CONFIG_SILENT_CONSOLE not working with NAND env
common/console.c has this function:
/* Called before relocation - use serial functions */ int console_init_f(void)
{
gd->have_console = 1;#ifdef CONFIG_SILENT_CONSOLE
if (getenv("silent") != NULL)
gd->flags |= GD_FLG_SILENT;#endif
return 0; }
I have defined CONFIG_SILENT_CONSOLE and set "silent" in my NAND env, but the SILENT flag doesn't get set.
I suspect this function is called way too early for NAND env to be available.
I can set the flag unconditionally and that works fine, but I don't think that that will make a patch worthy of submission...?
Any thoughts?
Thanks,
Nick.
Quoted 12 lines · Nick Thompson
common/console.chas this function:/* Called before relocation - use serial functions */ int
console_init_f(void)
{
? ? ? ?gd->have_console = 1;#ifdef
CONFIG_SILENT_CONSOLE
? ? ? ?if (getenv("silent")!= NULL)
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?gd->flags |=GD_FLG_SILENT;
#endif
Quoted 7 lines
? ? ? ?return 0;
}I have defined
CONFIG_SILENT_CONSOLEand set "silent" in my NAND env, but the SILENT flag doesn't get set.I suspect this function is called way too early for NAND env to be available.
NAND isnt the only one with this problem (SPI does too last i looked).
during early boot, you only have the default env available. so if
you want silent console, i'd suggest you enable that in your default env.
-mike
Quoted 19 lines · Mike Frysinger
Quoted 18 lines · Nick Thompson
common/console.chas this function:/* Called before relocation - use serial functions */ int
console_init_f(void){ gd->have_console = 1;#ifdef CONFIG_SILENT_CONSOLE if (getenv("silent") != NULL) gd->flags |= GD_FLG_SILENT;#endif
return 0; }I have defined
CONFIG_SILENT_CONSOLEand set "silent" in my NAND env, but the SILENT flag doesn't get set.
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 1 line
I suspect this function is called way too early for NAND env to be available.
NAND isnt the only one with this problem (SPI does too last i looked).
during early boot, you only have the default env available. so if
you want silent console, i'd suggest you enable that in your default env.
-mike
Yes, that's what I intend to do, I think, though I'd have liked it to be configurable at run time.
Thanks for the info,
Nick.
Quoted 21 lines · On Tue, 5 Apr 2011 17:07:13 +0100 Nick Thompson <[email protected]> wrote:
Quoted 20 lines · Mike Frysinger
Quoted 19 lines · Nick Thompson
common/console.chas this function:/* Called before relocation - use serial functions */ int
console_init_f(void){ gd->have_console = 1;#ifdef CONFIG_SILENT_CONSOLE if (getenv("silent") != NULL) gd->flags |= GD_FLG_SILENT;#endif
return 0; }I have defined
CONFIG_SILENT_CONSOLEand set "silent" in my NAND env, but the SILENT flag doesn't get set.I suspect this function is called way too early for NAND env to be available.
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 5 lines
NAND isnt the only one with this problem (SPI does too last i looked).
during early boot, you only have the default env available. so if
you want silent console, i'd suggest you enable that in your default env.
-mikeYes, that's what I intend to do, I think, though I'd have liked it to be configurable at run time.
Try enabling CONFIG_NAND_ENV_DST to have the environment be loaded by the SPL along with the main U-Boot image. You didn't say what board/chip you're using, so if you're using something other than the common nand_boot.c you may need to add support for this (it's just a couple lines), and silence any output from the SPL itself.
-Scott
Quoted 31 lines · Scott Wood
Quoted 20 lines · On Tue, 5 Apr 2011 17:07:13 +0100 Nick Thompson <[email protected]> wrote:
Quoted 19 lines · Mike Frysinger
Quoted 18 lines · Nick Thompson
common/console.chas this function:/* Called before relocation - use serial functions */ int
console_init_f(void){ gd->have_console = 1;#ifdef CONFIG_SILENT_CONSOLE if (getenv("silent") != NULL) gd->flags |= GD_FLG_SILENT;#endif
return 0; }I have defined
CONFIG_SILENT_CONSOLEand set "silent" in my NAND env, but the SILENT flag doesn't get set.Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 1 line
I suspect this function is called way too early for NAND env to be available.
NAND isnt the only one with this problem (SPI does too last i looked).
during early boot, you only have the default env available. so if
you want silent console, i'd suggest you enable that in your default env.
-mikeYes, that's what I intend to do, I think, though I'd have liked it to be configurable at run time.
Quoted 8 lines
Try enabling
CONFIG_NAND_ENV_DSTto have the environment be loaded by the SPL along with the main U-Boot image. You didn't say what board/chip you're using, so if you're using something other than the commonnand_boot.cyou may need to add support for this (it's just a couple lines), and silence any output from the SPL itself.-Scott
Thanks Scott,
That's interesting. I'm using a TI board (da830evm). Unfortunately it has its own UBL, so I don't have the SPL to configure that way.
That might be a good reason to consider dropping the UBL though. I believe TI are moving to U-Boot SPL themselves.
I'll add it to my TODO list.
Thanks,
Nick.
Dear Nick Thompson,
Quoted 3 lines · In message <[email protected]> you wrote:
That's interesting. I'm using a TI board (da830evm). Unfortunately it has its own UBL, so I don't have the SPL to configure that way.
There is little reason to stick with UBL. You can get rid of it and use the SPL approach instead - this is no real technical challenge, but just a "little effort".
Quoted 2 lines
That might be a good reason to consider dropping the UBL though. I believe TI are moving to U-Boot SPL themselves.
Are they? Do you have any pointers?
Quoted 1 line
I'll add it to my TODO list.
Thanks!
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
Signature · 5 lines
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd at denx.de Keep your head and your heart going in the right direction and you will not have to worry about your feet.
Quoted 6 lines · Wolfgang Denk
Dear Nick Thompson,
Quoted 2 lines · In message <[email protected]> you wrote:
That might be a good reason to consider dropping the UBL though. I believe TI are moving to U-Boot SPL themselves.
Are they? Do you have any pointers?
There have been some SPL submissions from TI people, for example:
http://www.mail-archive.com/u-boot at lists.denx.de/msg48557.html
I believe the work is focused on OMAP4, with OMAP3 as a later addition.
I notice there is already something in repo for da8xx, though not from TI. I think I need to take a look at that.
Nick.