IDE: Don't assume there are always two devices per bus
PATCH 2/7 IDE: Don't assume there are always two devices per bus
Excuse the noob question.
Is it intentional to replace '(dev >> 1) with '(dev >> 0)' ?
PATCH 2/7 IDE: Don't assume there are always two devices per bus
Quoted 2 lines · Gray Remlin
Excuse the noob question.
Is it intentional to replace '(dev >> 1) with '(dev >> 0)' ?
Ignore me, I get it. Divide by two, or not, as required.
PATCH 2/7 IDE: Don't assume there are always two devices per bus
Quoted 4 lines · Gray Remlin
Quoted 2 lines · Gray Remlin
Excuse the noob question.
Is it intentional to replace '(dev >> 1) with '(dev >> 0)' ?Ignore me, I get it. Divide by two, or not, as required.
Hi Gray,
Please also see the thread that starts at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/u-boot at lists.denx.de/msg36411.html
Albert was investigating changes to the IDE code to support multiple busses for his LaCie Net5big (with 8 ports). Not sure if he ever got it merged.
Rogan
PATCH 2/7 IDE: Don't assume there are always two devices per bus
Le 30/03/2011 21:45, Rogan Dawes a ?crit :
Quoted 8 lines · Gray Remlin
Quoted 4 lines · Gray Remlin
Quoted 2 lines
Excuse the noob question.
Is it intentional to replace '(dev>> 1) with '(dev>> 0)' ?Ignore me, I get it. Divide by two, or not, as required.
Hi Gray,
Quoted 7 lines
Please also see the thread that starts at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/u-boot at lists.denx.de/msg36411.html
Albert was investigating changes to the IDE code to support multiple busses for his LaCie Net5big (with 8 ports). Not sure if he ever got it merged.
Not yet but I will resume this once 2011.03 is out.
Quoted 1 line
Rogan
Amicalement,
Signature · 1 line
Albert.