prevent building/installation of various utilities
RFC PATCH 1/1 prevent building/installation of various utilities
Heya, I wanted to provide a patch to have the ability to _not_ build and install various tools even if the requirements are met.
Signature · 5 lines
Mierswa, Daniel
If you still don't like it, that's ok: that's why I'm boss. I simply
know better than you do.
--- Linus Torvalds, comp.os.linux.advocacy, 1996/07/22Quoted 1 line
From
9e0771185011dedd3969dd084f0e2b9a2b23da27Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Daniel Mierswa <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2011 05:38:55 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] make compilation/installation of some utils configurable
--- utils/Makefile | 4 ++++ 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
utils/Makefile +4 -0
@@ -5,11 +5,14 @@ all install: $(MAKE) -C $$i $@ || exit 1; \ done +ifneq ($(USE_SYSFS_PATH),no) # Test if libsysfs is installed @-if [ -f /usr/include/sysfs/libsysfs.h ]; then \ $(MAKE) -C v4l2-sysfs-path $@; \ fi +endif +ifneq ($(USE_QV4L2),no) # Test whether qmake is installed, and whether it is for qt4. @if which qmake-qt4 >/dev/null 2>&1; then \ QMAKE=qmake-qt4; \
@@ -24,6 +27,7 @@ all install: $(MAKE) -C qv4l2 -f Makefile.install $@; \ fi \ fi +endif sync-with-kernel: $(MAKE) -C keytable $@
Signature · 1 line
1.7.3.5
Quoted 2 lines · Daniel Mierswa
Heya, I wanted to provide a patch to have the ability to _not_ build and install various tools even if the requirements are met.
any comments on this? seems rather trivial to decide if it's good to go or not :D
wrong mailinglist or recipient perhaps?
Signature · 5 lines
Mierswa, Daniel
If you still don't like it, that's ok: that's why I'm boss. I simply
know better than you do.
--- Linus Torvalds, comp.os.linux.advocacy, 1996/07/22