s390x: fix memory detection for guests > 64GB
Alex,
the s390 memory detection has a 16bit field that specifies the amount of increments. This patch adopts the memory size to always fit into that scheme. This also fixes virtio detection for these guests, since the descriptor page is located after the main memory.
target-s390x/op_helper.c +5 -2
@@ -2361,6 +2361,7 @@ static void ext_interrupt(CPUState *env, int type, uint32_t param,int sclp_service_call (CPUState *env,uint32_t sccb,uint64_t code) {int r =0 ; +int shift =0 ;#ifdef DEBUG_HELPER printf ("sclp(0x%x, 0x%" PRIx64")\n" , sccb, code);
@@ -2375,8 +2376,10 @@ int sclp_service_call(CPUState *env, uint32_t sccb, uint64_t code)switch (code) {case SCLP_CMDW_READ_SCP_INFO :case SCLP_CMDW_READ_SCP_INFO_FORCED : -stw_phys (sccb +SCP_MEM_CODE , ram_size >>20 ); -stb_phys (sccb +SCP_INCREMENT ,1 ); +while ((ram_size >> (20 + shift)) >65535 ) + shift++; +stw_phys (sccb +SCP_MEM_CODE , ram_size >> (20 + shift)); +stb_phys (sccb +SCP_INCREMENT ,1 << shift);stw_phys (sccb +SCP_RESPONSE_CODE ,0x10 );if (kvm_enabled ()) {
vl.c +10 -0
@@ -2962,6 +2962,16 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv, char **envp)if (ram_size ==0 ) ram_size =DEFAULT_RAM_SIZE *1024 *1024 ; +/* s390x ram size detection needs a 16bit multiplier + an increment. So +guests > 64GB can be specified in 2MB steps etc */ +if (strstr (machine->name,"s390" )) { +int shift =0 ; + +while ((ram_size >> (20 + shift)) >65535 ) + shift++; + ram_size = ram_size >> (20 + shift) << (20 + shift); + } +/* init the dynamic translator */ cpu_exec_init_all (tb_size *1024 *1024 );
Quoted 20 lines · Christian Borntraeger
Alex,
the s390 memory detection has a 16bit field that specifies the amount of increments. This patch adopts the memory size to always fit into that scheme. This also fixes virtio detection for these guests, since the descriptor page is located after the main memory.
Signed-off-by Christian Borntraeger <[email protected]>target-s390x/op_helper.c +1
-0@@ -2361,6 +2361,7 @@ static void ext_interrupt(CPUState *env, int type, uint32_t param,int sclp_service_call (CPUState *env,uint32_t sccb,uint64_t code) {int r =0 ; +int shift =0 ;#ifdef DEBUG_HELPER printf ("sclp(0x%x, 0x%" PRIx64")\n" , sccb, code);
target-s390x/op_helper.c int sclp_service_call(CPUState *env, uint32_t sccb, uint64_t code) · line 2380
Quoted 7 lines
target-s390x/op_helper.c +2
-2@@ -2375,8 +2376,10 @@ int sclp_service_call(CPUState *env, uint32_t sccb, uint64_t code)switch (code) {case SCLP_CMDW_READ_SCP_INFO :case SCLP_CMDW_READ_SCP_INFO_FORCED : -stw_phys (sccb +SCP_MEM_CODE , ram_size >>20 ); -stb_phys (sccb +SCP_INCREMENT ,1 ); +while ((ram_size >> (20 + shift)) >65535 ) + shift++;
Please run scripts/checkpatch.pl on your patch.
Alex
PATCH v2 1/1 s390x: fix memory detection for guests > 64GB
the s390 memory detection has a 16bit field that specifies the amount of increments. This patch adopts the memory size to always fit into that scheme. This also fixes virtio detection for these guests, since the descriptor page is located after the main memory.
--- target-s390x/op_helper.c | 8 ++++++-- vl.c | 11 +++++++++++ 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
target-s390x/op_helper.c +6 -2
@@ -2361,6 +2361,7 @@ static void ext_interrupt(CPUState *env,int sclp_service_call (CPUState *env,uint32_t sccb,uint64_t code) {int r =0 ; +int shift =0 ;#ifdef DEBUG_HELPER printf ("sclp(0x%x, 0x%" PRIx64")\n" , sccb, code);
@@ -2375,8 +2376,11 @@ int sclp_service_call(CPUState *env, uinswitch (code) {case SCLP_CMDW_READ_SCP_INFO :case SCLP_CMDW_READ_SCP_INFO_FORCED : -stw_phys (sccb +SCP_MEM_CODE , ram_size >>20 ); -stb_phys (sccb +SCP_INCREMENT ,1 ); +while ((ram_size >> (20 + shift)) >65535 ) { + shift++; + } +stw_phys (sccb +SCP_MEM_CODE , ram_size >> (20 + shift)); +stb_phys (sccb +SCP_INCREMENT ,1 << shift);stw_phys (sccb +SCP_RESPONSE_CODE ,0x10 );if (kvm_enabled ()) {
vl.c +11 -0
@@ -2962,6 +2962,17 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv, char **eif (ram_size ==0 ) ram_size =DEFAULT_RAM_SIZE *1024 *1024 ; +/* s390x ram size detection needs a 16bit multiplier + an increment. So +guests > 64GB can be specified in 2MB steps etc */ +if (strstr (machine->name,"s390" )) { +int shift =0 ; + +while ((ram_size >> (20 + shift)) >65535 ) { + shift++; + } + ram_size = ram_size >> (20 + shift) << (20 + shift); + } +/* init the dynamic translator */ cpu_exec_init_all (tb_size *1024 *1024 );
Quoted 45 lines · Christian Borntraeger
the s390 memory detection has a 16bit field that specifies the amount of increments. This patch adopts the memory size to always fit into that scheme. This also fixes virtio detection for these guests, since the descriptor page is located after the main memory.
Signed-off-by Christian Borntraeger <[email protected]>---
target-s390x/op_helper.c| 8 ++++++--vl.c| 11 +++++++++++2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)Index:
b/target-s390x/op_helper.c
===================================================================target-s390x/op_helper.c +6
-2@@ -2361,6 +2361,7 @@ static void ext_interrupt(CPUState *env,int sclp_service_call (CPUState *env,uint32_t sccb,uint64_t code) {int r =0 ; +int shift =0 ;#ifdef DEBUG_HELPER printf ("sclp(0x%x, 0x%" PRIx64")\n" , sccb, code);@@ -2375,8 +2376,11 @@ int sclp_service_call(CPUState *env, uinswitch (code) {case SCLP_CMDW_READ_SCP_INFO :case SCLP_CMDW_READ_SCP_INFO_FORCED : -stw_phys (sccb +SCP_MEM_CODE , ram_size >>20 ); -stb_phys (sccb +SCP_INCREMENT ,1 ); +while ((ram_size >> (20 + shift)) >65535 ) { + shift++; + } +stw_phys (sccb +SCP_MEM_CODE , ram_size >> (20 + shift)); +stb_phys (sccb +SCP_INCREMENT ,1 << shift);stw_phys (sccb +SCP_RESPONSE_CODE ,0x10 );if (kvm_enabled ()) {Index:
b/vl.c
===================================================================vl.c +0
-0@@ -2962,6 +2962,17 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv, char **eif (ram_size ==0 ) ram_size =DEFAULT_RAM_SIZE *1024 *1024 ;
vl.c int main(int argc, char **argv, char **e · line 2973
Quoted 10 lines
vl.c +9
-0+/* s390x ram size detection needs a 16bit multiplier + an increment. So +guests > 64GB can be specified in 2MB steps etc */ +if (strstr (machine->name,"s390" )) { +int shift =0 ; + +while ((ram_size >> (20 + shift)) >65535 ) { + shift++; + } + ram_size = ram_size >> (20 + shift) << (20 + shift);
This one really belongs to hw/s390-virtio.c. Just move the same code to s390_init there and it should work out. The less hacks we can have in generic code, the better :).
Alex
Quoted 11 lines · Alexander Graf
vl.c int main(int argc, char **argv, char **e · line 2973
Quoted 9 lines
vl.c +9
-0+/* s390x ram size detection needs a 16bit multiplier + an increment. So +guests > 64GB can be specified in 2MB steps etc */ +if (strstr (machine->name,"s390" )) { +int shift =0 ; + +while ((ram_size >> (20 + shift)) >65535 ) { + shift++; + } + ram_size = ram_size >> (20 + shift) << (20 + shift);This one really belongs to
hw/s390-virtio.c. Just move the same code tos390_initthere and it should work out. The less hacks we can have in generic code, the better :).
Unfortunately this does not work. The slcp op helper uses the global variable ram_size fro vl.c. I could change the global ram_size in s390_init, but this is also pretty ugly.
Christian
Quoted 11 lines · Christian Borntraeger
Quoted 10 lines · Alexander Graf
Quoted 9 lines
vl.c +9
-0+/* s390x ram size detection needs a 16bit multiplier + an increment. So +guests > 64GB can be specified in 2MB steps etc */ +if (strstr (machine->name,"s390" )) { +int shift =0 ; + +while ((ram_size >> (20 + shift)) >65535 ) { + shift++; + } + ram_size = ram_size >> (20 + shift) << (20 + shift);
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 1 line
This one really belongs to
hw/s390-virtio.c. Just move the same code tos390_initthere and it should work out. The less hacks we can have in generic code, the better :).Unfortunately this does not work. The slcp op helper uses the global variable
ram_sizefrovl.c. I could change the globalram_sizeins390_init, but this is also pretty ugly.
I'd definitely prefer that over the change on vl.c :)
Alex
Quoted 1 line
I'd definitely prefer that over the change on
vl.c:)
the s390 memory detection has a 16bit field that specifies the amount of increments. This patch adopts the memory size to always fit into that scheme. This also fixes virtio detection for these guests, since the descriptor page is located after the main memory.
--- hw/s390-virtio.c | 20 +++++++++++++++----- target-s390x/op_helper.c | 8 ++++++-- 2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
hw/s390-virtio.c +15 -5
@@ -133,7 +133,7 @@ int s390_virtio_hypercall(CPUState *env, }/* PC hardware initialisation */ -static void s390_init(ram_addr_t ram_size, +static void s390_init(ram_addr_t my_ram_size, const char *boot_device, const char *kernel_filename, const char *kernel_cmdline,
@@ -145,19 +145,29 @@ static void s390_init(ram_addr_t ram_sizram_addr_t kernel_size =0 ;ram_addr_t initrd_offset;ram_addr_t initrd_size =0 ; +int shift =0 ;uint8_t *storage_keys;int i; +/* s390x ram size detection needs a 16bit multiplier + an increment. So +guests > 64GB can be specified in 2MB steps etc. */ +while ((my_ram_size >> (20 + shift)) >65535 ) { + shift++; + } + my_ram_size = my_ram_size >> (20 + shift) << (20 + shift); + +/* lets propagate the changed ram size into the global variable. */ + ram_size = my_ram_size;/* get a BUS */ - s390_bus =s390_virtio_bus_init (&ram_size); + s390_bus =s390_virtio_bus_init (&my_ram_size);/* allocate RAM */ - ram_addr =qemu_ram_alloc (NULL ,"s390.ram" , ram_size); -cpu_register_physical_memory (0 , ram_size, ram_addr); + ram_addr =qemu_ram_alloc (NULL ,"s390.ram" , my_ram_size); +cpu_register_physical_memory (0 , my_ram_size, ram_addr);/* allocate storage keys */ - storage_keys =qemu_mallocz (ram_size /TARGET_PAGE_SIZE ); + storage_keys =qemu_mallocz (my_ram_size /TARGET_PAGE_SIZE );/* init CPUs */ if (cpu_model ==NULL ) {
target-s390x/op_helper.c +6 -2
@@ -2361,6 +2361,7 @@ static void ext_interrupt(CPUState *env,int sclp_service_call (CPUState *env,uint32_t sccb,uint64_t code) {int r =0 ; +int shift =0 ;#ifdef DEBUG_HELPER printf ("sclp(0x%x, 0x%" PRIx64")\n" , sccb, code);
@@ -2375,8 +2376,11 @@ int sclp_service_call(CPUState *env, uinswitch (code) {case SCLP_CMDW_READ_SCP_INFO :case SCLP_CMDW_READ_SCP_INFO_FORCED : -stw_phys (sccb +SCP_MEM_CODE , ram_size >>20 ); -stb_phys (sccb +SCP_INCREMENT ,1 ); +while ((ram_size >> (20 + shift)) >65535 ) { + shift++; + } +stw_phys (sccb +SCP_MEM_CODE , ram_size >> (20 + shift)); +stb_phys (sccb +SCP_INCREMENT ,1 << shift);stw_phys (sccb +SCP_RESPONSE_CODE ,0x10 );if (kvm_enabled ()) {
Quoted 6 lines · Christian Borntraeger
Quoted 1 line
I'd definitely prefer that over the change on
vl.c:)the s390 memory detection has a 16bit field that specifies the amount of increments. This patch adopts the memory size to always fit into that scheme. This also fixes virtio detection for these guests, since the descriptor page is located after the main memory.
How did you test the patch?
agraf@s390t27:/home/agraf/git/qemu> ./s390x-softmmu/qemu-system-s390x -snapshot -nographic /media/studio/images/SUSE/s390/sles11.raw -kernel /boot/image -m 3600 -enable-kvm
[works]
agraf@s390t27:/home/agraf/git/qemu> ./s390x-softmmu/qemu-system-s390x -snapshot -nographic /media/studio/images/SUSE/s390/sles11.raw -kernel /boot/image -m 3700 -enable-kvmqemu_madvise: Invalid argument
Need MADV_DONTFORK in absence of synchronous KVM MMU
agraf@s390t27:/home/agraf/git/qemu> ./s390x-softmmu/qemu-system-s390x -snapshot -nographic /media/studio/images/SUSE/s390/sles11.raw -kernel /boot/image -m 3700 Segmentation fault
Alex
Quoted 14 lines · Alexander Graf
Quoted 6 lines · Christian Borntraeger
Quoted 1 line
I'd definitely prefer that over the change on
vl.c:)the s390 memory detection has a 16bit field that specifies the amount of increments. This patch adopts the memory size to always fit into that scheme. This also fixes virtio detection for these guests, since the descriptor page is located after the main memory.
How did you test the patch?
agraf@s390t27:/home/agraf/git/qemu> ./s390x-softmmu/qemu-system-s390x -snapshot -nographic /media/studio/images/SUSE/s390/sles11.raw -kernel
/boot/image-m 3600 -enable-kvm
Quoted 7 lines
[works]
agraf@s390t27:/home/agraf/git/qemu> ./s390x-softmmu/qemu-system-s390x -snapshot -nographic /media/studio/images/SUSE/s390/sles11.raw -kernel
/boot/image-m 3700 -enable-kvmqemu_madvise: Invalid argument
NeedMADV_DONTFORKin absence of synchronous KVM MMUagraf@s390t27:/home/agraf/git/qemu> ./s390x-softmmu/qemu-system-s390x -snapshot -nographic /media/studio/images/SUSE/s390/sles11.raw -kernel
/boot/image-m 3700 Segmentation fault
Ah, my fault - I had too little swap space :). Now I can even run an emulated VM with >64GB of RAM - yay!
Alex