INFO: suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage.
Subsystems (2)
seems this is just info, but probably should post this so you guys are aware..:
[ 1308.117068]
[ 1308.117072] ===================================================
[ 1308.117080] [ INFO: suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage. ]
[ 1308.117085] ---------------------------------------------------
[ 1308.117091] kernel/sched_rt.c:1266 invoked rcu_dereference_check() without protection!
[ 1308.117096]
[ 1308.117097] other info that might help us debug this:
[ 1308.117099]
[ 1308.117104]
[ 1308.117106] rcu_scheduler_active = 1, debug_locks = 1
[ 1308.117112] 1 lock held by watchdog/1/16:
[ 1308.117116] #0: (&rq->lock){-.-.-.}, at: [<ffffffff8103dac0>] post_schedule.part.25+0x14/0x4a
[ 1308.117137]
[ 1308.117139] stack backtrace:
[ 1308.117146] Pid: 16, comm: watchdog/1 Not tainted 2.6.39-04906-g5e152b4-dirty #2
[ 1308.117151] Call Trace:
[ 1308.117163] [<ffffffff81079f6f>] lockdep_rcu_dereference+0x9a/0xa2
[ 1308.117172] [<ffffffff8103d256>] find_lowest_rq+0xfe/0x179
[ 1308.117182] [<ffffffff81043f64>] push_rt_task.part.60+0x7b/0x1c8
[ 1308.117190] [<ffffffff810441bc>] post_schedule_rt+0x20/0x28
[ 1308.117198] [<ffffffff8103dadc>] post_schedule.part.25+0x30/0x4a
[ 1308.117209] [<ffffffff8148cce5>] schedule+0x725/0x773
[ 1308.117217] [<ffffffff810a3864>] ? watchdog_enable+0x198/0x198
[ 1308.117226] [<ffffffff8106e4b8>] ? cpu_clock+0x47/0x51
[ 1308.117234] [<ffffffff810a3864>] ? watchdog_enable+0x198/0x198
[ 1308.117241] [<ffffffff810a38d1>] watchdog+0x6d/0xb0
[ 1308.117249] [<ffffffff8106877d>] kthread+0xa8/0xb0
[ 1308.117259] [<ffffffff81496e64>] kernel_thread_helper+0x4/0x10
[ 1308.117268] [<ffffffff8148f594>] ? retint_restore_args+0x13/0x13
[ 1308.117276] [<ffffffff810686d5>] ? __init_kthread_worker+0x5a/0x5a
[ 1308.117283] [<ffffffff81496e60>] ? gs_change+0x13/0x13
[ 1308.117675]
[ 1308.117678] ===================================================
[ 1308.117685] [ INFO: suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage. ]
[ 1308.117690] ---------------------------------------------------
[ 1308.117695] kernel/sched.c:619 invoked rcu_dereference_check() without protection!
[ 1308.117700]
[ 1308.117701] other info that might help us debug this:
[ 1308.117704]
[ 1308.117708]
[ 1308.117710] rcu_scheduler_active = 1, debug_locks = 1
[ 1308.117715] 2 locks held by rcuc0/7:
[ 1308.117719] #0: (&rq->lock){-.-.-.}, at: [<ffffffff8148c6a1>] schedule+0xe1/0x773
[ 1308.117736] #1: (&rq->lock/1){..-.-.}, at: [<ffffffff8103f13e>] double_lock_balance+0x6c/0x78
[ 1308.117753]
[ 1308.117755] stack backtrace:
[ 1308.117761] Pid: 7, comm: rcuc0 Not tainted 2.6.39-04906-g5e152b4-dirty #2
[ 1308.117766] Call Trace:
[ 1308.117776] [<ffffffff81079f6f>] lockdep_rcu_dereference+0x9a/0xa2
[ 1308.117784] [<ffffffff8103ca8e>] task_group+0x7f/0xbe
[ 1308.117792] [<ffffffff8103cae4>] set_task_rq+0x17/0x70
[ 1308.117800] [<ffffffff81043c8d>] set_task_cpu+0xf7/0x14c
[ 1308.117810] [<ffffffff81217099>] ? plist_check_head+0x9a/0x9e
[ 1308.117818] [<ffffffff812171cf>] ? plist_del+0x70/0x79
[ 1308.117825] [<ffffffff8103e8b4>] ? dequeue_task_rt+0x38/0x3d
[ 1308.117833] [<ffffffff8103eb5c>] ? dequeue_task+0x87/0x8e
[ 1308.117841] [<ffffffff81043df7>] pull_rt_task+0x115/0x169
[ 1308.117849] [<ffffffff81043ee7>] pre_schedule_rt+0x1e/0x20
[ 1308.117857] [<ffffffff8148c889>] schedule+0x2c9/0x773
[ 1308.117865] [<ffffffff81068e22>] ? prepare_to_wait+0x6c/0x78
[ 1308.117875] [<ffffffff810a998a>] rcu_cpu_kthread+0xeb/0x34d
[ 1308.117883] [<ffffffff81068ef8>] ? __init_waitqueue_head+0x4b/0x4b
[ 1308.117892] [<ffffffff810a989f>] ? rcu_needs_cpu+0x1bd/0x1bd
[ 1308.117899] [<ffffffff8106877d>] kthread+0xa8/0xb0
[ 1308.117908] [<ffffffff81496e64>] kernel_thread_helper+0x4/0x10
[ 1308.117916] [<ffffffff8148f594>] ? retint_restore_args+0x13/0x13
[ 1308.117924] [<ffffffff810686d5>] ? __init_kthread_worker+0x5a/0x5a
[ 1308.117933] [<ffffffff81496e60>] ? gs_change+0x13/0x13full dmesg is here:
http://fpaste.org/IqRy/
Justin P. Mattock
Quoted 82 lines · Justin P. Mattock
seems this is just info, but probably should post this so you guys are aware..:
[ 1308.117068] [ 1308.117072] =================================================== [ 1308.117080] [ INFO: suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage. ] [ 1308.117085] --------------------------------------------------- [ 1308.117091] kernel/sched_rt.c:1266 invoked rcu_dereference_check() without protection! [ 1308.117096] [ 1308.117097] other info that might help us debug this: [ 1308.117099] [ 1308.117104] [ 1308.117106] rcu_scheduler_active = 1, debug_locks = 1 [ 1308.117112] 1 lock held by watchdog/1/16: [ 1308.117116] #0: (&rq->lock){-.-.-.}, at: [<ffffffff8103dac0>] post_schedule.part.25+0x14/0x4a [ 1308.117137] [ 1308.117139] stack backtrace: [ 1308.117146] Pid: 16, comm: watchdog/1 Not tainted 2.6.39-04906-g5e152b4-dirty #2 [ 1308.117151] Call Trace: [ 1308.117163] [<ffffffff81079f6f>] lockdep_rcu_dereference+0x9a/0xa2 [ 1308.117172] [<ffffffff8103d256>] find_lowest_rq+0xfe/0x179 [ 1308.117182] [<ffffffff81043f64>] push_rt_task.part.60+0x7b/0x1c8 [ 1308.117190] [<ffffffff810441bc>] post_schedule_rt+0x20/0x28 [ 1308.117198] [<ffffffff8103dadc>] post_schedule.part.25+0x30/0x4a [ 1308.117209] [<ffffffff8148cce5>] schedule+0x725/0x773 [ 1308.117217] [<ffffffff810a3864>] ? watchdog_enable+0x198/0x198 [ 1308.117226] [<ffffffff8106e4b8>] ? cpu_clock+0x47/0x51 [ 1308.117234] [<ffffffff810a3864>] ? watchdog_enable+0x198/0x198 [ 1308.117241] [<ffffffff810a38d1>] watchdog+0x6d/0xb0 [ 1308.117249] [<ffffffff8106877d>] kthread+0xa8/0xb0 [ 1308.117259] [<ffffffff81496e64>] kernel_thread_helper+0x4/0x10 [ 1308.117268] [<ffffffff8148f594>] ? retint_restore_args+0x13/0x13 [ 1308.117276] [<ffffffff810686d5>] ? __init_kthread_worker+0x5a/0x5a [ 1308.117283] [<ffffffff81496e60>] ? gs_change+0x13/0x13 [ 1308.117675] [ 1308.117678] =================================================== [ 1308.117685] [ INFO: suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage. ] [ 1308.117690] --------------------------------------------------- [ 1308.117695] kernel/sched.c:619 invoked rcu_dereference_check() without protection! [ 1308.117700] [ 1308.117701] other info that might help us debug this: [ 1308.117704] [ 1308.117708] [ 1308.117710] rcu_scheduler_active = 1, debug_locks = 1 [ 1308.117715] 2 locks held by rcuc0/7: [ 1308.117719] #0: (&rq->lock){-.-.-.}, at: [<ffffffff8148c6a1>] schedule+0xe1/0x773 [ 1308.117736] #1: (&rq->lock/1){..-.-.}, at: [<ffffffff8103f13e>] double_lock_balance+0x6c/0x78 [ 1308.117753] [ 1308.117755] stack backtrace: [ 1308.117761] Pid: 7, comm: rcuc0 Not tainted 2.6.39-04906-g5e152b4-dirty #2 [ 1308.117766] Call Trace: [ 1308.117776] [<ffffffff81079f6f>] lockdep_rcu_dereference+0x9a/0xa2 [ 1308.117784] [<ffffffff8103ca8e>] task_group+0x7f/0xbe [ 1308.117792] [<ffffffff8103cae4>] set_task_rq+0x17/0x70 [ 1308.117800] [<ffffffff81043c8d>] set_task_cpu+0xf7/0x14c [ 1308.117810] [<ffffffff81217099>] ? plist_check_head+0x9a/0x9e [ 1308.117818] [<ffffffff812171cf>] ? plist_del+0x70/0x79 [ 1308.117825] [<ffffffff8103e8b4>] ? dequeue_task_rt+0x38/0x3d [ 1308.117833] [<ffffffff8103eb5c>] ? dequeue_task+0x87/0x8e [ 1308.117841] [<ffffffff81043df7>] pull_rt_task+0x115/0x169 [ 1308.117849] [<ffffffff81043ee7>] pre_schedule_rt+0x1e/0x20 [ 1308.117857] [<ffffffff8148c889>] schedule+0x2c9/0x773 [ 1308.117865] [<ffffffff81068e22>] ? prepare_to_wait+0x6c/0x78 [ 1308.117875] [<ffffffff810a998a>] rcu_cpu_kthread+0xeb/0x34d [ 1308.117883] [<ffffffff81068ef8>] ? __init_waitqueue_head+0x4b/0x4b [ 1308.117892] [<ffffffff810a989f>] ? rcu_needs_cpu+0x1bd/0x1bd [ 1308.117899] [<ffffffff8106877d>] kthread+0xa8/0xb0 [ 1308.117908] [<ffffffff81496e64>] kernel_thread_helper+0x4/0x10 [ 1308.117916] [<ffffffff8148f594>] ? retint_restore_args+0x13/0x13 [ 1308.117924] [<ffffffff810686d5>] ? __init_kthread_worker+0x5a/0x5a [ 1308.117933] [<ffffffff81496e60>] ? gs_change+0x13/0x13
Quoted 5 lines
full dmesg is here:
http://fpaste.org/IqRy/Justin P. Mattock
well, after posting the above, I noticed some others as well. (system got sluggish, but is responsive).
[ 2862.310349] WARNING: at net/ipv4/route.c:1668 ip_rt_bug+0x5c/0x62() [ 2862.310353] Hardware name: MacBookPro2,2 [ 2862.310355] Modules linked in: fuse 8021q garp stp cpufreq_ondemand
llc acpi_cpufreq freq_table mperf ipt_REJECT nf_conntrack_ipv4 nf_defrag_ipv4 xt_state nf_conntrack iptable_filter ip_tables arc4 ath9k mac80211 radeon ath9k_common ath9k_hw ath cfg80211 btusb bluetooth ttm drm_kms_helper drm uvcvideo joydev microcode appletouch applesmc input_polldev iTCO_wdt videodev iTCO_vendor_support v4l2_compat_ioctl32 i2c_i801 rfkill sky2 i2c_algo_bit i2c_core apple_bl video [last unloaded: scsi_wait_scan]
[ 2862.310414] Pid: 6153, comm: gcm-session Not tainted 2.6.39-04906-g5e152b4-dirty #2 [ 2862.310417] Call Trace: [ 2862.310424] [<ffffffff8104c634>] warn_slowpath_common+0x83/0x9b [ 2862.310430] [<ffffffff8104c666>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1a/0x1c [ 2862.310434] [<ffffffff814095c9>] ip_rt_bug+0x5c/0x62 [ 2862.310439] [<ffffffff814112a1>] dst_output+0x19/0x1d [ 2862.310443] [<ffffffff81412aa0>] ip_local_out+0x20/0x25 [ 2862.310448] [<ffffffff814139c9>] ip_send_skb+0x19/0x58 [ 2862.310453] [<ffffffff8142fa4e>] udp_send_skb+0x239/0x29b [ 2862.310458] [<ffffffff814310f0>] udp_sendmsg+0x5a1/0x7d4 [ 2862.310464] [<ffffffff81079408>] ? trace_hardirqs_off+0xd/0xf [ 2862.310469] [<ffffffff8141139c>] ? ip_select_ident+0x3d/0x3d [ 2862.310475] [<ffffffff810525b8>] ? local_bh_enable_ip+0xe/0x10 [ 2862.310481] [<ffffffff8148f131>] ? _raw_spin_unlock_bh+0x31/0x35 [ 2862.310486] [<ffffffff813d41a6>] ? release_sock+0x14c/0x155 [ 2862.310490] [<ffffffff814386ac>] inet_sendmsg+0x66/0x6f [ 2862.310495] [<ffffffff813d02b0>] sock_sendmsg+0xe6/0x109 [ 2862.310501] [<ffffffff8107d63f>] ? lock_acquire+0xe1/0x109 [ 2862.310505] [<ffffffff8107d535>] ? lock_release+0x1aa/0x1d3 [ 2862.310512] [<ffffffff810ed549>] ? might_fault+0xa5/0xac [ 2862.310516] [<ffffffff813ceb34>] ? copy_from_user+0x2f/0x31 [ 2862.310521] [<ffffffff813d1f34>] sys_sendto+0x132/0x174 [ 2862.310526] [<ffffffff81495cfa>] ? sysret_check+0x2e/0x69 [ 2862.310531] [<ffffffff8107b016>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x13f/0x172 [ 2862.310537] [<ffffffff8109fd4d>] ? audit_syscall_entry+0x11c/0x148 [ 2862.310542] [<ffffffff8121debe>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_thunk+0x3a/0x3f [ 2862.310546] [<ffffffff81495cc2>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b [ 2862.310549] ---[ end trace 2d2332adaa8bf2b5 ]--- [ 2863.373889] ip_rt_bug: 10.0.0.10 -> 255.255.255.255, ? [ 2863.373903] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 2863.373910] WARNING: at net/ipv4/route.c:1668 ip_rt_bug+0x5c/0x62() [ 2863.373919] Hardware name: MacBookPro2,2 [ 2863.373921] Modules linked in: fuse 8021q garp stp cpufreq_ondemand
llc acpi_cpufreq freq_table mperf ipt_REJECT nf_conntrack_ipv4 nf_defrag_ipv4 xt_state nf_conntrack iptable_filter ip_tables arc4 ath9k mac80211 radeon ath9k_common ath9k_hw ath cfg80211 btusb bluetooth ttm drm_kms_helper drm uvcvideo joydev microcode appletouch applesmc input_polldev iTCO_wdt videodev iTCO_vendor_support v4l2_compat_ioctl32 i2c_i801 rfkill sky2 i2c_algo_bit i2c_core apple_bl video [last unloaded: scsi_wait_scan]
[ 2863.373986] Pid: 6153, comm: gcm-session Tainted: G W 2.6.39-04906-g5e152b4-dirty #2 [ 2863.373989] Call Trace: [ 2863.373996] [<ffffffff8104c634>] warn_slowpath_common+0x83/0x9b [ 2863.374058] [<ffffffff8104c666>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1a/0x1c [ 2863.374063] [<ffffffff814095c9>] ip_rt_bug+0x5c/0x62 [ 2863.374068] [<ffffffff814112a1>] dst_output+0x19/0x1d [ 2863.374073] [<ffffffff81412aa0>] ip_local_out+0x20/0x25 [ 2863.374079] [<ffffffff814139c9>] ip_send_skb+0x19/0x58 [ 2863.374084] [<ffffffff8142fa4e>] udp_send_skb+0x239/0x29b [ 2863.374089] [<ffffffff814310f0>] udp_sendmsg+0x5a1/0x7d4 [ 2863.374095] [<ffffffff81079408>] ? trace_hardirqs_off+0xd/0xf [ 2863.374100] [<ffffffff8141139c>] ? ip_select_ident+0x3d/0x3d [ 2863.374106] [<ffffffff810525b8>] ? local_bh_enable_ip+0xe/0x10 [ 2863.374111] [<ffffffff8148f131>] ? _raw_spin_unlock_bh+0x31/0x35 [ 2863.374117] [<ffffffff813d41a6>] ? release_sock+0x14c/0x155 [ 2863.374122] [<ffffffff814386ac>] inet_sendmsg+0x66/0x6f [ 2863.374127] [<ffffffff813d02b0>] sock_sendmsg+0xe6/0x109 [ 2863.374132] [<ffffffff8107d63f>] ? lock_acquire+0xe1/0x109 [ 2863.374137] [<ffffffff8107d535>] ? lock_release+0x1aa/0x1d3 [ 2863.374143] [<ffffffff810ed549>] ? might_fault+0xa5/0xac [ 2863.374148] [<ffffffff813ceb34>] ? copy_from_user+0x2f/0x31 [ 2863.374153] [<ffffffff813d1f34>] sys_sendto+0x132/0x174 [ 2863.374158] [<ffffffff81495cfa>] ? sysret_check+0x2e/0x69 [ 2863.374163] [<ffffffff8107b016>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x13f/0x172 [ 2863.374169] [<ffffffff8109fd4d>] ? audit_syscall_entry+0x11c/0x148 [ 2863.374175] [<ffffffff8121debe>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_thunk+0x3a/0x3f [ 2863.374180] [<ffffffff81495cc2>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b [ 2863.374184] ---[ end trace 2d2332adaa8bf2b6 ]---
full dmesg here:
http://fpaste.org/W4UK/
Signature · 1 line
Justin P. Mattock
Quoted 1 line · Justin Mattock
[ 2862.310349] WARNING: at net/ipv4/route.c:1668 ip_rt_bug+0x5c/0x62()
Awesome, adding that WARN_ON paid off. This is the same bug I've been trying to reproduce the last few weeks. DaveM mentioned that it means we used an input route for packet output.
Quoted 22 lines
[ 2862.310414] Pid: 6153, comm: gcm-session Not tainted 2.6.39-04906-g5e152b4-dirty #2 [ 2862.310417] Call Trace: [ 2862.310424] [<ffffffff8104c634>] warn_slowpath_common+0x83/0x9b [ 2862.310430] [<ffffffff8104c666>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1a/0x1c [ 2862.310434] [<ffffffff814095c9>] ip_rt_bug+0x5c/0x62 [ 2862.310439] [<ffffffff814112a1>] dst_output+0x19/0x1d [ 2862.310443] [<ffffffff81412aa0>] ip_local_out+0x20/0x25 [ 2862.310448] [<ffffffff814139c9>] ip_send_skb+0x19/0x58 [ 2862.310453] [<ffffffff8142fa4e>] udp_send_skb+0x239/0x29b [ 2862.310458] [<ffffffff814310f0>] udp_sendmsg+0x5a1/0x7d4 [ 2862.310464] [<ffffffff81079408>] ? trace_hardirqs_off+0xd/0xf [ 2862.310469] [<ffffffff8141139c>] ? ip_select_ident+0x3d/0x3d [ 2862.310475] [<ffffffff810525b8>] ? local_bh_enable_ip+0xe/0x10 [ 2862.310481] [<ffffffff8148f131>] ? _raw_spin_unlock_bh+0x31/0x35 [ 2862.310486] [<ffffffff813d41a6>] ? release_sock+0x14c/0x155 [ 2862.310490] [<ffffffff814386ac>] inet_sendmsg+0x66/0x6f [ 2862.310495] [<ffffffff813d02b0>] sock_sendmsg+0xe6/0x109 [ 2862.310501] [<ffffffff8107d63f>] ? lock_acquire+0xe1/0x109 [ 2862.310505] [<ffffffff8107d535>] ? lock_release+0x1aa/0x1d3 [ 2862.310512] [<ffffffff810ed549>] ? might_fault+0xa5/0xac [ 2862.310516] [<ffffffff813ceb34>] ? copy_from_user+0x2f/0x31
Quoted 8 lines
[ 2862.310521] [<ffffffff813d1f34>] sys_sendto+0x132/0x174 [ 2862.310526] [<ffffffff81495cfa>] ? sysret_check+0x2e/0x69 [ 2862.310531] [<ffffffff8107b016>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x13f/0x172 [ 2862.310537] [<ffffffff8109fd4d>] ? audit_syscall_entry+0x11c/0x148 [ 2862.310542] [<ffffffff8121debe>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_thunk+0x3a/0x3f [ 2862.310546] [<ffffffff81495cc2>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b [ 2862.310549] ---[ end trace 2d2332adaa8bf2b5 ]--- [ 2863.373889] ip_rt_bug: 10.0.0.10 -> 255.255.255.255, ?
The common thing between your bug and the trace I triggered was the destination ip reported. A clue maybe ?
Dave
Quoted 39 lines · Dave Jones
Quoted 1 line · Justin Mattock
[ 2862.310349] WARNING: at net/ipv4/route.c:1668 ip_rt_bug+0x5c/0x62()Awesome, adding that
WARN_ONpaid off. This is the same bug I've been trying to reproduce the last few weeks. DaveM mentioned that it means we used an input route for packet output.Quoted 22 lines
[ 2862.310414] Pid: 6153, comm: gcm-session Not tainted 2.6.39-04906-g5e152b4-dirty #2 [ 2862.310417] Call Trace: [ 2862.310424] [<ffffffff8104c634>] warn_slowpath_common+0x83/0x9b [ 2862.310430] [<ffffffff8104c666>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1a/0x1c [ 2862.310434] [<ffffffff814095c9>] ip_rt_bug+0x5c/0x62 [ 2862.310439] [<ffffffff814112a1>] dst_output+0x19/0x1d [ 2862.310443] [<ffffffff81412aa0>] ip_local_out+0x20/0x25 [ 2862.310448] [<ffffffff814139c9>] ip_send_skb+0x19/0x58 [ 2862.310453] [<ffffffff8142fa4e>] udp_send_skb+0x239/0x29b [ 2862.310458] [<ffffffff814310f0>] udp_sendmsg+0x5a1/0x7d4 [ 2862.310464] [<ffffffff81079408>] ? trace_hardirqs_off+0xd/0xf [ 2862.310469] [<ffffffff8141139c>] ? ip_select_ident+0x3d/0x3d [ 2862.310475] [<ffffffff810525b8>] ? local_bh_enable_ip+0xe/0x10 [ 2862.310481] [<ffffffff8148f131>] ? _raw_spin_unlock_bh+0x31/0x35 [ 2862.310486] [<ffffffff813d41a6>] ? release_sock+0x14c/0x155 [ 2862.310490] [<ffffffff814386ac>] inet_sendmsg+0x66/0x6f [ 2862.310495] [<ffffffff813d02b0>] sock_sendmsg+0xe6/0x109 [ 2862.310501] [<ffffffff8107d63f>] ? lock_acquire+0xe1/0x109 [ 2862.310505] [<ffffffff8107d535>] ? lock_release+0x1aa/0x1d3 [ 2862.310512] [<ffffffff810ed549>] ? might_fault+0xa5/0xac [ 2862.310516] [<ffffffff813ceb34>] ? copy_from_user+0x2f/0x31Quoted 8 lines
[ 2862.310521] [<ffffffff813d1f34>] sys_sendto+0x132/0x174 [ 2862.310526] [<ffffffff81495cfa>] ? sysret_check+0x2e/0x69 [ 2862.310531] [<ffffffff8107b016>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x13f/0x172 [ 2862.310537] [<ffffffff8109fd4d>] ? audit_syscall_entry+0x11c/0x148 [ 2862.310542] [<ffffffff8121debe>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_thunk+0x3a/0x3f [ 2862.310546] [<ffffffff81495cc2>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b [ 2862.310549] ---[ end trace 2d2332adaa8bf2b5 ]--- [ 2863.373889] ip_rt_bug: 10.0.0.10 -> 255.255.255.255, ?
Quoted 6 lines
The common thing between your bug and the trace I triggered was the destination ip reported. A clue maybe ?
Dave
there was a bug for http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=129913127722786&w=2
but looking I see something in there with recv.c not route.c but probably something same or in the same vacinity. as for the sluggishness I have been noticing the system doing so, but never saw anything like the above, so if it is your WARN_ON then kudos to you!
Justin P. Mattock
this fired off again.. fpasted dmesg.
http://fpaste.org/9bs4/
just pulled the laste Mainline will run and see, will send anything forward if I see anything.
Note: I am off the lists at the moment due to a transistion, Cc's me if anything.
Signature · 1 line
Justin P. Mattock