Repeatable crash in 2.6.38 related to O_DIRECT

DISCUSSION Ben Greear 3 participants 6 messages Apr 5, 2011 4 messages not in the archive

Subsystems (2)

SMB client (CIFS) Kernel SMB3 server (ksmbd)

lore

Share & tools

lore

Ben Greear

author

2011-04-05 22:46 UTC #0 lore raw

When we try to create files with O_DIRECT on cifs file systems, we get a repeatable crash in 2.6.38.2 (plus hacks, but no hacks to cifs)

It crashes in cifsFileInfo_put, probably because cif_file->dentry is NULL, but I'm still working on confirming that.

Assuming that is the cause, any ideas on how to go about fixing this properly?

(gdb) l *(cifsFileInfo_put+0x10)
0xfd59 is in cifsFileInfo_put (/home/greearb/git/linux-2.6.dev.38.y/fs/cifs/file.c:287).
282 * the filehandle out on the server. Must be called without holding
283 * cifs_file_list_lock.
284 */
285 void cifsFileInfo_put(struct cifsFileInfo *cifs_file)
286 {
287 struct inode *inode = cifs_file->dentry->d_inode;
288 struct cifsTconInfo *tcon = tlink_tcon(cifs_file->tlink);
289 struct cifsInodeInfo *cifsi = CIFS_I(inode);
290 struct cifs_sb_info *cifs_sb = CIFS_SB(inode->i_sb);
291 struct cifsLockInfo *li, *tmp;

BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000001c
IP: [<f993e265>] cifsFileInfo_put+0x10/0x1b1 [cifs]
*pde = 7efaa067
Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP
last sysfs file: /sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:1e.0/0000:03:00.0/net/wlan0/flags
Modules linked in: md4 nls_utf8 cifs xt_CT iptable_raw ipt_addrtype xt_DSCP xt_dscp xt_string xt_owner xt_NFQUEUE xt_multiport xt_mark xt_iprange xt_hashlimit xt_connmark veth cryptd aes_i586 aes_generic xt_TPROXY nf_tproxy_core xt_socket ip6_tables nf_defrag_ipv6 xt_connlimit 8021q garp stp llc fuse macvlan pktgen coretemp hwmon nfs lockd fscache nfs_acl auth_rpcgss sunrpc ipv6 uinput arc4 ecb ath9k snd_hda_codec_realtek mac80211 snd_hda_intel snd_hda_codec ath9k_common snd_hwdep snd_seq ath9k_hw snd_seq_device ath snd_pcm cfg80211 microcode snd_timer iTCO_wdt i2c_i801 iTCO_vendor_support snd r8169 pcspkr serio_raw soundcore mii snd_page_alloc i915 drm_kms_helper drm i2c_algo_bit video [last unloaded: ipt_addrtype]

Pid: 18514, comm: btserver Tainted: P 2.6.38-wl+ #53 To Be Filled By O.E.M. To Be Filled By O.E.M./To be filled by O.E.M.
EIP: 0060:[<f993e265>] EFLAGS: 00010292 CPU: 1
EIP is at cifsFileInfo_put+0x10/0x1b1 [cifs]
EAX: 00000000 EBX: 00000000 ECX: f993e583 EDX: f086d540
ESI: 00000008 EDI: e65302d4 EBP: f1e9bdbc ESP: f1e9bda8
DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 00d8 GS: 0033 SS: 0068
Process btserver (pid: 18514, ti=f1e9a000 task=f4e7d280 task.ti=f1e9a000)

Stack:
 00000000 00000000 f086d540 00000008 e65302d4 f1e9bdc8 f993e599 f086d540
 f1e9bdec c04e39a7 f06fe300 f086d548 e65302d4 eee5b780 ffffffea e65302d4
 00000000 f1e9be0c c04e1486 eee5b780 f06fe300 00000000 eee5b780 f1e9beec
Call Trace:
 [<f993e599>] cifs_close+0x16/0x25 [cifs]
 [<c04e39a7>] fput+0xf4/0x170
 [<c04e1486>] __dentry_open+0x19b/0x21c
 [<c04e163a>] lookup_instantiate_filp+0x70/0x8c
 [<c04e0e60>] ? generic_file_open+0x0/0x58
 [<c04e0e60>] ? generic_file_open+0x0/0x58
 [<f993ca91>] cifs_lookup+0x2af/0x38f [cifs]
 [<c04eaae5>] d_alloc_and_lookup+0x3d/0x54
 [<c04ead6e>] __lookup_hash+0x6a/0x71
 [<c04ebe0d>] do_last+0xb3/0x243
 [<c04ed69a>] do_filp_open+0x25f/0x4a9
 [<c04d566e>] ? __slab_alloc.clone.4+0xc6/0x203
 [<c07e20fa>] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x22/0x25
 [<c04e11fd>] do_sys_open+0x49/0xc9
 [<c04ea73a>] ? path_put+0x1a/0x1d
 [<c04e12c9>] sys_open+0x23/0x2b
 [<c040315c>] sysenter_do_call+0x12/0x38
Code: b3 4e 95 f9 68 72 4f 95 f9 e8 c4 1a ea c6 83 c4 14 8d 65 f4 31 c0 5b 5e 5f 5d c3 55 89 e5 57 56 53 83 ec 08 3e 8d 74 26 00 89 c3 <8b> 40 1c 8b 78 20 8b 43 24 8b 40 1c 89 45 f0 8b 47 10 8b 80 8c
EIP: [<f993e265>] cifsFileInfo_put+0x10/0x1b1 [cifs] SS:ESP 0068:f1e9bda8
CR2: 000000000000001c
---[ end trace db4167a97eeb41b3 ]---

Signature · 2 lines

Ben Greear <greearb-my8/[email protected]>
Candela Technologies Inc  http://www.candelatech.com

A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): 4D9B9BB0.3030604-my8/[email protected]

Jeff Layton

2011-04-05 23:26 UTC #2 lore raw

Quoted 61 lines · On Tue, 05 Apr 2011 15:46:08 -0700 Ben Greear…

When we try to create files with O_DIRECT on cifs file systems, we get a repeatable crash in 2.6.38.2 (plus hacks, but no hacks to cifs)
It crashes in cifsFileInfo_put, probably because cif_file->dentry is NULL, but I'm still working on confirming that.
Assuming that is the cause, any ideas on how to go about fixing this properly?
(gdb) l *(cifsFileInfo_put+0x10)
0xfd59 is in cifsFileInfo_put (/home/greearb/git/linux-2.6.dev.38.y/fs/cifs/file.c:287).
282 * the filehandle out on the server. Must be called without holding
283 * cifs_file_list_lock.
284 */
285 void cifsFileInfo_put(struct cifsFileInfo *cifs_file)
286 {
287 struct inode *inode = cifs_file->dentry->d_inode;
288 struct cifsTconInfo *tcon = tlink_tcon(cifs_file->tlink);
289 struct cifsInodeInfo *cifsi = CIFS_I(inode);
290 struct cifs_sb_info *cifs_sb = CIFS_SB(inode->i_sb);
291 struct cifsLockInfo *li, *tmp;
BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000001c
IP: [<f993e265>] cifsFileInfo_put+0x10/0x1b1 [cifs]
*pde = 7efaa067
Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP
last sysfs file: /sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:1e.0/0000:03:00.0/net/wlan0/flags
Modules linked in: md4 nls_utf8 cifs xt_CT iptable_raw ipt_addrtype xt_DSCP xt_dscp xt_string xt_owner xt_NFQUEUE xt_multiport xt_mark xt_iprange xt_hashlimit 
xt_connmark veth cryptd aes_i586 aes_generic xt_TPROXY nf_tproxy_core xt_socket ip6_tables nf_defrag_ipv6 xt_connlimit 8021q garp stp llc fuse macvlan pktgen coretemp hwmon nfs lockd fscache nfs_acl auth_rpcgss sunrpc ipv6 uinput arc4 ecb ath9k snd_hda_codec_realtek mac80211 snd_hda_intel snd_hda_codec ath9k_common snd_hwdep snd_seq ath9k_hw snd_seq_device ath snd_pcm cfg80211 microcode snd_timer iTCO_wdt i2c_i801 iTCO_vendor_support snd r8169 pcspkr serio_raw soundcore mii snd_page_alloc i915 drm_kms_helper drm i2c_algo_bit video [last unloaded: ipt_addrtype]
Pid: 18514, comm: btserver Tainted: P 2.6.38-wl+ #53 To Be Filled By O.E.M. To Be Filled By O.E.M./To be filled by O.E.M.
EIP: 0060:[<f993e265>] EFLAGS: 00010292 CPU: 1
EIP is at cifsFileInfo_put+0x10/0x1b1 [cifs]
EAX: 00000000 EBX: 00000000 ECX: f993e583 EDX: f086d540
ESI: 00000008 EDI: e65302d4 EBP: f1e9bdbc ESP: f1e9bda8
DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 00d8 GS: 0033 SS: 0068
Process btserver (pid: 18514, ti=f1e9a000 task=f4e7d280 task.ti=f1e9a000)
Stack:
  00000000 00000000 f086d540 00000008 e65302d4 f1e9bdc8 f993e599 f086d540
  f1e9bdec c04e39a7 f06fe300 f086d548 e65302d4 eee5b780 ffffffea e65302d4
  00000000 f1e9be0c c04e1486 eee5b780 f06fe300 00000000 eee5b780 f1e9beec
Call Trace:
  [<f993e599>] cifs_close+0x16/0x25 [cifs]
  [<c04e39a7>] fput+0xf4/0x170
  [<c04e1486>] __dentry_open+0x19b/0x21c
  [<c04e163a>] lookup_instantiate_filp+0x70/0x8c
  [<c04e0e60>] ? generic_file_open+0x0/0x58
  [<c04e0e60>] ? generic_file_open+0x0/0x58
  [<f993ca91>] cifs_lookup+0x2af/0x38f [cifs]
  [<c04eaae5>] d_alloc_and_lookup+0x3d/0x54
  [<c04ead6e>] __lookup_hash+0x6a/0x71
  [<c04ebe0d>] do_last+0xb3/0x243
  [<c04ed69a>] do_filp_open+0x25f/0x4a9
  [<c04d566e>] ? __slab_alloc.clone.4+0xc6/0x203
  [<c07e20fa>] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x22/0x25
  [<c04e11fd>] do_sys_open+0x49/0xc9

Quoted 9 lines

  [<c04ea73a>] ? path_put+0x1a/0x1d
  [<c04e12c9>] sys_open+0x23/0x2b
  [<c040315c>] sysenter_do_call+0x12/0x38
Code: b3 4e 95 f9 68 72 4f 95 f9 e8 c4 1a ea c6 83 c4 14 8d 65 f4 31 c0 5b 5e 5f 5d c3 55 89 e5 57 56 53 83 ec 08 3e 8d 74 26 00 89 c3 <8b> 40 1c 8b 78 20 8b 43 
24 8b 40 1c 89 45 f0 8b 47 10 8b 80 8c
EIP: [<f993e265>] cifsFileInfo_put+0x10/0x1b1 [cifs] SS:ESP 0068:f1e9bda8
CR2: 000000000000001c
---[ end trace db4167a97eeb41b3 ]---

Does the attached patch fix it? It's probably stable material if so...

FWIW, cifs doesn't handle O_DIRECT at all.

Signature · 1 line

Jeff Layton <[email protected]>

Quoted 1 line

From 0f1c5ffdb246b3166a9040dfc10a59eddfdd9828 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001

From: Jeff Layton <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2011 16:23:47 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] cifs: check for private_data before trying to put it

cifs_close doesn't check that the filp->private_data is non-NULL before trying to put it. That can cause an oops in certain error conditions that can occur on open or lookup before the private_data is set.

Reported-by Ben Greear <greearb-my8/[email protected]>

Signed-off-by Jeff Layton <[email protected]>

---
 fs/cifs/file.c |    6 ++++--
 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

fs/cifs/file.c +4 -2

index da53246..9c7f83f0 100644
@@ -575,8 +575,10 @@ reopen_error_exit:
 
 int cifs_close(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
 {
-	cifsFileInfo_put(file->private_data);
-	file->private_data = NULL;
+	if (file->private_data != NULL) {
+		cifsFileInfo_put(file->private_data);
+		file->private_data = NULL;
+	}
 
 	/* return code from the ->release op is always ignored */
 	return 0;

Signature · 1 line

1.7.4.2

A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): 20110405162609.6776e264-4QP7MXygkU+dMjc06nkz3ljfA9RmPOcC@public.gmane.org

Steve French

2011-04-05 23:33 UTC #4 lore raw

Quoted 74 lines · Jeff Layton

Quoted 61 lines · On Tue, 05 Apr 2011 15:46:08 -0700 Ben Greear…
When we try to create files with O_DIRECT on cifs file systems, we get a repeatable crash in 2.6.38.2 (plus hacks, but no hacks to cifs)
It crashes in cifsFileInfo_put, probably because cif_file->dentry is NULL, but I'm still working on confirming that.
Assuming that is the cause, any ideas on how to go about fixing this properly?
(gdb) l *(cifsFileInfo_put+0x10)
0xfd59 is in cifsFileInfo_put (/home/greearb/git/linux-2.6.dev.38.y/fs/cifs/file.c:287). 282 * the filehandle out on the server. Must be called without holding 283 * cifs_file_list_lock.
284 */
285 void cifsFileInfo_put(struct cifsFileInfo *cifs_file)
286 {
287 struct inode *inode = cifs_file->dentry->d_inode;
288 struct cifsTconInfo *tcon = tlink_tcon(cifs_file->tlink); 289 struct cifsInodeInfo *cifsi = CIFS_I(inode);
290 struct cifs_sb_info *cifs_sb = CIFS_SB(inode->i_sb);
291 struct cifsLockInfo *li, *tmp;
BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000001c
IP: [<f993e265>] cifsFileInfo_put+0x10/0x1b1 [cifs]
*pde = 7efaa067
Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP
last sysfs file: /sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:1e.0/0000:03:00.0/net/wlan0/flags
Modules linked in: md4 nls_utf8 cifs xt_CT iptable_raw ipt_addrtype xt_DSCP xt_dscp xt_string xt_owner xt_NFQUEUE xt_multiport xt_mark xt_iprange xt_hashlimit
xt_connmark veth cryptd aes_i586 aes_generic xt_TPROXY nf_tproxy_core xt_socket ip6_tables nf_defrag_ipv6 xt_connlimit 8021q garp stp llc fuse macvlan pktgen coretemp hwmon nfs lockd fscache nfs_acl auth_rpcgss sunrpc ipv6 uinput arc4 ecb ath9k snd_hda_codec_realtek mac80211 snd_hda_intel snd_hda_codec ath9k_common snd_hwdep snd_seq ath9k_hw snd_seq_device ath snd_pcm cfg80211 microcode snd_timer iTCO_wdt i2c_i801 iTCO_vendor_support snd r8169 pcspkr serio_raw soundcore mii snd_page_alloc i915 drm_kms_helper drm i2c_algo_bit video [last unloaded: ipt_addrtype]
Pid: 18514, comm: btserver Tainted: P 2.6.38-wl+ #53 To Be Filled By O.E.M. To Be Filled By O.E.M./To be filled by O.E.M.
EIP: 0060:[<f993e265>] EFLAGS: 00010292 CPU: 1
EIP is at cifsFileInfo_put+0x10/0x1b1 [cifs]
EAX: 00000000 EBX: 00000000 ECX: f993e583 EDX: f086d540
ESI: 00000008 EDI: e65302d4 EBP: f1e9bdbc ESP: f1e9bda8
DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 00d8 GS: 0033 SS: 0068
Process btserver (pid: 18514, ti=f1e9a000 task=f4e7d280 task.ti=f1e9a000)
Stack:
  00000000 00000000 f086d540 00000008 e65302d4 f1e9bdc8 f993e599 f086d540
  f1e9bdec c04e39a7 f06fe300 f086d548 e65302d4 eee5b780 ffffffea e65302d4
  00000000 f1e9be0c c04e1486 eee5b780 f06fe300 00000000 eee5b780 f1e9beec
Call Trace:
  [<f993e599>] cifs_close+0x16/0x25 [cifs]
  [<c04e39a7>] fput+0xf4/0x170
  [<c04e1486>] __dentry_open+0x19b/0x21c
  [<c04e163a>] lookup_instantiate_filp+0x70/0x8c
  [<c04e0e60>] ? generic_file_open+0x0/0x58
  [<c04e0e60>] ? generic_file_open+0x0/0x58
  [<f993ca91>] cifs_lookup+0x2af/0x38f [cifs]
  [<c04eaae5>] d_alloc_and_lookup+0x3d/0x54
  [<c04ead6e>] __lookup_hash+0x6a/0x71
  [<c04ebe0d>] do_last+0xb3/0x243
  [<c04ed69a>] do_filp_open+0x25f/0x4a9
  [<c04d566e>] ? __slab_alloc.clone.4+0xc6/0x203
  [<c07e20fa>] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x22/0x25
  [<c04e11fd>] do_sys_open+0x49/0xc9
Quoted 9 lines
  [<c04ea73a>] ? path_put+0x1a/0x1d
  [<c04e12c9>] sys_open+0x23/0x2b
  [<c040315c>] sysenter_do_call+0x12/0x38
Code: b3 4e 95 f9 68 72 4f 95 f9 e8 c4 1a ea c6 83 c4 14 8d 65 f4 31 c0 5b 5e 5f 5d c3 55 89 e5 57 56 53 83 ec 08 3e 8d 74 26 00 89 c3 <8b> 40 1c 8b 78 20 8b 43
24 8b 40 1c 89 45 f0 8b 47 10 8b 80 8c
EIP: [<f993e265>] cifsFileInfo_put+0x10/0x1b1 [cifs] SS:ESP 0068:f1e9bda8
CR2: 000000000000001c
---[ end trace db4167a97eeb41b3 ]---

Quoted 3 lines

Does the attached patch fix it? It's probably stable material if so...
FWIW, cifs doesn't handle O_DIRECT at all.

To get the equivalent, mount cifs with "forcedirectio"

At some point we should add support for the flag.

Signature · 3 lines

Thanks,

Steve

Ben Greear

author

2011-04-05 23:34 UTC #5 lore raw

In reply to a message not in the archive

Quoted 1 line · Jeff Layton

Does the attached patch fix it? It's probably stable material if so...

I'll test your patch. I verified that cifs_file is NULL in cifsFileInfo_put and protecting against that also solves the problem.

Quoted 2 lines

FWIW, cifs doesn't handle O_DIRECT at all.

I know..and I warn my users when the open() call fails, but I still let them attempt the file open. Seems a decent test case after all :)

Thanks,
Ben

Signature · 2 lines

Ben Greear <greearb-my8/[email protected]>
Candela Technologies Inc  http://www.candelatech.com

A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): 4D9BA6F9.1050207-my8/[email protected]

Jeff Layton

2011-04-05 23:38 UTC #7 lore raw

Quoted 7 lines · On Tue, 05 Apr 2011 16:34:17 -0700 Ben Greear…

Quoted 1 line · Jeff Layton
Does the attached patch fix it? It's probably stable material if so...
I'll test your patch. I verified that cifs_file is NULL in cifsFileInfo_put and protecting against that also solves the problem.

I'd probably prefer the patch I'm suggesting. I worry that turning cifsFileInfo_put into a no-op for NULL pointers might paper over future bugs.

Quoted 6 lines

Quoted 2 lines
FWIW, cifs doesn't handle O_DIRECT at all.
I know..and I warn my users when the open() call fails, but I still let them attempt the file open. Seems a decent test case after all :)

Definitely. It's a cifs bug for sure, just pointing out that it probably isn't going to give you what you expect. As Steve points out forcedirectio might give you something closer to this, but proper O_DIRECT support is still on the to-do list.

Signature · 1 line

Jeff Layton <[email protected]>

A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): 20110405163802.778b55b3-4QP7MXygkU+dMjc06nkz3ljfA9RmPOcC@public.gmane.org

Ben Greear

author Tested-by

2011-04-05 23:48 UTC #9 lore raw

Quoted 7 lines · Jeff Layton

Quoted 4 lines · On Tue, 05 Apr 2011 16:34:17 -0700 Ben Greear<greearb-my8/4N5VtI7c+919tysfdA@pu…
Quoted 1 line · Jeff Layton
Does the attached patch fix it? It's probably stable material if so...

Quoted 7 lines

Quoted 3 lines
I'll test your patch. I verified that cifs_file is NULL in cifsFileInfo_put and protecting against that also solves the problem.
I'd probably prefer the patch I'm suggesting. I worry that turning cifsFileInfo_put into a no-op for NULL pointers might paper over future bugs.

Fine by me. Your patch appears to work fine, though I had to apply it manually with patch, as 'git am' didn't understand it's format.

I agree this should go to stable.

Tested-by Ben Greear <greearb-my8/[email protected]>

Quoted 4 lines

Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 3 lines
FWIW, cifs doesn't handle O_DIRECT at all.

Quoted 8 lines

Quoted 3 lines
I know..and I warn my users when the open() call fails, but I still let them attempt the file open. Seems a decent test case after all :)
Definitely. It's a cifs bug for sure, just pointing out that it probably isn't going to give you what you expect. As Steve points out forcedirectio might give you something closer to this, but proper O_DIRECT support is still on the to-do list.

I was using just 'directio'. On Fedora 13, there is no mention of 'forcedirectio' in the mount.cifs man page. Are they actually the same thing, or is the man page just missing stuff?

Thanks,
Ben

Signature · 2 lines

Ben Greear <greearb-my8/[email protected]>
Candela Technologies Inc  http://www.candelatech.com