: patch to allow reading hal pid files from ifconfig_t
PATCH 28/34 : patch to allow reading hal pid files from ifconfig_t
This patch allows to read hal pid files from the ifconfig_t context.
policy/modules/system/sysnetwork.te +1 -0
@@ -327,6 +327,7 @@ ifdef(`hide_broken_symptoms',` optional_policy(` hal_dontaudit_rw_pipes(ifconfig_t) hal_dontaudit_rw_dgram_sockets(ifconfig_t) + hal_read_pid_files(ifconfig_t) ') optional_policy(`
PATCH 28/34 : patch to allow reading hal pid files from ifconfig_t
Quoted 7 lines · Guido Trentalancia
This patch allows to read hal pid files from the
ifconfig_tcontext.diff -pruN refpolicy-git-15022011-new-before-modification/policy/modules/system/sysnetwork.te refpolicy-git-15022011-new-modified/policy/modules/system/sysnetwork.te
policy/modules/system/sysnetwork.te ifdef(`hide_broken_symptoms',` · line 333
Quoted 7 lines
policy/modules/system/sysnetwork.te +1
-0@@ -327,6 +327,7 @@ ifdef(`hide_broken_symptoms',` optional_policy(` hal_dontaudit_rw_pipes(ifconfig_t) hal_dontaudit_rw_dgram_sockets(ifconfig_t) + hal_read_pid_files(ifconfig_t) ') optional_policy(`
Why would this be necessary? Are you sure its not another leak (especially considering the other dontaudits)?
Signature · 3 lines
Chris PeBenito Tresys Technology, LLC www.tresys.com | oss.tresys.com
PATCH 28/34 : patch to allow reading hal pid files from ifconfig_t
Quoted 14 lines · Christopher J. PeBenito
Quoted 13 lines · Guido Trentalancia
This patch allows to read hal pid files from the
ifconfig_tcontext.diff -pruN refpolicy-git-15022011-new-before-modification/policy/modules/system/sysnetwork.te refpolicy-git-15022011-new-modified/policy/modules/system/sysnetwork.te
policy/modules/system/sysnetwork.te +1
-0@@ -327,6 +327,7 @@ ifdef(`hide_broken_symptoms',` optional_policy(` hal_dontaudit_rw_pipes(ifconfig_t) hal_dontaudit_rw_dgram_sockets(ifconfig_t) + hal_read_pid_files(ifconfig_t) ')
Quoted 4 lines
policy/modules/system/sysnetwork.te ifdef(`hide_broken_symptoms',` · line 333
Quoted 1 line
policy/modules/system/sysnetwork.te +0
-0optional_policy(`Why would this be necessary? Are you sure its not another leak (especially considering the other dontaudits)?
We have in Fedora
hal_dontaudit_read_pid_files(ifconfig_t)
AFAIK this is a leak.
PATCH 28/34 : patch to allow reading hal pid files from ifconfig_t
In reply to Christopher J. PeBenitoQuoted 14 lines · Christopher J. PeBenito
Quoted 13 lines · Guido Trentalancia
This patch allows to read hal pid files from the
ifconfig_tcontext.diff -pruN refpolicy-git-15022011-new-before-modification/policy/modules/system/sysnetwork.te refpolicy-git-15022011-new-modified/policy/modules/system/sysnetwork.te
policy/modules/system/sysnetwork.te +1
-0@@ -327,6 +327,7 @@ ifdef(`hide_broken_symptoms',` optional_policy(` hal_dontaudit_rw_pipes(ifconfig_t) hal_dontaudit_rw_dgram_sockets(ifconfig_t) + hal_read_pid_files(ifconfig_t) ')
Quoted 4 lines
policy/modules/system/sysnetwork.te ifdef(`hide_broken_symptoms',` · line 333
Quoted 1 line
policy/modules/system/sysnetwork.te +0
-0optional_policy(`Why would this be necessary? Are you sure its not another leak (especially considering the other dontaudits)?
Yes, that is not strictly necessary. What do you mean exactly for a leak ?
Regards,
Guido
PATCH 28/34 : patch to allow reading hal pid files from ifconfig_t
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Quoted 23 lines · Guido Trentalancia
Quoted 14 lines · Christopher J. PeBenito
Quoted 13 lines · Guido Trentalancia
This patch allows to read hal pid files from the
ifconfig_tcontext.diff -pruN refpolicy-git-15022011-new-before-modification/policy/modules/system/sysnetwork.te refpolicy-git-15022011-new-modified/policy/modules/system/sysnetwork.te
policy/modules/system/sysnetwork.te +1
-0@@ -327,6 +327,7 @@ ifdef(`hide_broken_symptoms',` optional_policy(` hal_dontaudit_rw_pipes(ifconfig_t) hal_dontaudit_rw_dgram_sockets(ifconfig_t) + hal_read_pid_files(ifconfig_t) ')Quoted 4 lines
policy/modules/system/sysnetwork.te ifdef(`hide_broken_symptoms',` · line 333
Quoted 1 line
policy/modules/system/sysnetwork.te +0
-0optional_policy(`Why would this be necessary? Are you sure its not another leak (especially considering the other dontaudits)?
Yes, that is not strictly necessary. What do you mean exactly for a leak ?
Quoted 8 lines
Regards,
Guido
_______________________________________________
refpolicy mailing list
refpolicy at oss.tresys.com
http://oss.tresys.com/mailman/listinfo/refpolicy
http://danwalsh.livejournal.com/6117.html?thread=16613
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAk1r6+QACgkQrlYvE4MpobMQlgCgsXvKbJOASK9hh8uMWPFTF1Jz etAAnRn6N7mpw/QkcDj78XWq5eC3aHCa
=J1QJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----