llu min_vt=%llu" , cfqg->vdisktime, - st->min_vdisktime); +cfq_log_cfqg (cfqd, cfqg,"served: vt=%llu min_vt=%llu" , + cfqe->vdisktime, st->min_vdisktime);cfq_log_cfqq (cfqq->cfqd, cfqq,"sl_used=%u disp=%u charge=%u iops=%u" " sect=%u" , used_sl, cfqq->slice_dispatch, charge,iops_mode (cfqd), cfqq->nr_sectors);
@@ -996,7 +1012,7 @@ static inline struct cfq_group *cfqg_of_blkg(struct blkio_group *blkg)void cfq_update_blkio_group_weight (void *key,struct blkio_group *blkg,unsigned int weight) { -cfqg_of_blkg (blkg)->weight = weight; +cfqg_of_blkg (blkg)->cfqe.weight = weight; } static struct cfq_group *
@@ -1025,7 +1041,9 @@ cfq_find_alloc_cfqg(struct cfq_data *cfqd, struct cgroup *cgroup, int create)for_each_cfqg_st (cfqg, i, j, st) *st =CFQ_RB_ROOT ; -RB_CLEAR_NODE (&cfqg->rb_node); +RB_CLEAR_NODE (&cfqg->cfqe.rb_node); + + cfqg->cfqe.is_group_entity = true;/* * Take the initial reference that will be released on destroy
@@ -1049,7 +1067,7 @@ cfq_find_alloc_cfqg(struct cfq_data *cfqd, struct cgroup *cgroup, int create)cfq_blkiocg_add_blkio_group (blkcg, &cfqg->blkg, (void *)cfqd,0 ); - cfqg->weight =blkcg_get_weight (blkcg, cfqg->blkg.dev); + cfqg->cfqe.weight =blkcg_get_weight (blkcg, cfqg->blkg.dev);/* Add group on cfqd list */ hlist_add_head (&cfqg->cfqd_node, &cfqd->cfqg_list);
@@ -2209,10 +2227,13 @@ static struct cfq_group *cfq_get_next_cfqg(struct cfq_data *cfqd) {struct cfq_rb_root *st = &cfqd->grp_service_tree;struct cfq_group *cfqg; +struct cfq_entity *cfqe;if (RB_EMPTY_ROOT (&st->rb))return NULL ; - cfqg =cfq_rb_first_group (st); + cfqe =cfq_rb_first_entity (st); + cfqg =cfqg_of_entity (cfqe); +BUG_ON (!cfqg);update_min_vdisktime (st);return cfqg; }
@@ -2870,6 +2891,7 @@ static void cfq_init_cfqq(struct cfq_data *cfqd, struct cfq_queue *cfqq,RB_CLEAR_NODE (&cfqq->p_node);INIT_LIST_HEAD (&cfqq->fifo); + cfqe->is_group_entity = false;atomic_set (&cfqq->ref,0 ); cfqq->cfqd = cfqd;
@@ -3902,10 +3924,11 @@ static void *cfq_init_queue(struct request_queue *q) cfqg = &cfqd->root_group;for_each_cfqg_st (cfqg, i, j, st) *st =CFQ_RB_ROOT ; -RB_CLEAR_NODE (&cfqg->rb_node); +RB_CLEAR_NODE (&cfqg->cfqe.rb_node);/* Give preference to root group over other groups */ - cfqg->weight =2 *BLKIO_WEIGHT_DEFAULT ; + cfqg->cfqe.weight =2 *BLKIO_WEIGHT_DEFAULT ; + cfqg->cfqe.is_group_entity = true;#ifdef CONFIG_CFQ_GROUP_IOSCHED /*
Signature · 1 line
1.6.5.2
Re: [PATCH 2/6 v3] cfq-iosched: Introduce cfq_entity for CFQ group
On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 04:50:51PM +0800, Gui Jianfeng wrote:
[..]
block/cfq-iosched.c static struct cfq_entity *cfq_rb_first(struct cfq_rb_root *root) · line 798
Quoted 10 lines
block/cfq-iosched.c +2
-2-static struct cfq_group *cfq_rb_first_group (struct cfq_rb_root *root) +static struct cfq_entity *cfq_rb_first_entity (struct cfq_rb_root *root) {if (!root->left) root->left =rb_first (&root->rb);if (root->left) -return rb_entry_cfqg (root->left); +return rb_entry_entity (root->left);
Why are we defining cfq_rb_first_entity(). Can't we simply use cfq_rb_first() as introduced in first patch.
Thanks
Vivek
Re: [PATCH 2/6 v3] cfq-iosched: Introduce cfq_entity for CFQ group
Quoted 9 lines · Vivek Goyal
On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 04:50:51PM +0800, Gui Jianfeng wrote:
[..]
Quoted 6 lines
block/cfq-iosched.c +1
-1-static struct cfq_group *cfq_rb_first_group (struct cfq_rb_root *root) +static struct cfq_entity *cfq_rb_first_entity (struct cfq_rb_root *root) {if (!root->left) root->left =rb_first (&root->rb);
Quoted 7 lines
block/cfq-iosched.c static struct cfq_entity *cfq_rb_first(struct cfq_rb_root *root) · line 798
Quoted 4 lines
block/cfq-iosched.c +1
-1if (root->left) -return rb_entry_cfqg (root->left); +return rb_entry_entity (root->left);Why are we defining
cfq_rb_first_entity(). Can't we simply usecfq_rb_first()as introduced in first patch.
Ok, Will rename it.
Thanks,
Gui
Quoted 4 lines
Thanks
Vivek
Re: [PATCH 2/6 v3] cfq-iosched: Introduce cfq_entity for CFQ group
In reply to Vivek GoyalQuoted 9 lines · Vivek Goyal
On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 04:50:51PM +0800, Gui Jianfeng wrote:
[..]
Quoted 6 lines
block/cfq-iosched.c +1
-1-static struct cfq_group *cfq_rb_first_group (struct cfq_rb_root *root) +static struct cfq_entity *cfq_rb_first_entity (struct cfq_rb_root *root) {if (!root->left) root->left =rb_first (&root->rb);
Quoted 7 lines
block/cfq-iosched.c static struct cfq_entity *cfq_rb_first(struct cfq_rb_root *root) · line 798
Quoted 4 lines
block/cfq-iosched.c +1
-1if (root->left) -return rb_entry_cfqg (root->left); +return rb_entry_entity (root->left);Why are we defining
cfq_rb_first_entity(). Can't we simply usecfq_rb_first()as introduced in first patch.
Vivek,
At this time, we can't remove cfq_rb_first_entity(), because we don't use st->count for cfqg.
In [PATCH 5/6], I remove cfq_rb_first_entity() and just use cfq_rb_first() for cfqq and cfqg.
Thanks,
Gui
Quoted 4 lines
Thanks
Vivek
PATCH v3 3/6 cfq-iosched: Introduce vdisktime and io weight for CFQ queue
In reply to a message not in the archiveIntroduce vdisktime and io weight for CFQ queue scheduling. Currently, io priority maps to a range [100,1000]. It also gets rid of cfq_slice_offset() logic and makes use the same scheduling algorithm as CFQ group does. This helps for CFQ queue and group scheduling on the same service tree.
--- block/cfq-iosched.c | 211 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------- 1 files changed, 158 insertions(+), 53 deletions(-)
block/cfq-iosched.c +158 -53
@@ -100,10 +100,7 @@ struct cfq_entity {struct cfq_rb_root *service_tree;/* service_tree member */ struct rb_node rb_node; -/* service_tree key, represent the position on the tree */ -unsigned long rb_key; - -/* group service_tree key */ +/* service_tree key */ u64 vdisktime;bool is_group_entity;unsigned int weight;
@@ -115,6 +112,8 @@ struct cfq_entity {struct cfq_queue {/* The schedule entity */ struct cfq_entity cfqe; +/* Reposition time */ +unsigned long reposition_time;/* reference count */ atomic_t ref;/* various state flags, see below */
@@ -313,6 +312,24 @@ struct cfq_data {struct rcu_head rcu; }; +/* +* Map io priority(7 ~ 0) to io weight(100 ~ 1000) as follows +* prio 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 +* weight 1000 868 740 612 484 356 228 100 +*/ +static inline unsigned int cfq_prio_to_weight (unsigned short ioprio) +{ +unsigned int step; + +BUG_ON (ioprio >=IOPRIO_BE_NR ); + + step = (BLKIO_WEIGHT_MAX -BLKIO_WEIGHT_MIN ) / (IOPRIO_BE_NR -1 ); +if (ioprio ==0 ) +return BLKIO_WEIGHT_MAX ; + +return BLKIO_WEIGHT_MIN + (IOPRIO_BE_NR - ioprio -1 ) * step; +} +static inline struct cfq_queue *cfqq_of_entity (struct cfq_entity *cfqe) {
@@ -841,16 +858,6 @@ cfq_find_next_rq(struct cfq_data *cfqd, struct cfq_queue *cfqq,return cfq_choose_req (cfqd, next, prev,blk_rq_pos (last)); } -static unsigned long cfq_slice_offset (struct cfq_data *cfqd, -struct cfq_queue *cfqq) -{ -/* -* just an approximation, should be ok. -*/ -return (cfqq->cfqg->nr_cfqq -1 ) * (cfq_prio_slice (cfqd,1 ,0 ) - -cfq_prio_slice (cfqd,cfq_cfqq_sync (cfqq), cfqq->ioprio)); -} -static inline s64 entity_key (struct cfq_rb_root *st,struct cfq_entity *entity) {
@@ -1199,6 +1206,16 @@ static inline void cfq_put_cfqg(struct cfq_group *cfqg) {}#endif /* GROUP_IOSCHED */ +static inline u64 cfq_get_boost (struct cfq_data *cfqd, +struct cfq_entity *cfqe) +{ +u64 d = cfqd->cfq_slice[1 ] <<CFQ_SERVICE_SHIFT ; + + d = d *BLKIO_WEIGHT_DEFAULT ; +do_div (d,BLKIO_WEIGHT_MAX - cfqe->weight +BLKIO_WEIGHT_MIN ); +return d; +} +/* * The cfqd->service_trees holds all pending cfq_queue's that have * requests waiting to be processed. It is sorted in the order that
@@ -1210,13 +1227,14 @@ static void cfq_service_tree_add(struct cfq_data *cfqd, struct cfq_queue *cfqq,struct cfq_entity *cfqe;struct rb_node **p, *parent;struct cfq_entity *__cfqe; -unsigned long rb_key; -struct cfq_rb_root *service_tree; +struct cfq_rb_root *service_tree, *orig_st;int left;int new_cfqq =1 ;int group_changed =0 ; +s64 key; cfqe = &cfqq->cfqe; + orig_st = cfqe->service_tree;#ifdef CONFIG_CFQ_GROUP_IOSCHED if (!cfqd->cfq_group_isolation
@@ -1224,8 +1242,15 @@ static void cfq_service_tree_add(struct cfq_data *cfqd, struct cfq_queue *cfqq, && cfqq->cfqg && cfqq->cfqg != &cfqd->root_group) {/* Move this cfq to root group */ cfq_log_cfqq (cfqd, cfqq,"moving to root group" ); -if (!RB_EMPTY_NODE (&cfqe->rb_node)) +if (!RB_EMPTY_NODE (&cfqe->rb_node)) {cfq_group_service_tree_del (cfqd, cfqq->cfqg); +/* +* Group changed, dequeue this CFQ queue from the +* original service tree. +*/ +cfq_rb_erase (&cfqe->rb_node, cfqe->service_tree); + orig_st->total_weight -= cfqe->weight; + } cfqq->orig_cfqg = cfqq->cfqg; cfqq->cfqg = &cfqd->root_group;atomic_inc (&cfqd->root_group.ref);
@@ -1234,8 +1259,15 @@ static void cfq_service_tree_add(struct cfq_data *cfqd, struct cfq_queue *cfqq, && cfqq_type(cfqq) == SYNC_WORKLOAD && cfqq->orig_cfqg) {/* cfqq is sequential now needs to go to its original group */ BUG_ON (cfqq->cfqg != &cfqd->root_group); -if (!RB_EMPTY_NODE (&cfqe->rb_node)) +if (!RB_EMPTY_NODE (&cfqe->rb_node)) {cfq_group_service_tree_del (cfqd, cfqq->cfqg); +/* +* Group changed, dequeue this CFQ queue from the +* original service tree. +*/ +cfq_rb_erase (&cfqe->rb_node, cfqe->service_tree); + orig_st->total_weight -= cfqe->weight; + }cfq_put_cfqg (cfqq->cfqg); cfqq->cfqg = cfqq->orig_cfqg; cfqq->orig_cfqg =NULL ;
@@ -1246,47 +1278,71 @@ static void cfq_service_tree_add(struct cfq_data *cfqd, struct cfq_queue *cfqq, service_tree =service_tree_for (cfqq->cfqg,cfqq_prio (cfqq),cfqq_type (cfqq)); +/* +* For the time being, put the newly added CFQ queue at the end of the +* service tree. +*/ +if (RB_EMPTY_NODE (&cfqe->rb_node)) { +/* +* If this CFQ queue moves to another group, the original +* vdisktime makes no sense any more, reset the vdisktime +* here. +*/ + parent =rb_last (&service_tree->rb); +if (parent) { +u64 boost; +s64 __vdisktime; + + __cfqe =rb_entry_entity (parent); + cfqe->vdisktime = __cfqe->vdisktime +CFQ_IDLE_DELAY ; + +/* Give some vdisktime boost according to its weight */ + boost =cfq_get_boost (cfqd, cfqe); + __vdisktime = cfqe->vdisktime - boost; +if (__vdisktime > service_tree->min_vdisktime) + cfqe->vdisktime = __vdisktime; +else + cfqe->vdisktime = service_tree->min_vdisktime; + }else + cfqe->vdisktime = service_tree->min_vdisktime; + + goto insert; + } +/* +* Ok, we get here, this CFQ queue is on the service tree, dequeue it +* firstly. +*/ +cfq_rb_erase (&cfqe->rb_node, cfqe->service_tree); + orig_st->total_weight -= cfqe->weight; + + new_cfqq =0 ; +if (cfq_class_idle (cfqq)) { - rb_key =CFQ_IDLE_DELAY ; parent =rb_last (&service_tree->rb);if (parent && parent != &cfqe->rb_node) { __cfqe = rb_entry(parent, struct cfq_entity, rb_node); - rb_key += __cfqe->rb_key; + cfqe->vdisktime = __cfqe->vdisktime +CFQ_IDLE_DELAY ; }else - rb_key += jiffies; + cfqe->vdisktime = service_tree->min_vdisktime; }else if (!add_front) {/* -* Get our rb key offset. Subtract any residual slice -* value carried from last service. A negative resid -* count indicates slice overrun, and this should position -* the next service time further away in the tree. -*/ - rb_key =cfq_slice_offset (cfqd, cfqq) + jiffies; - rb_key -= cfqq->slice_resid; - cfqq->slice_resid =0 ; - }else { - rb_key = -HZ ; - __cfqe =cfq_rb_first (service_tree); - rb_key += __cfqe ? __cfqe->rb_key : jiffies; - } - -if (!RB_EMPTY_NODE (&cfqe->rb_node)) { - new_cfqq =0 ; -/* -* same position, nothing more to do +* We charge the CFQ queue by the time this queue runs, and +* repsition it on the service tree. */ -if (rb_key == cfqe->rb_key && - cfqe->service_tree == service_tree) -return ; +unsigned int used_sl; -cfq_rb_erase (&cfqe->rb_node, cfqe->service_tree); - cfqe->service_tree =NULL ; + used_sl =cfq_cfqq_slice_usage (cfqq); + cfqe->vdisktime +=cfq_scale_slice (used_sl, cfqe); + }else { + cfqe->vdisktime = service_tree->min_vdisktime; } +insert: left =1 ; parent =NULL ; cfqe->service_tree = service_tree; p = &service_tree->rb.rb_node; + key =entity_key (service_tree, cfqe);while (*p) {struct rb_node **n;
@@ -1296,7 +1352,7 @@ static void cfq_service_tree_add(struct cfq_data *cfqd, struct cfq_queue *cfqq,/* * sort by key, that represents service time. */ -if (time_before (rb_key, __cfqe->rb_key)) +if (key <entity_key (service_tree, __cfqe)) n = &(*p)->rb_left;else { n = &(*p)->rb_right;
@@ -1309,10 +1365,12 @@ static void cfq_service_tree_add(struct cfq_data *cfqd, struct cfq_queue *cfqq,if (left) service_tree->left = &cfqe->rb_node; - cfqe->rb_key = rb_key;rb_link_node (&cfqe->rb_node, parent, p);rb_insert_color (&cfqe->rb_node, &service_tree->rb); +update_min_vdisktime (service_tree); service_tree->count++; + service_tree->total_weight += cfqe->weight; + cfqq->reposition_time = jiffies;if ((add_front || !new_cfqq) && !group_changed)return ;cfq_group_service_tree_add (cfqd, cfqq->cfqg);
@@ -1414,14 +1472,18 @@ static void cfq_add_cfqq_rr(struct cfq_data *cfqd, struct cfq_queue *cfqq)static void cfq_del_cfqq_rr (struct cfq_data *cfqd,struct cfq_queue *cfqq) {struct cfq_entity *cfqe; +struct cfq_rb_root *service_tree; +cfq_log_cfqq (cfqd, cfqq,"del_from_rr" );BUG_ON (!cfq_cfqq_on_rr (cfqq));cfq_clear_cfqq_on_rr (cfqq); cfqe = &cfqq->cfqe; + service_tree = cfqe->service_tree;if (!RB_EMPTY_NODE (&cfqe->rb_node)) {cfq_rb_erase (&cfqe->rb_node, cfqe->service_tree); + service_tree->total_weight -= cfqe->weight; cfqe->service_tree =NULL ; }if (cfqq->p_root) {
@@ -2120,23 +2182,35 @@ static void cfq_setup_merge(struct cfq_queue *cfqq, struct cfq_queue *new_cfqq) } } +/* +* The time when a CFQ queue is put onto a service tree is recoreded in +* cfqq->reposition_time. Currently, we check the first priority CFQ queues +* on each service tree, and select the workload type that contain the lowest +* reposition_time CFQ queue among them. +*/ static enum wl_type_t cfq_choose_wl (struct cfq_data *cfqd,struct cfq_group *cfqg,enum wl_prio_t prio) {struct cfq_entity *cfqe; +struct cfq_queue *cfqq; +unsigned long lowest_start_time;int i; -bool key_valid = false; -unsigned long lowest_key =0 ; +bool time_valid = false;enum wl_type_t cur_best =SYNC_NOIDLE_WORKLOAD ; +/* +* TODO: We may take io priority into account when choosing a workload +* type. But for the time being just make use of reposition_time only. +*/ for (i =0 ; i <=SYNC_WORKLOAD ; ++i) { -/* select the one with lowest rb_key */ cfqe =cfq_rb_first (service_tree_for (cfqg, prio, i)); -if (cfqe && - (!key_valid ||time_before (cfqe->rb_key, lowest_key))) { - lowest_key = cfqe->rb_key; + cfqq =cfqq_of_entity (cfqe); +if (cfqe && (!time_valid || +time_before (cfqq->reposition_time, + lowest_start_time))) { + lowest_start_time = cfqq->reposition_time; cur_best = i; - key_valid = true; + time_valid = true; } }
@@ -2807,10 +2881,13 @@ static void cfq_init_prio_data(struct cfq_queue *cfqq, struct io_context *ioc) {struct task_struct *tsk = current;int ioprio_class; +struct cfq_entity *cfqe;if (!cfq_cfqq_prio_changed (cfqq))return ; + cfqe = &cfqq->cfqe; + ioprio_class =IOPRIO_PRIO_CLASS (ioc->ioprio);switch (ioprio_class) {default :
@@ -2837,6 +2914,17 @@ static void cfq_init_prio_data(struct cfq_queue *cfqq, struct io_context *ioc)break ; } +if (!RB_EMPTY_NODE (&cfqe->rb_node)) { +/* +* If this CFQ entity is already on service tree, we need to +* adjust service tree's total weight accordingly. +*/ + cfqe->service_tree->total_weight -= cfqe->weight; + cfqe->weight =cfq_prio_to_weight (cfqq->ioprio); + cfqe->service_tree->total_weight += cfqe->weight; + }else + cfqe->weight =cfq_prio_to_weight (cfqq->ioprio); +/* * keep track of original prio settings in case we have to temporarily * elevate the priority of this queue
@@ -3571,6 +3659,9 @@ static void cfq_completed_request(struct request_queue *q, struct request *rq)*/ static void cfq_prio_boost (struct cfq_queue *cfqq) { +struct cfq_entity *cfqe; + + cfqe = &cfqq->cfqe;if (has_fs_excl ()) {/* * boost idle prio on transactions that would lock out other
@@ -3587,6 +3678,20 @@ static void cfq_prio_boost(struct cfq_queue *cfqq) cfqq->ioprio_class = cfqq->org_ioprio_class; cfqq->ioprio = cfqq->org_ioprio; } + +/* +* update the io weight if io priority gets changed. +*/ +if (!RB_EMPTY_NODE (&cfqe->rb_node)) { +/* +* If this CFQ entity is already on service tree, we need to +* adjust service tree's total weight accordingly. +*/ + cfqe->service_tree->total_weight -= cfqe->weight; + cfqe->weight =cfq_prio_to_weight (cfqq->ioprio); + cfqe->service_tree->total_weight += cfqe->weight; + }else + cfqe->weight =cfq_prio_to_weight (cfqq->ioprio); }static inline int __cfq_may_queue (struct cfq_queue *cfqq)
Signature · 1 line
1.6.5.2
Re: [PATCH 3/6 v3] cfq-iosched: Introduce vdisktime and io weight for CFQ queue
Quoted 4 lines · Gui Jianfeng
Introduce vdisktime and io weight for CFQ queue scheduling. Currently, io priority maps to a range [100,1000]. It also gets rid of
cfq_slice_offset()logic and makes use the same scheduling algorithm as CFQ group does. This helps for CFQ queue and group scheduling on the same service tree.
Haven't read the whole series yet. Looks this changes a lot of logic even without cgroup support. Did you have test if this changes both performance and latency in some mixed workloads?
Quoted 75 lines
Signed-off-by Gui Jianfeng <[email protected]>--- block/cfq-iosched.c | 211 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------- 1 files changed, 158 insertions(+), 53 deletions(-)block/cfq-iosched.c +21
-14@@ -100,10 +100,7 @@ struct cfq_entity {struct cfq_rb_root *service_tree;/* service_tree member */ struct rb_node rb_node; -/* service_tree key, represent the position on the tree */ -unsigned long rb_key; - -/* group service_tree key */ +/* service_tree key */ u64 vdisktime;bool is_group_entity;unsigned int weight;@@ -115,6 +112,8 @@ struct cfq_entity {struct cfq_queue {/* The schedule entity */ struct cfq_entity cfqe; +/* Reposition time */ +unsigned long reposition_time;/* reference count */ atomic_t ref;/* various state flags, see below */ @@ -313,6 +312,24 @@ struct cfq_data {struct rcu_head rcu; }; +/* +* Map io priority(7 ~ 0) to io weight(100 ~ 1000) as follows +* prio 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 +* weight 1000 868 740 612 484 356 228 100 +*/ +static inline unsigned int cfq_prio_to_weight (unsigned short ioprio) +{ +unsigned int step; + +BUG_ON (ioprio >=IOPRIO_BE_NR ); + + step = (BLKIO_WEIGHT_MAX -BLKIO_WEIGHT_MIN ) / (IOPRIO_BE_NR -1 ); +if (ioprio ==0 ) +return BLKIO_WEIGHT_MAX ; + +return BLKIO_WEIGHT_MIN + (IOPRIO_BE_NR - ioprio -1 ) * step; +} +static inline struct cfq_queue *cfqq_of_entity (struct cfq_entity *cfqe) {@@ -841,16 +858,6 @@ cfq_find_next_rq(struct cfq_data *cfqd, struct cfq_queue *cfqq,return cfq_choose_req (cfqd, next, prev,blk_rq_pos (last)); } -static unsigned long cfq_slice_offset (struct cfq_data *cfqd, -struct cfq_queue *cfqq) -{ -/* -* just an approximation, should be ok. -*/ -return (cfqq->cfqg->nr_cfqq -1 ) * (cfq_prio_slice (cfqd,1 ,0 ) - -cfq_prio_slice (cfqd,cfq_cfqq_sync (cfqq), cfqq->ioprio)); -} -static inline s64 entity_key (struct cfq_rb_root *st,struct cfq_entity *entity) {@@ -1199,6 +1206,16 @@ static inline void cfq_put_cfqg(struct cfq_group *cfqg) {}#endif /* GROUP_IOSCHED */
block/cfq-iosched.c static inline void cfq_put_cfqg(struct cfq_group *cfqg) {} · line 1217
Quoted 10 lines
block/cfq-iosched.c +9
-0+static inline u64 cfq_get_boost (struct cfq_data *cfqd, +struct cfq_entity *cfqe) +{ +u64 d = cfqd->cfq_slice[1 ] <<CFQ_SERVICE_SHIFT ; + + d = d *BLKIO_WEIGHT_DEFAULT ; +do_div (d,BLKIO_WEIGHT_MAX - cfqe->weight +BLKIO_WEIGHT_MIN ); +return d; +}
don't consider sync/async here? for group, we don't have such issue, but we need boost sync otherwise.
Quoted 56 lines
block/cfq-iosched.c +20
-4+/* * The cfqd->service_trees holds all pending cfq_queue's that have * requests waiting to be processed. It is sorted in the order that @@ -1210,13 +1227,14 @@ static void cfq_service_tree_add(struct cfq_data *cfqd, struct cfq_queue *cfqq,struct cfq_entity *cfqe;struct rb_node **p, *parent;struct cfq_entity *__cfqe; -unsigned long rb_key; -struct cfq_rb_root *service_tree; +struct cfq_rb_root *service_tree, *orig_st;int left;int new_cfqq =1 ;int group_changed =0 ; +s64 key; cfqe = &cfqq->cfqe; + orig_st = cfqe->service_tree;#ifdef CONFIG_CFQ_GROUP_IOSCHED if (!cfqd->cfq_group_isolation@@ -1224,8 +1242,15 @@ static void cfq_service_tree_add(struct cfq_data *cfqd, struct cfq_queue *cfqq, && cfqq->cfqg && cfqq->cfqg != &cfqd->root_group) {/* Move this cfq to root group */ cfq_log_cfqq (cfqd, cfqq,"moving to root group" ); -if (!RB_EMPTY_NODE (&cfqe->rb_node)) +if (!RB_EMPTY_NODE (&cfqe->rb_node)) {cfq_group_service_tree_del (cfqd, cfqq->cfqg); +/* +* Group changed, dequeue this CFQ queue from the +* original service tree. +*/ +cfq_rb_erase (&cfqe->rb_node, cfqe->service_tree); + orig_st->total_weight -= cfqe->weight; + } cfqq->orig_cfqg = cfqq->cfqg; cfqq->cfqg = &cfqd->root_group;atomic_inc (&cfqd->root_group.ref);@@ -1234,8 +1259,15 @@ static void cfq_service_tree_add(struct cfq_data *cfqd, struct cfq_queue *cfqq, && cfqq_type(cfqq) == SYNC_WORKLOAD && cfqq->orig_cfqg) {/* cfqq is sequential now needs to go to its original group */ BUG_ON (cfqq->cfqg != &cfqd->root_group); -if (!RB_EMPTY_NODE (&cfqe->rb_node)) +if (!RB_EMPTY_NODE (&cfqe->rb_node)) {cfq_group_service_tree_del (cfqd, cfqq->cfqg); +/* +* Group changed, dequeue this CFQ queue from the +* original service tree. +*/ +cfq_rb_erase (&cfqe->rb_node, cfqe->service_tree); + orig_st->total_weight -= cfqe->weight; + }cfq_put_cfqg (cfqq->cfqg); cfqq->cfqg = cfqq->orig_cfqg; cfqq->orig_cfqg =NULL ;
block/cfq-iosched.c static void cfq_service_tree_add(struct cfq_data *cfqd, struct cfq_queue *cfqq, · line 1284
Quoted 7 lines
block/cfq-iosched.c +4
-0@@ -1246,47 +1278,71 @@ static void cfq_service_tree_add(struct cfq_data *cfqd, struct cfq_queue *cfqq, service_tree =service_tree_for (cfqq->cfqg,cfqq_prio (cfqq),cfqq_type (cfqq)); +/* +* For the time being, put the newly added CFQ queue at the end of the +* service tree. +*/
so this should be fixed later? please mark it as a todo.
Quoted 67 lines
block/cfq-iosched.c +39
-21+if (RB_EMPTY_NODE (&cfqe->rb_node)) { +/* +* If this CFQ queue moves to another group, the original +* vdisktime makes no sense any more, reset the vdisktime +* here. +*/ + parent =rb_last (&service_tree->rb); +if (parent) { +u64 boost; +s64 __vdisktime; + + __cfqe =rb_entry_entity (parent); + cfqe->vdisktime = __cfqe->vdisktime +CFQ_IDLE_DELAY ; + +/* Give some vdisktime boost according to its weight */ + boost =cfq_get_boost (cfqd, cfqe); + __vdisktime = cfqe->vdisktime - boost; +if (__vdisktime > service_tree->min_vdisktime) + cfqe->vdisktime = __vdisktime; +else + cfqe->vdisktime = service_tree->min_vdisktime; + }else + cfqe->vdisktime = service_tree->min_vdisktime; + + goto insert; + } +/* +* Ok, we get here, this CFQ queue is on the service tree, dequeue it +* firstly. +*/ +cfq_rb_erase (&cfqe->rb_node, cfqe->service_tree); + orig_st->total_weight -= cfqe->weight; + + new_cfqq =0 ; +if (cfq_class_idle (cfqq)) { - rb_key =CFQ_IDLE_DELAY ; parent =rb_last (&service_tree->rb);if (parent && parent != &cfqe->rb_node) { __cfqe = rb_entry(parent, struct cfq_entity, rb_node); - rb_key += __cfqe->rb_key; + cfqe->vdisktime = __cfqe->vdisktime +CFQ_IDLE_DELAY ; }else - rb_key += jiffies; + cfqe->vdisktime = service_tree->min_vdisktime; }else if (!add_front) {/* -* Get our rb key offset. Subtract any residual slice -* value carried from last service. A negative resid -* count indicates slice overrun, and this should position -* the next service time further away in the tree. -*/ - rb_key =cfq_slice_offset (cfqd, cfqq) + jiffies; - rb_key -= cfqq->slice_resid; - cfqq->slice_resid =0 ; - }else { - rb_key = -HZ ; - __cfqe =cfq_rb_first (service_tree); - rb_key += __cfqe ? __cfqe->rb_key : jiffies; - } - -if (!RB_EMPTY_NODE (&cfqe->rb_node)) { - new_cfqq =0 ; -/* -* same position, nothing more to do +* We charge the CFQ queue by the time this queue runs, and +* repsition it on the service tree.
block/cfq-iosched.c static void cfq_service_tree_add(struct cfq_data *cfqd, struct cfq_queue *cfqq, · line 1335
Quoted 10 lines
block/cfq-iosched.c +3
-5*/ -if (rb_key == cfqe->rb_key && - cfqe->service_tree == service_tree) -return ; +unsigned int used_sl; -cfq_rb_erase (&cfqe->rb_node, cfqe->service_tree); - cfqe->service_tree =NULL ; + used_sl =cfq_cfqq_slice_usage (cfqq); + cfqe->vdisktime +=cfq_scale_slice (used_sl, cfqe);
cfqq->slice_resid could be > 0 or < 0, and the queue can be boosted or penalized. Looks the logic is completely removed. This exists in current cfq group too, I wonder why?
Quoted 71 lines
block/cfq-iosched.c +20
-2+ }else { + cfqe->vdisktime = service_tree->min_vdisktime; } +insert: left =1 ; parent =NULL ; cfqe->service_tree = service_tree; p = &service_tree->rb.rb_node; + key =entity_key (service_tree, cfqe);while (*p) {struct rb_node **n;@@ -1296,7 +1352,7 @@ static void cfq_service_tree_add(struct cfq_data *cfqd, struct cfq_queue *cfqq,/* * sort by key, that represents service time. */ -if (time_before (rb_key, __cfqe->rb_key)) +if (key <entity_key (service_tree, __cfqe)) n = &(*p)->rb_left;else { n = &(*p)->rb_right;@@ -1309,10 +1365,12 @@ static void cfq_service_tree_add(struct cfq_data *cfqd, struct cfq_queue *cfqq,if (left) service_tree->left = &cfqe->rb_node; - cfqe->rb_key = rb_key;rb_link_node (&cfqe->rb_node, parent, p);rb_insert_color (&cfqe->rb_node, &service_tree->rb); +update_min_vdisktime (service_tree); service_tree->count++; + service_tree->total_weight += cfqe->weight; + cfqq->reposition_time = jiffies;if ((add_front || !new_cfqq) && !group_changed)return ;cfq_group_service_tree_add (cfqd, cfqq->cfqg);@@ -1414,14 +1472,18 @@ static void cfq_add_cfqq_rr(struct cfq_data *cfqd, struct cfq_queue *cfqq)static void cfq_del_cfqq_rr (struct cfq_data *cfqd,struct cfq_queue *cfqq) {struct cfq_entity *cfqe; +struct cfq_rb_root *service_tree; +cfq_log_cfqq (cfqd, cfqq,"del_from_rr" );BUG_ON (!cfq_cfqq_on_rr (cfqq));cfq_clear_cfqq_on_rr (cfqq); cfqe = &cfqq->cfqe; + service_tree = cfqe->service_tree;if (!RB_EMPTY_NODE (&cfqe->rb_node)) {cfq_rb_erase (&cfqe->rb_node, cfqe->service_tree); + service_tree->total_weight -= cfqe->weight; cfqe->service_tree =NULL ; }if (cfqq->p_root) {@@ -2120,23 +2182,35 @@ static void cfq_setup_merge(struct cfq_queue *cfqq, struct cfq_queue *new_cfqq) } } +/* +* The time when a CFQ queue is put onto a service tree is recoreded in +* cfqq->reposition_time. Currently, we check the first priority CFQ queues +* on each service tree, and select the workload type that contain the lowest +* reposition_time CFQ queue among them. +*/ static enum wl_type_t cfq_choose_wl (struct cfq_data *cfqd,struct cfq_group *cfqg,enum wl_prio_t prio) {struct cfq_entity *cfqe; +struct cfq_queue *cfqq; +unsigned long lowest_start_time;
block/cfq-iosched.c static void cfq_setup_merge(struct cfq_queue *cfqq, struct cfq_queue *new_cfqq) · line 2204
Quoted 10 lines
block/cfq-iosched.c +5
-2int i; -bool key_valid = false; -unsigned long lowest_key =0 ; +bool time_valid = false;enum wl_type_t cur_best =SYNC_NOIDLE_WORKLOAD ; +/* +* TODO: We may take io priority into account when choosing a workload +* type. But for the time being just make use of reposition_time only. +*/
not just priority, original rb_key considers sys/async too.
Quoted 6 lines
block/cfq-iosched.c +0
-4for (i =0 ; i <=SYNC_WORKLOAD ; ++i) { -/* select the one with lowest rb_key */ cfqe =cfq_rb_first (service_tree_for (cfqg, prio, i)); -if (cfqe && - (!key_valid ||time_before (cfqe->rb_key, lowest_key))) { - lowest_key = cfqe->rb_key;
block/cfq-iosched.c static void cfq_setup_merge(struct cfq_queue *cfqq, struct cfq_queue *new_cfqq) · line 2215
Quoted 10 lines
block/cfq-iosched.c +6
-1+ cfqq =cfqq_of_entity (cfqe); +if (cfqe && (!time_valid || +time_before (cfqq->reposition_time, + lowest_start_time))) { + lowest_start_time = cfqq->reposition_time; cur_best = i; - key_valid = true; + time_valid = true; } }
Thanks,
Shaohua
Re: [PATCH 3/6 v3] cfq-iosched: Introduce vdisktime and io weight for CFQ queue
Quoted 8 lines · Shaohua Li
Quoted 4 lines · Gui Jianfeng
Introduce vdisktime and io weight for CFQ queue scheduling. Currently, io priority maps to a range [100,1000]. It also gets rid of
cfq_slice_offset()logic and makes use the same scheduling algorithm as CFQ group does. This helps for CFQ queue and group scheduling on the same service tree.Haven't read the whole series yet. Looks this changes a lot of logic even without cgroup support. Did you have test if this changes both performance and latency in some mixed workloads?
Hi Shaohua,
I did some tests with different workloads and with idling on or idling off. I don't see performance drop on my box.
Quoted 77 lines
Quoted 77 lines
Signed-off-by Gui Jianfeng <[email protected]>--- block/cfq-iosched.c | 211 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------- 1 files changed, 158 insertions(+), 53 deletions(-)block/cfq-iosched.c +21
-14@@ -100,10 +100,7 @@ struct cfq_entity {struct cfq_rb_root *service_tree;/* service_tree member */ struct rb_node rb_node; -/* service_tree key, represent the position on the tree */ -unsigned long rb_key; - -/* group service_tree key */ +/* service_tree key */ u64 vdisktime;bool is_group_entity;unsigned int weight;@@ -115,6 +112,8 @@ struct cfq_entity {struct cfq_queue {/* The schedule entity */ struct cfq_entity cfqe; +/* Reposition time */ +unsigned long reposition_time;/* reference count */ atomic_t ref;/* various state flags, see below */ @@ -313,6 +312,24 @@ struct cfq_data {struct rcu_head rcu; }; +/* +* Map io priority(7 ~ 0) to io weight(100 ~ 1000) as follows +* prio 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 +* weight 1000 868 740 612 484 356 228 100 +*/ +static inline unsigned int cfq_prio_to_weight (unsigned short ioprio) +{ +unsigned int step; + +BUG_ON (ioprio >=IOPRIO_BE_NR ); + + step = (BLKIO_WEIGHT_MAX -BLKIO_WEIGHT_MIN ) / (IOPRIO_BE_NR -1 ); +if (ioprio ==0 ) +return BLKIO_WEIGHT_MAX ; + +return BLKIO_WEIGHT_MIN + (IOPRIO_BE_NR - ioprio -1 ) * step; +} +static inline struct cfq_queue *cfqq_of_entity (struct cfq_entity *cfqe) {@@ -841,16 +858,6 @@ cfq_find_next_rq(struct cfq_data *cfqd, struct cfq_queue *cfqq,return cfq_choose_req (cfqd, next, prev,blk_rq_pos (last)); } -static unsigned long cfq_slice_offset (struct cfq_data *cfqd, -struct cfq_queue *cfqq) -{ -/* -* just an approximation, should be ok. -*/ -return (cfqq->cfqg->nr_cfqq -1 ) * (cfq_prio_slice (cfqd,1 ,0 ) - -cfq_prio_slice (cfqd,cfq_cfqq_sync (cfqq), cfqq->ioprio)); -} -static inline s64 entity_key (struct cfq_rb_root *st,struct cfq_entity *entity) {@@ -1199,6 +1206,16 @@ static inline void cfq_put_cfqg(struct cfq_group *cfqg) {}#endif /* GROUP_IOSCHED */
Quoted 11 lines
block/cfq-iosched.c static inline void cfq_put_cfqg(struct cfq_group *cfqg) {} · line 1217
Quoted 9 lines
block/cfq-iosched.c +9
-0+static inline u64 cfq_get_boost (struct cfq_data *cfqd, +struct cfq_entity *cfqe) +{ +u64 d = cfqd->cfq_slice[1 ] <<CFQ_SERVICE_SHIFT ; + + d = d *BLKIO_WEIGHT_DEFAULT ; +do_div (d,BLKIO_WEIGHT_MAX - cfqe->weight +BLKIO_WEIGHT_MIN ); +return d; +}don't consider sync/async here? for group, we don't have such issue, but we need boost sync otherwise.
Ok, we should.
Quoted 57 lines
Quoted 57 lines
block/cfq-iosched.c +20
-4+/* * The cfqd->service_trees holds all pending cfq_queue's that have * requests waiting to be processed. It is sorted in the order that @@ -1210,13 +1227,14 @@ static void cfq_service_tree_add(struct cfq_data *cfqd, struct cfq_queue *cfqq,struct cfq_entity *cfqe;struct rb_node **p, *parent;struct cfq_entity *__cfqe; -unsigned long rb_key; -struct cfq_rb_root *service_tree; +struct cfq_rb_root *service_tree, *orig_st;int left;int new_cfqq =1 ;int group_changed =0 ; +s64 key; cfqe = &cfqq->cfqe; + orig_st = cfqe->service_tree;#ifdef CONFIG_CFQ_GROUP_IOSCHED if (!cfqd->cfq_group_isolation@@ -1224,8 +1242,15 @@ static void cfq_service_tree_add(struct cfq_data *cfqd, struct cfq_queue *cfqq, && cfqq->cfqg && cfqq->cfqg != &cfqd->root_group) {/* Move this cfq to root group */ cfq_log_cfqq (cfqd, cfqq,"moving to root group" ); -if (!RB_EMPTY_NODE (&cfqe->rb_node)) +if (!RB_EMPTY_NODE (&cfqe->rb_node)) {cfq_group_service_tree_del (cfqd, cfqq->cfqg); +/* +* Group changed, dequeue this CFQ queue from the +* original service tree. +*/ +cfq_rb_erase (&cfqe->rb_node, cfqe->service_tree); + orig_st->total_weight -= cfqe->weight; + } cfqq->orig_cfqg = cfqq->cfqg; cfqq->cfqg = &cfqd->root_group;atomic_inc (&cfqd->root_group.ref);@@ -1234,8 +1259,15 @@ static void cfq_service_tree_add(struct cfq_data *cfqd, struct cfq_queue *cfqq, && cfqq_type(cfqq) == SYNC_WORKLOAD && cfqq->orig_cfqg) {/* cfqq is sequential now needs to go to its original group */ BUG_ON (cfqq->cfqg != &cfqd->root_group); -if (!RB_EMPTY_NODE (&cfqe->rb_node)) +if (!RB_EMPTY_NODE (&cfqe->rb_node)) {cfq_group_service_tree_del (cfqd, cfqq->cfqg); +/* +* Group changed, dequeue this CFQ queue from the +* original service tree. +*/ +cfq_rb_erase (&cfqe->rb_node, cfqe->service_tree); + orig_st->total_weight -= cfqe->weight; + }cfq_put_cfqg (cfqq->cfqg); cfqq->cfqg = cfqq->orig_cfqg; cfqq->orig_cfqg =NULL ;@@ -1246,47 +1278,71 @@ static void cfq_service_tree_add(struct cfq_data *cfqd, struct cfq_queue *cfqq,
Quoted 7 lines
block/cfq-iosched.c static void cfq_service_tree_add(struct cfq_data *cfqd, struct cfq_queue *cfqq, · line 1284
Quoted 6 lines
block/cfq-iosched.c +4
-0service_tree =service_tree_for (cfqq->cfqg,cfqq_prio (cfqq),cfqq_type (cfqq)); +/* +* For the time being, put the newly added CFQ queue at the end of the +* service tree. +*/ so this should be fixed later? please mark it as a todo.
Ahh, forgot remove this annotation, I'v already boost vdisktime according to it ioprio.
Quoted 73 lines
Quoted 73 lines
block/cfq-iosched.c +40
-24+if (RB_EMPTY_NODE (&cfqe->rb_node)) { +/* +* If this CFQ queue moves to another group, the original +* vdisktime makes no sense any more, reset the vdisktime +* here. +*/ + parent =rb_last (&service_tree->rb); +if (parent) { +u64 boost; +s64 __vdisktime; + + __cfqe =rb_entry_entity (parent); + cfqe->vdisktime = __cfqe->vdisktime +CFQ_IDLE_DELAY ; + +/* Give some vdisktime boost according to its weight */ + boost =cfq_get_boost (cfqd, cfqe); + __vdisktime = cfqe->vdisktime - boost; +if (__vdisktime > service_tree->min_vdisktime) + cfqe->vdisktime = __vdisktime; +else + cfqe->vdisktime = service_tree->min_vdisktime; + }else + cfqe->vdisktime = service_tree->min_vdisktime; + + goto insert; + } +/* +* Ok, we get here, this CFQ queue is on the service tree, dequeue it +* firstly. +*/ +cfq_rb_erase (&cfqe->rb_node, cfqe->service_tree); + orig_st->total_weight -= cfqe->weight; + + new_cfqq =0 ; +if (cfq_class_idle (cfqq)) { - rb_key =CFQ_IDLE_DELAY ; parent =rb_last (&service_tree->rb);if (parent && parent != &cfqe->rb_node) { __cfqe = rb_entry(parent, struct cfq_entity, rb_node); - rb_key += __cfqe->rb_key; + cfqe->vdisktime = __cfqe->vdisktime +CFQ_IDLE_DELAY ; }else - rb_key += jiffies; + cfqe->vdisktime = service_tree->min_vdisktime; }else if (!add_front) {/* -* Get our rb key offset. Subtract any residual slice -* value carried from last service. A negative resid -* count indicates slice overrun, and this should position -* the next service time further away in the tree. -*/ - rb_key =cfq_slice_offset (cfqd, cfqq) + jiffies; - rb_key -= cfqq->slice_resid; - cfqq->slice_resid =0 ; - }else { - rb_key = -HZ ; - __cfqe =cfq_rb_first (service_tree); - rb_key += __cfqe ? __cfqe->rb_key : jiffies; - } - -if (!RB_EMPTY_NODE (&cfqe->rb_node)) { - new_cfqq =0 ; -/* -* same position, nothing more to do +* We charge the CFQ queue by the time this queue runs, and +* repsition it on the service tree. */ -if (rb_key == cfqe->rb_key && - cfqe->service_tree == service_tree) -return ; +unsigned int used_sl;
Quoted 7 lines
block/cfq-iosched.c static void cfq_service_tree_add(struct cfq_data *cfqd, struct cfq_queue *cfqq, · line 1335
Quoted 4 lines
block/cfq-iosched.c +2
-2-cfq_rb_erase (&cfqe->rb_node, cfqe->service_tree); - cfqe->service_tree =NULL ; + used_sl =cfq_cfqq_slice_usage (cfqq); + cfqe->vdisktime +=cfq_scale_slice (used_sl, cfqe);
cfqq->slice_residcould be > 0 or < 0, and the queue can be boosted or penalized. Looks the logic is completely removed. This exists in current cfq group too, I wonder why?
With vdisktime introduced, vdisktime represents cfqq's position on a service tree. And vdisktime is decided by the acutal running time by a cfqq. So we don't need slice_resid any more here.
Quoted 78 lines
Quoted 78 lines
block/cfq-iosched.c +21
-4+ }else { + cfqe->vdisktime = service_tree->min_vdisktime; } +insert: left =1 ; parent =NULL ; cfqe->service_tree = service_tree; p = &service_tree->rb.rb_node; + key =entity_key (service_tree, cfqe);while (*p) {struct rb_node **n;@@ -1296,7 +1352,7 @@ static void cfq_service_tree_add(struct cfq_data *cfqd, struct cfq_queue *cfqq,/* * sort by key, that represents service time. */ -if (time_before (rb_key, __cfqe->rb_key)) +if (key <entity_key (service_tree, __cfqe)) n = &(*p)->rb_left;else { n = &(*p)->rb_right;@@ -1309,10 +1365,12 @@ static void cfq_service_tree_add(struct cfq_data *cfqd, struct cfq_queue *cfqq,if (left) service_tree->left = &cfqe->rb_node; - cfqe->rb_key = rb_key;rb_link_node (&cfqe->rb_node, parent, p);rb_insert_color (&cfqe->rb_node, &service_tree->rb); +update_min_vdisktime (service_tree); service_tree->count++; + service_tree->total_weight += cfqe->weight; + cfqq->reposition_time = jiffies;if ((add_front || !new_cfqq) && !group_changed)return ;cfq_group_service_tree_add (cfqd, cfqq->cfqg);@@ -1414,14 +1472,18 @@ static void cfq_add_cfqq_rr(struct cfq_data *cfqd, struct cfq_queue *cfqq)static void cfq_del_cfqq_rr (struct cfq_data *cfqd,struct cfq_queue *cfqq) {struct cfq_entity *cfqe; +struct cfq_rb_root *service_tree; +cfq_log_cfqq (cfqd, cfqq,"del_from_rr" );BUG_ON (!cfq_cfqq_on_rr (cfqq));cfq_clear_cfqq_on_rr (cfqq); cfqe = &cfqq->cfqe; + service_tree = cfqe->service_tree;if (!RB_EMPTY_NODE (&cfqe->rb_node)) {cfq_rb_erase (&cfqe->rb_node, cfqe->service_tree); + service_tree->total_weight -= cfqe->weight; cfqe->service_tree =NULL ; }if (cfqq->p_root) {@@ -2120,23 +2182,35 @@ static void cfq_setup_merge(struct cfq_queue *cfqq, struct cfq_queue *new_cfqq) } } +/* +* The time when a CFQ queue is put onto a service tree is recoreded in +* cfqq->reposition_time. Currently, we check the first priority CFQ queues +* on each service tree, and select the workload type that contain the lowest +* reposition_time CFQ queue among them. +*/ static enum wl_type_t cfq_choose_wl (struct cfq_data *cfqd,struct cfq_group *cfqg,enum wl_prio_t prio) {struct cfq_entity *cfqe; +struct cfq_queue *cfqq; +unsigned long lowest_start_time;int i; -bool key_valid = false; -unsigned long lowest_key =0 ; +bool time_valid = false;enum wl_type_t cur_best =SYNC_NOIDLE_WORKLOAD ;
Quoted 5 lines
block/cfq-iosched.c static void cfq_setup_merge(struct cfq_queue *cfqq, struct cfq_queue *new_cfqq) · line 2204
Quoted 4 lines
block/cfq-iosched.c +4
-0+/* +* TODO: We may take io priority into account when choosing a workload +* type. But for the time being just make use of reposition_time only. +*/ not just priority, original
rb_keyconsiders sys/async too.
IIUC, in original CFQ, rb_key is cross tree, so we need to take sync/async into account. But with vdisktime introduced, each service has its own vdisktime space. So there's no need to consider sync/async here.
Quoted 26 lines
Quoted 6 lines
block/cfq-iosched.c +0
-4for (i =0 ; i <=SYNC_WORKLOAD ; ++i) { -/* select the one with lowest rb_key */ cfqe =cfq_rb_first (service_tree_for (cfqg, prio, i)); -if (cfqe && - (!key_valid ||time_before (cfqe->rb_key, lowest_key))) { - lowest_key = cfqe->rb_key;block/cfq-iosched.c static void cfq_setup_merge(struct cfq_queue *cfqq, struct cfq_queue *new_cfqq) · line 2215
Quoted 10 lines
block/cfq-iosched.c +6
-1+ cfqq =cfqq_of_entity (cfqe); +if (cfqe && (!time_valid || +time_before (cfqq->reposition_time, + lowest_start_time))) { + lowest_start_time = cfqq->reposition_time; cur_best = i; - key_valid = true; + time_valid = true; } }Thanks,
Shaohua--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Signature · 2 lines
Regards Gui Jianfeng
Re: [PATCH 3/6 v3] cfq-iosched: Introduce vdisktime and io weight for CFQ queue
Quoted 6 lines · Gui Jianfeng
Quoted 5 lines · Shaohua Li
Quoted 4 lines · Gui Jianfeng
Introduce vdisktime and io weight for CFQ queue scheduling. Currently, io priority maps to a range [100,1000]. It also gets rid of
cfq_slice_offset()logic and makes use the same scheduling algorithm as CFQ group does. This helps for CFQ queue and group scheduling on the same service tree.
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 3 lines
Haven't read the whole series yet. Looks this changes a lot of logic even without cgroup support. Did you have test if this changes both performance and latency in some mixed workloads?
Hi Shaohua,
I did some tests with different workloads and with idling on or idling off. I don't see performance drop on my box.
please check latency too.
Quoted 155 lines
Quoted 76 lines
Quoted 76 lines
Signed-off-by Gui Jianfeng <[email protected]>--- block/cfq-iosched.c | 211 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------- 1 files changed, 158 insertions(+), 53 deletions(-)block/cfq-iosched.c +21
-14@@ -100,10 +100,7 @@ struct cfq_entity {struct cfq_rb_root *service_tree;/* service_tree member */ struct rb_node rb_node; -/* service_tree key, represent the position on the tree */ -unsigned long rb_key; - -/* group service_tree key */ +/* service_tree key */ u64 vdisktime;bool is_group_entity;unsigned int weight;@@ -115,6 +112,8 @@ struct cfq_entity {struct cfq_queue {/* The schedule entity */ struct cfq_entity cfqe; +/* Reposition time */ +unsigned long reposition_time;/* reference count */ atomic_t ref;/* various state flags, see below */ @@ -313,6 +312,24 @@ struct cfq_data {struct rcu_head rcu; }; +/* +* Map io priority(7 ~ 0) to io weight(100 ~ 1000) as follows +* prio 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 +* weight 1000 868 740 612 484 356 228 100 +*/ +static inline unsigned int cfq_prio_to_weight (unsigned short ioprio) +{ +unsigned int step; + +BUG_ON (ioprio >=IOPRIO_BE_NR ); + + step = (BLKIO_WEIGHT_MAX -BLKIO_WEIGHT_MIN ) / (IOPRIO_BE_NR -1 ); +if (ioprio ==0 ) +return BLKIO_WEIGHT_MAX ; + +return BLKIO_WEIGHT_MIN + (IOPRIO_BE_NR - ioprio -1 ) * step; +} +static inline struct cfq_queue *cfqq_of_entity (struct cfq_entity *cfqe) {@@ -841,16 +858,6 @@ cfq_find_next_rq(struct cfq_data *cfqd, struct cfq_queue *cfqq,return cfq_choose_req (cfqd, next, prev,blk_rq_pos (last)); } -static unsigned long cfq_slice_offset (struct cfq_data *cfqd, -struct cfq_queue *cfqq) -{ -/* -* just an approximation, should be ok. -*/ -return (cfqq->cfqg->nr_cfqq -1 ) * (cfq_prio_slice (cfqd,1 ,0 ) - -cfq_prio_slice (cfqd,cfq_cfqq_sync (cfqq), cfqq->ioprio)); -} -static inline s64 entity_key (struct cfq_rb_root *st,struct cfq_entity *entity) {@@ -1199,6 +1206,16 @@ static inline void cfq_put_cfqg(struct cfq_group *cfqg) {}#endif /* GROUP_IOSCHED */ Quoted 11 lines
block/cfq-iosched.c static inline void cfq_put_cfqg(struct cfq_group *cfqg) {} · line 1217
Quoted 9 lines
block/cfq-iosched.c +9
-0+static inline u64 cfq_get_boost (struct cfq_data *cfqd, +struct cfq_entity *cfqe) +{ +u64 d = cfqd->cfq_slice[1 ] <<CFQ_SERVICE_SHIFT ; + + d = d *BLKIO_WEIGHT_DEFAULT ; +do_div (d,BLKIO_WEIGHT_MAX - cfqe->weight +BLKIO_WEIGHT_MIN ); +return d; +}don't consider sync/async here? for group, we don't have such issue, but we need boost sync otherwise.
Ok, we should.
Quoted 57 lines
Quoted 57 lines
block/cfq-iosched.c +20
-4+/* * The cfqd->service_trees holds all pending cfq_queue's that have * requests waiting to be processed. It is sorted in the order that @@ -1210,13 +1227,14 @@ static void cfq_service_tree_add(struct cfq_data *cfqd, struct cfq_queue *cfqq,struct cfq_entity *cfqe;struct rb_node **p, *parent;struct cfq_entity *__cfqe; -unsigned long rb_key; -struct cfq_rb_root *service_tree; +struct cfq_rb_root *service_tree, *orig_st;int left;int new_cfqq =1 ;int group_changed =0 ; +s64 key; cfqe = &cfqq->cfqe; + orig_st = cfqe->service_tree;#ifdef CONFIG_CFQ_GROUP_IOSCHED if (!cfqd->cfq_group_isolation@@ -1224,8 +1242,15 @@ static void cfq_service_tree_add(struct cfq_data *cfqd, struct cfq_queue *cfqq, && cfqq->cfqg && cfqq->cfqg != &cfqd->root_group) {/* Move this cfq to root group */ cfq_log_cfqq (cfqd, cfqq,"moving to root group" ); -if (!RB_EMPTY_NODE (&cfqe->rb_node)) +if (!RB_EMPTY_NODE (&cfqe->rb_node)) {cfq_group_service_tree_del (cfqd, cfqq->cfqg); +/* +* Group changed, dequeue this CFQ queue from the +* original service tree. +*/ +cfq_rb_erase (&cfqe->rb_node, cfqe->service_tree); + orig_st->total_weight -= cfqe->weight; + } cfqq->orig_cfqg = cfqq->cfqg; cfqq->cfqg = &cfqd->root_group;atomic_inc (&cfqd->root_group.ref);@@ -1234,8 +1259,15 @@ static void cfq_service_tree_add(struct cfq_data *cfqd, struct cfq_queue *cfqq, && cfqq_type(cfqq) == SYNC_WORKLOAD && cfqq->orig_cfqg) {/* cfqq is sequential now needs to go to its original group */ BUG_ON (cfqq->cfqg != &cfqd->root_group); -if (!RB_EMPTY_NODE (&cfqe->rb_node)) +if (!RB_EMPTY_NODE (&cfqe->rb_node)) {cfq_group_service_tree_del (cfqd, cfqq->cfqg); +/* +* Group changed, dequeue this CFQ queue from the +* original service tree. +*/ +cfq_rb_erase (&cfqe->rb_node, cfqe->service_tree); + orig_st->total_weight -= cfqe->weight; + }cfq_put_cfqg (cfqq->cfqg); cfqq->cfqg = cfqq->orig_cfqg; cfqq->orig_cfqg =NULL ;@@ -1246,47 +1278,71 @@ static void cfq_service_tree_add(struct cfq_data *cfqd, struct cfq_queue *cfqq,Quoted 7 lines
block/cfq-iosched.c static void cfq_service_tree_add(struct cfq_data *cfqd, struct cfq_queue *cfqq, · line 1284
Quoted 6 lines
block/cfq-iosched.c +4
-0service_tree =service_tree_for (cfqq->cfqg,cfqq_prio (cfqq),cfqq_type (cfqq)); +/* +* For the time being, put the newly added CFQ queue at the end of the +* service tree. +*/ so this should be fixed later? please mark it as a todo.
Quoted 1 line
Ahh, forgot remove this annotation, I'v already boost vdisktime according to it ioprio.
ok, at below code, looks cfq_get_boost returns a value which is always greater than CFQ_IDLE_DELAY, so the new queue is inserted before __cfqe, is this intended?
Quoted 81 lines
Quoted 73 lines
Quoted 73 lines
block/cfq-iosched.c +40
-24+if (RB_EMPTY_NODE (&cfqe->rb_node)) { +/* +* If this CFQ queue moves to another group, the original +* vdisktime makes no sense any more, reset the vdisktime +* here. +*/ + parent =rb_last (&service_tree->rb); +if (parent) { +u64 boost; +s64 __vdisktime; + + __cfqe =rb_entry_entity (parent); + cfqe->vdisktime = __cfqe->vdisktime +CFQ_IDLE_DELAY ; + +/* Give some vdisktime boost according to its weight */ + boost =cfq_get_boost (cfqd, cfqe); + __vdisktime = cfqe->vdisktime - boost; +if (__vdisktime > service_tree->min_vdisktime) + cfqe->vdisktime = __vdisktime; +else + cfqe->vdisktime = service_tree->min_vdisktime; + }else + cfqe->vdisktime = service_tree->min_vdisktime; + + goto insert; + } +/* +* Ok, we get here, this CFQ queue is on the service tree, dequeue it +* firstly. +*/ +cfq_rb_erase (&cfqe->rb_node, cfqe->service_tree); + orig_st->total_weight -= cfqe->weight; + + new_cfqq =0 ; +if (cfq_class_idle (cfqq)) { - rb_key =CFQ_IDLE_DELAY ; parent =rb_last (&service_tree->rb);if (parent && parent != &cfqe->rb_node) { __cfqe = rb_entry(parent, struct cfq_entity, rb_node); - rb_key += __cfqe->rb_key; + cfqe->vdisktime = __cfqe->vdisktime +CFQ_IDLE_DELAY ; }else - rb_key += jiffies; + cfqe->vdisktime = service_tree->min_vdisktime; }else if (!add_front) {/* -* Get our rb key offset. Subtract any residual slice -* value carried from last service. A negative resid -* count indicates slice overrun, and this should position -* the next service time further away in the tree. -*/ - rb_key =cfq_slice_offset (cfqd, cfqq) + jiffies; - rb_key -= cfqq->slice_resid; - cfqq->slice_resid =0 ; - }else { - rb_key = -HZ ; - __cfqe =cfq_rb_first (service_tree); - rb_key += __cfqe ? __cfqe->rb_key : jiffies; - } - -if (!RB_EMPTY_NODE (&cfqe->rb_node)) { - new_cfqq =0 ; -/* -* same position, nothing more to do +* We charge the CFQ queue by the time this queue runs, and +* repsition it on the service tree. */ -if (rb_key == cfqe->rb_key && - cfqe->service_tree == service_tree) -return ; +unsigned int used_sl;Quoted 7 lines
block/cfq-iosched.c static void cfq_service_tree_add(struct cfq_data *cfqd, struct cfq_queue *cfqq, · line 1335
Quoted 4 lines
block/cfq-iosched.c +2
-2-cfq_rb_erase (&cfqe->rb_node, cfqe->service_tree); - cfqe->service_tree =NULL ; + used_sl =cfq_cfqq_slice_usage (cfqq); + cfqe->vdisktime +=cfq_scale_slice (used_sl, cfqe);
cfqq->slice_residcould be > 0 or < 0, and the queue can be boosted or penalized. Looks the logic is completely removed. This exists in current cfq group too, I wonder why?
Quoted 3 lines
With vdisktime introduced, vdisktime represents cfqq's position on a service tree. And vdisktime is decided by the acutal running time by a cfqq. So we don't need
slice_residany more here.
I mean the logic. cfq_cfq_slice_usage does:
slice_used = jiffies - cfqq->slice_start; if (slice_used > cfqq->allocated_slice) slice_used = cfqq->allocated_slice;
so the queue doesn't get penalty if it uses more slices than allocated, looks like a bug here.
Quoted 84 lines
Quoted 78 lines
Quoted 78 lines
block/cfq-iosched.c +21
-4+ }else { + cfqe->vdisktime = service_tree->min_vdisktime; } +insert: left =1 ; parent =NULL ; cfqe->service_tree = service_tree; p = &service_tree->rb.rb_node; + key =entity_key (service_tree, cfqe);while (*p) {struct rb_node **n;@@ -1296,7 +1352,7 @@ static void cfq_service_tree_add(struct cfq_data *cfqd, struct cfq_queue *cfqq,/* * sort by key, that represents service time. */ -if (time_before (rb_key, __cfqe->rb_key)) +if (key <entity_key (service_tree, __cfqe)) n = &(*p)->rb_left;else { n = &(*p)->rb_right;@@ -1309,10 +1365,12 @@ static void cfq_service_tree_add(struct cfq_data *cfqd, struct cfq_queue *cfqq,if (left) service_tree->left = &cfqe->rb_node; - cfqe->rb_key = rb_key;rb_link_node (&cfqe->rb_node, parent, p);rb_insert_color (&cfqe->rb_node, &service_tree->rb); +update_min_vdisktime (service_tree); service_tree->count++; + service_tree->total_weight += cfqe->weight; + cfqq->reposition_time = jiffies;if ((add_front || !new_cfqq) && !group_changed)return ;cfq_group_service_tree_add (cfqd, cfqq->cfqg);@@ -1414,14 +1472,18 @@ static void cfq_add_cfqq_rr(struct cfq_data *cfqd, struct cfq_queue *cfqq)static void cfq_del_cfqq_rr (struct cfq_data *cfqd,struct cfq_queue *cfqq) {struct cfq_entity *cfqe; +struct cfq_rb_root *service_tree; +cfq_log_cfqq (cfqd, cfqq,"del_from_rr" );BUG_ON (!cfq_cfqq_on_rr (cfqq));cfq_clear_cfqq_on_rr (cfqq); cfqe = &cfqq->cfqe; + service_tree = cfqe->service_tree;if (!RB_EMPTY_NODE (&cfqe->rb_node)) {cfq_rb_erase (&cfqe->rb_node, cfqe->service_tree); + service_tree->total_weight -= cfqe->weight; cfqe->service_tree =NULL ; }if (cfqq->p_root) {@@ -2120,23 +2182,35 @@ static void cfq_setup_merge(struct cfq_queue *cfqq, struct cfq_queue *new_cfqq) } } +/* +* The time when a CFQ queue is put onto a service tree is recoreded in +* cfqq->reposition_time. Currently, we check the first priority CFQ queues +* on each service tree, and select the workload type that contain the lowest +* reposition_time CFQ queue among them. +*/ static enum wl_type_t cfq_choose_wl (struct cfq_data *cfqd,struct cfq_group *cfqg,enum wl_prio_t prio) {struct cfq_entity *cfqe; +struct cfq_queue *cfqq; +unsigned long lowest_start_time;int i; -bool key_valid = false; -unsigned long lowest_key =0 ; +bool time_valid = false;enum wl_type_t cur_best =SYNC_NOIDLE_WORKLOAD ;Quoted 5 lines
block/cfq-iosched.c static void cfq_setup_merge(struct cfq_queue *cfqq, struct cfq_queue *new_cfqq) · line 2204
Quoted 4 lines
block/cfq-iosched.c +4
-0+/* +* TODO: We may take io priority into account when choosing a workload +* type. But for the time being just make use of reposition_time only. +*/ not just priority, original
rb_keyconsiders sys/async too.
Quoted 3 lines
IIUC, in original CFQ,
rb_keyis cross tree, so we need to take sync/async into account. But with vdisktime introduced, each service has its own vdisktime space. So there's no need to consider sync/async here.
previously rb_key is jiffies + offset, where offset is scaled by priority and sync/async. So if you add two queues with different type and same priority, sync queue will be dispatched first, while currently only the inserted time is checked here, so sync queue isn't boosted. That's why I said original code not just consider priority but also sync/async
Thanks,
Shaohua
Re: [PATCH 3/6 v3] cfq-iosched: Introduce vdisktime and io weight for CFQ queue
Quoted 169 lines · Shaohua Li
Quoted 6 lines · Gui Jianfeng
Quoted 5 lines · Shaohua Li
Quoted 4 lines · Gui Jianfeng
Introduce vdisktime and io weight for CFQ queue scheduling. Currently, io priority maps to a range [100,1000]. It also gets rid of
cfq_slice_offset()logic and makes use the same scheduling algorithm as CFQ group does. This helps for CFQ queue and group scheduling on the same service tree.Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 3 lines
Haven't read the whole series yet. Looks this changes a lot of logic even without cgroup support. Did you have test if this changes both performance and latency in some mixed workloads?
Hi Shaohua,
I did some tests with different workloads and with idling on or idling off. I don't see performance drop on my box.
please check latency too.
Quoted 153 lines
Quoted 76 lines
Quoted 76 lines
Signed-off-by Gui Jianfeng <[email protected]>--- block/cfq-iosched.c | 211 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------- 1 files changed, 158 insertions(+), 53 deletions(-)block/cfq-iosched.c +21
-14@@ -100,10 +100,7 @@ struct cfq_entity {struct cfq_rb_root *service_tree;/* service_tree member */ struct rb_node rb_node; -/* service_tree key, represent the position on the tree */ -unsigned long rb_key; - -/* group service_tree key */ +/* service_tree key */ u64 vdisktime;bool is_group_entity;unsigned int weight;@@ -115,6 +112,8 @@ struct cfq_entity {struct cfq_queue {/* The schedule entity */ struct cfq_entity cfqe; +/* Reposition time */ +unsigned long reposition_time;/* reference count */ atomic_t ref;/* various state flags, see below */ @@ -313,6 +312,24 @@ struct cfq_data {struct rcu_head rcu; }; +/* +* Map io priority(7 ~ 0) to io weight(100 ~ 1000) as follows +* prio 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 +* weight 1000 868 740 612 484 356 228 100 +*/ +static inline unsigned int cfq_prio_to_weight (unsigned short ioprio) +{ +unsigned int step; + +BUG_ON (ioprio >=IOPRIO_BE_NR ); + + step = (BLKIO_WEIGHT_MAX -BLKIO_WEIGHT_MIN ) / (IOPRIO_BE_NR -1 ); +if (ioprio ==0 ) +return BLKIO_WEIGHT_MAX ; + +return BLKIO_WEIGHT_MIN + (IOPRIO_BE_NR - ioprio -1 ) * step; +} +static inline struct cfq_queue *cfqq_of_entity (struct cfq_entity *cfqe) {@@ -841,16 +858,6 @@ cfq_find_next_rq(struct cfq_data *cfqd, struct cfq_queue *cfqq,return cfq_choose_req (cfqd, next, prev,blk_rq_pos (last)); } -static unsigned long cfq_slice_offset (struct cfq_data *cfqd, -struct cfq_queue *cfqq) -{ -/* -* just an approximation, should be ok. -*/ -return (cfqq->cfqg->nr_cfqq -1 ) * (cfq_prio_slice (cfqd,1 ,0 ) - -cfq_prio_slice (cfqd,cfq_cfqq_sync (cfqq), cfqq->ioprio)); -} -static inline s64 entity_key (struct cfq_rb_root *st,struct cfq_entity *entity) {@@ -1199,6 +1206,16 @@ static inline void cfq_put_cfqg(struct cfq_group *cfqg) {}#endif /* GROUP_IOSCHED */ Quoted 11 lines
block/cfq-iosched.c static inline void cfq_put_cfqg(struct cfq_group *cfqg) {} · line 1217
Quoted 9 lines
block/cfq-iosched.c +9
-0+static inline u64 cfq_get_boost (struct cfq_data *cfqd, +struct cfq_entity *cfqe) +{ +u64 d = cfqd->cfq_slice[1 ] <<CFQ_SERVICE_SHIFT ; + + d = d *BLKIO_WEIGHT_DEFAULT ; +do_div (d,BLKIO_WEIGHT_MAX - cfqe->weight +BLKIO_WEIGHT_MIN ); +return d; +}don't consider sync/async here? for group, we don't have such issue, but we need boost sync otherwise.
Ok, we should.
Quoted 64 lines
Quoted 56 lines
block/cfq-iosched.c +20
-4+/* * The cfqd->service_trees holds all pending cfq_queue's that have * requests waiting to be processed. It is sorted in the order that @@ -1210,13 +1227,14 @@ static void cfq_service_tree_add(struct cfq_data *cfqd, struct cfq_queue *cfqq,struct cfq_entity *cfqe;struct rb_node **p, *parent;struct cfq_entity *__cfqe; -unsigned long rb_key; -struct cfq_rb_root *service_tree; +struct cfq_rb_root *service_tree, *orig_st;int left;int new_cfqq =1 ;int group_changed =0 ; +s64 key; cfqe = &cfqq->cfqe; + orig_st = cfqe->service_tree;#ifdef CONFIG_CFQ_GROUP_IOSCHED if (!cfqd->cfq_group_isolation@@ -1224,8 +1242,15 @@ static void cfq_service_tree_add(struct cfq_data *cfqd, struct cfq_queue *cfqq, && cfqq->cfqg && cfqq->cfqg != &cfqd->root_group) {/* Move this cfq to root group */ cfq_log_cfqq (cfqd, cfqq,"moving to root group" ); -if (!RB_EMPTY_NODE (&cfqe->rb_node)) +if (!RB_EMPTY_NODE (&cfqe->rb_node)) {cfq_group_service_tree_del (cfqd, cfqq->cfqg); +/* +* Group changed, dequeue this CFQ queue from the +* original service tree. +*/ +cfq_rb_erase (&cfqe->rb_node, cfqe->service_tree); + orig_st->total_weight -= cfqe->weight; + } cfqq->orig_cfqg = cfqq->cfqg; cfqq->cfqg = &cfqd->root_group;atomic_inc (&cfqd->root_group.ref);@@ -1234,8 +1259,15 @@ static void cfq_service_tree_add(struct cfq_data *cfqd, struct cfq_queue *cfqq, && cfqq_type(cfqq) == SYNC_WORKLOAD && cfqq->orig_cfqg) {/* cfqq is sequential now needs to go to its original group */ BUG_ON (cfqq->cfqg != &cfqd->root_group); -if (!RB_EMPTY_NODE (&cfqe->rb_node)) +if (!RB_EMPTY_NODE (&cfqe->rb_node)) {cfq_group_service_tree_del (cfqd, cfqq->cfqg); +/* +* Group changed, dequeue this CFQ queue from the +* original service tree. +*/ +cfq_rb_erase (&cfqe->rb_node, cfqe->service_tree); + orig_st->total_weight -= cfqe->weight; + }cfq_put_cfqg (cfqq->cfqg); cfqq->cfqg = cfqq->orig_cfqg; cfqq->orig_cfqg =NULL ;block/cfq-iosched.c static void cfq_service_tree_add(struct cfq_data *cfqd, struct cfq_queue *cfqq, · line 1284
Quoted 7 lines
block/cfq-iosched.c +4
-0@@ -1246,47 +1278,71 @@ static void cfq_service_tree_add(struct cfq_data *cfqd, struct cfq_queue *cfqq, service_tree =service_tree_for (cfqq->cfqg,cfqq_prio (cfqq),cfqq_type (cfqq)); +/* +* For the time being, put the newly added CFQ queue at the end of the +* service tree. +*/ so this should be fixed later? please mark it as a todo.
Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 1 line
Ahh, forgot remove this annotation, I'v already boost vdisktime according to it ioprio.
ok, at below code, looks
cfq_get_boostreturns a value which is always greater thanCFQ_IDLE_DELAY, so the new queue is inserted before__cfqe, is this intended?
Currently, yes.
I may improve cfq_get_boost() logic later.
Quoted 83 lines
Quoted 80 lines
Quoted 73 lines
Quoted 73 lines
block/cfq-iosched.c +40
-24+if (RB_EMPTY_NODE (&cfqe->rb_node)) { +/* +* If this CFQ queue moves to another group, the original +* vdisktime makes no sense any more, reset the vdisktime +* here. +*/ + parent =rb_last (&service_tree->rb); +if (parent) { +u64 boost; +s64 __vdisktime; + + __cfqe =rb_entry_entity (parent); + cfqe->vdisktime = __cfqe->vdisktime +CFQ_IDLE_DELAY ; + +/* Give some vdisktime boost according to its weight */ + boost =cfq_get_boost (cfqd, cfqe); + __vdisktime = cfqe->vdisktime - boost; +if (__vdisktime > service_tree->min_vdisktime) + cfqe->vdisktime = __vdisktime; +else + cfqe->vdisktime = service_tree->min_vdisktime; + }else + cfqe->vdisktime = service_tree->min_vdisktime; + + goto insert; + } +/* +* Ok, we get here, this CFQ queue is on the service tree, dequeue it +* firstly. +*/ +cfq_rb_erase (&cfqe->rb_node, cfqe->service_tree); + orig_st->total_weight -= cfqe->weight; + + new_cfqq =0 ; +if (cfq_class_idle (cfqq)) { - rb_key =CFQ_IDLE_DELAY ; parent =rb_last (&service_tree->rb);if (parent && parent != &cfqe->rb_node) { __cfqe = rb_entry(parent, struct cfq_entity, rb_node); - rb_key += __cfqe->rb_key; + cfqe->vdisktime = __cfqe->vdisktime +CFQ_IDLE_DELAY ; }else - rb_key += jiffies; + cfqe->vdisktime = service_tree->min_vdisktime; }else if (!add_front) {/* -* Get our rb key offset. Subtract any residual slice -* value carried from last service. A negative resid -* count indicates slice overrun, and this should position -* the next service time further away in the tree. -*/ - rb_key =cfq_slice_offset (cfqd, cfqq) + jiffies; - rb_key -= cfqq->slice_resid; - cfqq->slice_resid =0 ; - }else { - rb_key = -HZ ; - __cfqe =cfq_rb_first (service_tree); - rb_key += __cfqe ? __cfqe->rb_key : jiffies; - } - -if (!RB_EMPTY_NODE (&cfqe->rb_node)) { - new_cfqq =0 ; -/* -* same position, nothing more to do +* We charge the CFQ queue by the time this queue runs, and +* repsition it on the service tree. */ -if (rb_key == cfqe->rb_key && - cfqe->service_tree == service_tree) -return ; +unsigned int used_sl;Quoted 7 lines
block/cfq-iosched.c static void cfq_service_tree_add(struct cfq_data *cfqd, struct cfq_queue *cfqq, · line 1335
Quoted 4 lines
block/cfq-iosched.c +2
-2-cfq_rb_erase (&cfqe->rb_node, cfqe->service_tree); - cfqe->service_tree =NULL ; + used_sl =cfq_cfqq_slice_usage (cfqq); + cfqe->vdisktime +=cfq_scale_slice (used_sl, cfqe);
cfqq->slice_residcould be > 0 or < 0, and the queue can be boosted or penalized. Looks the logic is completely removed. This exists in current cfq group too, I wonder why?Quoted 3 lines
With vdisktime introduced, vdisktime represents cfqq's position on a service tree. And vdisktime is decided by the acutal running time by a cfqq. So we don't need
slice_residany more here.
Quoted 6 lines
I mean the logic.
cfq_cfq_slice_usagedoes:slice_used = jiffies - cfqq->slice_start; if (slice_used > cfqq->allocated_slice) slice_used = cfqq->allocated_slice;so the queue doesn't get penalty if it uses more slices than allocated, looks like a bug here.
Ok, since cfqq and cfqg are scheduling at the same level, I'd like to let them confirm to the same scheduling logic. I'm not sure why cfqg charge allocated slice rather than the used slice when overshooting. Vivek may answer it.
Quoted 85 lines
Quoted 77 lines
Quoted 77 lines
Quoted 77 lines
block/cfq-iosched.c +21
-4+ }else { + cfqe->vdisktime = service_tree->min_vdisktime; } +insert: left =1 ; parent =NULL ; cfqe->service_tree = service_tree; p = &service_tree->rb.rb_node; + key =entity_key (service_tree, cfqe);while (*p) {struct rb_node **n;@@ -1296,7 +1352,7 @@ static void cfq_service_tree_add(struct cfq_data *cfqd, struct cfq_queue *cfqq,/* * sort by key, that represents service time. */ -if (time_before (rb_key, __cfqe->rb_key)) +if (key <entity_key (service_tree, __cfqe)) n = &(*p)->rb_left;else { n = &(*p)->rb_right;@@ -1309,10 +1365,12 @@ static void cfq_service_tree_add(struct cfq_data *cfqd, struct cfq_queue *cfqq,if (left) service_tree->left = &cfqe->rb_node; - cfqe->rb_key = rb_key;rb_link_node (&cfqe->rb_node, parent, p);rb_insert_color (&cfqe->rb_node, &service_tree->rb); +update_min_vdisktime (service_tree); service_tree->count++; + service_tree->total_weight += cfqe->weight; + cfqq->reposition_time = jiffies;if ((add_front || !new_cfqq) && !group_changed)return ;cfq_group_service_tree_add (cfqd, cfqq->cfqg);@@ -1414,14 +1472,18 @@ static void cfq_add_cfqq_rr(struct cfq_data *cfqd, struct cfq_queue *cfqq)static void cfq_del_cfqq_rr (struct cfq_data *cfqd,struct cfq_queue *cfqq) {struct cfq_entity *cfqe; +struct cfq_rb_root *service_tree; +cfq_log_cfqq (cfqd, cfqq,"del_from_rr" );BUG_ON (!cfq_cfqq_on_rr (cfqq));cfq_clear_cfqq_on_rr (cfqq); cfqe = &cfqq->cfqe; + service_tree = cfqe->service_tree;if (!RB_EMPTY_NODE (&cfqe->rb_node)) {cfq_rb_erase (&cfqe->rb_node, cfqe->service_tree); + service_tree->total_weight -= cfqe->weight; cfqe->service_tree =NULL ; }if (cfqq->p_root) {@@ -2120,23 +2182,35 @@ static void cfq_setup_merge(struct cfq_queue *cfqq, struct cfq_queue *new_cfqq) } } +/* +* The time when a CFQ queue is put onto a service tree is recoreded in +* cfqq->reposition_time. Currently, we check the first priority CFQ queues +* on each service tree, and select the workload type that contain the lowest +* reposition_time CFQ queue among them. +*/ static enum wl_type_t cfq_choose_wl (struct cfq_data *cfqd,struct cfq_group *cfqg,enum wl_prio_t prio) {struct cfq_entity *cfqe; +struct cfq_queue *cfqq; +unsigned long lowest_start_time;int i; -bool key_valid = false; -unsigned long lowest_key =0 ; +bool time_valid = false;enum wl_type_t cur_best =SYNC_NOIDLE_WORKLOAD ;Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 5 lines
block/cfq-iosched.c static void cfq_setup_merge(struct cfq_queue *cfqq, struct cfq_queue *new_cfqq) · line 2204
Quoted 4 lines
block/cfq-iosched.c +4
-0+/* +* TODO: We may take io priority into account when choosing a workload +* type. But for the time being just make use of reposition_time only. +*/ not just priority, original
rb_keyconsiders sys/async too.IIUC, in original CFQ,
rb_keyis cross tree, so we need to take sync/async into account. But with vdisktime introduced, each service has its own vdisktime space. So there's no need to consider sync/async here.
Quoted 6 lines
previously
rb_keyis jiffies + offset, where offset is scaled by priority and sync/async. So if you add two queues with different type and same priority, sync queue will be dispatched first, while currently only the inserted time is checked here, so sync queue isn't boosted. That's why I said original code not just consider priority but also sync/async
Ok, I got. will update the annonatation.
Thanks for the comments Shaohua.
Gui
Quoted 5 lines
Thanks,
Shaohua
Re: [PATCH 3/6 v3] cfq-iosched: Introduce vdisktime and io weight for CFQ queue
In reply to Gui JianfengQuoted 6 lines · Gui Jianfeng
Introduce vdisktime and io weight for CFQ queue scheduling. Currently, io priority maps to a range [100,1000]. It also gets rid of
cfq_slice_offset()logic and makes use the same scheduling algorithm as CFQ group does. This helps for CFQ queue and group scheduling on the same service tree.Signed-off-by Gui Jianfeng <[email protected]>
[..]
Quoted 21 lines
block/cfq-iosched.c +17
-0@@ -1246,47 +1278,71 @@ static void cfq_service_tree_add(struct cfq_data *cfqd, struct cfq_queue *cfqq, service_tree =service_tree_for (cfqq->cfqg,cfqq_prio (cfqq),cfqq_type (cfqq)); +/* +* For the time being, put the newly added CFQ queue at the end of the +* service tree. +*/ +if (RB_EMPTY_NODE (&cfqe->rb_node)) { +/* +* If this CFQ queue moves to another group, the original +* vdisktime makes no sense any more, reset the vdisktime +* here. +*/ + parent =rb_last (&service_tree->rb); +if (parent) { +u64 boost; +s64 __vdisktime; + + __cfqe =rb_entry_entity (parent); + cfqe->vdisktime = __cfqe->vdisktime +CFQ_IDLE_DELAY ;
block/cfq-iosched.c static void cfq_service_tree_add(struct cfq_data *cfqd, struct cfq_queue *cfqq, · line 1307
Quoted 10 lines
block/cfq-iosched.c +10
-0+ +/* Give some vdisktime boost according to its weight */ + boost =cfq_get_boost (cfqd, cfqe); + __vdisktime = cfqe->vdisktime - boost; +if (__vdisktime > service_tree->min_vdisktime) + cfqe->vdisktime = __vdisktime; +else + cfqe->vdisktime = service_tree->min_vdisktime; + }else + cfqe->vdisktime = service_tree->min_vdisktime;
Hi Gui,
Is above logic actually working? I suspect that most of the time all the new queues will end up getting same vdisktime and that is st->min_vdisktime and there will be no service differentiation across various prio.
Reason being, on SSD, idle is disabled. So very few/no queue will consume its slice and follow reque path. So every queue will be new. Now you are doing following.
cfqd->vdisktime = vdisktime_of_parent + IDLE_DELAY - boost
assume vdisktime_of_parent=st->min_vdisktime, then (IDLE_DELAY - boost) is always going to be a -ve number and hence cfqd->vdisktime will default to st->min_vdisktime. (IDLE_DELAY=200 while boost should be a huge value due to SERVICE_SHIFT thing).
I think this logic needs refining. Maybe instead of subtracting the boost we can instead place entities further away from st->min_vdisktime and offset is higher for lower ioprio queues.
cfqe->vdisktime = st->min_vdisktime + offset
here offset is something similar to boost but reversed in nature in the sense that lower weight has got lower offset and vice-versa.
The important test here will be to run bunch of cfqq queues of different ioprio on a SSD with queue depth 1 and see if you can see the service differentiation. If yes, then you can increase the queue depth a bit and also number of competing queues and see what's the result. Also monitor the blktrace and vdisktime and make sure higher prio queues get to run more than lower prio queues.
This is the most critical piece of converting cfqq scheduling logic, so lets make sure that we get it right.
Thanks
Vivek
Re: [PATCH 3/6 v3] cfq-iosched: Introduce vdisktime and io weight for CFQ queue
Quoted 51 lines · Vivek Goyal
Quoted 6 lines · Gui Jianfeng
Introduce vdisktime and io weight for CFQ queue scheduling. Currently, io priority maps to a range [100,1000]. It also gets rid of
cfq_slice_offset()logic and makes use the same scheduling algorithm as CFQ group does. This helps for CFQ queue and group scheduling on the same service tree.Signed-off-by Gui Jianfeng <[email protected]>[..]
Quoted 21 lines
block/cfq-iosched.c +17
-0@@ -1246,47 +1278,71 @@ static void cfq_service_tree_add(struct cfq_data *cfqd, struct cfq_queue *cfqq, service_tree =service_tree_for (cfqq->cfqg,cfqq_prio (cfqq),cfqq_type (cfqq)); +/* +* For the time being, put the newly added CFQ queue at the end of the +* service tree. +*/ +if (RB_EMPTY_NODE (&cfqe->rb_node)) { +/* +* If this CFQ queue moves to another group, the original +* vdisktime makes no sense any more, reset the vdisktime +* here. +*/ + parent =rb_last (&service_tree->rb); +if (parent) { +u64 boost; +s64 __vdisktime; + + __cfqe =rb_entry_entity (parent); + cfqe->vdisktime = __cfqe->vdisktime +CFQ_IDLE_DELAY ;block/cfq-iosched.c static void cfq_service_tree_add(struct cfq_data *cfqd, struct cfq_queue *cfqq, · line 1307
Quoted 10 lines
block/cfq-iosched.c +10
-0+ +/* Give some vdisktime boost according to its weight */ + boost =cfq_get_boost (cfqd, cfqe); + __vdisktime = cfqe->vdisktime - boost; +if (__vdisktime > service_tree->min_vdisktime) + cfqe->vdisktime = __vdisktime; +else + cfqe->vdisktime = service_tree->min_vdisktime; + }else + cfqe->vdisktime = service_tree->min_vdisktime;Hi Gui,
Is above logic actually working? I suspect that most of the time all the new queues will end up getting same vdisktime and that is
st->min_vdisktimeand there will be no service differentiation across various prio.Reason being, on SSD, idle is disabled. So very few/no queue will consume its slice and follow reque path. So every queue will be new. Now you are doing following.
Quoted 6 lines
cfqd->vdisktime = vdisktime_of_parent + IDLE_DELAY - boostassume vdisktime_of_parent=st->min_vdisktime, then (
IDLE_DELAY- boost) is always going to be a -ve number and hencecfqd->vdisktimewill default tost->min_vdisktime. (IDLE_DELAY=200 while boost should be a huge value due toSERVICE_SHIFTthing).
Vivek,
Actually, I tested on rotational disk with idling disabled, I saw service differentiation between two tasks with different ioprio.
I don't have a SSD on hand, But I'll get one and do more tests.
Quoted 9 lines
I think this logic needs refining. Maybe instead of subtracting the boost we can instead place entities further away from
st->min_vdisktimeand offset is higher for lower ioprio queues.cfqe->vdisktime = st->min_vdisktime + offsethere offset is something similar to boost but reversed in nature in the sense that lower weight has got lower offset and vice-versa.
I'll consider this idea and try it.
Quoted 10 lines
The important test here will be to run bunch of cfqq queues of different ioprio on a SSD with queue depth 1 and see if you can see the service differentiation. If yes, then you can increase the queue depth a bit and also number of competing queues and see what's the result. Also monitor the blktrace and vdisktime and make sure higher prio queues get to run more than lower prio queues.
This is the most critical piece of converting cfqq scheduling logic, so lets make sure that we get it right.
Yes, of course. :)
Thanks,
Gui
Quoted 5 lines
Thanks
Vivek
Re: [PATCH 3/6 v3] cfq-iosched: Introduce vdisktime and io weight for CFQ queue
Quoted 59 lines · Gui Jianfeng
Quoted 51 lines · Vivek Goyal
Quoted 6 lines · Gui Jianfeng
Introduce vdisktime and io weight for CFQ queue scheduling. Currently, io priority maps to a range [100,1000]. It also gets rid of
cfq_slice_offset()logic and makes use the same scheduling algorithm as CFQ group does. This helps for CFQ queue and group scheduling on the same service tree.Signed-off-by Gui Jianfeng <[email protected]>[..]
Quoted 21 lines
block/cfq-iosched.c +17
-0@@ -1246,47 +1278,71 @@ static void cfq_service_tree_add(struct cfq_data *cfqd, struct cfq_queue *cfqq, service_tree =service_tree_for (cfqq->cfqg,cfqq_prio (cfqq),cfqq_type (cfqq)); +/* +* For the time being, put the newly added CFQ queue at the end of the +* service tree. +*/ +if (RB_EMPTY_NODE (&cfqe->rb_node)) { +/* +* If this CFQ queue moves to another group, the original +* vdisktime makes no sense any more, reset the vdisktime +* here. +*/ + parent =rb_last (&service_tree->rb); +if (parent) { +u64 boost; +s64 __vdisktime; + + __cfqe =rb_entry_entity (parent); + cfqe->vdisktime = __cfqe->vdisktime +CFQ_IDLE_DELAY ;block/cfq-iosched.c static void cfq_service_tree_add(struct cfq_data *cfqd, struct cfq_queue *cfqq, · line 1307
Quoted 10 lines
block/cfq-iosched.c +10
-0+ +/* Give some vdisktime boost according to its weight */ + boost =cfq_get_boost (cfqd, cfqe); + __vdisktime = cfqe->vdisktime - boost; +if (__vdisktime > service_tree->min_vdisktime) + cfqe->vdisktime = __vdisktime; +else + cfqe->vdisktime = service_tree->min_vdisktime; + }else + cfqe->vdisktime = service_tree->min_vdisktime;Hi Gui,
Is above logic actually working? I suspect that most of the time all the new queues will end up getting same vdisktime and that is
st->min_vdisktimeand there will be no service differentiation across various prio.Reason being, on SSD, idle is disabled. So very few/no queue will consume its slice and follow reque path. So every queue will be new. Now you are doing following.
Quoted 6 lines
cfqd->vdisktime = vdisktime_of_parent + IDLE_DELAY - boostassume vdisktime_of_parent=st->min_vdisktime, then (
IDLE_DELAY- boost) is always going to be a -ve number and hencecfqd->vdisktimewill default tost->min_vdisktime. (IDLE_DELAY=200 while boost should be a huge value due toSERVICE_SHIFTthing).
Quoted 5 lines
Vivek,
Actually, I tested on rotational disk with idling disabled, I saw service differentiation between two tasks with different ioprio.
I don't have a SSD on hand, But I'll get one and do more tests.
Ok, I am really not sure how did it work for you because boost will turn out to be huge number in comparision to IDLE_DELAY or vdisktime of parent. If you have some blktrace data or if you can explain how it is working will help in understanding it better.
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 6 lines
I think this logic needs refining. Maybe instead of subtracting the boost we can instead place entities further away from
st->min_vdisktimeand offset is higher for lower ioprio queues.
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 4 lines
cfqe->vdisktime = st->min_vdisktime + offsethere offset is something similar to boost but reversed in nature in the sense that lower weight has got lower offset and vice-versa.
I'll consider this idea and try it.
I think I wrote it reversed. offset should be higher for lower weights and lower for higher weights so that higher weight queues/groups can dispatch IO earlier.
If this works fine, this will help with group logic also. Currently we place all newly backlogged group at the end of sevice tree and this results in no service differentiation of idling is disabled. (slice_idle and group_idle). Keeping idling on can hurt very badly on faster sotrage like storage arrays.
So I wanted to make sure that this logic works so that even for groups one can disable idling on faster storage and still get some service differentaion among groups.
Thanks
Vivek
Re: [PATCH 3/6 v3] cfq-iosched: Introduce vdisktime and io weight for CFQ queue
Quoted 59 lines · Vivek Goyal
Quoted 58 lines · Gui Jianfeng
Quoted 49 lines · Vivek Goyal
Quoted 6 lines · Gui Jianfeng
Introduce vdisktime and io weight for CFQ queue scheduling. Currently, io priority maps to a range [100,1000]. It also gets rid of
cfq_slice_offset()logic and makes use the same scheduling algorithm as CFQ group does. This helps for CFQ queue and group scheduling on the same service tree.Signed-off-by Gui Jianfeng <[email protected]>[..]
Quoted 21 lines
block/cfq-iosched.c +17
-0@@ -1246,47 +1278,71 @@ static void cfq_service_tree_add(struct cfq_data *cfqd, struct cfq_queue *cfqq, service_tree =service_tree_for (cfqq->cfqg,cfqq_prio (cfqq),cfqq_type (cfqq)); +/* +* For the time being, put the newly added CFQ queue at the end of the +* service tree. +*/ +if (RB_EMPTY_NODE (&cfqe->rb_node)) { +/* +* If this CFQ queue moves to another group, the original +* vdisktime makes no sense any more, reset the vdisktime +* here. +*/ + parent =rb_last (&service_tree->rb); +if (parent) { +u64 boost; +s64 __vdisktime; + + __cfqe =rb_entry_entity (parent); + cfqe->vdisktime = __cfqe->vdisktime +CFQ_IDLE_DELAY ;block/cfq-iosched.c static void cfq_service_tree_add(struct cfq_data *cfqd, struct cfq_queue *cfqq, · line 1307
Quoted 10 lines
block/cfq-iosched.c +10
-0+ +/* Give some vdisktime boost according to its weight */ + boost =cfq_get_boost (cfqd, cfqe); + __vdisktime = cfqe->vdisktime - boost; +if (__vdisktime > service_tree->min_vdisktime) + cfqe->vdisktime = __vdisktime; +else + cfqe->vdisktime = service_tree->min_vdisktime; + }else + cfqe->vdisktime = service_tree->min_vdisktime;Hi Gui,
Is above logic actually working? I suspect that most of the time all the new queues will end up getting same vdisktime and that is
st->min_vdisktimeand there will be no service differentiation across various prio.Reason being, on SSD, idle is disabled. So very few/no queue will consume its slice and follow reque path. So every queue will be new. Now you are doing following.
Quoted 6 lines
cfqd->vdisktime = vdisktime_of_parent + IDLE_DELAY - boostassume vdisktime_of_parent=st->min_vdisktime, then (
IDLE_DELAY- boost) is always going to be a -ve number and hencecfqd->vdisktimewill default tost->min_vdisktime. (IDLE_DELAY=200 while boost should be a huge value due toSERVICE_SHIFTthing).Vivek,
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 3 lines
Actually, I tested on rotational disk with idling disabled, I saw service differentiation between two tasks with different ioprio.
I don't have a SSD on hand, But I'll get one and do more tests.Ok, I am really not sure how did it work for you because boost will turn out to be huge number in comparision to
IDLE_DELAYor vdisktime of parent. If you have some blktrace data or if you can explain how it is working will help in understanding it better.
Vivek,
I think there must be something configuration wrong in my previous tests. I tested again with patch applied. I don't see service differentiation this time.
But, I do the same test on vanilla kernel, I don't see service differentiation either. I dig into it. It seems when I set slice_idle and group_idle to zero, it means i close idle window by mannual. In this case, IO tasks becomes SYNC NOIDLE workloads, they will preempts each other mutually. And the cfqq will always be put at the front of service tree. So we don't see service differentiation.
Actually, We don't want preemption happening in such case, right? So I think we should refine the preemption logic.
Thoughts?
Below is my fio job file:
[global]
directory=/hdb3
ioengine=sync
runtime=30
time_based=1
direct=1
bs=128K
size=64M
numjobs=1
exec_prerun='echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches'
[task-prio-0]
description=task-prio-0
rw=read
prio=0
filename=file1
[task-prio-7]
description=task-prio-7
rw=read
prio=7
filename=file2
Thanks,
Gui
Re: [PATCH 3/6 v3] cfq-iosched: Introduce vdisktime and io weight for CFQ queue
Quoted 80 lines · Gui Jianfeng
Quoted 59 lines · Vivek Goyal
Quoted 58 lines · Gui Jianfeng
Quoted 49 lines · Vivek Goyal
Quoted 6 lines · Gui Jianfeng
Introduce vdisktime and io weight for CFQ queue scheduling. Currently, io priority maps to a range [100,1000]. It also gets rid of
cfq_slice_offset()logic and makes use the same scheduling algorithm as CFQ group does. This helps for CFQ queue and group scheduling on the same service tree.Signed-off-by Gui Jianfeng <[email protected]>[..]
Quoted 21 lines
block/cfq-iosched.c +17
-0@@ -1246,47 +1278,71 @@ static void cfq_service_tree_add(struct cfq_data *cfqd, struct cfq_queue *cfqq, service_tree =service_tree_for (cfqq->cfqg,cfqq_prio (cfqq),cfqq_type (cfqq)); +/* +* For the time being, put the newly added CFQ queue at the end of the +* service tree. +*/ +if (RB_EMPTY_NODE (&cfqe->rb_node)) { +/* +* If this CFQ queue moves to another group, the original +* vdisktime makes no sense any more, reset the vdisktime +* here. +*/ + parent =rb_last (&service_tree->rb); +if (parent) { +u64 boost; +s64 __vdisktime; + + __cfqe =rb_entry_entity (parent); + cfqe->vdisktime = __cfqe->vdisktime +CFQ_IDLE_DELAY ;block/cfq-iosched.c static void cfq_service_tree_add(struct cfq_data *cfqd, struct cfq_queue *cfqq, · line 1307
Quoted 10 lines
block/cfq-iosched.c +10
-0+ +/* Give some vdisktime boost according to its weight */ + boost =cfq_get_boost (cfqd, cfqe); + __vdisktime = cfqe->vdisktime - boost; +if (__vdisktime > service_tree->min_vdisktime) + cfqe->vdisktime = __vdisktime; +else + cfqe->vdisktime = service_tree->min_vdisktime; + }else + cfqe->vdisktime = service_tree->min_vdisktime;Hi Gui,
Is above logic actually working? I suspect that most of the time all the new queues will end up getting same vdisktime and that is
st->min_vdisktimeand there will be no service differentiation across various prio.Reason being, on SSD, idle is disabled. So very few/no queue will consume its slice and follow reque path. So every queue will be new. Now you are doing following.
Quoted 6 lines
cfqd->vdisktime = vdisktime_of_parent + IDLE_DELAY - boostassume vdisktime_of_parent=st->min_vdisktime, then (
IDLE_DELAY- boost) is always going to be a -ve number and hencecfqd->vdisktimewill default tost->min_vdisktime. (IDLE_DELAY=200 while boost should be a huge value due toSERVICE_SHIFTthing).Vivek,
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 3 lines
Actually, I tested on rotational disk with idling disabled, I saw service differentiation between two tasks with different ioprio.
I don't have a SSD on hand, But I'll get one and do more tests.Ok, I am really not sure how did it work for you because boost will turn out to be huge number in comparision to
IDLE_DELAYor vdisktime of parent. If you have some blktrace data or if you can explain how it is working will help in understanding it better.Vivek,
I think there must be something configuration wrong in my previous tests. I tested again with patch applied. I don't see service differentiation this time.
But, I do the same test on vanilla kernel, I don't see service differentiation either. I dig into it. It seems when I setslice_idleandgroup_idleto zero, it means i close idle window by mannual. In this case, IO tasks becomes SYNC NOIDLE workloads, they will preempts each other mutually. And the cfqq will always be put at the front of service tree. So we don't see service differentiation.
Quoted 3 lines
Actually, We don't want preemption happening in such case, right? So I think we should refine the preemption logic.
Thoughts?
Gui,
That preemption only happens when we are idling on existing sync-noidle queue and a new queue gets backlogged. It makes sense from overall throughput perspective. So I think getting rid of this is not a good idea.
But agreed that it does not play well with ioprio thing. I would suggest that instead of two threads, try more 4-5 threads which are doing IO and keep queue depth as 1. That way you should end up in a case where there are more than 1 thread backlogged on sync-noidle service tree.
Thanks
Vivek
Quoted 28 lines
Below is my fio job file:
[global]
directory=/hdb3
ioengine=sync
runtime=30
time_based=1
direct=1
bs=128K
size=64M
numjobs=1
exec_prerun='echo 3 >/proc/sys/vm/drop_caches'[task-prio-0]
description=task-prio-0
rw=read
prio=0
filename=file1[task-prio-7]
description=task-prio-7
rw=read
prio=7
filename=file2Thanks,
Gui
PATCH v3 4/6 cfq-iosched: Extract some common code of service tree handling for CFQ queue and CFQ group
In reply to a message not in the archiveExtract some common code of service tree handling for CFQ queue and CFQ group. This helps when CFQ queue and CFQ group are scheduling together.
--- block/cfq-iosched.c | 86 +++++++++++++++++++++----------------------------- 1 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 50 deletions(-)
block/cfq-iosched.c +36 -50
@@ -865,12 +865,11 @@ entity_key(struct cfq_rb_root *st, struct cfq_entity *entity) }static void -__cfq_group_service_tree_add (struct cfq_rb_root *st,struct cfq_group *cfqg) +__cfq_entity_service_tree_add (struct cfq_rb_root *st,struct cfq_entity *cfqe) {struct rb_node **node = &st->rb.rb_node;struct rb_node *parent =NULL ;struct cfq_entity *__cfqe; -struct cfq_entity *cfqe = &cfqg->cfqe;s64 key =entity_key (st, cfqe);int left =1 ;
@@ -894,6 +893,14 @@ __cfq_group_service_tree_add(struct cfq_rb_root *st, struct cfq_group *cfqg) }static void +cfq_entity_service_tree_add (struct cfq_rb_root *st,struct cfq_entity *cfqe) +{ +__cfq_entity_service_tree_add (st, cfqe); + st->count++; + st->total_weight += cfqe->weight; +} + +static void cfq_group_service_tree_add (struct cfq_data *cfqd,struct cfq_group *cfqg) {struct cfq_rb_root *st = &cfqd->grp_service_tree;
@@ -917,8 +924,23 @@ cfq_group_service_tree_add(struct cfq_data *cfqd, struct cfq_group *cfqg) }else cfqe->vdisktime = st->min_vdisktime; -__cfq_group_service_tree_add (st, cfqg); - st->total_weight += cfqe->weight; +cfq_entity_service_tree_add (st, cfqe); +} + +static void +__cfq_entity_service_tree_del (struct cfq_rb_root *st,struct cfq_entity *cfqe) +{ +cfq_rb_erase (&cfqe->rb_node, st); +} + +static void +cfq_entity_service_tree_del (struct cfq_rb_root *st,struct cfq_entity *cfqe) +{ +if (!RB_EMPTY_NODE (&cfqe->rb_node)) { +__cfq_entity_service_tree_del (st, cfqe); + st->total_weight -= cfqe->weight; + cfqe->service_tree =NULL ; + } } static void
@@ -935,9 +957,7 @@ cfq_group_service_tree_del(struct cfq_data *cfqd, struct cfq_group *cfqg)return ;cfq_log_cfqg (cfqd, cfqg,"del_from_rr group" ); - st->total_weight -= cfqe->weight; -if (!RB_EMPTY_NODE (&cfqe->rb_node)) -cfq_rb_erase (&cfqe->rb_node, st); +cfq_entity_service_tree_del (st, cfqe); cfqg->saved_workload_slice =0 ;cfq_blkiocg_update_dequeue_stats (&cfqg->blkg,1 ); }
@@ -986,9 +1006,9 @@ static void cfq_group_served(struct cfq_data *cfqd, struct cfq_group *cfqg, charge = cfqq->allocated_slice;/* Can't update vdisktime while group is on service tree */ -cfq_rb_erase (&cfqe->rb_node, st); +__cfq_entity_service_tree_del (st, cfqe); cfqe->vdisktime +=cfq_scale_slice (charge, cfqe); -__cfq_group_service_tree_add (st, cfqg); +__cfq_entity_service_tree_add (st, cfqe);/* This group is being expired. Save the context */ if (time_after (cfqd->workload_expires, jiffies)) {
@@ -1225,13 +1245,11 @@ static void cfq_service_tree_add(struct cfq_data *cfqd, struct cfq_queue *cfqq, bool add_front) {struct cfq_entity *cfqe; -struct rb_node **p, *parent; +struct rb_node *parent;struct cfq_entity *__cfqe;struct cfq_rb_root *service_tree, *orig_st; -int left;int new_cfqq =1 ;int group_changed =0 ; -s64 key; cfqe = &cfqq->cfqe; orig_st = cfqe->service_tree;
@@ -1248,8 +1266,7 @@ static void cfq_service_tree_add(struct cfq_data *cfqd, struct cfq_queue *cfqq,* Group changed, dequeue this CFQ queue from the * original service tree. */ -cfq_rb_erase (&cfqe->rb_node, cfqe->service_tree); - orig_st->total_weight -= cfqe->weight; +cfq_entity_service_tree_del (orig_st, cfqe); } cfqq->orig_cfqg = cfqq->cfqg; cfqq->cfqg = &cfqd->root_group;
@@ -1265,8 +1282,7 @@ static void cfq_service_tree_add(struct cfq_data *cfqd, struct cfq_queue *cfqq,* Group changed, dequeue this CFQ queue from the * original service tree. */ -cfq_rb_erase (&cfqe->rb_node, cfqe->service_tree); - orig_st->total_weight -= cfqe->weight; +cfq_entity_service_tree_del (orig_st, cfqe); }cfq_put_cfqg (cfqq->cfqg); cfqq->cfqg = cfqq->orig_cfqg;
@@ -1312,8 +1328,7 @@ static void cfq_service_tree_add(struct cfq_data *cfqd, struct cfq_queue *cfqq,* Ok, we get here, this CFQ queue is on the service tree, dequeue it * firstly. */ -cfq_rb_erase (&cfqe->rb_node, cfqe->service_tree); - orig_st->total_weight -= cfqe->weight; +cfq_entity_service_tree_del (orig_st, cfqe); new_cfqq =0 ;
@@ -1338,38 +1353,11 @@ static void cfq_service_tree_add(struct cfq_data *cfqd, struct cfq_queue *cfqq, } insert: - left =1 ; - parent =NULL ; cfqe->service_tree = service_tree; - p = &service_tree->rb.rb_node; - key =entity_key (service_tree, cfqe); -while (*p) { -struct rb_node **n; - - parent = *p; - __cfqe = rb_entry(parent, struct cfq_entity, rb_node); - -/* -* sort by key, that represents service time. -*/ -if (key <entity_key (service_tree, __cfqe)) - n = &(*p)->rb_left; -else { - n = &(*p)->rb_right; - left =0 ; - } - - p = n; - } -if (left) - service_tree->left = &cfqe->rb_node; - -rb_link_node (&cfqe->rb_node, parent, p); -rb_insert_color (&cfqe->rb_node, &service_tree->rb); +/* Add cfqq onto service tree. */ +cfq_entity_service_tree_add (service_tree, cfqe);update_min_vdisktime (service_tree); - service_tree->count++; - service_tree->total_weight += cfqe->weight; cfqq->reposition_time = jiffies;if ((add_front || !new_cfqq) && !group_changed)return ;
@@ -1482,9 +1470,7 @@ static void cfq_del_cfqq_rr(struct cfq_data *cfqd, struct cfq_queue *cfqq) service_tree = cfqe->service_tree;if (!RB_EMPTY_NODE (&cfqe->rb_node)) { -cfq_rb_erase (&cfqe->rb_node, cfqe->service_tree); - service_tree->total_weight -= cfqe->weight; - cfqe->service_tree =NULL ; +cfq_entity_service_tree_del (service_tree, cfqe); }if (cfqq->p_root) {rb_erase (&cfqq->p_node, cfqq->p_root);
Signature · 1 line
1.6.5.2
PATCH v3 5/6 cfq-iosched: CFQ group hierarchical scheduling and use_hierarchy interface
In reply to a message not in the archiveCFQ group hierarchical scheduling and use_hierarchy interface.
--- block/blk-cgroup.c | 61 ++++++- block/blk-cgroup.h | 3 + block/cfq-iosched.c | 570 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------- 3 files changed, 469 insertions(+), 165 deletions(-)
block/blk-cgroup.c +59 -2
@@ -25,7 +25,10 @@static DEFINE_SPINLOCK (blkio_list_lock);static LIST_HEAD (blkio_list); -struct blkio_cgroup blkio_root_cgroup = { .weight =2 *BLKIO_WEIGHT_DEFAULT }; +struct blkio_cgroup blkio_root_cgroup = { + .weight =2 *BLKIO_WEIGHT_DEFAULT , + .use_hierarchy =0 +};EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL (blkio_root_cgroup); static struct cgroup_subsys_state *blkiocg_create(struct cgroup_subsys *,
@@ -454,6 +457,7 @@ static void __blkiocg_del_blkio_group(struct blkio_group *blkg) blkg->blkcg_id =0 ; } +/* * returns 0 if blkio_group was still on cgroup list. Otherwise returns 1 * indicating that blk_group was unhashed by the time we got to it.
@@ -765,6 +769,12 @@ unsigned int blkcg_get_weight(struct blkio_cgroup *blkcg, }EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL (blkcg_get_weight); +unsigned int blkcg_get_use_hierarchy (struct blkio_cgroup *blkcg) +{ +return blkcg->use_hierarchy; +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL (blkcg_get_use_hierarchy); +uint64_t blkcg_get_read_bps (struct blkio_cgroup *blkcg,dev_t dev) {struct blkio_policy_node *pn;
@@ -1202,6 +1212,8 @@ static u64 blkiocg_file_read_u64 (struct cgroup *cgrp, struct cftype *cft) {switch (name) {case BLKIO_PROP_weight:return (u64 )blkcg->weight; +case BLKIO_PROP_use_hierarchy: +return (u64 )blkcg->use_hierarchy; }break ;default :
@@ -1210,6 +1222,36 @@ static u64 blkiocg_file_read_u64 (struct cgroup *cgrp, struct cftype *cft) {return 0 ; } +static int blkio_use_hierarchy_write (struct cgroup *cgrp,u64 val) +{ +struct cgroup *parent = cgrp->parent; +struct blkio_cgroup *blkcg, *parent_blkcg =NULL ; +int ret =0 ; + +if (val !=0 && val !=1 ) +return -EINVAL ; + + blkcg =cgroup_to_blkio_cgroup (cgrp); +if (parent) + parent_blkcg =cgroup_to_blkio_cgroup (parent); + +cgroup_lock (); +/* +* If parent's use_hierarchy is set, we can't make any modifications +* in the child subtrees. If it is unset, then the change can occur, +* provided the current cgroup has no children. +*/ +if (!parent_blkcg || !parent_blkcg->use_hierarchy) { +if (list_empty (&cgrp->children)) + blkcg->use_hierarchy = val; +else + ret = -EBUSY ; + }else + ret = -EINVAL ; +cgroup_unlock (); +return ret; +} +static int blkiocg_file_write_u64 (struct cgroup *cgrp,struct cftype *cft,u64 val) {
@@ -1224,6 +1266,8 @@ blkiocg_file_write_u64(struct cgroup *cgrp, struct cftype *cft, u64 val)switch (name) {case BLKIO_PROP_weight:return blkio_weight_write (blkcg, val); +case BLKIO_PROP_use_hierarchy: +return blkio_use_hierarchy_write (cgrp, val); }break ;default :
@@ -1301,6 +1345,13 @@ struct cftype blkio_files[] = { .name = "reset_stats", .write_u64 = blkiocg_reset_stats, }, + { + .name = "use_hierarchy", + .private = BLKIOFILE_PRIVATE(BLKIO_POLICY_PROP, + BLKIO_PROP_use_hierarchy), + .read_u64 = blkiocg_file_read_u64, + .write_u64 = blkiocg_file_write_u64, + }, #ifdef CONFIG_BLK_DEV_THROTTLING { .name = "throttle.read_bps_device",
@@ -1444,7 +1495,7 @@ static void blkiocg_destroy(struct cgroup_subsys *subsys, struct cgroup *cgroup)static struct cgroup_subsys_state *blkiocg_create (struct cgroup_subsys *subsys,struct cgroup *cgroup) { -struct blkio_cgroup *blkcg; +struct blkio_cgroup *blkcg, *parent_blkcg =NULL ;struct cgroup *parent = cgroup->parent;if (!parent) {
@@ -1452,6 +1503,7 @@ blkiocg_create(struct cgroup_subsys *subsys, struct cgroup *cgroup) goto done; } + parent_blkcg =cgroup_to_blkio_cgroup (parent); blkcg =kzalloc (sizeof (*blkcg),GFP_KERNEL );if (!blkcg)return ERR_PTR (-ENOMEM );
@@ -1462,6 +1514,11 @@ done:INIT_HLIST_HEAD (&blkcg->blkg_list);INIT_LIST_HEAD (&blkcg->policy_list); +if (parent) + blkcg->use_hierarchy = parent_blkcg->use_hierarchy; +else + blkcg->use_hierarchy =0 ; +return &blkcg->css; }
block/blk-cgroup.h +3 -0
@@ -90,6 +90,7 @@ enum blkcg_file_name_prop { BLKIO_PROP_idle_time, BLKIO_PROP_empty_time, BLKIO_PROP_dequeue, + BLKIO_PROP_use_hierarchy, };/* cgroup files owned by throttle policy */
@@ -105,6 +106,7 @@ enum blkcg_file_name_throtl {struct blkio_cgroup {struct cgroup_subsys_state css;unsigned int weight; +bool use_hierarchy;spinlock_t lock;struct hlist_head blkg_list;struct list_head policy_list;/* list of blkio_policy_node */
@@ -179,6 +181,7 @@ struct blkio_policy_node {extern unsigned int blkcg_get_weight (struct blkio_cgroup *blkcg,dev_t dev); +extern unsigned int blkcg_get_use_hierarchy (struct blkio_cgroup *blkcg);extern uint64_t blkcg_get_read_bps (struct blkio_cgroup *blkcg,dev_t dev); extern uint64_t blkcg_get_write_bps(struct blkio_cgroup *blkcg,
block/cfq-iosched.c +407 -163
845 lines not on this page · raw message
Signature · 1 line
1.6.5.2
Re: [PATCH 5/6 v3] cfq-iosched: CFQ group hierarchical scheduling and use_hierarchy interface
On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 04:51:14PM +0800, Gui Jianfeng wrote:
[..]
Quoted 15 lines
block/cfq-iosched.c +4
-3-static struct cfq_group *cfq_get_next_cfqg (struct cfq_data *cfqd); -static struct cfq_rb_root *service_tree_for (struct cfq_group *cfqg,enum wl_prio_t prio,enum wl_type_t type)@@ -640,10 +646,19 @@ static inline unsigned cfq_group_get_avg_queues(struct cfq_data *cfqd,static inline unsigned cfq_group_slice (struct cfq_data *cfqd,struct cfq_group *cfqg) { -struct cfq_rb_root *st = &cfqd->grp_service_tree;struct cfq_entity *cfqe = &cfqg->cfqe; +struct cfq_rb_root *st = cfqe->service_tree; +int group_slice = cfq_target_latency; + +/* Calculate group slice in a hierarchical way */
block/cfq-iosched.c static inline unsigned cfq_group_get_avg_queues(struct cfq_data *cfqd, · line 662
Quoted 10 lines
block/cfq-iosched.c +7
-1+do { + group_slice = group_slice * cfqe->weight / st->total_weight; + cfqe = cfqe->parent; +if (cfqe) + st = cfqe->service_tree; + }while (cfqe); -return cfq_target_latency * cfqe->weight / st->total_weight; +return group_slice; }
Gui, I think this is still not fully correct. In flat mode there was only 1 service tree at top and all the groups were on that service tree so st->total_weight worked fine.
But now with hierarchical mode, children group might be on one of the sync-idle tree and there might be other queues on other service tree in the parent group.
So we shall have to have a notion of total group weigt (and not just service tree weight) to calculate this accurately I think.
Secondly, this logic does not take into account the ioprio or sync/async to calculate the group share. I think for the time being we can keep it simple and later look into it to refine it.
Also I want to have some integration/simplification of workload slice a and cfqq slice calculation logic with group slice logic. I guess will take that up later.
block/cfq-iosched.c cfq_set_prio_slice(struct cfq_data *cfqd, struct cfq_queue *cfqq) · line 685
Quoted 9 lines
block/cfq-iosched.c +2
-1static inline void@@ -666,7 +681,8 @@ cfq_set_prio_slice(struct cfq_data *cfqd, struct cfq_queue *cfqq)/* scale low_slice according to IO priority * and sync vs async */ unsigned low_slice = -min (slice, base_low_slice * slice / sync_slice); +min (slice, base_low_slice * slice / + sync_slice);
Why extra line?
Thanks
Vivek
PATCH v3 6/6 blkio-cgroup: Document for blkio.use_hierarchy interface
In reply to a message not in the archiveDocument for blkio.use_hierarchy interface
--- Documentation/cgroups/blkio-controller.txt | 70 ++++++++++++++++++++-------- 1 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
Documentation/cgroups/blkio-controller.txt +51 -19
@@ -91,30 +91,51 @@ Throttling/Upper Limit policy Hierarchical Cgroups ==================== -- Currently none of the IO control policy supports hierarhical groups. But - cgroup interface does allow creation of hierarhical cgroups and internally - IO policies treat them as flat hierarchy. +- Cgroup interface allows creation of hierarchical cgroups. Currently, + internally IO policies are able to treat them as flat hierarchy or + hierarchical hierarchy. Both hierarchical bandwidth division and flat + bandwidth division are supported. "blkio.use_hierarchy" can be used to + switch between flat mode and hierarchical mode. - So this patch will allow creation of cgroup hierarhcy but at the backend - everything will be treated as flat. So if somebody created a hierarchy like - as follows. + Consider the following CGroup hierarchy: - root - / \ - test1 test2 - | - test3 + Root + / | \ + Grp1 Grp2 tsk1 + / \ + Grp3 tsk2 - CFQ and throttling will practically treat all groups at same level. + If blkio.use_hierarchy is disabled in all CGroups, CFQ will practically treat all groups + at the same level. - pivot - / | \ \ - root test1 test2 test3 + Pivot tree + / | | \ + Root Grp1 Grp2 Grp3 + / | + tsk1 tsk2 - Down the line we can implement hierarchical accounting/control support - and also introduce a new cgroup file "use_hierarchy" which will control - whether cgroup hierarchy is viewed as flat or hierarchical by the policy.. - This is how memory controller also has implemented the things. + If blkio.use_hierarchy is enabled in Grp1 and Grp3, CFQ will treat groups and tasks as the + same view in CGroup hierarchy, it looks as follows. + + + Pivot tree + / | \ + Root Grp1 Grp2 + / / \ + tsk1 Grp3 tsk2 + + Root, Grp1 and Grp2 are treated at the same level under Pivot tree. tsk1 stays under Root. + Grp3 and tsk2 are treated at the same level under Grp1. Below is the mapping between + task io priority and io weight: + + prio 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 + weight 1000 868 740 612 484 356 228 100 + + Note1: Regardless of the use_hierarchy setting in Root group, Root group is always put onto + Pivot tree. + + Note2: Currently, "blkio.use_hierarchy" only effects proportional bandwidth division. For + Throttling logic, it still continue to treat everything as flat. Various user visible config options ===================================
@@ -169,6 +190,17 @@ Proportional weight policy files dev weight 8:16 300 +- blkio.use_hierarchy + - Switch between hierarchical mode and flat mode as stated above. + blkio.use_hierarchy == 1 means hierarchical mode is enabled. + blkio.use_hierarchy == 0 means flat mode is enabled. + You can set this interface only if there isn't any child CGroup under + this CGroup. If one CGroup's blkio.use_hierarchy is set, the created + children will inherit it. it's not allowed to unset it in children. + The default mode in Root CGroup is flat. + blkio.use_hierarchy only works for proportional bandwidth division + as of today and doesn't have any effect on throttling logic. + - blkio.time - disk time allocated to cgroup per device in milliseconds. First two fields specify the major and minor number of the device and
Signature · 1 line
1.6.5.2
Re: [PATCH 6/6 v3] blkio-cgroup: Document for blkio.use_hierarchy interface
Quoted 12 lines · Gui Jianfeng
Document for blkio.use_hierarchy interface
Signed-off-by Gui Jianfeng <[email protected]>--- Documentation/cgroups/blkio-controller.txt | 70 ++++++++++++++++++++-------- 1 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)Documentation/cgroups/blkio-controller.txt +0
-0
Documentation/cgroups/blkio-controller.txt Throttling/Upper Limit policy · line 96
Quoted 9 lines
Documentation/cgroups/blkio-controller.txt +3
-3@@ -91,30 +91,51 @@ Throttling/Upper Limit policy Hierarchical Cgroups ==================== -- Currently none of the IO control policy supports hierarhical groups. But - cgroup interface does allow creation of hierarhical cgroups and internally - IO policies treat them as flat hierarchy. +- Cgroup interface allows creation of hierarchical cgroups. Currently, + internally IO policies are able to treat them as flat hierarchy or + hierarchical hierarchy.
Gui, now we have 2 IO policies. Throttling policy still supports only flat mode. Can you please make it clear here that CFQ will support both flat and hierarhical mode while throttling supports only flat mode as of today.
Quoted 28 lines
Both hierarchical bandwidth division and flat
Documentation/cgroups/blkio-controller.txt +11
-12+ bandwidth division are supported. "blkio.use_hierarchy" can be used to + switch between flat mode and hierarchical mode. - So this patch will allow creation of cgroup hierarhcy but at the backend - everything will be treated as flat. So if somebody created a hierarchy like - as follows. + Consider the following CGroup hierarchy: - root - / \ - test1 test2 - | - test3 + Root + / | \ + Grp1 Grp2 tsk1 + / \ + Grp3 tsk2 - CFQ and throttling will practically treat all groups at same level. + If blkio.use_hierarchy is disabled in all CGroups, CFQ will practically treat all groups + at the same level. - pivot - / | \ \ - root test1 test2 test3 + Pivot tree
Documentation/cgroups/blkio-controller.txt Throttling/Upper Limit policy · line 117
Quoted 10 lines
Documentation/cgroups/blkio-controller.txt +5
-4+ / | | \ + Root Grp1 Grp2 Grp3 + / | + tsk1 tsk2 - Down the line we can implement hierarchical accounting/control support - and also introduce a new cgroup file "use_hierarchy" which will control - whether cgroup hierarchy is viewed as flat or hierarchical by the policy.. - This is how memory controller also has implemented the things. + If blkio.use_hierarchy is enabled in Grp1 and Grp3, CFQ will treat groups and tasks as the
I would think that before this example, we can give one simpler example where use_hierarhcy=1 in root cgroup and that would/should lead to all children group under root having use_hierarchy=1 set automatically and will look as follows.
Pivot tree | root / | | tsk1 G1 G2 / \ grp3 tsk2
After this now you can give more complicated example as below where use_hierarchy=1 is only set for sub branch of tree and not the whole tree.
Quoted 12 lines
Documentation/cgroups/blkio-controller.txt +11
-0+ same view in CGroup hierarchy, it looks as follows. + + + Pivot tree + / | \ + Root Grp1 Grp2 + / / \ + tsk1 Grp3 tsk2 + + Root, Grp1 and Grp2 are treated at the same level under Pivot tree. tsk1 stays under Root. + Grp3 and tsk2 are treated at the same level under Grp1. Below is the mapping between
Documentation/cgroups/blkio-controller.txt Throttling/Upper Limit policy · line 138
Quoted 10 lines
Documentation/cgroups/blkio-controller.txt +10
-0+ task io priority and io weight: + + prio 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 + weight 1000 868 740 612 484 356 228 100 + + Note1: Regardless of the use_hierarchy setting in Root group, Root group is always put onto + Pivot tree. + + Note2: Currently, "blkio.use_hierarchy" only effects proportional bandwidth division. For + Throttling logic, it still continue to treat everything as flat.
Ok, I see you mentioned throttling flat mode here. I guess it is better to clarify it in the beginning itself.
Quoted 7 lines
Various user visible config options
===================================Documentation/cgroups/blkio-controller.txt +1
-0@@ -169,6 +190,17 @@ Proportional weight policy files dev weight 8:16 300 +- blkio.use_hierarchy
Documentation/cgroups/blkio-controller.txt Proportional weight policy files · line 203
Quoted 10 lines
Documentation/cgroups/blkio-controller.txt +10
-0+ - Switch between hierarchical mode and flat mode as stated above. + blkio.use_hierarchy == 1 means hierarchical mode is enabled. + blkio.use_hierarchy == 0 means flat mode is enabled. + You can set this interface only if there isn't any child CGroup under + this CGroup. If one CGroup's blkio.use_hierarchy is set, the created + children will inherit it. it's not allowed to unset it in children. + The default mode in Root CGroup is flat. + blkio.use_hierarchy only works for proportional bandwidth division + as of today and doesn't have any effect on throttling logic. +
This is good. Makes use_hierarchy behavior for children and subtree very clear.
Quoted 11 lines
Documentation/cgroups/blkio-controller.txt +0
-0- blkio.time - disk time allocated to cgroup per device in milliseconds. First two fields specify the major and minor number of the device andSignature · 1 line
1.6.5.2
Re: [PATCH 6/6 v3] blkio-cgroup: Document for blkio.use_hierarchy interface
Quoted 79 lines · Vivek Goyal
Quoted 12 lines · Gui Jianfeng
Document for blkio.use_hierarchy interface
Signed-off-by Gui Jianfeng <[email protected]>--- Documentation/cgroups/blkio-controller.txt | 70 ++++++++++++++++++++-------- 1 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)Documentation/cgroups/blkio-controller.txt +0
-0Documentation/cgroups/blkio-controller.txt Throttling/Upper Limit policy · line 96
Quoted 9 lines
Documentation/cgroups/blkio-controller.txt +3
-3@@ -91,30 +91,51 @@ Throttling/Upper Limit policy Hierarchical Cgroups ==================== -- Currently none of the IO control policy supports hierarhical groups. But - cgroup interface does allow creation of hierarhical cgroups and internally - IO policies treat them as flat hierarchy. +- Cgroup interface allows creation of hierarchical cgroups. Currently, + internally IO policies are able to treat them as flat hierarchy or + hierarchical hierarchy.Gui, now we have 2 IO policies. Throttling policy still supports only flat mode. Can you please make it clear here that CFQ will support both flat and hierarhical mode while throttling supports only flat mode as of today.
Quoted 28 lines
Both hierarchical bandwidth division and flat
Documentation/cgroups/blkio-controller.txt +11
-12+ bandwidth division are supported. "blkio.use_hierarchy" can be used to + switch between flat mode and hierarchical mode. - So this patch will allow creation of cgroup hierarhcy but at the backend - everything will be treated as flat. So if somebody created a hierarchy like - as follows. + Consider the following CGroup hierarchy: - root - / \ - test1 test2 - | - test3 + Root + / | \ + Grp1 Grp2 tsk1 + / \ + Grp3 tsk2 - CFQ and throttling will practically treat all groups at same level. + If blkio.use_hierarchy is disabled in all CGroups, CFQ will practically treat all groups + at the same level. - pivot - / | \ \ - root test1 test2 test3 + Pivot treeDocumentation/cgroups/blkio-controller.txt Throttling/Upper Limit policy · line 117
Quoted 10 lines
Documentation/cgroups/blkio-controller.txt +5
-4+ / | | \ + Root Grp1 Grp2 Grp3 + / | + tsk1 tsk2 - Down the line we can implement hierarchical accounting/control support - and also introduce a new cgroup file "use_hierarchy" which will control - whether cgroup hierarchy is viewed as flat or hierarchical by the policy.. - This is how memory controller also has implemented the things. + If blkio.use_hierarchy is enabled in Grp1 and Grp3, CFQ will treat groups and tasks as theI would think that before this example, we can give one simpler example where use_hierarhcy=1 in root cgroup and that would/should lead to all children group under root having use_hierarchy=1 set automatically and will look as follows.
Pivot tree | root / | | tsk1 G1 G2 / \ grp3 tsk2
Quoted 3 lines
After this now you can give more complicated example as below where use_hierarchy=1 is only set for sub branch of tree and not the whole tree.
Sure.
Quoted 18 lines
Quoted 18 lines
Documentation/cgroups/blkio-controller.txt +17
-0+ same view in CGroup hierarchy, it looks as follows. + + + Pivot tree + / | \ + Root Grp1 Grp2 + / / \ + tsk1 Grp3 tsk2 + + Root, Grp1 and Grp2 are treated at the same level under Pivot tree. tsk1 stays under Root. + Grp3 and tsk2 are treated at the same level under Grp1. Below is the mapping between + task io priority and io weight: + + prio 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 + weight 1000 868 740 612 484 356 228 100 + + Note1: Regardless of the use_hierarchy setting in Root group, Root group is always put onto
Quoted 8 lines
Documentation/cgroups/blkio-controller.txt Throttling/Upper Limit policy · line 138
Quoted 5 lines
Documentation/cgroups/blkio-controller.txt +4
-0+ Pivot tree. + + Note2: Currently, "blkio.use_hierarchy" only effects proportional bandwidth division. For + Throttling logic, it still continue to treat everything as flat.Ok, I see you mentioned throttling flat mode here. I guess it is better to clarify it in the beginning itself.
Ok
Thanks,
Gui
Quoted 34 lines
Quoted 8 lines
Various user visible config options
===================================Documentation/cgroups/blkio-controller.txt +1
-0@@ -169,6 +190,17 @@ Proportional weight policy files dev weight 8:16 300 +- blkio.use_hierarchyDocumentation/cgroups/blkio-controller.txt Proportional weight policy files · line 203
Quoted 10 lines
Documentation/cgroups/blkio-controller.txt +10
-0+ - Switch between hierarchical mode and flat mode as stated above. + blkio.use_hierarchy == 1 means hierarchical mode is enabled. + blkio.use_hierarchy == 0 means flat mode is enabled. + You can set this interface only if there isn't any child CGroup under + this CGroup. If one CGroup's blkio.use_hierarchy is set, the created + children will inherit it. it's not allowed to unset it in children. + The default mode in Root CGroup is flat. + blkio.use_hierarchy only works for proportional bandwidth division + as of today and doesn't have any effect on throttling logic. +This is good. Makes
use_hierarchybehavior for children and subtree very clear.Quoted 11 lines
Documentation/cgroups/blkio-controller.txt +0
-0- blkio.time - disk time allocated to cgroup per device in milliseconds. First two fields specify the major and minor number of the device andSignature · 1 line
1.6.5.2