Skip to contentSkip to conversation

ARM: GIC: Convert GIC library to use the IO relaxed operations

PATCH Superseded Santosh Shilimkar 3 participants 6 messages Apr 29, 2011 – May 5, 2011 Arm (32-bit)

lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw

PATCH v3 1/1 ARM: GIC: Convert GIC library to use the IO relaxed operations

The GIC register accesses today make use of readl()/writel() which prove to be very expensive when used along with mandatory barriers. This mandatory barriers also introduces an un-necessary and expensive l2x0_sync() operation. On Cortex-A9 MP cores, GIC IO accesses from CPU are direct and doesn't go through L2X0 write buffer.

A DSB before writel_relaxed() in gic_raise_softirq() is added to be compliant with the Barrier Litmus document - the mailbox scenario.

Cc Catalin Marinas <[email protected]>
Cc Will Deacon <[email protected]>

---
Rebased on top of Will Deacon's "ARM: gic: use handle_fasteoi_irq for SPIs" patch and boot tested on OMAP4430.

 arch/arm/common/gic.c |   50 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
 1 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
arch/arm/common/gic.c +26 -24
index e9c2ff8..80b3d3c 100644
@@ -89,7 +89,8 @@ static void gic_mask_irq(struct irq_data *d)
 	u32 mask = 1 << (d->irq % 32);
 
 	spin_lock(&irq_controller_lock);
-	writel(mask, gic_dist_base(d) + GIC_DIST_ENABLE_CLEAR + (gic_irq(d) / 32) * 4);
+	writel_relaxed(mask, gic_dist_base(d) + GIC_DIST_ENABLE_CLEAR + (gic_irq(d) / 32) * 4);
+	readl_relaxed(gic_dist_base(d) + GIC_DIST_ENABLE_CLEAR + (gic_irq(d) / 32) * 4);
 	if (gic_arch_extn.irq_mask)
 		gic_arch_extn.irq_mask(d);
 	spin_unlock(&irq_controller_lock);
@@ -102,7 +103,7 @@ static void gic_unmask_irq(struct irq_data *d)
 	spin_lock(&irq_controller_lock);
 	if (gic_arch_extn.irq_unmask)
 		gic_arch_extn.irq_unmask(d);
-	writel(mask, gic_dist_base(d) + GIC_DIST_ENABLE_SET + (gic_irq(d) / 32) * 4);
+	writel_relaxed(mask, gic_dist_base(d) + GIC_DIST_ENABLE_SET + (gic_irq(d) / 32) * 4);
 	spin_unlock(&irq_controller_lock);
 }
 
@@ -114,7 +115,7 @@ static void gic_eoi_irq(struct irq_data *d)
 		spin_unlock(&irq_controller_lock);
 	}
 
-	writel(gic_irq(d), gic_cpu_base(d) + GIC_CPU_EOI);
+	writel_relaxed(gic_irq(d), gic_cpu_base(d) + GIC_CPU_EOI);
 }
 
 static int gic_set_type(struct irq_data *d, unsigned int type)
@@ -140,7 +141,7 @@ static int gic_set_type(struct irq_data *d, unsigned int type)
 	if (gic_arch_extn.irq_set_type)
 		gic_arch_extn.irq_set_type(d, type);
 
-	val = readl(base + GIC_DIST_CONFIG + confoff);
+	val = readl_relaxed(base + GIC_DIST_CONFIG + confoff);
 	if (type == IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH)
 		val &= ~confmask;
 	else if (type == IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING)
@@ -150,15 +151,15 @@ static int gic_set_type(struct irq_data *d, unsigned int type)
 	 * As recommended by the spec, disable the interrupt before changing
 	 * the configuration
 	 */
-	if (readl(base + GIC_DIST_ENABLE_SET + enableoff) & enablemask) {
-		writel(enablemask, base + GIC_DIST_ENABLE_CLEAR + enableoff);
+	if (readl_relaxed(base + GIC_DIST_ENABLE_SET + enableoff) & enablemask) {
+		writel_relaxed(enablemask, base + GIC_DIST_ENABLE_CLEAR + enableoff);
 		enabled = true;
 	}
 
-	writel(val, base + GIC_DIST_CONFIG + confoff);
+	writel_relaxed(val, base + GIC_DIST_CONFIG + confoff);
 
 	if (enabled)
-		writel(enablemask, base + GIC_DIST_ENABLE_SET + enableoff);
+		writel_relaxed(enablemask, base + GIC_DIST_ENABLE_SET + enableoff);
 
 	spin_unlock(&irq_controller_lock);
 
@@ -190,8 +191,8 @@ static int gic_set_affinity(struct irq_data *d, const struct cpumask *mask_val,
 
 	spin_lock(&irq_controller_lock);
 	d->node = cpu;
-	val = readl(reg) & ~mask;
-	writel(val | bit, reg);
+	val = readl_relaxed(reg) & ~mask;
+	writel_relaxed(val | bit, reg);
 	spin_unlock(&irq_controller_lock);
 
 	return 0;
@@ -223,7 +224,7 @@ static void gic_handle_cascade_irq(unsigned int irq, struct irq_desc *desc)
 	chained_irq_enter(chip, desc);
 
 	spin_lock(&irq_controller_lock);
-	status = readl(chip_data->cpu_base + GIC_CPU_INTACK);
+	status = readl_relaxed(chip_data->cpu_base + GIC_CPU_INTACK);
 	spin_unlock(&irq_controller_lock);
 
 	gic_irq = (status & 0x3ff);
@@ -272,13 +273,13 @@ static void __init gic_dist_init(struct gic_chip_data *gic,
 	cpumask |= cpumask << 8;
 	cpumask |= cpumask << 16;
 
-	writel(0, base + GIC_DIST_CTRL);
+	writel_relaxed(0, base + GIC_DIST_CTRL);
 
 	/*
 	 * Find out how many interrupts are supported.
 	 * The GIC only supports up to 1020 interrupt sources.
 	 */
-	gic_irqs = readl(base + GIC_DIST_CTR) & 0x1f;
+	gic_irqs = readl_relaxed(base + GIC_DIST_CTR) & 0x1f;
 	gic_irqs = (gic_irqs + 1) * 32;
 	if (gic_irqs > 1020)
 		gic_irqs = 1020;
@@ -287,26 +288,26 @@ static void __init gic_dist_init(struct gic_chip_data *gic,
 	 * Set all global interrupts to be level triggered, active low.
 	 */
 	for (i = 32; i < gic_irqs; i += 16)
-		writel(0, base + GIC_DIST_CONFIG + i * 4 / 16);
+		writel_relaxed(0, base + GIC_DIST_CONFIG + i * 4 / 16);
 
 	/*
 	 * Set all global interrupts to this CPU only.
 	 */
 	for (i = 32; i < gic_irqs; i += 4)
-		writel(cpumask, base + GIC_DIST_TARGET + i * 4 / 4);
+		writel_relaxed(cpumask, base + GIC_DIST_TARGET + i * 4 / 4);
 
 	/*
 	 * Set priority on all global interrupts.
 	 */
 	for (i = 32; i < gic_irqs; i += 4)
-		writel(0xa0a0a0a0, base + GIC_DIST_PRI + i * 4 / 4);
+		writel_relaxed(0xa0a0a0a0, base + GIC_DIST_PRI + i * 4 / 4);
 
 	/*
 	 * Disable all interrupts.  Leave the PPI and SGIs alone
 	 * as these enables are banked registers.
 	 */
 	for (i = 32; i < gic_irqs; i += 32)
-		writel(0xffffffff, base + GIC_DIST_ENABLE_CLEAR + i * 4 / 32);
+		writel_relaxed(0xffffffff, base + GIC_DIST_ENABLE_CLEAR + i * 4 / 32);
 
 	/*
 	 * Limit number of interrupts registered to the platform maximum
@@ -324,7 +325,7 @@ static void __init gic_dist_init(struct gic_chip_data *gic,
 		set_irq_flags(i, IRQF_VALID | IRQF_PROBE);
 	}
 
-	writel(1, base + GIC_DIST_CTRL);
+	writel_relaxed(1, base + GIC_DIST_CTRL);
 }
 
 static void __cpuinit gic_cpu_init(struct gic_chip_data *gic)
@@ -337,17 +338,17 @@ static void __cpuinit gic_cpu_init(struct gic_chip_data *gic)
 	 * Deal with the banked PPI and SGI interrupts - disable all
 	 * PPI interrupts, ensure all SGI interrupts are enabled.
 	 */
-	writel(0xffff0000, dist_base + GIC_DIST_ENABLE_CLEAR);
-	writel(0x0000ffff, dist_base + GIC_DIST_ENABLE_SET);
+	writel_relaxed(0xffff0000, dist_base + GIC_DIST_ENABLE_CLEAR);
+	writel_relaxed(0x0000ffff, dist_base + GIC_DIST_ENABLE_SET);
 
 	/*
 	 * Set priority on PPI and SGI interrupts
 	 */
 	for (i = 0; i < 32; i += 4)
-		writel(0xa0a0a0a0, dist_base + GIC_DIST_PRI + i * 4 / 4);
+		writel_relaxed(0xa0a0a0a0, dist_base + GIC_DIST_PRI + i * 4 / 4);
 
-	writel(0xf0, base + GIC_CPU_PRIMASK);
-	writel(1, base + GIC_CPU_CTRL);
+	writel_relaxed(0xf0, base + GIC_CPU_PRIMASK);
+	writel_relaxed(1, base + GIC_CPU_CTRL);
 }
 
 void __init gic_init(unsigned int gic_nr, unsigned int irq_start,
@@ -392,6 +393,7 @@ void gic_raise_softirq(const struct cpumask *mask, unsigned int irq)
 	unsigned long map = *cpus_addr(*mask);
 
 	/* this always happens on GIC0 */
-	writel(map << 16 | irq, gic_data[0].dist_base + GIC_DIST_SOFTINT);
+	dsb();
+	writel_relaxed(map << 16 | irq, gic_data[0].dist_base + GIC_DIST_SOFTINT);
 }
 #endif
Signature · 1 line
1.6.0.4
#1 lore raw

PATCH v3 1/1 ARM: GIC: Convert GIC library to use the IO relaxed operations

Quoted 25 lines · Santosh Shilimkar

The GIC register accesses today make use of readl()/writel() which prove to be very expensive when used along with mandatory barriers. This mandatory barriers also introduces an un-necessary and expensive l2x0_sync() operation. On Cortex-A9 MP cores, GIC IO accesses from CPU are direct and doesn't go through L2X0 write buffer.

A DSB before writel_relaxed() in gic_raise_softirq() is added to be compliant with the Barrier Litmus document - the mailbox scenario.

Cc Catalin Marinas <[email protected]>
Cc Will Deacon <[email protected]>

---
Rebased on top of Will Deacon's "ARM: gic: use handle_fasteoi_irq for SPIs" patch and boot tested on OMAP4430.

 arch/arm/common/gic.c |   50 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
 1 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
arch/arm/common/gic.c +0 -0
index e9c2ff8..80b3d3c 100644

arch/arm/common/gic.c static void gic_mask_irq(struct irq_data *d) · line 93

Quoted 6 lines
arch/arm/common/gic.c +2 -1
@@ -89,7 +89,8 @@ static void gic_mask_irq(struct irq_data *d)
        u32 mask = 1 << (d->irq % 32);
 
        spin_lock(&irq_controller_lock);
-       writel(mask, gic_dist_base(d) + GIC_DIST_ENABLE_CLEAR + (gic_irq(d) / 32) * 4);
+       writel_relaxed(mask, gic_dist_base(d) + GIC_DIST_ENABLE_CLEAR + (gic_irq(d) / 32) * 4);
+       readl_relaxed(gic_dist_base(d) + GIC_DIST_ENABLE_CLEAR + (gic_irq(d) / 32) * 4);

As I commented on the version 2 of this patch, I don't think we should even bother with the additional readl_relaxed() here. It's not enough to prevent spurious interrupts anyway.

arch/arm/common/gic.c void gic_raise_softirq(const struct cpumask *mask, unsigned int irq) · line 397

Quoted 7 lines
arch/arm/common/gic.c +2 -1
@@ -392,6 +393,7 @@ void gic_raise_softirq(const struct cpumask *mask, unsigned int irq)
        unsigned long map = *cpus_addr(*mask);
 
        /* this always happens on GIC0 */
-       writel(map << 16 | irq, gic_data[0].dist_base + GIC_DIST_SOFTINT);
+       dsb();
+       writel_relaxed(map << 16 | irq, gic_data[0].dist_base + GIC_DIST_SOFTINT);

I would add a comment before the dsb() on why it is needed. Maybe something like:

/*
* Ensure that stores to Normal memory are visible to the other CPUs before
* issuing the IPI.
*/

Otherwise the patch looks fine (I'll add my ack after you fix the above).

Thanks.

Signature · 1 line
Catalin
#2 lore raw

PATCH v3 1/1 ARM: GIC: Convert GIC library to use the IO relaxed operations

On 5/3/2011 3:41 PM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
[...]

Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 7 lines
arch/arm/common/gic.c +0 -0
index e9c2ff8..80b3d3c 100644
@@ -89,7 +89,8 @@ static void gic_mask_irq(struct irq_data *d)
         u32 mask = 1<<  (d->irq % 32);
 
Quoted 9 lines

arch/arm/common/gic.c static void gic_mask_irq(struct irq_data *d) · line 93

Quoted 4 lines
arch/arm/common/gic.c +2 -1
         spin_lock(&irq_controller_lock);
-       writel(mask, gic_dist_base(d) + GIC_DIST_ENABLE_CLEAR + (gic_irq(d) / 32) * 4);
+       writel_relaxed(mask, gic_dist_base(d) + GIC_DIST_ENABLE_CLEAR + (gic_irq(d) / 32) * 4);
+       readl_relaxed(gic_dist_base(d) + GIC_DIST_ENABLE_CLEAR + (gic_irq(d) / 32) * 4);

As I commented on the version 2 of this patch, I don't think we should even bother with the additional readl_relaxed() here. It's not enough to prevent spurious interrupts anyway.

I forgot to drop this one.

Quoted 10 lines

arch/arm/common/gic.c void gic_raise_softirq(const struct cpumask *mask, unsigned int irq) · line 397

Quoted 7 lines
arch/arm/common/gic.c +2 -1
@@ -392,6 +393,7 @@ void gic_raise_softirq(const struct cpumask *mask, unsigned int irq)
         unsigned long map = *cpus_addr(*mask);
 
         /* this always happens on GIC0 */
-       writel(map<<  16 | irq, gic_data[0].dist_base + GIC_DIST_SOFTINT);
+       dsb();
+       writel_relaxed(map<<  16 | irq, gic_data[0].dist_base + GIC_DIST_SOFTINT);

I would add a comment before the dsb() on why it is needed. Maybe something like:

Quoted 8 lines

/*
* Ensure that stores to Normal memory are visible to the other CPUs before
* issuing the IPI.
*/

Otherwise the patch looks fine (I'll add my ack after you fix the above).

Thanks. Will add above comment, drop the readl and repost with your ack.

Same will push it the patch system

Regards
Santosh

#3 lore raw

PATCH v3 1/1 ARM: GIC: Convert GIC library to use the IO relaxed operations

Quoted 1 line · Santosh Shilimkar

On 5/3/2011 3:41 PM, Catalin Marinas wrote:

[...]

Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 3 lines

Otherwise the patch looks fine (I'll add my ack after you fix the above).

Thanks. Will add above comment, drop the readl and repost with your ack.

Same will push it the patch system

Below is the updated version. I didn't push this to patch system because it is generated on top of Will's GIC series.

Will,
Can you queue this patch part of your series please?

Regards
Santosh

From 1506abc77b36eb10ae0e3f8711e6ad1b87ca363d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Santosh Shilimkar <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 19:27:46 +0530
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: GIC: Convert GIC library to use the IO relaxed operations

The GIC register accesses today make use of readl()/writel() which prove to be very expensive when used along with mandatory barriers. This mandatory barriers also introduces an un-necessary and expensive l2x0_sync() operation. On Cortex-A9 MP cores, GIC IO accesses from CPU are direct and doesn't go through L2X0 write buffer.

A DSB before writel_relaxed() in gic_raise_softirq() is added to be compliant with the Barrier Litmus document - the mailbox scenario.

---
  arch/arm/common/gic.c |   54 
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
  1 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
arch/arm/common/gic.c +0 -1
index e9c2ff8..4ddd0a6 100644
@@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ static void gic_mask_irq(struct irq_data *d)
  	u32 mask = 1 << (d->irq % 32);
 
  	spin_lock(&irq_controller_lock);
-	writel(mask, gic_dist_base(d) + GIC_DIST_ENABLE_CLEAR + (gic_irq(d) / 

32) * 4);
+ writel_relaxed(mask, gic_dist_base(d) + GIC_DIST_ENABLE_CLEAR +
(gic_irq(d) / 32) * 4);
if (gic_arch_extn.irq_mask)
gic_arch_extn.irq_mask(d);
spin_unlock(&irq_controller_lock);
@@ -102,7 +102,7 @@ static void gic_unmask_irq(struct irq_data *d)
spin_lock(&irq_controller_lock);
if (gic_arch_extn.irq_unmask)
gic_arch_extn.irq_unmask(d);
- writel(mask, gic_dist_base(d) + GIC_DIST_ENABLE_SET + (gic_irq(d) /
32) * 4);
+ writel_relaxed(mask, gic_dist_base(d) + GIC_DIST_ENABLE_SET +
(gic_irq(d) / 32) * 4);
spin_unlock(&irq_controller_lock);
}

@@ -114,7 +114,7 @@ static void gic_eoi_irq(struct irq_data *d)
spin_unlock(&irq_controller_lock);
}

- writel(gic_irq(d), gic_cpu_base(d) + GIC_CPU_EOI);
+ writel_relaxed(gic_irq(d), gic_cpu_base(d) + GIC_CPU_EOI);
}

static int gic_set_type(struct irq_data *d, unsigned int type)
@@ -140,7 +140,7 @@ static int gic_set_type(struct irq_data *d, unsigned int type)
if (gic_arch_extn.irq_set_type)
gic_arch_extn.irq_set_type(d, type);

- val = readl(base + GIC_DIST_CONFIG + confoff);
+ val = readl_relaxed(base + GIC_DIST_CONFIG + confoff);
if (type == IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH)
val &= ~confmask;
else if (type == IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING)
@@ -150,15 +150,15 @@ static int gic_set_type(struct irq_data *d, unsigned int type)
* As recommended by the spec, disable the interrupt before changing
* the configuration
*/
- if (readl(base + GIC_DIST_ENABLE_SET + enableoff) & enablemask) {
- writel(enablemask, base + GIC_DIST_ENABLE_CLEAR + enableoff);
+ if (readl_relaxed(base + GIC_DIST_ENABLE_SET + enableoff) & enablemask) {
+ writel_relaxed(enablemask, base + GIC_DIST_ENABLE_CLEAR + enableoff);
enabled = true;
}

- writel(val, base + GIC_DIST_CONFIG + confoff);
+ writel_relaxed(val, base + GIC_DIST_CONFIG + confoff);

if (enabled)
- writel(enablemask, base + GIC_DIST_ENABLE_SET + enableoff);
+ writel_relaxed(enablemask, base + GIC_DIST_ENABLE_SET + enableoff);

  	spin_unlock(&irq_controller_lock);

@@ -190,8 +190,8 @@ static int gic_set_affinity(struct irq_data *d, const struct cpumask *mask_val,

spin_lock(&irq_controller_lock);
d->node = cpu;
- val = readl(reg) & ~mask;
- writel(val | bit, reg);
+ val = readl_relaxed(reg) & ~mask;
+ writel_relaxed(val | bit, reg);
spin_unlock(&irq_controller_lock);

return 0;
@@ -223,7 +223,7 @@ static void gic_handle_cascade_irq(unsigned int irq, struct irq_desc *desc)
chained_irq_enter(chip, desc);

spin_lock(&irq_controller_lock);
- status = readl(chip_data->cpu_base + GIC_CPU_INTACK);
+ status = readl_relaxed(chip_data->cpu_base + GIC_CPU_INTACK);
spin_unlock(&irq_controller_lock);

gic_irq = (status & 0x3ff);
@@ -272,13 +272,13 @@ static void __init gic_dist_init(struct gic_chip_data *gic,
cpumask |= cpumask << 8;
cpumask |= cpumask << 16;

- writel(0, base + GIC_DIST_CTRL);
+ writel_relaxed(0, base + GIC_DIST_CTRL);

/*
* Find out how many interrupts are supported.
* The GIC only supports up to 1020 interrupt sources. */
- gic_irqs = readl(base + GIC_DIST_CTR) & 0x1f;
+ gic_irqs = readl_relaxed(base + GIC_DIST_CTR) & 0x1f;
gic_irqs = (gic_irqs + 1) * 32;
if (gic_irqs > 1020)
gic_irqs = 1020;
@@ -287,26 +287,26 @@ static void __init gic_dist_init(struct gic_chip_data *gic,
* Set all global interrupts to be level triggered, active low. */
for (i = 32; i < gic_irqs; i += 16)
- writel(0, base + GIC_DIST_CONFIG + i * 4 / 16);
+ writel_relaxed(0, base + GIC_DIST_CONFIG + i * 4 / 16);

/*
* Set all global interrupts to this CPU only. */
for (i = 32; i < gic_irqs; i += 4)
- writel(cpumask, base + GIC_DIST_TARGET + i * 4 / 4);
+ writel_relaxed(cpumask, base + GIC_DIST_TARGET + i * 4 / 4);

/*
* Set priority on all global interrupts.
*/
for (i = 32; i < gic_irqs; i += 4)
- writel(0xa0a0a0a0, base + GIC_DIST_PRI + i * 4 / 4);
+ writel_relaxed(0xa0a0a0a0, base + GIC_DIST_PRI + i * 4 / 4);

/*
* Disable all interrupts. Leave the PPI and SGIs alone
* as these enables are banked registers.
*/
for (i = 32; i < gic_irqs; i += 32)
- writel(0xffffffff, base + GIC_DIST_ENABLE_CLEAR + i * 4 / 32);
+ writel_relaxed(0xffffffff, base + GIC_DIST_ENABLE_CLEAR + i * 4 / 32);

/*
* Limit number of interrupts registered to the platform maximum
@@ -324,7 +324,7 @@ static void __init gic_dist_init(struct gic_chip_data *gic,
set_irq_flags(i, IRQF_VALID | IRQF_PROBE);
}

- writel(1, base + GIC_DIST_CTRL);
+ writel_relaxed(1, base + GIC_DIST_CTRL);
}

static void __cpuinit gic_cpu_init(struct gic_chip_data *gic)
@@ -337,17 +337,17 @@ static void __cpuinit gic_cpu_init(struct gic_chip_data *gic)
* Deal with the banked PPI and SGI interrupts - disable all
* PPI interrupts, ensure all SGI interrupts are enabled. */
- writel(0xffff0000, dist_base + GIC_DIST_ENABLE_CLEAR);
- writel(0x0000ffff, dist_base + GIC_DIST_ENABLE_SET);
+ writel_relaxed(0xffff0000, dist_base + GIC_DIST_ENABLE_CLEAR);
+ writel_relaxed(0x0000ffff, dist_base + GIC_DIST_ENABLE_SET);

/*
* Set priority on PPI and SGI interrupts
*/
for (i = 0; i < 32; i += 4)
- writel(0xa0a0a0a0, dist_base + GIC_DIST_PRI + i * 4 / 4);
+ writel_relaxed(0xa0a0a0a0, dist_base + GIC_DIST_PRI + i * 4 / 4);

- writel(0xf0, base + GIC_CPU_PRIMASK);
- writel(1, base + GIC_CPU_CTRL);
+ writel_relaxed(0xf0, base + GIC_CPU_PRIMASK);
+ writel_relaxed(1, base + GIC_CPU_CTRL);
}

void __init gic_init(unsigned int gic_nr, unsigned int irq_start,
@@ -391,7 +391,13 @@ void gic_raise_softirq(const struct cpumask *mask, unsigned int irq)
{
unsigned long map = *cpus_addr(*mask);

+ /*
+ * Ensure that stores to Normal memory are visible to the
+ * other CPUs before issuing the IPI.
+ */
+ dsb();
+
/* this always happens on GIC0 */
- writel(map << 16 | irq, gic_data[0].dist_base + GIC_DIST_SOFTINT);
+ writel_relaxed(map << 16 | irq, gic_data[0].dist_base + GIC_DIST_SOFTINT);
}
#endif

Signature · 8 lines
1.6.0.4



-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: 0001-ARM-GIC-Convert-GIC-library-to-use-the-IO-relaxed.patch
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20110504/1a89444d/attachment.ksh>
#4 lore raw

PATCH v3 1/1 ARM: GIC: Convert GIC library to use the IO relaxed operations

Hi Santosh,

Quoted 2 lines · Santosh Shilimkar

Will,
Can you queue this patch part of your series please?

Yes, providing that Russell is happy to pull the IRQ stuff (fasteoi, Tegra changes and this) from me.

Will

#5 lore raw

PATCH v3 1/1 ARM: GIC: Convert GIC library to use the IO relaxed operations

Quoted 9 lines · Will Deacon

Hi Santosh,

Quoted 2 lines · Santosh Shilimkar

Will,
Can you queue this patch part of your series please?

Yes, providing that Russell is happy to pull the IRQ stuff (fasteoi, Tegra changes and this) from me.

Thanks.

Regards
Santosh